Spyke

What's that you say? A Trump agency not obeying the law? (un)Believable!

37
lemmy.ca

"potential violations"? If they're deleting texts, then there's nothing "potential" about it. They're just "violations".

36
ayyyreply
sh.itjust.works

NY Times sure loves to sanewash fascism. It’s kinda their whole thing.

9

Oh, no, no. It's cool. They aren't even storing them so that way they don't have to delete them. Chessmate libs /s

3

Christ, if we keep this country and the adults ever are put back in charge, I would so love to see all the people doing all this illegal shit have the book thrown at them, and given maximum possible sentences.

Unamerican trash.

And I have zero sympathy for a Democrat to come into office and pull that "we're looking forward, not backward" bullshit that both Obama and Biden (and for that matter, Clinton) pulled. FUCK THAT. That just signals to these conservative assholes that they can try even MORE next time.

16

They were looking forward - to this.

They knew what was right, they knew what people demanded, they knew the consequence of doing nothing.

Tada.!

2

You reached the end

Homeland Security Dept. Says It Hasn’t Kept Text Message Data Since April: The agency’s response to public records requests indicated potential violations of federal records laws, experts said. | Spyke