Spyke
danreply
upvote.au

It's probably the most popular music streaming service at the moment.

59
Appoxoreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Who is any better? Literally all are paying pennies to the artist per stream.

6

Sure, that's true, though if you allow streams on Bandcamp, those pay $0, so in terms of "try before you buy", any streaming service is better. It's only if you actually sell an album on band camp (or AmpWall, a smaller indie service that does a lot of the same stuff) that you'd get paid, as an artist.

I say this as a musician who has put out several albums both independently and with a label.

7

Buying albums is great because you can host them on your own Plex server and use Plexamp.

(or something like Jellyfin, but IMO Plexamp is still the best app available for streaming your own music collection)

2
sh.itjust.works

Tidal doesn't host far-right mouthpieces, offers much higher quality streams, and pays the artists far, far more per play.

Edit: Here's a chart from 2022:

4

The chart is neat.

But I could care less about (US) politics while listening to music.

0
bernoreply
lemmy.world

-Sent from my iPhone built with slave labor and suicide nets at foxconn factories

-4
zecgreply
lemmy.world

Buy their merch rather than feeding the beast

23
Mihiesreply
programming.dev

Even if that was ok, I'm sure people who pirate buy a ton of merch from all the artists they pirate, that's why all those artists get a ton of money.

-13
Prunebuttreply
slrpnk.net

I'm sure that small to medium artists don't get fleeced by Spotify and get a ton of money from a service that almost everyone in the west is using. /s

11

Some more things I'm sure of include that Spotify exists for the artists and won't sneakily replace them with Suno-generated shit at first opportunity or fuck with people's legacy of holy playlists or make the interface more cumbersome to alter users' habits, or increase the price until the frogs start jumping out. It's allowed to exists through the graces of biggest publishing conglomerates whose C-suite and shareholders get the lion's share. Fuck fucking Spotify.

6

I'm sure they are on Spotify (which is shitty anyway) and other streaming services by choice. And if you are against streaming services, feel free to buy their albums.

-2

Yeah. Just started my self hosting journey a few months ago, looking to replace Spotify at some point. I got a NAS with Jellyfin set up, my next step is replacing Google photos with Immich probably.

I do appreciate Spotify will be adding lossless music soon, but they have so many other issues.

2

Mostly for random song discovery considering my previously liked songs, I regularly download/obtain those songs I like for offline reproduction and preservation... online stuff has short lifes

1
lemmy.zip

Is this the onion? They add the basic feature of a media player where you can listen the title you clicked and not random stuff? If I understood correctly, this is not a feature, it's just a restriction being removed

43
fedia.io

The mobile application has always had this restriction for free users (as far as I know), but the desktop application has not.

23

No, you could tap shuffle on an album-by-album basis, or on a Playlist with like 10+ tracks or something.

8

Well, on PC or tablet you always could, but on mobile it was always album random shuffle... and if you created an album of less than N songs, in mobile they added related tracks in the reproduction (radio-spotify like) so it remained not possible to control what you listen...

EDIT: I updated the verb tenses to the fact that now you can in the mobile app chose the song to play

8

This is why I never even gave Spotify a chance. It didn’t make sense to me.

7
piefed.social

Easier to let users play music for free when you don't pay the artists I guess

23
cabbagereply
piefed.social

Lol, I'm a vinyl nerd, I've probably given more money to the music industry than to anything else except food

12

Touché. Gotta admit I didn't think it through properly, there's probably a bunch of other things as well. Point is I think I've provided the music industry with more money than it strictly deserves.

Especially with the price of concerts these days. Jesus.

2
lemmy.world

I'm so confused. Couldn't you always pick what track you wanted to play?

18
_g_bereply
lemmy.world

Nope. At some point spotify forced FREE users to shuffle play playlists. You couldn't pick which specific song you'll hear first. And with ads, obviously.

22
sh.itjust.works

Damn, when I joined way back when, you could pick the track you wanted you just couldn't skip and had to hear ads. Being able to pick a track is the whole reason I moved away from Pandora.

7
_g_bereply
lemmy.world

I've recently moved away from Spotify and to Pandora, ironically.

Pandora premium let's you play whichever track you want, they are not longer exclusively stations, but their station algorithm is the reason I decided on them over other spotify alternatives

4
Art3misreply
lemmy.world

I like tidal a lot. They pay their artists the highest percentage last i checked, and they have sound quality as their main selling point. The station algorithm is a little bunk though.

I am slowly rebuilding my mp3 library after switching to streaming 15 years ago when it was the hot new thing. Hopefully i can ditch them all together soon.

3
lemmy.pt

Right now, it's Qobuz that pays the most, and they also sport lossless audio formats as well. Tidal's still a good pick, as far as music streamers go, though.

