Spyke
reddthat.com

The best way to deal with bluster and narcissism is the grey rock method.

That won't work here because of FOX and the influencers will then be the only source for communication with the Trump administration.

The only thing that will work would be a general strike and Emperor's New Clothes moment of huge protests in multiple cities with millions taking part.

That is the only non-violent road forward. And the USA might be too big and too trapped in a digital maroon-ing to be able to coordinate that type of civil action.

Laugh all we can. I agree. But there needs to be a nation-wide coordination of civil disobedience on a scale unseen in the USA ever before. It is going to require getting over differences that the Trump administration will leverage to divide and conquer.

73
Selenireply
lemmy.world

No. The best way is with humor (assuming you don’t have a gun handy). Fascists hate being laughed at. They want to believe they’re the baddest motherfuckers in the room, and cry like little toddlers the second they think they’re not. (Mel Brooks proved this time and again in WWII)

That’s why the ‘stop being weird’ thing worked so well. That’s why Commander Failure had a breakdown to rival a tired four-year-old in his office after the US generals didn’t leap up out of their seats applauding him.

Mock them. Belittle them. Laugh at them. Tell them they’re weird. It will get under their skin like nothing else.

34
balsoftreply
lemmy.ml

Fascists hate being laughed at.

Sure, but how does this help?

That’s why the ‘stop being weird’ thing worked so well

Did it work? I count one orange fascist in the white house.

That’s why Commander Failure had a breakdown to rival a tired four-year-old in his office after the US generals didn’t leap up out of their seats applauding him.

So what? He's still in office. He's still ruining your social safety net. He's still oppressing marginalized communities. He's still crushing protests with military force. He's still funding and running multiple genocides all over the world.

Mock them. Belittle them. Laugh at them. Tell them they’re weird. It will get under their skin like nothing else.

It might get under their skin but it will not help.

Fascists (or autocrats in general) will not leave the positions of power just because you laugh at them. They won't even leave if the majority of people laugh at them or vote against them. Look at Russia. I'm pretty sure most of the country was laughing at Putin 15 years ago. I assume you know how it went after that.

They will leave only when forced out physically, or if there is a credible threat of imprisonment or death if they don't. You need to have an organized and armed force on your side to do that. And neither the police nor the military will be.

Organize.

Join a union.

Join PSL or other parties that actually try to fight fascism.

For now (since revolution is pretty much impossible for a multitude of reasons) the most realistic way to force Republicans out of office is to make the billionaires funding them afraid. Make a realistic threat of a general strike, or even just block ports like the Italian port workers did, and Trump will be out of office in a week.

1

Yeah I'm gonna be real with you, no chance I'm joining a political party that is pro North Korea 🤷‍♂️ Otherwise you have a point though.

1

if only we can convince the railroad workers to strike again, that definitely got both Houses scared asf.

8

The book Stop Caretaking the Borderline or Narcissist is actually a VERY good source for what to do with narcissists when you can't leave or grey rock them.

4
lemmy.ca

I remember watching these ads on latenight TV in the 90s and wondering, what kind of losers buy this?

oh, that kind of loser.

55

Who thinks that's an improvement? But I recall those commercials as well as everyone making fun of them. Now one of the biggest fascists in North America went on tv with that crap at one point.

And the President of the United States allows him to run so many things. Crazy. I'm not sure Mad magazine could have wrote something so bizarre.

13
lemmy.ml

Body shaming still isn't cool. For every short Nazi, there is a short comrade.

32
Feydreply
programming.dev

Yup. People always come out of the woodwork defending body shaming bad people. Body shaming anybody perpetuates the ridiculous stigmas, and even if it makes bad people feel bad, it doesn't result in them changing their behavior.

I'm pretty sure it's just people that want to be assholes but have the wherewithal to understand they shouldn't looking for acceptable targets.

29

Is this case he’s a healthy and very normal looking dude. He’s just min-maxed his personality and how he carries himself for immense goblin vibes.

I’m not defending the goblin, or the people noticing that adult goblins are 4 feet 10 inches tall, on average.

10
lemmy.world

I'm a short overweight guy and don't don't take offense at all when people use that to mock bad people lmao

8
Rentlarreply
lemmy.ca

Like much of the Republican administration, he is a small man, referring to his personality, not his physical form.

