Spyke

‘A literal gut punch’: Missouri workers devastated by Republican repeal of paid sick leave

Voters approved sick leave mandate by 58%, but lawmakers are caving to lobbying by the state’s chamber of commerce

Being sick is a costly business for Bill Thompson, who worked in the fast-food industry in Independence, Missouri, for more than 30 years, and recently worked at Guitar Center until early July, when he was laid off as.

“As an older worker, I have health issues from working on my feet and with my hands for many years with no breaks for eight to 10 hours a day. I have done it for 38 years now, living paycheck to paycheck,” 54-year-old Thompson said, noting in Missouri, workers are not mandated breaks of any kind during work.

So when Republicans in Missouri repealed a paid sick leave mandate that the state’s voters approved by 58% after an aggressive lobbying campaign by the Missouri chamber of commerce and industry and other business industry groups, he said, “It was a literal gut punch.”

‘A literal gut punch’: Missouri workers devastated by Republican repeal of paid sick leavehttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/aug/12/missouri-paid-sick-leave-repealOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
sh.itjust.works

Even on a day where Missourians sort of overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump, Josh Hawley and Governor Kehoe, they also overwhelmingly voted for an increase in paid sick days.

So they elected candidates who historically have opposed labor protections and government benefits, and then expected to get paid sick leave?

152
Asafumreply
feddit.nl

Fox news tells them the GOP are pro-worker and the Democrats actually hate America and workers.

It's infuriating :/

77
fishyreply
lemmy.today

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me for three decades straight and I'm the average Republican.

96

Yeah but I pray to the photo of Reagan on my wall every night that if I keep my mouth open and look up then the wealth will piss trickle down from the rich as they get richer

26

The GOP are proanti-worker and the Democratstic leadership actually hate America andworkers

There we go, now it makes sense :)

2
Eldritchreply
piefed.world

There's a lot of lead pipes here still. And massive swaths of empty land that votes against anyone that might try to maintain or replace them via the necessary step of raising taxes.

Kansas city and St Louis didn't vote for Republicans. Unfortunately both blue patches aren't quite half the States population. But were close enough that there governor is looking to take away our representation.

23

Yep, Kansas city is sliced through the center like a pie. St Louis is a different kind of gerrymandered as well.

11
lemmy.world

I'm a school bus driver and our shop is union (Teamsters). My coworkers rabidly support our union, but are opposed to all other unions (except police unions of course) including even the teachers' union in our district. They're also mostly MAGA. They're just so fucking clueless about their own self-interest, leaving aside their utter selfishness. Our dispatcher is a lesbian who proudly talks about her wife, and she's the most rabid trumper of them all. I had one painful conversation with her where she insisted that it's the GOP that brought about same-sex marriage.

14

KC here... I'm frankly fucking AMAZED we're still not a "Right to Work" state... for how quickly everything else has been overturned blatantly I'm amazed Gov Heehaw didn't find a way to gut it on the way out.

3
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

she insisted that it's the GOP that brought about same-sex marriage

Well she's about to find out the hard way how wrong this is as the Supreme Court is about to (probably) overturn Obergefell

3
Mulligrubsreply
lemmy.world

So they elected candidates who historically have opposed labor protections and government benefits

In the USA, all candidates oppose labor protections and government benefits; it's not as if the Democrats provide relief.

(min. wage 7.25, no sick leave, no maternity leave, no vacation, fire at will, no union protections, unions down to 10% (from 40% in 70s))

Both parties are not the same, but they are both pro-corporate and anti-labor

-4
lemmy.world

Minimum wage

Democrats have consistently advocated for its increase. Including a proposal to raise it to $15/hour in the 2024 platform.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/10/07/can-harris-stop-blue-collar-workers-from-defecting-to-donald-trump?

Paid medical/family leave

This seems to be mostly determined by states. Several have mandated times. Plus, the Democrats push FAMILY act, which would federally require 12 paid weeks.

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was passed in 2022 - requiring better accommodations for pregnant women.

Unions

Democrats push the Protecting the Right to Organize Act - aims to expand collective bargaining rights and strengthen penalties for labor violations.

Executive actions under Biden:
Repealed Trump-era EOs that weakened collective bargaining

    Raised the pay floor for federal workers to $15/hour

    Appointed pro-union guy to the labor relations board

Pay equity

Passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in 2009 and the Paycheck Fairness Act - both attempting more equality in pay.

