The bummer is that like most things sensory, our perception of how sweet it is depends massively on how sweet everything else we eat is. So for folks in the US who just grow up eating all of these over sweetened products it seems normal and less sweet products taste bland in a way most consumers can't easily identify.

As for how we got here, this is how it seems to me:

Food marketers learned that if you take two identical food products, and add a small amount of sugar to one, most consumers will prefer the sweeter one even if they don't identify it as "I like this one cuz it's a little sweeter". Our brains are just super primed to subconsciously reach for calorie dense foods, and sweetness says "there's energy here".

Think of a basic item like bread or tomato sauce - no sugar initially, they aren't sweets after all. Imagine some brands take that tactic and add a little sugar - the others who don't slowly lose market share until they either fade to irrelevance or add sugar too - well, now that's the new perceived normal. Later, to stand out, someone bumps it again. Consumers start preferring that new slightly sweeter product - rinse and repeat for a few decades across basically all of our food products (plus guzzling soda, another topic), and eventually you have a country full of outrageously sugary foods that taste "normal" to most folks.

It's sad and it's actually really challenging to reset one's palate. I've done it, for like 30+ days, ate only things that had zero added sweeteners of any kind, artificial or otherwise. It's expensive and time-consuming here but before long, even certain raw veggies like carrots start to taste unmistakably sweet. Corn on the cob becomes almost a dessert. And then, now habituated to a much more normal level of sweetness, processed foods taste like the poison they are. But to do that consistently here in the US and keep that normal degree of sensitivity, it requires a dogmatic level of dedication, never going out to eat at all, etc.

So like most things, the population here got manipulated in subtle ways into slowly changing their preferences, without any real coordination or intent by the manipulators beyond "doing a little bit of this bad thing outperforms our competition", and rinse and repeat until we're all deranged and don't even realize it.

What do you use for sauce?

It's very very simple: vegetables have carbs, you need vegetables (only way to get fibre, which is very important to gut health), thus the idea that carbs are bad is complete and utter lunacy. Even obligate carnivores will eat plant matter from time to time.

In general if someone tries to tell you a nutrient is objectively bad and can never be good or even acceptable, they're delusional and/or trying to sell you something.
Sugar is the nutrient that is closest to being Bad, but there's still nuance because it's only bad if you eat large amounts of it and don't burn the calories. People doing the Tour De France will literally suck on bags of sugar gel because they need pure energy that goes directly into their bloodstream.

you need vegetables to be healthy

My reading of the available literature doesn't reach the same conclusion. The Mongols, the Inuit, the Masai are examples of populations that were healthy without any carbohydrates.

I'll agree that vegetables can be part of a healthy lifestyle, but they are not necessary

Edit: Ah, downvoting everything I've posted concerning food in the last 15 days. A tirade of negativity doesn't really communicate the strength of your position.

:::spoiler negativity log https://lemvotes.org/user/[email protected] :::