Spyke

DOJ won’t meet Friday deadline to release all the Epstein files

The Department of Justice will not be releasing all of its files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by Friday’s deadline, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said Friday morning.

In an interview with Fox News, Blanche said the department would “release several hundred thousand documents today.”

But he acknowledged Friday’s release would not encompass all of the DOJ’s documents for the investigation into the late financier.

DOJ won’t meet Friday deadline to release all the Epstein fileshttps://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/19/epstein-documents-release-friday-deadline-00699935Open linkView original on lemmy.world
lemmy.world

The delay means the White House is in apparent conflict with a law

That's the thing. "Apparent" is actually too strong of a word here, because they aren't in conflict with the law at all. Unenforced laws are meaningless laws.

165
lemmy.blahaj.zone

What the fuck is even the point of having a deadline when there are zero consequences when they blow past it?

145
arrow74reply
lemmy.zip

While the republican controlled congress might not care if dems ever retake both chambers it will be added to the list of crimes for impeachment.

Lots of ifs, but in a sane world this would have been enough at one time

48
piefed.social

Not unless the Democrats flush half their own leadership because NONE of the DNC leaders have any interest in actually doing anything about Trump.

41
arrow74reply
lemmy.zip

They did impeach him last time and I believe all the senate dems voted to remove him from office. Still shy of the 2/3rds majority

So if anything it's the Republicans not doing anything.

But you are right, the resistance to Trump has been ineffective and they keep rubber stamping his appointments. So my hopes are low, but we can only know if they get a majority.

16

I despise "both sides" bullshit, but they were definitely correct in this case.

Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries have completely abdicated their responsibility as the main check on the Executive branch. They need to go.

23

It was performative. The only reason they voted that way is because they knew they wouldn't have the votes to make any change. If they did they would've stalled or pulled some bullshit about moral upstanding

5

Biden: I'm totally serious citizens, Trump is bad news, and will literally take the constitution, as in the one in the National Archives with Franklin's preserved chocolate fingerprint in the upper left corner--and he will ejaculate on it (which is slightly green for some fucking reason) and then set it on fire. Don't elect that dude for real guys.

Garland: Hey boss, Donny said he's on vacation with Ivanka and thirteen 13 year-olds, so he'll totally send thise docs over next week. Or something. I told that hound dog it was all good in the hood. So I'm gonna punch out early, kay?

Biden:

Garland: Boss?

5
lemmy.world

What's the point of impeachment? Wasn't trump already impeached a couple of times in the first term? He didn't get kicked out or banned from running again

8
arrow74reply
lemmy.zip

Impeachment is necessary to kick him out. That's the point. Yes it takes votes, but you have to Impeach first then the Senate can vote to remove.

Being impeached has no effect on eligibility to run again.

That's the legal framework

12
lemmy.world

Ahh ok, so it's like the first step. How come last time there wasn't the second step? Also on a related question, if he'd been kicked out last time would he have been able to run again this time?

3
arrow74reply
lemmy.zip

Ahh ok, so it's like the first step. How come last time there wasn't the second step?

There was a second step. It just failed. To "introduce articles of impeachment" requires a simple majority in the house. Then to formally remove the president during the impeachment proccess requires a 2/3rds vote in the senate.

That second step did occur, but didn't have enough votes to pass. The democrats did not have a 2/3rds majority in the senate and Republicans weren't willing to impeach their own president

Also on a related question, if he'd been kicked out last time would he have been able to run again this time?

Yes he would have

10

That has nothing to do with congress and is not something people can effect with their vote.

Honestly it's even more of a longshot than a successful impeachment.

You are right on the law though and technically correct.

4
lemmy.world

I know it's a big word and people hesitate to use it, but it's not debatable anymore.

These are traitors.

Traitors are operating our federal government.

And they aren't just going to leave when asked politely.

107
lemmy.world

You're like those people who say you can't criticize movies unless you're a director

22
DarkFuturereply
lemmy.world

post on the least popular social media platform in existence

So I should post on Reddit where there are so many comments mine gets hidden in the pile and no one sees it?

I have over 80 upvotes on my comment. That means at least that many people saw it. People see comments they agree with, then they talk about those subjects elsewhere online and IRL. The sentiment spreads. If it spreads enough then words slowly turn into actions.

You coming on "the least popular social media in existence" and trying to speak down to people communicating to each other is unproductive and, frankly, stupid.

And believe me, you are in no position to think less of anyone.

6
lemmy.dbzer0.com

How about you get off our least popular social media platform in existence, leave us alone, and go and do something about the traitors yourself if you think it's hypocrisy not to?

