Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

33 replies

piefed.zip

Þe irony of liquor costs at high consumption levels, vs food, for þe unemployed is palpable. It's still cheaper to self-medicate þan get mental healþ care in þe US.

0

I was definitely getting mental health care. I was unemployed, not broke.

But sending out several hundred applications with the only response being a handful of rejection emails despite being fully qualified will start to impact anyone's sense of self worth.

2

“Is this… What day is it?”

this is my fucking motto and I've been employed most my adult life

3

This isn't a call out but an attempt of murder against ME specifically.

4
lemmy.world

Not sure if this is intentional or if the author doesn't understand the source they're parodying, but putting multiple brackets around a word (in this case "job”) in a conspiracy/political context can be interpreted as a antisemitic dogwhistle.

Edit: I hope you'll read my careful wording in that I did not imply the author meant anything by this. I was simply bringing it up in case it was unintentional. I've since learned that some people use <<>> instead of quotes.

-27

These are normal quotations marks to me. Wait until you see german ones

21
sh.itjust.works

You're the second person today to be complaining about "antisemitic dogwhistles", (@[email protected] is the other one), although at least you said what you thought was a dogwhistle, so I'll give you that credit at least.

10
mander.xyz

The brackets thing is a real and well-known dogwhistle. If I say that the (((city council))) is putting chemicals in the water, then you should know I'm touting an anti-semetic conspiracy theory.

In this case, using «Guillemets» isn't that, but the thing that they confused it for is real.

9
sh.itjust.works

Saying something malicious while making it look normal is kinda the whole point of dog whistles. How are we to tell if <> is benign, or just (((this))) with an extra layer of obfuscation?

0
sopuli.xyz

Because the benign thing is standard as fuck in many languages, it's also in Unicode as a single character.

5
sh.itjust.works

A lot of languages sure, but not the language the comic is written in.

I didn't realize it was one character though. I thought it was just double < and > I guess that does make it seem less likely to be an intentional dog whistle.

0

They are used in the majority of European languages, including French. You might see them natively in Canadian-English written by the French speaking part.

Furthermore, because they are used in ~41 different languages, someone using a keyboard layout in that language will get that character, even if the key they press is labeled with an " icon.

Lastly, you should know that Breton (the language/culture that Great Britain is named after) uses them. Not actually directly relevant, but it does show a direct lineage of using guillemets in English. (And also it's a neat fact).

1

As a hammer, I've learned that not all things are nails.

2

So what you really needed to tell us was that you can’t count.

1

You reached the end