10
Ferrousreply
lemmy.ml

“Stephen Miller is a clown! I’ve never seen that guy in real life, but he looks like he’s, like, 4 feet 10 inches. And he looks like he is angry about the fact that he’s 4 feet 10 inches. And he looks like he is so mad that he is 4 feet 10 inches, that he has taken that anger out on any other population possible,” the New York Rep. said.

Ah yes, definitely referring solely to his personality.

Just stop lying. Disingenuous.

6
Rentlarreply
lemmy.ca

I was, not AOC. You and I can take the high road all we like as outsiders, but AOC shouldn't since it hasn't worked for the Democrats for 15+ years.

11
Zorquereply
lemmy.world

Shockingly enough there's more roads than ignoring blatant corruption and resorting to petty name calling.

The former doesn't nothing, as we've seen. And the latter is generally used by shifty characters trying to distract from truly heinous activity happening behind the curtain.

Neither is particularly effective at actually accomplishing anything other than widening the already vast political divide in this country.

-2
krashmoreply
lemmy.world

They went low and you went so high that nobody else can even see you anymore.

Of course this shit works. Trump won almost exclusively because his voters love that he's a dick to people. Having higher standards than his voters is a good thing but that doesn't change the fact that the argument you're making here is categorically false. This is exactly the kind of language that resonates with the average idiot in America.

8
Feydreply
programming.dev

Lol no. People have been calling Trump variations of orange man and making fun of his hands, how fat he is, and his shitty suit fit since before he was elected the first time. It clearly doesn't do Jack shit

-1

There is a very specific mindset and set of values that it works with. The kind of people who just want to see everyone they dislike get fucked over. They dont want to see things get better, they dont want to accomplish anything. They just want schadenfreude.

As you might be able to surmise, this doesn't end with a positive outcome.

Trump won specifically because he preaches division and fucking over "the other". Trying to emulate him is antithetical to getting rid of him and his ilk.

-1
drhodlreply
lemmy.world

I think you're underestimating the small penis. People with small penises gravitate towards republicanism.

1

I mean, they all are rumored to have deformed dicks

Trump's tiny mushroom head

Elon's deformed dick that meant that at least one baby mama needed artificial insemination (also so he can make sure every baby is male)

And Stephen Miller's wife cheated on him for Elon so I can only imagine why that was a step forward

And none eat pussy to make up for it, you can tell they are shitty lovers

2

I've said it often that the best way to deal with them all is laugh when they speak. It affects them on a level that few can sense. They feed off your anger but laughter hurts them.

Edit: best not beat. A little Freudian slip.

26

Get groups of teen girls to roast him mercilessly. Being considered laughably unfuckable by the most "desirable" females is one of their triggers.

23
lemmy.world

What you said is so offensive on so many layers.

Maybe as an adult YOU could step up against this admin and stop thinking about and using teen girls at all. They don't need to be part of your thought processes, they have algebra homework to do.

2
fedia.io

I was thrilled as a teen girl to lash out at politicians. I turned 18 after GWB was elected so I had a lot of issues with that type of shit being out of my control. If I knew I could hurt them, at an age when I felt the least guilt over hurting someone's feelings, I'd be up for it.

3
lemmy.world

Great, again, maybe as an adult YOU could do something instead of volunteering others who are much younger with less informed consent of the danger they are in.

It's giving Ghilisaine- teen girls are NOT your dolls to play with, regardless of who YOU were as a teen. They are not meant for you to project onto. Go do it yourself.

-1
lemmy.world

Great, and now you're an adult so presumably you can go to town halls and call your representatives and do other political advocacy that adults do

-2

How would I know what you do not state? All I know is what you've said in your comments, sending teen girls to engage online about and be in danger of associates of Epstein and Andrew Tate. Great idea btw

-1
lemmy.zip

Sure. These fucks are gearing up to declared all Democrats terrorists ... but laughter at their height I guess.

13
Lemminaryreply
lemmy.world

Don't underestimate the power of ridicule. This isn't about laughing, but about changing the public eye's perception, and that is powerful.

40
lemmy.world

This is such a fucking lib take

Driving off a cliff into fascism, laughing all the way

-14
Lemminaryreply
lemmy.world

Yeah, I guess we should legitimize it instead by taking it vewy sewiously.

Fucking dork ass take.

12
lemmy.world

I wish I could be this happy clapping my hands at distractions that don't require a politician to do anything helpful. That's just what Neoliberals do and it makes me concerned AOC is behaving the same as the loser Kamala Harris. She's supposed to be a progressive.