Trying to equate the Republicans and Democrats on these issues is absolutely asinine, completely indefensible and based on sheer ignorance. People like you, too lazy to do the slightest research and subsisting on lazy assumptions and memes, are why a convicted pedophile is currently the president.

26

Democrats have consistently advocated for its increase. Including a proposal to raise it to $15/hour in the 2024 platform.

Yes, they advocate for many things that they will not do. Biden had a majority for two years, proposed it, a few Democrats voted against, and that's that. Did they try to at least raise it a little, say to nine an hour? No, why bother? It's always a few Democrats; Super PACs don't have to pay everybody. Just enough.

This seems to be mostly determined by states. Several have mandated times. Plus, the Democrats push FAMILY act, which would federally require 12 paid weeks. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was passed in 2022 - requiring better accommodations for pregnant women.

That's neat, but did you know that we are surpassed by the entire first world with worker benefits, and now even eastern Europe? That's pro-labor? No. No, it is not. If Poland increases their minimum wage another dollar, they will surpass the USAs "labor party" in results in every way.

Democrats push the Protecting the Right to Organize Act - aims to expand collective bargaining rights and strengthen penalties for labor violations. Executive actions under Biden: Repealed Trump-era EOs that weakened collective bargaining

Union membership has fallen down to 10%, from 40% in the 1970s. Union membership does not rise under D administrations, that's a fact.

Trying to equate the Republicans and Democrats on these issues is absolutely asinine

They are both pro-business and anti-labor, and anyone who disagrees (specifically you) should be under supervised care and hidden from the public. Japan, Australia, Canada, South Korea, United Kingdom, Western and Eastern Europe all prove that you are wrong. They have real labor parties, not the shallow mockery of one we have in the USA.

completely indefensible and based on sheer ignorance.

Only a dimwitted ignoramus would think that the Democrats are "pro-labor" when compared to the rest of civilization as we know it. You bring shame to yourself and your family

People like you, too lazy to do the slightest research and subsisting on lazy assumptions and memes, are why a convicted pedophile is currently the president.

People like you will always lick the boot, because you're fine with union membership and pay dropping every year, immune to the suffering of labor all around you in spite of mountains of evidence to the contrary, and eager to believe that things are different than they really are. They should take away your driver's license.

-9
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

The Democratic party is, but at the local and state levels, there absolutely are progressive, pro-labor Democrats. Whereas all Republicans right now are fascists (the few non-fascists left or were forced out).

12
Mulligrubsreply
lemmy.world

Yes, local and state is filled with decent progressive Democrats, also socialists, libertarians, green party, and more.

Federal? One pro-labor Democrat has been allowed to take office, yay.... and she agrees with me (that Democrats have abandoned labor).

Leadership "allows" them to exist, after all you can't just load them all into work camps. Yet.

1

Federal? One pro-labor Democrat has been allowed to take office

There's more than one in the House and Senate. But yes, can probably count them on two hands.

2
Vupwarereply
lemmy.zip

In this instance, they voted for paid sick leave. Yeah, these people should have the day they voted for.

89
lemmy.world

They also elected a legislature and governor that stabbed them in the back.

84
lemmy.world

So when Republicans in Missouri repealed a paid sick leave mandate that the state’s voters approved by 58% after an aggressive lobbying campaign by the Missouri chamber of commerce and industry and other business industry groups

33
discuss.tchncs.de

But the republicans are in power and have campaigned for years on a clear platform to support capitalists and not the working class.

53
krashmoreply
lemmy.world

I understood 2 of those phrases but the rest sounds like commie bullshit.

  • Republican voters
15
Optionalreply
lemmy.world

“Even on a day where Missourians sort of overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump, Josh Hawley and Governor Kehoe, they also overwhelmingly voted for an increase in paid sick days,” von Glahn said. “Any notion that there’s really a Republican party, that is a party of workers, Missouri shows just how much of a stranglehold corporate interests still have on the Republican establishment. I think that’s a cautionary tale for working-class people.”

13
lemmy.today

oh silly people, they think they can have thier slice of the pie when they vote for the gop that would do something like this. they cant have both, its either one or the other with republicans.

2
XeroxCoolreply
lemmy.world

Opinion poll numbers aren't the same as election votes

-49

Happened in Nebraska too. Voters passed legal weed but the GOP isn't going to follow through and is actually trying to outlaw the farm bill shit in the process.