6
lemmy.dbzer0.com

So when are you gonna go do something about it? Are you a gun guy or a poison guy?

This appears to be a claim that voicing opposition without taking action is hypocrisy.

5
lemmy.world

In case you aren't just trolling...

The conservatives WANT violence from their opposition. They will use it to further destabilize the country allowing them to gain more actual power.

Sometimes violence is the answer. And there are plenty available if it gets too that. But despite where we are, playing their game the way they want us to isn't the solution. Violence isn't the answer... yet.

And hopefully we never get to that point.

2

If they aren't made to follow the rules, then they don't need to follow the rules, and then the rules are optional, enforced only when it empowers them.

45
programming.dev

They need thousands of FBI agents more to obscure Orange's name?

34
dhorkreply
lemmy.world

How many FBI agents know how to use sed?

's/Donald Trump/Bill Clinton/g'

They even have the same number of characters

17
Rodancocireply
lemmy.world

"Bill Clinton went down on Bill Clinton" doesn't have the same ring to it.

11

The photo was a result of a bunch of jokes that spawned from the email from Epstein's brother asking him if Putin had the "pictures of Trump blowing Bubba".

4

It's important to remain polite at all times. We wouldn't want to offend traitors/ kleptocrats/ racists/ pedophiles/ psychopaths.

9

I'm confused why would they miss a deadline. Is their hard drive copying slow? Or have they not finished altering the files to suit?

21

Anyone who was thinking Trump wasn’t just going to shred or redact anything that implicated him was dreaming.

It’s a little weird that they’d delay…so much. I don’t understand and can’t sufficiently explain why they’re doing it. My best guess is they want to start a war before they release some of the stuff that makes him look bad by proxy. I guess maybe some of the people he’s throwing under the bus need a heads up?

21

Trying to just not quite release the files, playing along with "wanting to release the files" combined with a smattering of the content they hope to be enough to mollify most people.

A pretend "good faith effort" to stall until people stop paying attention. Presumably something in the news cycle at some point will cause people to stop caring about some 'inconsequential' content beyond what they released.

3

It’s a little weird that they’d delay…so much.

Trump is just a human loyalty test. Prolonging the Epstein shit lets them make sure that anyone who continues to follow him is utterly and completely on board with this crew's agenda.

1

If they were at all interested in transparency, they could/would/should have been releasing files as they were ready every one of the last 30 days. No reason to wait until the last minute to dump all of them at once other than slow walking the inevitable.

19

That's a lot of fucking tho.
However their fucking is documented in arranged files they have & refer to them by a common name.

2
pie.andmc.ca

ok so go arrest Bondi like you said you were gonna but you actually won't.

Heaven forbid a Democrat actually does what they say they're going to do.

14
nullreply
piefed.nullspace.lol

Which Democrats have the authority to arrest her?

Which one said they would?

31

how's that rage bait? your own rep Ro Khanna threatened Bondi with jailtime and prosecution if the full files aren't release, they're not being released.

Christ on a cracker grow up.

1

The House Sergeant at Arms can be ordered to arrest her for contempt of Congress. Will the House order that? It's probably never been done before.

1

do you? or do your Democratic Reps just spout bullshit? so Ro Khanna threatening prosecution and jail time is just a nothing burger?

2

So, who's going to prison for this? Party of law and order, right?

14
programming.dev

imagine being so slow and inefficient that you can't even redact names on time

10
brown567reply
sh.itjust.works

They've got a lot of work to do! They need to find everything about any Democrat, but they need to make sure nothing they release incriminates trump!

5

From what I have seen so far it's all.Clinton stuff and nothing on Trump. You couldn't make this stuff up 😂

1
lemmy.today

Oh, I'm not defending it at all! They should've been released carte blanch before today, unredacted. I'm honestly surprised we got anything at all given this current admins proclivity to ignoring legal orders.

4

nah for sure. i just felt this was important context for everyone to remember. the president isn't just covering up his pedophile buddies' actions. the president, by not releasing everything has broken a law that literally says he has to put it out

2

100% ignorant here(me not you) but was it not that the victims, the ones sex trafficked, names supposed to be the ones protected. So that there would be redactions but only to keep the privacy of those harmed. Not whole pages?

1

Not really. It’s fragmentary and illegally redacted, without any legally required redaction explanations.

12

It looks that they just released the ones including Bill Clinton and didn't release those that had trump on them.

4

Trumps chumps cant do anything right. Especially when they can't alter the files fast enough.

3