Spyke

Trump preparing large-scale cancellation of federal funding for California, sources say

The Trump administration is preparing to cancel a large swath of federal funding for California, an effort that could begin as soon as Friday, according to multiple sources.

Agencies are being told to start identifying grants the administration can withhold from California. Sources said the administration is specifically considering a full termination of federal grant funding for the University of California and California State University systems.

Singling out one state for massive cuts would be an unusual move, but Donald Trump has long made Democratic-led California a target.

Trump preparing large-scale cancellation of federal funding for California, sources sayhttps://www.cnn.com/2025/06/06/politics/trump-california-federal-fundingOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
N0t_5urereply
lemmy.world

That would break the bank. California is 4th largest economy in the world, after the U.S., China, and Germany. It would probably cause Trump to declare martial law and send troops to California.

151
sh.itjust.works

You're assuming Trump wouldn't also fuck over troops stationed here in California. Remember military personnel are reliant on local infrastructure in a lot of areas and if Trump starts fucking with it again the military may be caught in the crossfire.

39
sh.itjust.works

I thought ya meant that because of how militarized the state was it'd be hard for the state to respond. I was just stating you could cut water and electricity as a response to that.

But yeah you are right on the fact the response would at best be a mess, honestly if they were told to occupy the state they'd probably just sit around getting heat stroke and doing nothing.

9

Why are people still convinced that the courts have any meaningful power anymore? The orangeboi regime has already flagrantly ignored a ton of court rulings; they’ll continue to ignore more court rulings. They don’t care. It’s not “who’s gonna let me”; it’s “who’s gonna stop me”. Orangeboi et al have inserted their own loyalist flunkies into the leadership of all the organizations that can effectively function as the enforcement of court decisions. There are no guardrails anymore. “Checks and balances” is and always was a gentlemen’s agreement, and it’s no longer being honored.

14

so there’s loads of bases

Staffed with federal employees. Fort Hunter isn't going to protect Californians from the Pentagon. It is the Pentagon.

Also, and this is a much bigger deal, Gavin Newsome is a cowardly little parasite. He's not going to side with Californians on this. He's going to grovel on his belly and lick Trump's shoes hoping he can convince The Donald to relent.

Most likely, this will just yet again be a defeat in court.

So long as DOGE runs the US Treasury, it hardly matters. If Trump starts cancelling payments and reversing transactions at a California scale, he'll drag the whole country into recession overnight. Courts can issue orders, but only the Treasury has the power to authorize payments.

11

That and the geography is an absolute mf for logistics. There's like three good roads that cross the Sierra Nevada.

6
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Yeah but how the fuck would he pay the troops without, you know, California's money?

I maintain the quickest way for military and LEOs to drop support for Trump is realizing they aren't gonna get paid or that their money has become essentially worthless. Either scenario will pit them against him. If they can't feed their families they will turn, considering it's an all volunteer military. He would have to instate a harsh draft first to avoid that.

41
N0t_5urereply
lemmy.world

realizing they aren't gonna get paid or that their money has become essentially worthless.

If California's taxes suddenly evaporated, it would create a massive budget deficit that would have to be plugged by printing money, would debase the currency and likely cause hyperinflation.

22
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Which would render the US dollar essentially worthless, resulting in soldiers and LEOs essentially being "unpaid" and no longer willing to support Trump.

16
N0t_5urereply
lemmy.world

Maybe, maybe not. What you have to consider is that when you are in the military, the federal government owns you like livestock. They feed you, house you, and can send you to your death. You don't necessarily need money, especially in the short term. Moreover, there are rules that prevent active duty military from being ejected from housing. You might not be happy about dollar devaluation, but the blame will be focused on the "bad" people of California and you're there to make it right. It would take a lot for the U.S. military machine to grind to a halt, and a lot of damage can be done while it is happening.

Another common idea is that the good folks in the military aren't going to shoot civilians, and would rebel if ordered to. While there might be some isolated rebellion, most people in the military are conditioned to follow orders, and will do so, even if such orders are illegal. People will do what they have to to keep the pressure off themselves.

10

I assure you, you can be both active duty and broke shitless. Its heavily subsidized food, lodging, and bare necessities; and the current government is trying to slash even those benefits. There's also only so long you can keep people happy without disposable income.