3

Currently, for free users, only PC or tablet allows to control what you listen (caveat occasional ads) but mobile constraints to a shuffle reproduction of albums, and if you dare to do a short album they spice it with additional related tracks, so you are never in control of what is likely to play...

EDIT: well, apparently I can do that also on my mobile app, I remember in the past some glitched occasions bit it seems is real now...

1
lemmy.nz

wow the music app finally lets users select music! I'm sad that this is actually something to look forward to.

13
Appoxoreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Be happy it was free and ads could probably be blocked.
Would you appreciate it more if they blocked the view of the library like the videostreamers like Netflix or D+ do?

1
Fizzreply
lemmy.nz

Idk I haven't used the free tier of Spotify in a decade. I think add supported listening is enough and all features should be available to the free user except offline listening.

1

And I think that's sufficient enough for free.
Though non-random playback is a nice addition :)

3
lemmy.world

I love product updates as part of my technology feed....

I miss old technology feeds in the classic internet days. That actually posted and listed out cool stuff with technology

12
60d
lemmy.ca

Or you've been using spotube and been doing this all along

11
xianjamreply
programming.dev

Spotube doesn't actually use the Spotify API. They used to use the Spotify API for their music database, but they stopped when they received a cease and desist.

9

Oh my, things have changed fast. I wasn't aware there were other metadata providers. There I go spreading misinformation again.

6
lemmy.world

Winamp with a cool custom skin and downloaded mp3s was better than Spotify imo.

10

I know it's cool to shit on spotify and streaming services on Lemmy, but personally I disagree. I loved Winamp and had tens of thousands of songs back in the day, downloaded on my zippy 56k dial up connection. But being able to search for and play virtually any song available instantly and share collaborative playlists, no matter where you are, is so much better.

5
nevetsgreply
aussie.zone

Why would I decide what I like to listen to when am algorithm can do it for me?

3

I fully jumped on the Spotify bandwagon hoping the algorithm would decide what i listen to, I'd become stuck in a rut and hadn't really listened to anything new for a good 15 years.

Well... After letting it figure my music tastes out, every single automatically generated playlist on there starts off with crap I just immediately skip before devolving into the same 5-10 songs I listened to pre-Spotify. So i guess it knows my taste well? But it has turned out to be useless for this too!

0

YouTube Music allows this, maybe they're losing ad money to them on the people that weren't going to get premium anyway.

6
lemmy.world

Call me a hardcore Spotify fan boy: I paid for Spotify for 15 years, I loved it, I even applied to worked for them. The product was great and unmatched so as I didn't care about the problems, so many problems. things were getting progressively more problematic but in the end, King Gizzard convinced me to quit. I don't regret it a single minute. Fuck Spotify.

8

I had an account day 1 when Spotify launched in my country. It was such a big deal to me, a person who spent their teens and 20s hoarding music. One service and it was most of the music I wanted. I could sideload my own music and shuffle it all together.

I miss that little app store on the desktop client. You could join shared radio stations and vote on the next track while people wrote to each other in a chat.

4
reddthat.com

Too late, already got sick of their shit and went back to downloading everything myself. I have to have two media player apps on my phone to account for podcasts and music but it's still better than using spotify. Probably a better way to do that too but haven't been bothered enough to look into it.

8

I still let spotify to discover me things from time to time... but regularly I download/obtain those that I like, I never abandoned my offline library, I am old enough to know that nothing online perdures...

1
sh.itjust.works

I've not seen anyone recommend an alternative like Qobuz in these "fuck spotify" discussions - I think it's a good honest alternative?

7

I use Musify on Android. (From the F-Droid store) It pulls the music off of YouTube and works pretty well. Save playlists,download individual songs, it has recommendations but u didn't know how they work.

4
HereIAmreply
lemmy.world

I was looking to try Qobuz, but they didn't like my email domain, so skipped it.

3

I have a custom domain and they accepted it a couple months ago - maybe give it another shot if it was a while back?

1
Appoxoreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I recommend .

Jokes aside, the only reason I use Spotify is for discovery and the vast catalog (primarily the JP music market).
And I havent seen Qobuz be mentioned in any capacity by japanese artists.

2
sh.itjust.works

Ah this is an interesting point. I think Qoboz are active in expanding their libraries and they do take requests on site. Do you have any JP recommendations - its not a region I've ever really listened to?

1
Appoxoreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Japanese are difficult to deal with.
It sure was a process to get them to release on Spotify. Before that they tended to stay on Apple Music.