There's no reason for them to actually legislate or govern since they'll still get voted in, all they need is the R and they're set. World's easiest job.

37

It wasn't an opinion poll, it was a referendum vote that should have had binding legal effect but the Republican lawmakers and judges in the state made up a few bullshit legal loopholes and just made it go away

21

Why are you commenting if you don’t have the 6 seconds to understand the discussion?

17
jballsreply
sh.itjust.works

In this dude's defense, no where does it mention him being a Republican or supporting Republican politicians. It does say:

Thompson helped gather signatures for the paid-sick-leave and minimum-wage-increase ballot initiative

So I don't think this is a leopards eating face scenario.

9

I don't think it necessarily needs the victim to have voted for them - it's more about the majority supporting the referendum and also the incompatible representatives. The LEPF party were elected and are doing what they do.

3
piefed.social

I was talking with my brother about how republican state congresses tend to overturn voter initiatives. I don't understand this cuck attitude that keeps so many people voting for them.

72
BakerBagelreply
midwest.social

Because the Democrats aren't running on those platforms, because they are also opposed to thise initiatives. The Democrats COULD run on a platform of guaranteed sick leave, mandatory holiday pay, rent control, and other wildly popular pro-worker policies, but they don't ecause they want to "appeal to moderates" or some other dumb bullshit. So you end up with a useless Democratic party in states like Ohio, Missouri, and Wisconsin who refuse to help people because they don't want Republicans to call them socialists. Then come election time they get caleld socialists anyway who support " illegals stealing jobs and giving abortions" or whatever and and shocked Pikachu when they keep losing elections. Until Democrats start openly campaigning on things that immediately benefit workers, they will continue to lose ground to the Republicans.

21
piefed.social

thats all fine but when the folks you vote for are reversing he specific thing you voted for. I mean its not hard to realize you need to not be putting these people in power. At the very least they could just not vote actively for the ones doing this. I don't see how the dems not good enough plays in. If Im dying of thirst and I have a choice of drinking from a sewage pipe or a stream. Im going to risk the stream.

13

The people have been so deeply brainrotted, that they will never vote for someone with a 'D' next to their name. Many of them would literally rather die.

14
lemmy.world

They’ve spent decades demonizing the left so thoroughly that any idea that they dislike and can associate with the left hey do so ad nauseam.

So any idea that would help those on the right just has to be called liberal and they’ll vote against it even if it hurts them too. It’s literally an unthinking knee-jerk hatred and reaction at this point. No thinking required.

12
piefed.social

Still. They vote for something and then their reps reverse it. I mean you would think something would seep through there.

10
thanks AVreply
lemmy.world

You're still assuming these people arent all literal cult members. We are in nazi germany fam, those people wouldn't vote for democrats even if they were thrown into the concentration camps. There's no amount of abuse they wont accept for the privilege of being a fascist.

9

Unfortunately I agree here. I, like many I think, have wondered how nazi germany came to be and I really did not mean the musing to be fulfilled as some sort of wish to experience it personally but here we are.

7

There’s no amount of abuse they wont accept for the privilege of being a fascist.

Spot on. Seeing some of the people who previously relished in Trump's evil, eventually have their lives ruined by it, will be one of the few truly enjoyable things for me in the coming years.

5

you would think

I live in Missouri. This is the first mistake you make when attempting to reason with these fucking idiots.

4

Oh dumbass Missourians.

Just like in 2018 when they voted against right to work and on the same ballot voted in a Republican majority and the Republican majority tried to implement right to work as the first item on the new session.

Never learn Missourians, never learn.

54
lemmy.world

NOTE: Not a literal gut punch.

Thank you for your attention to this grammar.

45
ttrpg.network

"Literal" has been used metaphorically for emphasis by better writers than you, centuries before you were born. Shut up.

-29
lemmy.world

We should change that. "Literal" is much quite useful for it's defined meaning, much less so as metaphorical emphasis. It can be mistaken as sarcasm if it's used incorrectly.

5

The dictionary changed it the other way a few years ago. Literally now means figuratively. There is no word for what literally used to mean, and that's apparently OK with them.

2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Read the article to see if someone was punched in the gut. Spoiler: nobody was.

Fuck Missouri.

40
ORbituaryreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

It's journalism. The least they can do is be grammatically accurate. It's half their job.