11

You don’t necessarily need money, especially in the short term.

If you have kids, you do. Plenty of people in the military with spouses and children.

8

the trick is to have them shoot their kids especially if they live in california with them then they wont feel bad for not getting paid to shoot their kids

6

Ya'll gotta understand that california doesn't just hand over big bags of money once a year, the mechanisms of payment are numerous and vastly complex, often overseen directly by the IRS in concert with interstate banking groups which california has no authority over. Add to that, the federal budget is a budget. The feds already have payroll secured for the forseeable future, certainly long enough to roll in and arrest Newsom (et. al.) for sedition. The conservative hate machine has, as well, been painting "Commiefornia" as the enemy for years. Troops have been fantasizing about rolling tanks down sunset boulevard and pacifying those uppity libs for decades now, it's not like that sentiment can't or won't be exploited by the trump admin.

There's just no feasible scenario in which this would end well for california.

4
veroxiireply
aussie.zone

If you subtract California from the USA is it still #1?

10

Yes. The U.S. GDP is around $30 trillion. China is around $19 trillion. California is around $4 trillion.

13

Sign me up for Cali's defense. Better to fight Trump and his kind, than to live with them for the rest of my life.

7
lemmy.world

Remember, the state doesn’t pay taxes, individual citizens do by filling out their annual federal income taxes.

So, if “California” were to stop giving money to the federal government, the governor would basically need to convince individual citizens not to file their 1040.

And all of those people would have to clinch their assholes and hope Trump didn’t sick the IRS on them.

43
midwest.social

If Californians (Or everyone) just filed for extensions en masse, that alone would fuck shit up and would be totally legal.

23
kautaureply
lemmy.world

A little, but not that much. The federal government already has most of the money because of tax withholding from employers. When you file taxes as an employee you're just balancing what's leftover and playing "did I over or under pay even though you already know that." It would require the state preventing employers from withholding or sending money to the IRS on behalf of their employees, and I doubt companies would just unilaterally stop doing that.

6
errerreply
lemmy.world

In fact it might help the federal government cause people tend to be owed more refunds than unpaid tax.

3

Yeah that was my thinking as well, the idea that people stop filing their taxes doesn't do much when the system to get the money from your paycheck to the government mostly doesn't involve you

1
lemmy.world

If Californians (Or everyone) just filed for extensions en masse

Most people don't owe the IRS money. They're owed a rebate. How would filing for an extension benefit someone who is expecting a $2000 check back from the IRS for excess paid?

5
Zaktorreply
sopuli.xyz

If you're planning to do any sort of tax strike, step one is zeroing your withholdings.

6

Based on my research, this is what I'm seeing as well, an important first step.

If it really starts affecting the economy, expect the ability to set your withholdings to vanish.

4

Presumably California would declare that they wouldn't comply with IRS investigations but those people would be vulnerable if they travel or have assets outside California

16

California imposes a new law that companies operating in Cali cannot automatically collect federal income tax from Californian citizens.

Cali raises the state tax rate to match the current federal rate (could probably go lower actually, since Cali is subsidizing most of the red states).

Boom, no more taxes paid to the Fed.

Or... Cali's creates a law where their own tax department collects the federal tax and pays it for their citizens.

7

But then each of those people get walloped with a big ass 1040 payment from the feds at the end of the year. And they feds can chose to make an “example” of random people who don’t pay up.

2

Also employers would need to all simultaneously stop withholding taxes from employee paychecks for federal taxes, since you can't just update your W-2 to a $0 withholding without claiming dependents, multiple other jobs, etc. You don't "choose" your withholding, you just check the boxes that calculates the minimum withholding.

5

For private businesses sure, but Newsom can simply set up an escrow account and direct all state government entities to send their federal withholding to the new account instead.

4
Skyrmirreply
lemmy.world

That's the problem California doesn't send taxes to the Federal government. People and businesses pay directly to the government. There's no mechanism to even stop it on a state level if a governor wanted to.

22
Skyrmirreply
lemmy.world

They don't do that now. The IRS contacts the bank, that's licensed as a bank by the federal government, and tells them to close your account. Usually the first step is to freeze your assets, then they start taking things. The banks aren't going to argue, they're not going to give up their entire business just to protect you, or a single state. Even if it is California.

