Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on piefed.social

13 replies

We wouldn't say a human translator who did this was hallucinating.

AI translations are wrong. The product is defective.

46
lemmy.world

And then they'll train me models on the hallucinated content, causing even more hallucinations

24
piefed.social

I think it's that thing where they do it on purpose so someone corrects it for free and then they steal it.

10
reddthat.com

What do you mean steal it? The article makes it clear that the errors are likely the result of AI hallucinations that arose during translation and that accounts that have submitted multiple articles with these errors will be subject to additional review or banning from this program. It seems likely that underpaid people using AI to translate things aren't paying as much attention to the output as Wikipedia expects.

20
antonimreply
lemmy.world

underpaid people

Nobody is paid for editing Wikipedia, the economic incentive is nonexistent.

(Except for shills/manipulators.)

Edit: I should've read the article.

0
feddit.nu

You should have read the article:

[...] Open Knowledge Association (OKA), a non-profit organization dedicated to improving Wikipedia and other open platforms.

“We do so by providing monthly stipends to full-time contributors and translators,” OKA’s site says. “We leverage AI (Large Language Models) to automate most of the work.”

5

You reached the end

AI Translations Are Adding ‘Hallucinations’ to Wikipedia Articles | Spyke