-8
teftreply
piefed.social

The least they can do be grammatically accurate.

The irony of this sentence is great.

22
teftreply
piefed.social

The irony is you fucking up your grammar while complaining about grammar fuck-ups. There is nothing for me to get over. I just thought it was funny.

25

I blame it on the editor. What, you don't have one? Neither does the paper, apparently.

The real answer is it's a quote. It may be an inaccurate quote, but it's still a quote. And people used to expect better from professionals, even professional lawmakers, like the ones in this story.

4
tane69reply
lemmy.world

He’s literally quoting the person in the article. Your weird little nitpicky beef is with the subject of the article not the author.

11
tane69reply
lemmy.world

It’s journalism to accurately quote. What you want is for the author to editorialize about grammar.

14

Though it would be hilarious if the author titled the article:

‘A literal (sic) gut punch’: Missouri workers devastated by Republican repeal of paid sick leave

3

Um, that's the metaphorical definition of "gut punch", not the literal one. The literal definition of "gut punch" is, well you know, when you take a punch to the gut. It's when an actual fist suddenly displaces your favorite abdominal organs. Houdini was killed by a literal gut punch (rip). As far as I know, metaphorical gut punches only killed Padme (rip). Two totally different definitions, and the whole point of the word "literally" is to convey the correct one.

We literally can't say that literally every phrase literally matching its dictionary definition (regardless if it's the literal or metaphorical definition) can be literally prepended by the word "literally", because that's literally every phrase in the dictionary, literally (literally).

3

Modern dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. They document how language is used, and if an error becomes common enough it will show up in the dictionary.

For example, a lot of people say "alot" instead of "a lot". If that happens enough, "alot" will be added to the dictionary.

Enough people now mistakenly say "literally" when they mean "figuratively" that that misuse is now documented in the dictionary.

1
lemmy.world

Sorry, but get fukt red Missourians. I hope they feel as much pain and anguish as possible, because it's the only way they learn, if it personally negatively affects them. And even then they sometimes still don't learn (see: COVID). I feel terrible for the democrat voters that get screwed anyway.

38
w3dd1ereply
lemmy.zip

Missouri has voted on numerous laws that have been repealed by state legislators. We voted an anti-gerrymandering law in but it was repealed a year later. We voted for abortion and they tried to take that back, we voted for better pay and sick leave, and they are taking that.

I don’t know how red Missouri actually is or if it’s just getting fucked by some bad representation. (Don’t get me wrong, Missouri voted in Josh Hawley and Roy Blunt, it’s not perfect)

30

I’m not saying they are Dems. Just that when they vote for leftist ideals, the state government overturns them. Will of the people is irrelevant in MO.

5
lemmy.world

Ironically they will still vote Republican. They will somehow blame Hillary for it.

27
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I've never understood this. Even from the viewpoint of an extremely selfish person; do you want someone with COVID, the flu, or a cold making your food, or even just interacting with you in a retail environment? And as for employers; how shortsighted are you that you don't realize that while one sick person coming in may be better for productivity than them staying home, that quickly becomes five sick people working much less efficiently instead of four healthy ones and one person out sick?

32
lemmy.world

Yeah but that's not an answer. It also makes no sense.

Get people to think through the fact that that does not help them.

4

Yeah but that's not an answer. It also makes no sense.

Sure it is. You want people to suffer. This policy does that.

4
reddthat.com

I used to work for someone who prided herself on never missing work. My first day back after catching bronchitis from her, she called me into her office to berate me for taking time off when she was there working with a 104 degree fever all week.

3

I don't know what's worse, those dipshits that never take the time, or the ones that come in sick because sick days are for impromptu golf days.

2

The thing that is crazy to me about all of this even when midterms come up people will still go out and support the GOP. There is no bottom floor to hit for them.

31
lemmy.ca

This is what happened in Ontario. Our premier took away mandatory paid sick days right away and guess what happened next? ...Ontario voted for him again 4 years later with a majority. And then they did it again earlier this year.

Never underestimate how stupid the voter base is.

25

It's because they do these things strategically. They passed these corporate centric laws that hurt voters in the years when there's no election. Then they spend the rest of the time pumping social issues that their conservative minded voters care about like abortion and immigration totally overshadowing the thing they did to screw over the voters. And the, now conservative controlled, media helps them to cover it all up.