4
auraithxreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

That is an oversimplification. While the IRS can issue levies to federally regulated banks, it usually requires a formal legal process such as a tax lien or a court order. Banks do not comply automatically without proper documentation. State laws can influence how quickly or effectively the IRS operates, especially if the state limits data sharing, delays cooperation, or questions jurisdiction. Not all banks are federally chartered. Some are licensed at the state level and may face different legal pressures. California cannot stop the IRS entirely, but it can slow down enforcement, create legal friction, and raise the political stakes.

3
limerreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

How could California do that when taxes are paid directly by the taxee to the IRS?

14
sh.itjust.works

Start cutting power, water, and gas to federal offices and facilities, let's see if they can do jack shit when it's 90 degrees outside and 110 inside. Mind you that is just me thinking reconciliation is stupid and shouldn't be considered as a possibility.

5
lemmy.world

West coast has enough intelligence and money to navigate without the federal govt.

1
someguy3reply
lemmy.world

That's not the point. By cutting off water electricity etc you are helping Trump dismantle the federal government. You know that Trump guy that said "we want federal employees to hate going into work" well congratulations you just helped him big time.

1
lemmy.world

Those very workers might be happy working for the state should CA make that offer to workers helping manage dams etc, particularly if compensation is the same or better. Organizationally, there would be some disarray, but...

It'd be interesting to directly head-hunt the federal offices until they were empty, even if it were just temporary.

2

Sigh. Federal and state cover different things. If you think you can dismantle the fed and everyone can just go to the state and everything will be the same, then you really are no different than the Trumpers that want to burn everything down. I'm out of this conversation.

1

Change your withholding, then only pay state tax.

3
Dozzi92reply
lemmy.world

I was wondering about this. The new BBB or whatever increases SALT to 40k. I live in Jersey. I would have no problem with NJ just taxing me 40k outright. You just pay 40k to live in NJ. And then I just deduct that 40k from my federal tax burden, bringing it down below 0. What's stopping states from doing this?

6
Skyrmirreply
lemmy.world

The irs wouldn't recognize the deduction and you would still owe the entire amount to the federal government.

6
Dozzi92reply
lemmy.world

I'm curious why you say this, and I'm not trying to be argumentative. I pay 11k for property taxes, and so with this I get to deduct that 11k from my federal taxes. And if you mean to say that the IRS and the Feds would be like hey, you can't do that, yeah, you're probably right, and I agree. I'm just curious if you had some other rationale for the suggestion. I am no tax expert.

3
Skyrmirreply
lemmy.world

It would be considered tax evasion. Deductions not authorized by federal statute, have no affect on federal tax laws. Start following your own rules, and they will come knocking on your door. Of course with staffing cuts, it could be years from now when they show up.

0
Dozzi92reply
lemmy.world

Yeah, I guess I'm still a little confused. You're allowed to deduct State and Local taxes on your federal return. Now it's 10k, the BBB raises it to 40k. I'm just saying states should levy a tax to maximize the SALT deduction for everyone, because you're allowed to do it. But it's not going to happen, just me being silly.

2

I was misunderstanding a bit myself. I was thinking you meant by yourself. As a state, California could possibly increase property taxes to maximize everyone's salt deduction. As more of a long term solution it might even be an idea depending on California constitutional law. More likely though, they would just have to fight the illegal impoundment in the court. While it would likely take months to get done, changing tax law the the affects of that would take years.

2
lemmy.world

If the federal government isn't going to give California back the federal taxes paid by its citizens then it should stop paying federal taxes.

158
lemm.ee

I'm going to be fucking shook if Gavin actually does it. So far, the only people I've seen him meaningfully stand up to are bay area NIMBYs and homeless people.

40

I don't see how he could since individuals pay income tax directly to the federal government during tax season. It would take all of them working in unison to do it. Unless there's some other tax payment directly from CA state that I don't know about.

4
Ledericasreply
lemm.ee

millbrae made a fuss like a year-2 ago about some housing/location being built for the poor. guess who the nimbys are, all rich white people(i saw the video of them whining). Poc dont make a fuss with others around, i ever only seen caucasian people do it. remember the white flight in the bay, now its regentrifying. we did a whole talk/project about gentrification in the area in one of my courses.