Examples of artists I liked:
Tokyo Health Club - J-Rap but a bit more lo-fi
-> One of my favs: https://youtu.be/GSRfeUHZZN8
-> Honorable mention: https://youtu.be/ErLSUsqERm8

  • Crazy Beats (Touhou - Eurobeat Remixes)
    -> Just open any of their songs and listen ;)
  • Akatsuki Records (Tohou Remix - All kinds of genre)
    -> Same here
  • Hololive (A group of vTubers that also release music of all kinds of genre)
    -> https://youtu.be/twUFbqyul_M
    -> https://youtu.be/WGgEFoI9MhE
  • Ado (Also very diverse voice and genre selection. But usually more towards pop and pop-rock-like releases)
1
sh.itjust.works

Thank you! I'm going to have a listen through these this week - you may have just broadened my horizons!

2
Victorreply
lemmy.world

Seen the recommendation plenty of times.

Is it better than TIDAL? I'm interested in switching to either of those, perhaps.

1
sh.itjust.works

I only used Tidal a while back during a free trial, so can't comment too much. I think Tidal might have more wide spread functuonality adoption than Qoboz - but they do seem to be pushing out updates to meet feature parity.

Qoboz has been great to use though. I actually find I get a wider spectrum of recommendations than Spotify. Spotify seemed to type cast my current listening habits agressively, and it would take a while to break out of that loop each time.

2
Victorreply
lemmy.world

Cool, thank you!

Any experience with using it in a car system?

1

Like a caveman, I just plug in and use my phone to control it!

At home I do use an amp thay supports direct play, there's a few companies that support Qobuz in thay way - and self hosted options too. To make use of the fidelity.

2
lemmy.world

I haven’t used Spotify, until recently, since it was first released. Its big value over Pandora was that it let you choose what to listen to…when did that change?

I’m using spotx on Linux so I don’t get ads, can search individual songs, etc. I thought the free tier was just ad supported, I didn’t realize that they didn’t let you pick what you wanted to listen to.

6

What a ripoff.

Oh, there's a Spotx for Windows too. There ya go, anybody using Spotify free who doesn't want to buy into the tiering enshittification go patch your Spotify client. No ads, pick your own tracks, like Spotify used to be when it was a new and a good value for the service.

I'm just too lazy to find a music private tracker and setup Lidarr, I'll do that eventually and then just stream through Jellyfin like one of the cool kids.

1
fedia.io

The desktop application (both Windows and Linux) allows free users to pick tracks. The mobile application does not.

2

That makes sense, thanks.

I use a laptop for a mobile device so I haven’t bothered with the mobile apps yet. It seems like the same kind of client patch could be done with revanced.

1
lemmy.zip

Spotify being nice? Absolutely not. There certainly is a hidden agenda behind this.

6

My theory is, since they’re releasing lossless audio for premium users, they had to make the free version more appealing to the casual user.

2
Victorreply
lemmy.world

Qobuz vs TIDAL, go! (Curious to know more, if someone is willing to do a comparison that has experience with both, or either.)

1
treyf711reply
eviltoast.org

I trialed Tidal and thought it was fine. Just Fine. I’m trying Qobuz right now. It seems like all the things I like from Bandcamp but there’s also a paid streaming service. The audio sounds great on Qobuz and I like the option of buying HiRes albums for my local media server. I’m an iOS loser, and they just updated Apple Music with finally some good crossfade. I’m a simpleton and that appeals a lot to me. I can’t find crossfade setting on Qobuz for iOS. I feel like I would pick Qobuz over Tidal just for the ease of downloading my music to my Zune/iPod/subsonic/jellyfin.

2
harfangreply
slrpnk.net

Easy comparison. Tidal is not ethical. With investors like Black rocks ...they're devil financing wars and genocide.

1
Victorreply
lemmy.world

I don't know who Black Rocks is or whether or not they finance wars and genocide. I also couldn't find anything regarding them investing in TIDAL. Can you confirm with sources for either claim?

2
harfangreply
slrpnk.net

BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, overseeing trillions of dollars for governments, corporations, and individuals.

1
Victorreply
lemmy.world

So I see. I still can't find anywhere that says they invested in TIDAL.

But does that make TIDAL unethical? Does the poison run up the water stream or down?

1

So Block owns TIDAL, and BlackRock owns some shares in Block, and BlackRock does some shady investments.

I dunno man. I don't know how far/many steps back I should take before I consider it far enough removed from the unethical practices. It's not like TIDAL invests in war and genocide. Right?

1
ttrpg.network

When I was making money, I'd buy albums from bands I liked. Built up a nice library.

3

I'd love to buy the entire discographies of all the hundreds of artists I follow on Spotify. 💀 Simply not feasible.

1

That's why I originally went Google music. I thought Spotify was garbage and didn't have that shit I wanted, still true today 🤣

2

AFAIK, yes, and they're around the same ball park, I think cheaper on the individual plan, but a dollar more than Tidal on the Family Plan, IIRC. Nothing like trying them out.

0