-12
Lemminaryreply
lemmy.world

Yes, I'm obviously a neoliberal and also an American because you decided it was so. Get your neanderthal-ass takes out of my face, honestly. Go read a sociology book and consider changing your username to match that stinking attitude while you're at it.

2
lemmy.world

Oh ok so you you aren't invested and informed on US politics it seems, and you don't know what you're talking about.

-8

Seems like you don't know the first thing about the person you're taking to. And yet here you are.

3

If we call them weird enough, then they will get discouraged and stop committing crimes like Swiper from Dora.

XD

1

Hey fuck steven miller, but anyone who mocks someone over something as superficial as their height is a prick.

7

Your right, we should only mock people about their skin color.

I personally don't care how we mock them as long as it is effective. If it hurts a few people's feelings then that is a price we have to be willing to pay to help defeat this administration.

1

I'm sure it's because of his upbringing, and a direct result of his parents inflicting trauma on him, but this man is a monster. He needs to be punched in the face.

6
reddthat.com

Fuck Stephen Miller but as a short dude her comments pissed me off to be honest. That dude's taller than I am. Stick to his politics. Maybe short dudes wouldn't feel the need to compensate if we weren't getting shit on from all sides constantly. If we don't compensate we're ignored or ridiculed.

5
lightnsfwreply
reddthat.com

So denigrating short men is going to help? She's gonna win a lot of people over with that?

5
lightnsfwreply
reddthat.com

First off it's not a fucking game.

Second, all she's done is alienate a bunch of short dudes, a demo she's probably not doing great with in the first place, and remind us that people will always see us that way regardless of anything else we do. No one cares about his height either and he's not even that short if they did.

1

I'm short too, but somehow didn't wind up inadequate like you.

1

Everything is a game. An argument with your father is a game. You balancing a delicious, spicy curry against the ulcer you might have in 5 years is a game. Being popular is absolutely a game.

This is the bone I have to pick with you. You care more about maintaining your perfect little bubble than you do about winning.

I'm not going to argue with you about your specific insecurities. I'm asking what political strategy would energize people?

I don't believe you have any ideas because you've never thought about crowdwork once.

1
4amreply
lemmy.zip

Stop being a doomer troll. We all hate him for his politics, there’s literally no reason to give a shit about him otherwise

5

I'm referring to the general public. The people that AOC would be speaking to. If his politics were enough to defeat him, then why is he currently the Deputy Chief of Staff?

It is not doomerism, by the way, to think about your chess moves.

1
drhodlreply
lemmy.world

You should grow up. I'm short, and I have never felt like that. Ever.

-1

You should learn to accept criticism more gracefully, your feelings are not universal and do not justify being a dick about physical traits people have no choice about

4
lemmy.ca

Unless the information is incorrect, Google measures him at 5'9.. Now, I'm no fan of fuck-face Miller, but why are we pretending like the exact median human height in North America is laughably short? AOC herself is 5'4. This entire height dunking situation is a bit confusing.

5
lemmy.world

Now, I’m no fan of fuck-face Miller, but why are we pretending like the exact median human height in North America is laughably short?

We know he's insecure about it.

8

Exactly. He's a bully. And it is always okay to bully the shit out of a bully. Because then they'll stop being weird loser dipshits.

3

Its not really about what is or isnt tall, its about what annoys him. If he believes that being 5ft9 is short, than calling him Smurfette will likely make his piss boil. Doesnt make it true, just makes it true that hes an insecure nazi dweeb.

8
lemmy.ca

I'm not saying modern Conservatives have small dicks, but they sure do give off little dick energy.

4
lemmy.nz

Can we please stop the body shaming.

Attack them for their character, not their genetics.

4

I was writing a novel but I really don't give a shit. I respect you have a different opinion. I don't give a shit. This PC bullshit needs to stop. Stop focusing on the words people use and focus on their actions.

4

Headline is meh... AOC wants people to ridicule these people in power, you know, like how Tim Waltz called them "weird". That was majorly effective, because it tarnishes the "strong man" image that these weirdos like to portray.

4

I don't think we should make fun of Miller for his height. We should make fun of him for his stupid fucking voice. Little bitch always sounds like he's about to ask to speak to the manager. He's talking about how the federal government is going to crush their enemies but he sounds like he's whining about his Panera Bread order being wrong. And with his dumb fucking accent he sounds like fascist Pauly Shore.