0

Yeah. I'm out here fighting the NIMBYs in my city, they're almost all older white dudes, not even that wealthy by California standards. It was super cool to see Newsom twist their arm like that, way less cool to see him bulldoze the homeless afterward.

2
Tilgarereply
lemmy.world

I have NO clue what the legal ramifications are here. If it's not, that would seem like a next step.

7
acchariyareply
lemmy.world

The state of California could implement say, an 80% state income tax. This would be deductable from federal tax per IRS tax code. The state could then create an instant tax credit to credit back a gross 69% income, leaving 11% to the state to match their current tax rate.

The Feds would only get tax on 20% of wages, unlike the 89% they do now

26

Then you get something like the current SALT cap that cancels that out

4
lemmy.world

It would only delay things. When you get a state tax refund, the next year it's counted as federal wages.

3
lemmy.world

Taxes are collected through the private for-profit banking system in a manner that's completely disjointed from the state of residency. Payroll taxes are incredibly efficient, with north of a 98% collections rate, for this reason. The private banks need the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve needs the US Treasury. So when the US Treasury says it's taking a vig on your employer's deposit at Bank of America or Citigroup or even your local Credit Union, compliance is instant and unquestioning.

Going Unbanked is one way to get around this. But without an employer who is operating on the same wavelength and willing to play ball, unbanking yourself is difficult and expensive and fraught with criminal liabilities.

So, the short answer is that there's no (practical) way for a State Government to intervene on Federal income tax collection. Not when all the transactions are taking place in a server farm hosted in a NYC boiler room, anyway.

9
lemmy.zip

Individuals don’t typically pay taxes themselves. They get deducted from paychecks. Employers do this before we even get paid. So companies would need to support this. But then you have some like my employer who has hundreds of people in California but is based in another state. How is that going to work? This just isn’t as easy as residents just deciding not to.

4

Okay. I didnt know this. I've never actually paid taxes myself.

But it's also possible other states get on board, and i know domestic industries like cannabis that dont do business with the maij body of the empire play it pretty fast abd loose with taxes.

1
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

First pretty dumb to say this publicly if true... But second: you do realize that the rules about paying taxes literally, only apply to people like you and I? They 100% will continue to go after low hanging fruit, and that means people who can't afford a team of attorneys on retainer.

11
ayyyreply
sh.itjust.works

You will lose against the IRS. The only way this works is if everyone acts together. You cannot beat Uncle Sam alone.

4
Xaphanosreply
lemmy.world

Add NY, MA, AND NJ and you have a block that is on quite solid ground.

22

I doubt it's him who thinks he does. Remember, Putin is calling the shots, and his goal is to destabilize and destroy the US.

12
lemmy.world

if state funding is being canceled, that state should leave the union. why be apart of the united states government if trump is dismantling and destroying the united states government.

59
lemmy.world

The American thing to do is fight for America.

The people who want California to just leave are the ones who want to dismantle the country.

25
ayyyreply
sh.itjust.works

I’m Californian. The federal government, for my entire life, has just taken and taken and taken from me. I have received nothing in return. I don’t need your shitty union of thugs and mouth breathers, and I don’t need your bullshit military colonizing waste of time and money.

35
lemmy.world

Well you probably don't realize the things the federal government does give cali. Interstate highways are one. Coast guard. Bridges. And clearly funding to the universities. Now the balance is lopsided, in that cali gives more back. But that doesn't mean cali would have given you those same things.
That said... determining if CA would be better with our without the feds is a complicated question. For one, they would probably need to fund thier own military, as they would be a ripe target given thier economic prosperity.

2
ayyyreply
sh.itjust.works

We pay more into those federal programs than they spend back on us. If we just kept the taxes locally, while maintaining funding for all those programs, we would come out ahead by a factor of nearly 2:1.

As for military spending, there is a lot of savings to be had by not fighting endless bullshit Christian jihads.

22
lemmy.world

So you missed my point. Many of those things that the feds pay for just wouldn't happen if the state was paying. Politics is tricky like that.

-5
sh.itjust.works

It's not a matter of the state taking over things, the federal government is (hypothetically) stopping those funds regardless of what they do, so why wouldn't they fund it themselves because all those things you mentioned still need to happen.

