I'm fairly certain that's New Street All Bar One in Birmingham. This is typical attire for tossers going out day drinking in Brum.
Also, these guys just look British. The short guy couldn't look more aggressively British if he was wearing the Union Jack and invading countries for their tea.
Also, I'm not sure these clothes cost too many pounds - lots of polyester there. No shade - I don't buy expensive clothes myself either.
Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I don't think you should subject everyone in public to having to see the entire shape of your cock and balls in pants that are so tight you can't even walk in them.
I can't stand tight clothes especially shirts. There are very few things more annoying and uncomfortable than a shirt that desperately wants to burrow into your armpit.
As for the pants I can't say I'd enjoy needing a changing partner:
Left guy is fine, I think. Proportional and his clothes fit. The ripped knees are questionable but w/e if he wants to tell us he's on his knees all day I won't judge.
Walking in with my pants rolled up to mid-calf and the knees busted out like I've been giving head at the local truck stop for the last three weeks. I've got a full head of hair, yet I insist on shaving everything but the crown. I absolutely cannot grow a beard, and I refuse to get a proper shave. I'm wearing a watch in the year 2025, purely to show off how much money I can throw at one of the only allowed men's accessories. Neck. Tattoos. There's a 50/50 chance I'm wearing socks.
The entire cast of the Jersey Shore is lining up to get my number. Everyone else is staying at the distance necessary not to smell the patchouli.
Give it about ten years and the popular style will pendulum back to fitted/tight clothing.
Just like it was before the current baggy trend and after the previous baggy trend, which was preceded by another tight trend, which was preceded by another baggy trend, and so on and so on
I wonder how much momentum there is in that pendulum?
I think it started swinging (at least in America) in the 30's. Between the scarcity of the depression and rationing during the war, fashions tended toward minimal. Then in the abundance of the 50's you got big puffy poodle skirts and zoot suits because we finally had a surplus.
It means 'loser'
It comes from the word 'jobber' who is a type of pro wrestler who's role is to lose and make the other guy look strong going in to more meaningful matches. (Synonyms: jabroni, enhancement talent, job guy, carpenter, fall guy)
Often these are young wrestlers cutting their teeth in the business. But there are some wrestlers who specialize in the role.
Note: some wrestlers (jobbers) find the word 'jobber' to be insulating, insinuating they are in the role due to lack of talent. The term enhancement talent is considered more respectful.
That moment when you have a pair of 36 and 44 waist shorts from the same company and both fit the same. Then you put on a 38 and they fall off your ass and a 40 is to tight. If there was more quality control in clothes I'd probably be a lot more apt to shop
Personally for me I have massive legs even without working out( benefits of overweight with the right genetics) and I can't get the skinny jeans past my calves. 🤷♂️
It would also look ridiculous on me.
I would never wear long jeans that are not long enough and low socks to expose my ankles, that would feel terrible.
Junk too big, I'm too fat, and it's a douchy style when taken to the extreme of the photo. Wearing well fit clothes is good, but this is something else.
I regularly have trouble finding pants where the crotch doesn't crush things or make it look like I'm smuggling sausage, the waist is wide enough, and the legs don't look like they're parachutes. Usually settle for two of the three.
As a woman who's had limited access to pockets for most of her life, why would anyone willingly choose to give up proper pants storage? Clearly, these men don't realize how privileged their existence has been.
Sometimes tight trousers have excellent pockets (menswear doesn't give a toss about pockets ruining the line of the clothing, even on skin tight clothing), like the man in the op photo with his phone deep in his right pocket
Yeah, losing pockets is a trade-off I don't always like. But some situations requires freedom of movement and the skintight pants are more aerodynamic. However I'm not into leggings, so jeans will do.
Guy in the beige shirt accidentally came out wearing his little brother's face.
Hahaha this response deserves its own post in this community. 🤣
Alex Horne got jacked.
I think he threw his clothes in the dryer, then smoothed his face onto the door for the whole cycle.
This is an example of more dollars than sense. They look terrible and paid good money for the privilege.
More pounds than sense.
I'm fairly certain that's New Street All Bar One in Birmingham. This is typical attire for tossers going out day drinking in Brum.
Also, these guys just look British. The short guy couldn't look more aggressively British if he was wearing the Union Jack and invading countries for their tea.
Also, I'm not sure these clothes cost too many pounds - lots of polyester there. No shade - I don't buy expensive clothes myself either.
It's just an idiom, not a declaration of origin.
That second guy is one fart away from a public nudity charge.
Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I don't think you should subject everyone in public to having to see the entire shape of your cock and balls in pants that are so tight you can't even walk in them.
I’m not a complete fucking bellend.
I'm at 89% on the bellend-o-meter myself at the moment, I'm afraid that if I go over 90% I'll have to dress like them!!
"What's preventing you from dressing like this?"
My moderate self esteem.
I can't stand tight clothes especially shirts. There are very few things more annoying and uncomfortable than a shirt that desperately wants to burrow into your armpit.
As for the pants I can't say I'd enjoy needing a changing partner:
What's preventing me? For one, actually having taste in clothing.
I am not dressing for you. I am dressing for my own comfort and to satisfy legal requirements.
The fact that my girlfriend would die from laughter if I did.
Life insurance for her, buddy
They've all got chicken legs
Left guy is fine, I think. Proportional and his clothes fit. The ripped knees are questionable but w/e if he wants to tell us he's on his knees all day I won't judge.
Second from left and third from right both have pretty muscular legs. The edges have good, proportional legs.
Second from left is the short guy, third from right is the same short guy.
