He didn't really compile his own OS, he used build tools to make slop-binaries.
It only counts if the user manually types the binary files using only a Morse code key because we all know that using software to make your job easier only produces slop and the only REAL way to do anything is completely manually.
Earlier i made a bad 5 minute ms paint draving:
has an 85+% while the original had about 66% (before it was taken down because it broke a no ai rule)
So at least in that metric doing some low effort painting, even while pointing out its copied content, has way better metrics
so yea: dont do it with ai slop
op is probably also loosing some time on us commenters disliking the slop that could have been invested into a scetch on paper
You're licking the boots of a company that uses the work of others without compensation or credit then sells it back to you at a premium. This is the exact behavior the GPL license aimed to prevent. I have nothing against the technology if it's made with permission and benefits the people it depends on, but that's clearly not the case here.
Ludites are an apt comparison. The Luddites fought to protect their industry from industrialists who aimed to replace them with cheap, low skilled and child labour. The goal of AI isn't advancement it's replacement, and most of the companies pushing it are transparent about that.
Yeah, it's getting worse and worse with Microsoft. I hope they will release some sort of Windows "light" soon for people who only want performance and no bells and whistles
Cool, now do it without AI slop
He didn’t have the time to draw, he was compiling his own OS before breakfast.
He didn't really compile his own OS, he used build tools to make slop-binaries.
It only counts if the user manually types the binary files using only a Morse code key because we all know that using software to make your job easier only produces slop and the only REAL way to do anything is completely manually.
how do you know this was ai? i need to stay sharp on these things
This is the n-th cartoon of this bland style.
This same style is popping up everywhere.
Look for style consistency, including lettering, colors, line thicknesses, character features (e.g. number of fingers, shapes of facial features)
There's no attribution as well. No artist does that.
Unless it's stolen, but again, the art style is very current AIesque.
I dont use attribution normally but at some level of quality there should be one.
But its definetly a very good indicator to take a closer look when there is no attribution or it "looks woird"
Yeah same here, no idea how to tell this is AI made...
IDK if it's AI or not, but it does look it.
There's just a certain smoothness to the art you usually don't find in human art. The crop is weird, the keys don't make sense...
It might be human, I don't know for sure, but it looks very AI.
Good call on the keys
keyboard
also just vibes
AI doesn't know that text in the bubbles doesn't need s period at the end
keyboard for me
If it looks like a sepia pip-boy cartoon, it's most likely AI. For some reason that's the default cartoon style it generates.
Earlier i made a bad 5 minute ms paint draving:
has an 85+% while the original had about 66% (before it was taken down because it broke a no ai rule)
So at least in that metric doing some low effort painting, even while pointing out its copied content, has way better metrics
so yea: dont do it with ai slop
op is probably also loosing some time on us commenters disliking the slop that could have been invested into a scetch on paper
You could have used anything, but AI was your first choice?
Oh no.... I can't tell. Ah shit, ah fuck. It's happening.
The colours are toned out and bubbles are in incorrect spots, the laptops also look awkward in my opinion
Bubbles are in incorrect spot?
neither of these people seems to be using Linux, so why is this a Linux meme?
I'm allowing Linux-adjacent OSes. BSD is a niche part of a niche community, and they wouldn't have much of a community otherwise.
This is also spelled out in the rules, which you obviously didn't read through.
alright, point taken :)
I'm guilty of this a few days ago, but there's no FOSS memes community on Lemmy and I don't know if there's enough interest to make one.
Linux looking at other Unixes who are pretending it's not there and saying "Look at me brother"
There's no Linux in this picture.
@daggermoon @cm0002 because linux users are still compiling their os...
You can't larp about using opensource software while creating memes using closed source garbage.
Wow, the anti-AI zealots can tell exactly what diffusion models the OP was using.
Truly an inspirational group of neo-luddites.
you know the luddites were only standing up for their rights, they didn't hate technology
You're licking the boots of a company that uses the work of others without compensation or credit then sells it back to you at a premium. This is the exact behavior the GPL license aimed to prevent. I have nothing against the technology if it's made with permission and benefits the people it depends on, but that's clearly not the case here.
Ludites are an apt comparison. The Luddites fought to protect their industry from industrialists who aimed to replace them with cheap, low skilled and child labour. The goal of AI isn't advancement it's replacement, and most of the companies pushing it are transparent about that.
If you look closely at his shirt, and what he said, you'd know he compiled his own OS before breakfast
But was it a functioning OS that you compiled?
Ew
NetBSD would compile then make your breakfast same device.
Slop
I drew my own meme before breakfast
Get this clanker shit off Dolly Parton's internet
Heh, my prejudices(?/presumptions) are showing. I presumed Gentoo, before I saw the NetBSD on the laptop.
Yeah, it's getting worse and worse with Microsoft. I hope they will release some sort of Windows "light" soon for people who only want performance and no bells and whistles