Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.zip

62 replies

Martineskireply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Heard it got discontinued by devs leaving over POS repo owner and that "Morphe" is it's successor with the devs moving there instead.

8

I feel you. Learned about it just recently but revanced still works for me so I'm not going to bother changing anything right now.

8
MetalSlugXreply
piefed.social

Looks pretty painless to me. Yes, I like to find something and when it works, stick with it as I have with ReVanced. But I'm going to try this and if I have any troubles I'll edit this comment.

https://morpheapp.software/

1

That's kind of what I'm saying though, it's pretty painless to use the new installer, why worry about the drama? Just use what works. I tried it and it was painless, and I don't really care about squabbling on dev teams, I just know what works now 🤷

1

I was just updating recently, and the launcher really is a beast now, all in one, almost fully automated, right here on my phone

2
Mac
mander.xyz

Blocked with uBO a long time ago. lmao

25
remonreply
ani.social

Not out of the box, but it can block basically anything if you create a custom filter.

I even use it to re-size the thumbnails so I get 5 videos per row on my feed instead of just 3.

2

You can block lots of things with the picker.

1
pawb.social

Why don't they just make them behave like normal videos? The problem with shorts is the repeating and the endless scrolling (and the ever-present prompt to scroll). A lot of perfectly useful/entertaining content has been recommended to me by the static presentation on the home screen.

18
Rekorsereply
sh.itjust.works

That's the whole idea of shorts and tiktok style though; rapidly consuming quick content.

I think its interesting that for some people, that experience is deeply uncomfortable, and for others its necessary. It may sound over the top but I see a lot of parallels to hard drug addiction.

10

I don't think it's necessary for anyone, though I understand you probably mean they feel it is. They've done at least one study I read which showed that being fed content actually makes you stupid in the immediate short-term (long-term was outside the scope of the study). Consuming the same content by selecting which ones you want to see caused no problems. It's the removal of agency that's thought to be the problem, training your brain to be passive.

1

Same it's the best of both. Sometimes I actually want to watch a short because it's relevant. The problem is that the UI autoplays the next video and you can't time scrub back to the bit you probably wanted to see a second time and before you know it you're watching cat videos and 1 hour has passed.

4

It doesn't actually turn off shorts, just prevents (limits) infinite scrolling.

You'll still be recommended shorts and if you accidentally click a short it will play.

16
feddit.nu

i just set up a redirect from /shorts/video-id to /watch?v=video-id. then you get the normal player.

13

Same, I used Tampermonkey. It also inserts a floating switch to turn them off or on in results.

4
Cethinreply
lemmy.zip

The player isn't the issue with shorts. It's the content.

1

my subscriptions usually upload shorter updates or extra bits as shorts, so i want to keep them on without the horrendous ui.

1

I didn't see one either - I'm in Denmark, maybe it's rolling out in different regions?

2
lemmy.world

I don't watch shorts, but I've checked the setting anyway and the minimum that it allows for me is 15 minutes, not 0.

10

I've had the Unhook extension for years, and YouTube's decision not to make Shorts hideable was the catalyst. I still won't uninstall it because it gets rid of a bunch of YouTube's other trash, but this is at least moves the needle so it's no longer unthinkable to uninstall it.

9
feddit.org

I hated how shorts were designed to draw me into this app so much, that i deleted it all together. Now i reinstalled it, just to find out, that the feature is not yet rolled out to me.

5

I used revanced to completely disable shorts in the YouTube app.

5
reddthat.com

NewPipe literally has none of this shit. The various invidious instances as well. If you continue to use the official YouTube app, that's on you.

4

Even Revanced has the options to hide Shorts or open them as regular videos. So does youtube.com with a simple Redirector rule.

1
lemmy.zip

Maybe I’m using Shorts in a different way, but I’m not seeing a problem with them. I just view them through the home page and they’re in my suggested list like every other video. I consider them just another format of video to watch.

I think the difference is I look at them like discreet units and then jump back to my homepage as opposed to doomscrolling them.

4
JakenVeinareply
midwest.social

I have two main conplaints about shorts, myself, the end result of which is that I prefer to just never see them in my feed, ever.

  1. Most shorts that pop up for me are literally just clips from longer form videos I've already seen, or are already on my Watch Later list. And there's SO damn many of them. Those types of shorts are purely clutter.

  2. The other type of shorts I see most often are just aping the tiktok format, characterized by being extremely shallow and low-effort, as well as having the INFURIATING tendency to be over-edited for length trimming. You know the type of editing I mean, the one where the creator apparently thinks that even pausing to BREATHE between words or thoughts is too much downtime in the video. I find it insulting that TikTok and now YouTube have normalized the idea that creators should be so overwhelmingly desperate to capture every moment of your attention. Plus, it's pretty well understood by now that feeding your attention that heavily is wildly unhealthy for your brain.

3

This really fucks up the delivery and timing of comedy clips. I’ll admit I watch a lot of shorts and there are some specific creators who are really good at it. Shout out to miniminuteman and hydronyc.

I quickly run into terribly cut clips that are only coherent when you watch the full video, and of course a plethora of AI slop of both clips and ads.

I need to get off this shit.

0

that’s great but it is simple as I don’t want to

nothing more need be discussed

modern companies are just trash

1

Absurd that we need YouTube for that. In an ideal world, YouTube would be a backend service with an open API which there would be dozens of different apps for, with different features, including maybe this one… but I suppose you can't make money with an ideal world…

3

this is app only and the 0 hour limit is now gone

sadly useless advice now

3

Those shorts are entertaining little chunks of nothing that have no date and are usually cut off at the end. I'm thankful I can urn them off.

2
lemmy.zip

so more restrictions, cool, interesting but how much they have to do to totaly inject hate in their userbase like facebook did

1
Alleroreply
lemmy.today

It's not a restriction, it's user control. You can have them always on (and I suspect that will stay as the default), turn them off, or anything in between.

You just got more tools to control the interface and remove what you don't care about, what's wrong about that?

1

appreciate it but just not write full reply, i thought: yes this feature is great but they have more restrictions and always fight adblockers, yes this still understandable by this is biggest video sharing service

2
bainesreply
lemmy.cafe

lol there is no 0 option

this isn’t about user control this is getting ahead of CYA because regulation is likely coming given multiple countries are serious about limiting ages that can access social media

1
Alleroreply
lemmy.today

You mean, no such option in an app? Because at least the article and the post clearly state you can opt for 0.

1

and pc web interface and tv interface has no option at all and the app for ios has no 0 option

article is pretty shit if it didn’t test any of these

1