7

They did. I think some of them regretted now. last time I went to a Walmart and workers openingly complained about Trump.

Trump is not on their side. Biden was

2

The irony is that in the passing of sick leave and the repeal of it Missourians still got what they voted for. No sympathy.

19
rekabisreply
lemmy.ca

If they voted Republican, they voted for exactly this.

There is just no other way to spin it.

3

I'm saying not everyone voted Republican.

You… have reading comprehension difficulties, no? Because I qualified exactly this. You’re repeating the same limitation, I just assigned blame where blame is due.

0

Missourian businesses basically want workhouses... say goodbye to modern ideas of a weekend.

18

Gonna be contentious with this one. Missouri wasn't technically the South. Iowa and Kansas certainly weren't either. Yet the bible belt all the way to Canada is full of states that drink the red kool-aid of the Republicans...

I'm not gonna argue "Fuck the South" but the attitude to that is that the South has infected the rest of the country.

2
lemmy.world

If something is voted in, how can 'lawmakers' just choose to ignore it ?

13
sh.itjust.works

On an article about Republicans it never fails someone both sides the bullshit and brings in Democrats

1

ah yes, the crowd that says its very sound to believe the pawl in the rachet.

1

Well then maybe the Democrats should stop following and supporting the Republican policy.

0

Have you not been paying attention for the last 8 years?

9
lemmy.dbzer0.com

It depends on the state. Many states have no means of direct voter legislation. Some do, but the result is a new law, which can be repealed by the legislature as easily as anything else. Some states treat citizen ballot initiatives as more powerful than basic laws (eg, as an amendment to the state constitution) which are generally way harder for politicians to roll back.

7

Missouri is one of those states that does have direct voter legislation. Able to even get things put in to the state constitution.

Trouble is our chucklefuck idiots will vote for very progressive things in state, but then go full stupid and keep voting for the R next to the name despite overturning our voting for direct legislation for the past decade.

11
lemmy.world

This is why progressives win when they’re not being undermined by corporate Democrats. Average people, including Republican voters, support this stuff by large majorities most of the time, even in the face of right wing propaganda.

I don’t think they deserve this because they vote Republican. I think they deserve paid sick leave and a higher wage. We should look inward and ask how we’re failing them if they’re voting traitor lunatic.

10
piefoodreply
feddit.online

It's because we let the Democrats get away with being awful. Their goal is to be barely less evil than Republicans. If they had to actually fight for votes, we'd start to see results.

1
buttnuggetreply
lemmy.world

I don’t really follow this reasoning. How would they earn votes? What would be different than now?

1

The Democrats generally don't try to earn votes. They generally only try to appeal to their rich donors. If people stopped voting Blue No Matter Who, and started voting for other parties, then the Democratic Party would either die off, or would have to start fighting to earn votes.

1

They'll forget about it when the petrolum they're dumping in the water hits the memory centers of their brains

9
Mulligrubsreply
lemmy.world

They're not the same, but both are anti-labor and pro-corporate. Neither provides any benefits for workers, Rs have always been awful and Ds have ignored labor for decades.

Poland has better worker benefits than the USA... we've been surpassed by Japan, Australia, Korea, Canada, most of Europe and now even eastern Europe. Sad.

-1
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

At the risk of repeating myself from another reply to a similar comment you made elsewhere in this thread:

The Democratic party, as a whole, is as you say. That said, there absolutely are progressive candidates at the state and local levels.

3

Of course! With state politics, even third parties have had some success (socialist, green, libertarian, et al).

The Fed leadership of the party will always tolerate low-level activists, we even have one congressperson who is pro-labor.

She agrees with me; Democrats abandoned labor long ago.

2
Mulligrubsreply
lemmy.world

"Both sides are anti-labor" is not "both sides are the same".

Some day it will sink in, and boy will you feel dumb

-1
Mulligrubsreply
lemmy.world

Me.... "cars and trucks are both vehicles"

You... "So they're the same."

Me... "No."


Me... "horses and tigers are both quadrupeds"

You... "So they're the same!!"

Me... "No."


Me... "both of our parties are beholden to Super PACs"

You... "So they must be the same!"

Me... "No."

-1

Me "cacti and junipers are both plants"

You "So they're the same!"

Me "No..."

0

Yeah, screw the people who can't afford to leave! Their neighbors are morons so they deserve to eat shit as well!

3