5

The more local the governing body, the more they have to pacify the not in my backyard people. The federal government can generally ignore those people and just make things that need to happen, happen.

2

Correct. But what you may have implied and got wrong is that this is somehow a bad idea. America is long overdue for a federal collapse. This cultural infighting is unsustainable.

As a new Yorker I am sick of having my tax dollars go to subsidize hicks in the deep south and Midwest that ultimately vote against my rights. I am more than happy to see the bridges that unite us burn because the concept of "unity" in a melting pot is a ticking time bomb, as it always has been.

28
lemmy.ca

The people who want California to just leave are the ones who want to dismantle the country.

This Canadian is fine with it at this point. Fuck the USA. We've been your friend forever and you shit on us.

Burn baby burn.

15
Warl0k3reply
lemmy.world

I wouldn't really want to be sharing the largest land border in the world with the size of tempest brewing up in the US right now, should it ever boil over. Seems like that might be a bit of a nightmare to keep contained.

8
lemmy.ca

I don't want what's best for America. I want what's best for California. It's in a bad relationship and is always the provider and the victim.

Without liberty and justice for all, there can BE no one nation indivisible.

8

Dude, this all blue states. We always help the poorly uneducated.. and always get fucked on. Those leaders don’t even say thank you, or even wear a suit.

6
lemmy.world

I think it maybe time to change the dynamic of the USA. Maybe instead of 2 levels, maybe three. Federal, regional, and state. Where the federal hands over some powers to the regional government. I am not sure how that could happen, but it might be a good direction.

7

I personally think that there should be three presidents, each overseeing a major chunk of America - West, Center, and East. This would help divide up the power of the executive branch, as the Judicial and Congressional branches would remain a global aspect of the nation. Unitary executive theory would be dead, since there can be no unitary, IMO.

Plus, we can have three separate elections - someone who ran to be elected in Centre America can't run for the other two regions. This would allow us to have a lot more candidates, all of them quite focused on what they offer the region they decided to run for. Right now, a president has to appeal to ALL of America, which means not many people will actually be happy.

7
lemmy.world

So Americans need to switch it off and on again. Gather up new founding fathers and mothers, write up a new constitution and declaration of independence - write up documents for a new federation between states...

Create a back up United States. Declare the old one null and void. Stop interacting with the old one. Start interacting with the new one.

Call all this something benign sounding. Try not to go to war about it. But yeah, you all need to switch this shit off and on again.

55
Absarokareply
lemmy.world

I agree. Time for a good old constitutional convention.

19

I can't wait to be the United Coca-Cola States of Unilever America.

20

Except that's exactly what the Heritage Foundation has been wanting for decades so they can turn the US into an official Christofascist nation.

12
lemmy.ca

Yup, by excluding the south east (Texas to Florida) they could easily reboot it in a much more progressive manner.

12

Woah woah woah. Texas seceded from Mexico to preserve slavery until they joined the US so they could secede to preserve slavery. And a cuba libre is delicious, not nearly as watered down (underwater) as Florida is.

4

How about California cancelling paying federal taxes in turn? This would probably lead to a big loss for the federal budget, wouldn't it?

38
lemm.ee

If the Federal Government boycotts California, then California should close every Federal agency, prohibit all Federal employees from working, and confiscate all Federal property, then make it illegal to pay Federal income taxes in California. Instead, Federal income taxes will be collected by the state, and used to provide free health care and college for all California citizens.

They should also form a state pact with Oregon and Washington, then form an alliance with Canada and Mexico. That would surround about 3/4 of the USA

That would allow them to cut off MAGA access to the west coast ports, and charge exorbitant taxes and fees to get shipments from Asia, or be forced to ship them through the Panama Canal to the East Coast.

37
slingstonereply
lemmy.world

The war that would result would be like nothing any of us have ever experienced, except for our veterans, perhaps, though they would never have had to fight their own people before. The only people who would truly know ahead of time what to expect would be those who came to this country from war-torn regions that had experienced civil war.

California is powerful economically, but do they have the military might to withstand the hell that the US Army can unleash? If other states join them, it'll be utter chaos, and who knows how it ends, but that might turn the tide for the rebels as the military would likely fracture as many might follow their states to the exit.