4

Um, no, this is not a political W. It's one of those things that is cathartic for some people but godawful for optics. Cheer this on if you want the left to look anti-male and hypocritical.

🚫

3
lemmy.nz

What the hell AOC? :( I'm short and 'insecure' about it. Why are you using my body and mental health as a punching bag? Is the fact that he's a disgusting nazi not enough?

3
pyrereply
lemmy.world

I'm short and i support this. Fascists like to feel superior for superficial reasons that are not separable from them: You don't have to be good at anything if you're superior because of your supposed genes. They like being disgusting Nazis. they like being evil and scary. makes them feel powerful. they don't like being emasculated. Hit them where it hurts.

men are kings and being a short is nothing to be ashamed of or insecure about. we're human beings. I'm against making fun of human beings for their appearance. just a little while ago i said in a comment that I'm bothered by people making fun of the appearance of the Olsen twins. but when a fascist cunt goes around talking about how other people are inferior you have an obligation to remind him that he looks like a lizard covered in lube and he needs a new chin transplant.

but fascists should be made fun of for things they value, not things we human beings value. they also like to pretend they're the default/normal people so attacking them to there is good too. that's why Walz's "weird" was working so well. they lost their minds over that one word. but of course the Dem campaign had to stop Walz from doing it because they love losing.

11
pyrereply
lemmy.world

what's the plan point of saying things that are universal? i know liberals exist and I'm sick of their pussy ass shit. fascists are not people and they don't have deserve kindness.

4
lemmy.nz

Yet you’re doing the lib thing of throwing away any claimed ethics the second you can insult someone.

0

nope; my ethics are fucking rock solid. not valuing fascists as lifeforms let alone people is an important part of my ethics.

1
lemmy.nz

Would you be okay with calling Byron Donalds a N word?

That's where it hurts right? Picking out the weak spot and alienating him from his white supremacist party members who don't defend him?

-3
pyrereply
lemmy.world

wait a minute... people calling me different variations of "short" all my life was the same as the n-word? holy shit I'm gonna start asking for reparations now!

1
lemmy.nz

People discriminating against you based on your body is the same as discriminating want you based on your body.

1

i think you may have botched this comment because it makes no sense

0

She did say that short kings are great. It's just those insecure people in power that try to portray a "strong man" image that can be hurt with a little ridicule.

5

He cant, hes too short. If he did, he wouldnt be able to walk. He just bounce along the road like he was on a space hopper...

0

Strongly worded letters and playground insults will surely save the Republic. /s

1

if you post enough kayfabe i hear it comes true

dude is trying to make his whole wishyverse come true

1
lemmy.ml

AOC offering nothing of substance, says we should laugh at our enemies, I laugh at her when she says "defensive missiles for israel", and not for the way she looks

-11
absentbirdreply
lemmy.world

Missiles that intercept other missiles are defensive. That's their entire function. Imo that's the only missiles we should make, and we should give them to both sides.

8
remonreply
ani.social

Unless you use them to shoot down an airliner.

3
absentbirdreply
lemmy.world

What are we talking about? Israel shot down flight 114 with a fighter jet.

Both patriot missiles and the iron dome are specifically for intercepting missiles, though Israel stopped using patriots last year. The iron dome only works on unguided projectiles, while the patriot system is capable of hitting drones and guided missiles.

The only time a patriot missile has taken down a plane, at least in my memory, is that spy plane over Ukraine, but that is a very impressive outlier.

3
remonreply
ani.social

What are we talking about?

The fact that you can use air defense systems to shoot down airliners, which I'd argue doesn't exactly count as "defensive" use.

Both patriot missiles and the iron dome are specifically for intercepting missiles

Not really. Patriot is a general anti-air defense system and Iron dome is also designed to intercept artillery shells. Missiles are just the most common things to intercept.

4
absentbirdreply
lemmy.world

An artillery shell is a ballistic missile.

A patriot missile can shoot down an airplane, but they have never been used against airliners. I don't think the iron dome has ever even been deployed against aircraft.

2
remonreply
ani.social

An artillery shell is a ballistic missile.

No, missiles have a motor.

A patriot missile can shoot down an airplane, but they have never been used against airliners. I don’t think the iron dome has ever even been deployed against aircraft.