I'm not disagreeing with you BTW, it's just the same person :)
That was the joke. ;)
Argggg, sorry, only just woken up and a little dense at the best of times. Carry on :)
My nuts would never forgive me
Not wanting to look like Douchebag McDouchebagface is what's stopping people from looking like that.
They almost look shrink wrapped
Also I try not to wear plastics.
Because I don't shop in the kids section.
Walking in with my pants rolled up to mid-calf and the knees busted out like I've been giving head at the local truck stop for the last three weeks. I've got a full head of hair, yet I insist on shaving everything but the crown. I absolutely cannot grow a beard, and I refuse to get a proper shave. I'm wearing a watch in the year 2025, purely to show off how much money I can throw at one of the only allowed men's accessories. Neck. Tattoos. There's a 50/50 chance I'm wearing socks.
The entire cast of the Jersey Shore is lining up to get my number. Everyone else is staying at the distance necessary not to smell the patchouli.
I've managed to buy clothes since I left the eighth grade.
Dudes look like a still image for a gay fashion themed Sims 4 pack
The gays probably have better fashion sense
Real ones know gays mostly wear carharts and dickies
Gay men are disproportionately the victims of this fashion disaster, not the perpetrators stop the stigma
I said this because I spent my teenage years downloading, installing, and abusing such mods.
I was making a joke but it maybe didn't land right oops
All in all I don't like that style. I knew a boy who liked that style as a youth, he was a arsehole
The ability to move without squeaking.
Give it about ten years and the popular style will pendulum back to fitted/tight clothing.
Just like it was before the current baggy trend and after the previous baggy trend, which was preceded by another tight trend, which was preceded by another baggy trend, and so on and so on
I wonder how much momentum there is in that pendulum?
I think it started swinging (at least in America) in the 30's. Between the scarcity of the depression and rationing during the war, fashions tended toward minimal. Then in the abundance of the 50's you got big puffy poodle skirts and zoot suits because we finally had a surplus.
Their arms are as big as their thigh. How can you even do that?
By skipping leg day
Skipping leg day
Because I'm 55 years old and would—shockingly—even appear more of a buffoon than they?
Seems like a fairly good reason to me.
Leg day.
Short socks make me feel gross
Yeah, I don't like the texture difference when both my bare and clothed feed touch the shoe.
They give off dbag vibes
Holy shit that's funny
What a bunch of jabronis
What is a jabroni?
One of today's lucky 10000! Search YouTube for jabroni always sunny for the source of the term being used outside wrestling
It means 'loser' It comes from the word 'jobber' who is a type of pro wrestler who's role is to lose and make the other guy look strong going in to more meaningful matches. (Synonyms: jabroni, enhancement talent, job guy, carpenter, fall guy) Often these are young wrestlers cutting their teeth in the business. But there are some wrestlers who specialize in the role. Note: some wrestlers (jobbers) find the word 'jobber' to be insulating, insinuating they are in the role due to lack of talent. The term enhancement talent is considered more respectful.
Thank you. TIL.
These aren't jabronis, these are Deanos
Video by YouTube anthropologist, Sans Beanstalk
All my trousers are too tight, it's the washing machine I swear
That moment when you have a pair of 36 and 44 waist shorts from the same company and both fit the same. Then you put on a 38 and they fall off your ass and a 40 is to tight. If there was more quality control in clothes I'd probably be a lot more apt to shop
Just wash everything on cold, except if there's a specific stain to remove that needs hot water.
You can almost tell their religion be a their pants are so tight
The one lad has gone baggy what is he hiding
They're all wearing leggings of assorted fabrics and styles.
Totally not gay, bro
Personally for me I have massive legs even without working out( benefits of overweight with the right genetics) and I can't get the skinny jeans past my calves. 🤷♂️
It would also look ridiculous on me.
I would never wear long jeans that are not long enough and low socks to expose my ankles, that would feel terrible.
So what? It sure isn't stopping them!
If you consider round a shape I’d totally wear that
what is this? the tight pants convention?
Because I'm not into CBT.
Junk too big, I'm too fat, and it's a douchy style when taken to the extreme of the photo. Wearing well fit clothes is good, but this is something else.
I regularly have trouble finding pants where the crotch doesn't crush things or make it look like I'm smuggling sausage, the waist is wide enough, and the legs don't look like they're parachutes. Usually settle for two of the three.
Showing off those sexy ankles would've gotten them in quite the pickle back in the late 1800s.
My curves are in different places
the pants look like they'll rip any second
Yeah, how do they expect to sit.
I have blue jeans like those and they're actually quite snug.
But I also have baggy jeans with large pockets and they give me the feeling of unlimited power.
As a woman who's had limited access to pockets for most of her life, why would anyone willingly choose to give up proper pants storage? Clearly, these men don't realize how privileged their existence has been.
And this is why I wear baggy cargo pants/shorts. I have 8 pockets, but only use maybe three at the most. Muwhahaha. Be jealous. 🤴
Sometimes tight trousers have excellent pockets (menswear doesn't give a toss about pockets ruining the line of the clothing, even on skin tight clothing), like the man in the op photo with his phone deep in his right pocket
Yeah, losing pockets is a trade-off I don't always like. But some situations requires freedom of movement and the skintight pants are more aerodynamic. However I'm not into leggings, so jeans will do.
Trans woman--well worth giving up pockets to dress in a way that feels right!
For anyone outside the UK, this is a Deano.
Here's an explanation by the Anthropologist Sans Beanstalk.
Guy on the left looks good to me honestly. The other three take it too far for my tastes but Lefty's hot
Testicles descent outside the body for good biological reasons.