Aside from utter dissolution of the Union, the only way I can see California standing up to the USA would be to have a nuclear deterrent available immediately upon independence, which would likely mean seizing as many federal nuclear weapons as they could. Whether the California National Guard would be up to that is beyond my ken.

God help us all if Trump continues on this path.

16

Considering that many members of the military have been based in California for a long time, it has become their home. They have met their lovers, raised families, known comrades, and steeped in the culture of California. I think it is a fair bet that a large chunk of the military in California would be loyal to the territory. Washington is a far off place, filled with cretinous and bonespur-ridden leaders who badmouthed the service of those who were willing to bleed.

Here's hoping this assertion holds true. If not, the nation is well and truly lost to evil.

7
Cocopandareply
lemmy.world

Funny thing Is that Trump would nuke California. He’s speed running the Civil War movie that came out.

3
slingstonereply
lemmy.world

And get nuked in return, assuming weapons could be seized by California and employed. But you're right: I could see that egomaniac fucking us all over further by starting a nuclear conflict.

God, I want my family out of this country, but there's nowhere to go.

2

Before my dad went down the Qanon hole. He told me America was the last place on earth for true freedom. And we ran away from a genocide because our overlords turned on us.

2
lemmy.world

He's still mad that Schwarzenegger took over The Celebrity Apprentice

34

Holy shit. This would be so on brand for Trump that it's probably the main reason.

12
szmer.info

Is California secession still a thing?

30
PattyMcBreply
lemmy.world

I'm pretty sure Texas is the only "legal" state allowed to secede, but I'm not a lawyer and my info may be woefully out of date

-13
Xaphanosreply
lemmy.world

And there is an emoluments clause. And dozens of others already violated.

12
entwine413reply
lemm.ee

That's irrelevant to whether or not a state has an established legal right to do a thing.

8

When it gets to the level of a component piece of a country leaving said country, it doesn't really matter what the law is. The South isn't part of the US because it was decided that secession was illegal, they're there because they got their ass beaten.

1
blitzenreply
lemmy.ca

The colonies weren’t “allowed” to leave England either, yet here we are.

Would it cause a civil war? Yea. Would California win? Of course not.

9

I'm not convinced it would lead to civil war. It could, but it still takes a lot of manufacturing consent for us to go to war with random brown countries. It'd be no easy task to convince the US population and military we needed to start dropping bombs on Hollywood. Soldiers would desert and other states would think about joining.

1
Towerreply
lemmy.zip

No, Texas (nor any other state) can not secede from the Union.

https://www.sll.texas.gov/faqs/can-texas-secede

Can Texas secede? I heard it is one of the only states that can secede from the United States.

It is a common misunderstanding that Texas has the right to leave the United States. The Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) addresses this on their page about Texas’s annexation:

It is said of Texas (and, occasionally, Vermont) that it received a letter or document of permission to withdraw from the Federal Union if it so chose. […] In fact, Texas received no special terms in its admission to the Union. Once Texas had agreed to join the Union, she never had the legal option of leaving, either before or after the Civil War.

13

The US would never allow that much freedom. It has to ensure everyone is locked down.

1
lemm.ee

The University of California is the largest employer in the state.

In most other states, Walmart is the biggest employer.

Talk about giving higher education the middle finger!

28

Is it because they are a hospital network like the University of Pittsburgh? (UPMC is the largest in PA)

1
lemm.ee

And spend 30 years building high speed rail through it, just to flex.

7

anti-science funding. the threat to fascists states are usually intellectual and science so they are often the first to be persecuted before minorities are. most of the people in the industries are smart enough to leave the country before sht hits the fan.

25
lemmy.world

The ICE raids are meant to cause the response we are seeing, and eventually an even more powerful response. The White House has already been throwing around the word insurrection, which implies the insurrection act. If the natural escalation that they expect takes place, it could create the conditions where the insurrection act can be invoked. Since the Federal level is under control of the Trump Administration, that leaves the National Guard, state police, county sheriffs, and local police departments. The only one of these capable of standing up to the Feds would be the National Guard. If things turn ugly over the next few weeks during continued raids in places like L.A., it could force the Governor to deploy the national guard given the numbers of people involved. Some of these communities are well armed and they are already fighting back. If the goal is to cause the conditions to invoke the insurrection act, it would take away the ablity of the California Governor to direct his national guard. They can be forced to follow the orders of the President, which is one of the reasons for using the Insurrection Act in the first place.