Not am I aware of, no.

1

Maybe there's some military specifics I don't understand, but ballistic basically means unguided, and a missile is either a self propelled projectile or a forcibly propelled projectile. Wouldn't that include artillery? Like an arrow can be called a missile, that's where the term comes from.

2
lemmy.ml

These missiles make it safe for Israel to bomb children without fear of repercussion.

1

Maybe I'm jaded, but I feel like Israel would use any deaths caused by rockets to bomb even more.

The idea that more dead civilians is the key to fewer dead civilians just seems backwards. Every totalitarian regime I'm familiar with revels in the pain inflicted on innocents, just look at how they treat the October 7th victims. It's almost like Netanyahu was waiting for an excuse to go full tilt.

I have very little knowledge of how the Israeli culture/government works, but I did live through the Bush era, and I can only imagine that additional terrorist attacks would have been a boon to the occupation efforts.

They lean hard on any tragedy, always pushing for more violence. The voters often fall for it, every tragedy allows them to seize more control and justify their unhinged behavior.

There's almost a symbiotic relationship between stochastic violence against civilians and rising fascism, each step twists the ratchet tighter and tighter.

1
feddit.nl

she's a politician. I like her. but she is a politician.

so.... not the last person.

you people really need to be more pessimistic and skeptical about the world. we wouldn't be in this fucking mess if you were.

3

I like actions that actually get results which for us in the states means a general strike at the bare minimum, which the government would almost certainly respond to with violent force anyway because that's literally always what happens, so yeah an armed revolution whether we like it or not

1
feddit.nl

no. at this point i think an armed revolution would be completely moronic. (although when compared to the outlook you'd have, if doing nothing, its understandable)

However.

I do think people should COLLECTIVELY cease to pay taxes. even if 30% of the population just stopped paying federal taxes, the government would be completely crippled. You would be able to force the fascists to the table. You would be able to force them out.

If the governments of blue states supported this idea, this would be even easier.

Armed revolution is asinine in comparison.... Anyway. I'm already doing my part.

Was there a point you were trying to make?

1

Small scale bullshit. I very highly doubt the government could mount an effective response if 81 million people were to stop paying taxes. But hey, good luck!

1
RenLinwoodreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

You say that as if we aren't commenting on a very straightforward example of her doing exactly that

0
lemmy.world

Performative implies pretending to be proactive but the end results are inconsequential. Like Cory Booker's filibuster which achieved minimally. AOC had been touring the country with Bernie Sanders rallying the working class, the base which the Dems abandoned, and even got support from the Republican voters they visited. AOC's encouragement to mock the Republican politicians is simply drawing more ammunition from her arsenal of actually being engaged.

4
drhodlreply
lemmy.world

At least we don't treason and incite violence, magat. I can't believe someone who can actually read and write, would be a magat smdh!

1
webadictreply
lemmy.world

I dunno, you're making communism look really stupid right now by being an asshole.

Like, no solutions, no nothing. Just a bad attitude.

Hey, while we're pointing out performative nothings, why is it that every communist I've met keeps talking about the revolution and then waits for it? Like, my local communist party sets up tables at events but has no information or resources on how to setup a workers or tenants union. Why is that? Don't you guys have answers?

5
RenLinwoodreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

If your opinion on an entire political philosophy is based on whether or not you personally like someone who espouses it rather than on it's actual merits then you're a fucking moron, and you clearly are

I don't need to have a detailed plan for fixing the world to recognize and acknowledge the many obvious failings of the democrats, nobody owes you that and your insistence that they do is a transparent attempt to deflect completely valid criticisms

"Every communist I've met" lol sample size and obvious credibility issues, try harder loser

-3
lemmy.world

Why is it that every communists I've met act like a child when they can't think of a counterargument to their silly ideas?

2

But... You're doing the exact same thing? It's pretty hypocritical.

I brought up a legitimate criticism, and you deflected, name called, and then did nothing, ultimately.

Listen, I'm just saying that you should be contributing to your ability, so either you have very little ability to do so, or you are the same as the people you criticize.

1

what she actually said was that he looks like he's insecure about being short, not that he is short

so it's not quite body shaming, it's shaming his alleged feelings about his body

also, there are no rules for how to treat people who are absolutely pieces of shit. they don't get the same courtesy as regular people

13
lemmy.world

look man they don't listen to reason, maybe small pp jokes will do something

11
chlorokenreply
lemmy.ml

It's literally ableism. Leftists don't talk like this, only liberals.

-7
chlorokenreply
lemmy.ml

You can split hairs, but its ableism regardless of the packaging. To deny that she's making fun of his body is to deny reality.

-2
lemmy.world

She just isn't though. She is clearly making fun of his anger and self hate at the reality that he is not a perfect picture of his OWN values regarding eugenics and taking it out on people who are not to blame via genociding them. And that's exactly what he is.

If she was talking about Robert Reich, he has a very different mindset about life than hurting others, so it just wouldn't be valid when applied to him, because of who he is as a person. He has made the world a better place because his disability (per his own words) allowed him to see the importance of social programs and economic equity. So no one would claim Robert Reich is angry at being a little person and taking it out on others by deporting families/genociding them - because he isn't. Therefore, the criticism isn't about his SIZE, it is about his self hatred, eugenicism, and genocidal reaction.... OBVIOUSLY

1
o1011oreply
lemmy.world

I think we should consider this the way we would any other form of hurting people. So long as you don't have to, it's wrong to do so. I agree that we shouldn't body shame and I question the need to do so even in this instance, but I have to acknowledge that those on the right do not respond to reason or appeals to their better nature. If by mocking them we can hurt their ego enough that they start acting better to stop the mocking and that stops them from literally killing people then by calling them 'short' we saved lives. War is messy business and I'd much rather hurt someone's ego and cause the societal harm of normalizing shaming about body type than have to kill somebody.

I'll reiterate that body shaming is an ugly thing and the only way to justify it is as the lesser of two evils. We have to hate fascists openly and unabashedly. They have to know that all the social niceties we give to tolerant people cannot apply to them.

Body acceptance is a form of tolerance and tolerance is a social contract. It's dangerous to body shame but not more dangerous than tolerating the intolerant.

6

Ableism is never acceptable. It's a tool of the weak-minded. A leftist using ableist terms has no solidarity and doesn't understand her premise.

0
Jaxreply
sh.itjust.works

Ah yes, moral grandstanding. A tenet of the left.

4
chlorokenreply
lemmy.ml

Are you following me around to different threads now? How owned are you?

Also, be careful. You wouldn't want to get banned for harassment.

-8
Jaxreply
sh.itjust.works

No, Lemmy has a small content pool — and you consistently have bad takes

Edit: To think I would waste my time following a dipshit around Lemmy. Occam's Razor, dingus — but I get why such a cough complicated philosophical principle might be beyond you.

6
Jaxreply
sh.itjust.works

Of what, the ratio?

Jesus, .ml users, MAGA — what's the difference?

0

No you just deny the Tiannenmen Square Massacre, celebrate the oct 7th massacre, think supporting Ukraine means that you're a brainwashed lib or a neo nazi, and whatever other crazy genuinely awful shit you people believe.

So we've established that what you people say is beyond worse than calling people dogs. Actually, I shouldn't call you a dog. I love my dogs, I should call you something that directly harms people. A cancerous tumor.

Oh, believe me when I say this, the admins here are 100% aware of my disdain for .ml users, hexbear, that entire cultish side of Lemmy. I'll go ahead and steelman your argument for you — I've had multiple conversations with Cowbee (you know, one of the people who celebrated the oct 7th massacre). Why, in your clearly infinite wisdom, would I not have been banned for following Cowbee around if what you're saying is true?

It's because I'm not you fucking dipshit.

Finally I didn't even recognize your name when I responded to you, or the tag I gave you — I simply saw a stupid fucking take from one of the cancerous tumors on Lemmy's metaphorical brain. Get fucked.

Edit: I just noticed the part where you claimed I lost an argument. Dude, you got ratio'd there too — what world do you live in?

-1

Yeah, a lot of people need to stop doing it, it doesn't harm them, or if it does it also hurts those that aren't horrible like them. People, but especially the left, need to stop doing it.

1
chlorokenreply
lemmy.ml

I'm mocking American bipartisan electoralism. How are you so naive?

-3
chlorokenreply
lemmy.ml

Are you upset that you didn't understand what was happening? If you miss something, it's normal to feel silly, but don't make your ignorance my problem.

1
chlorokenreply
lemmy.ml

You're too stupid to realize you missed the entire premise of the comment you replied to. And now you're just saying words.

Embarrassing.

1