In a place like L.A., this leaves just the LAPD and Sherrifs department and they do not have the power to stop both the Feds and a national guard under White House control. L.A. seems to be heavily targeted by the Trump administration in many different ways. They are looking at bribery and corruption in many areas like LA Homeless Agency. The ICE raids targeted the Fashion District are meant as an economic attack, as many of those people worked in shops and factories. Other ICE raids targeted companies involved in agriculture. The Trump admin is also looking at other Federal funding to take away from California.

All of this combined could mean that the state Government, state and local police cannot protect these communities from what is being sent after them, partially as an overall form of economic warfare against California generally. You have the wildfire funds, the tariffs attacking the shipping areas of coastal California, and it's obvious that it is a well planned operation. Behind this too is a hostile DOJ and FBI, not to mention DHS, ICE, and everyone else. They are being hunted.

The State Government can't protect anyone either, they have been totally outmanuvered at every stage, because they are just coasting until 2026. The one advantage people have is their numbers. Peaceful protest is the way forward, it just takes a lot more people knowing about the raids and being present to protest them. If the Trump admin wants a Kent state or Tiananmen Square type situation on their hands, that will be on them...

23
Almaccareply
aussie.zone

"The takeover will be bloodless if the left allows it to be."

There's your choice, America.

19

Everyone should find that statement absolutely chilling. They are prepared to kill anyone that tries to prevent them from getting their way. Those are the stakes. The courts won't help you

1
lemmy.world

National Guard was already deployed by Trump to Los Angeles today.

1

Looks like a class action lawsuit involving the people of California and the Feds.

21
lemmy.world

california doesnt even need federal funding. california funds everyone else.

21

Raging war on the greatest state within the country that he rules. What a fucking sack of shit.

16
lemmy.world

I've seriously considered not having any income taxes withheld, because with the IRS cut to the bone, they'd be hard pressed to collect

4

Y'all are in for a rude awakening. The IRS will absolutely still collect, and they will continue to target low-hanging fruit because it is cheaper. That means people (presumably) like you and I who can't afford a bevvy of lawyers

6

We all get to fight AI tax prep now haha. All they have to do is send notices, it's up to you to provide the man-hours.

2
lemmy.world

Cali should stop paying taxes.

I'm not paying taxes to a fascist government. A State can figure out how to do it too.

15
jmsyreply
lemmy.world

Easier said than done. Payroll systems do this automatically

1

So hire an A-Team of Payroll experts to figure it out. Use the money that would have gone to GovCo to pay their fee.

It's not that it can't be done. It's whether or not they want to do it.

1

A Trump TACO tastes like diarrhea. It is like a Taco Bell, but the artificial meat product can't spark joy.

1
lemm.ee

The federal government has irrevocably been compromised, US states need to be able to leave it. Preferably like the UK left the EU, without a civil war. It's only going to get worse, and reform is no longer possible, as too many branches have been compromised and midterms are likely to be compromised by Agent Kraskov and friends. As much as the Trump-Musk sideshow feud keeps going, it's not doing much and is not likely to do much to stop Trump.

13
Cocopandareply
lemmy.world

This is a test of the Union that formed after the Civil War. We should have scrubbed the Electoral College then and we should have forced the redistribution of land to the slaves. With federal forces providing local police protection. So the palm colored people couldn't hurt them.

10
lemm.ee

Unfortunately, Lincoln was murdered soon after the South surrendered, and Andrew Johnson, a drunken Confederate sympathizer took over as president, and led the post-war Reconstruction.

10
lemm.ee

This is no longer a test, it is a reality. Too many branches of the federal government are corrupt, with legal exceptions to back them up. If a bridge is no longer just in need of severe maintenance but is in the process of crumbling, do you still call it and use it as a bridge? That's the actual state of your Union right now. I don't think seceding is realistically an option right now because it requires opposition that just isn't there, but I don't see any other realistic alternative. Look at LA, that's falling directly into Trump's hands by giving him emergency powers and control of the national guard, the only difference if a state attempts to secede is that it has more of a chance to use its institutions to resist. The excuse under a dictatorship is always doomed to be manufactured if not forced.

1

They are acting like people are going to attack the headquarters. Like this is Libya. But guess what? If anyone shoots. It will be the feds starting it off.

1
lemmy.world

Wow, so I thought I was fucked when I had "California secedes" on my bingo card

12

better to just balkanize the blue states, and let the red states without welfare for a change.

9
lemmy.world

If you build the dome in silicone valley, John Galt will appear beneath it and bless the Mars sperm ark.

7
lemmy.world

Aren't there a fuckload of Republicans in wine country?

I doubt they'll be happy about that

7
blitzenreply
lemmy.ca

There’s repugnicans everywhere in California. There’s just more Democrats.

I wouldn’t say there are more Republicans in wine country than any other agricultural region in the state. Probably slightly fewer.

9

Krasnov and his Kremlin bosses always wanted to turn California into another fucking red run oblast shithole like Arkansas.

7
lemmy.ca

Then California should cancel sending money to the federal government.

California should secede

3

Yep. California pays more than it gets back, so this is a win for California.

1
lemmy.today

I hope this convinces Californians to sign the CalExit petition, so that California can start researching the option to secede. The way things are looking, the dissolution of the union seems likely. It would be better if California and the other blue states got prepared for that.

CalExit

-6
lemmy.today

Considering that Trump has killed all sorts of diplomatic relationships, I think it would be better for California and the other blue states to form their own arrangements with other powers, alongside internal ones.

Trump killed NOAA. The weather service that helped all of the states to prepare their crops and disaster management, is now torn to pieces. Our schools are being barred from having students from abroad, which weakens America's abilities to have the best and brightest to join our nation. Tariffs are destroying our supply chains. The courts have become delegitimized, used to entrap people who dared to believe in the justice of law. The wall of flesh in Panama is failing.

...I had plenty of think, thank you very much.

Our enemies have burrowed inside our flesh. If we don't remove them, we are truly screwed.

6
lemmy.ml

To be fair I did say Trump was Americas brexit. So I take it back, you’re right. This is scary times for the USA, and the rest of the world will suffer too.

3
lemmy.today

Honestly, it is a situation that has no clear answer. It is very frustrating!

2

It has no near term answer. Will there be free elections? Will the constitution be restored? Will law and order mean something again? Will sanity be restored?

If there’s any hope left for my fellow Americans, it’s just another year and a half before the nazis and sycophants get voted out. Then two years of non-functioning infighting …. I can dream that sanity happens. Eventually everyone of these thugs acting above the law should be brought to justice. Every one of those cops and ice agents: you know what constitutional rights are, including habeas corpus; you are responsible for obeying illegal orders

2
Sektorreply
lemmy.world

Have a think how brake up of Yugoslavia went for Slovenia (the richest YU republic).

1

That’s ok, we can broker trade deals with Appalachistan for cheap third world labor. They get the hellhole they seem to want and we have a nearby banana republic to exploit. Win-win

2
lemmy.ml

Thanks. Just wasn’t sure.

It makes me laugh that the same Brexit morons are against that.

1
faxedreply
lemmy.ca

Indyref was broadly supported by the left but brexit was a right wing project. And indyref was pro-EU, which was reflected a few years later when the same voters who wanted to leave UK voted remain in EU.

The concept of leaving a union of nations has no inherent other political implications.

3

For me it all comes down to whether the Scots can get themselves in to the EU or not. Casting yourself adrift, Brexit style, is foolish.

1
ayyyreply
sh.itjust.works

How are the situations similar? Because of the name?

-1
lemmy.ml

Leaving your nearest trading partner doesn’t seem like a good thing.

3

Despite it. Our governor actually shows up to trade negotiations and sticks to the agreed terms.

7

With the current Trump tariffs the existing US trade deal is a dysfunction at best.

4
lemmy.world

Since Confederate States of America have gained a negative connotation and to avoid confusion, you could proclaim Libertarian States of America, I know most people here are not libertarian, but still fucking closer to that than typical trumpists, and they are going to steal the word otherwise. Said as a libertarian and a citizen of Russia, which means I'll enjoy watching the events from afar quite a lot, might even remember to make popcorn.

-16
Soulgreply
ani.social

Since Confederate States of America have gained a negative connotation

No they did that to themselves by caring only about preserving slavery

3