Spyke

I gotta think of the ridiculous Simpsons clip with McBain where he said: “COMMI NAZIS” And it was funny because of how ridiculous it is to have a communist Nazi

2
lemmy.world

Communists were literally one of the first groups targeted for arrest when Hitler came to power in 1933. Like 10 seconds on google.

143
lemmy.blahaj.zone

I think it's very possible that he doesn't actually believe this, but instead wishes that his fans, who are always so eager to kiss his ass do, since in the eyes of most people, Hitler was the most horrible person to ever exist, and if Hitler was a communist that'd mean that communists are horrible people.

On the other hand, Muskrat is so stupid that him honestly believing this isn't impossible.

34
lemmy.world

I think Elon believes whatever is most convenient for him to achieve his goals.

11

This assumes Elon is being genuine. He is not. Same as Trump. All the bullshit they spout is about manipulation of their supporters and not about being genuine about their beliefs.

3

To quote wikipedia : The first [concentration] camp was Nohra, established on 3 March 1933 in a school. The number of prisoners in 1933–1934 is difficult to determine; historian Jane Caplan estimated it at 50,000, with arrests perhaps exceeding 100,000. Eighty per cent of prisoners were members of the Communist Party of Germany and ten per cent members of the Social Democratic Party of Germany.

This obviousy proves Hitler had tens of thousands of communists imprisonned in concentration camps to hide the fact that he secretly was a communist/socialist ! /s

8

But then again Hitler did kill Hitler so maybe he was just playing the long game to catch Hitler off guard.

5
lemmy.world

The Axis alliance between Italy Germany and Japan was literally formed as an anti-communist alliance.

99
Dewayreply
lemmy.world

Dear Leader says Hitler was a communist so he was, all of you are wrong!

14

Ah just like dear Winnie The Pooh, who we swear is a good communist, and China is the greatest egalitarian state.

(Ignore our billionaires and Uyghur genocide)

8
lemmy.zip

I was looking for this comment. It just shows Elon's lack of knowledge and the will to say anything for the sake o confirming your beliefs.

6
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Is this the whole "Nazis were socialists because it's in the name" thing again? The far right love to pull this point out, ignoring the fact that as soon as he had power, Hitler had anyone remotely socialist in the Nazi party murdered so he could get on with the fascism. The name "National Socialist" was a trick to get people on board. Anyway, it figures that Musk thinks Hitler was too left wing, since Musk thinks the whole universe is too left wing. And it's characteristic of Musk that being to the right of Hitler doesn't even give him pause.

78
NOT_RICKreply
lemmy.world

North Korea is a thriving democracy; it’s right in the name!

24
ghurabreply
lemmy.world

and Baathist Syria was totally a democratic republic

3
FlowVoidreply
lemmy.world

I don't believe Syria ever styled itself "Democratic". But the Syrian Republic was certainly a republic.

For that matter, so was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

A republic is simply a nation with no monarch. If you don't believe me ask any Canadian, as they are constantly debating whether to officially leave the British crown and become a republic.

2

Yea, the name is originally in latin res publica, meaning "public matter". In opposition to a kingdom that is the private domain of a single person.

3
ghurabreply
lemmy.world

Not as a title, but if i recall correctly, the first first article of the old constitution states that the Syrian Arab Republic is a Democracy. Also for what it's worth, the Baath party was also officially "socialist".

The lack of a monarchy isn't enough to qualify as a republic, the people need to also hold some sort of power.

1

Being a republic has nothing to do with whether ordinary people hold power. For example in Plato's Republic, power was exclusively held by philosophers because ordinary people were unwise and could not be trusted.

1

The name "National Socialist" was a trick to get people on board.

Sort of. Hitler didn't found the party, he joined it as a mole in order to spy on it for the military. He ended up doing a lot more than most moles, eventually taking it over and expelling the more socialist (though still racist) founders.

Hitler hated socialists and tried to change the name as soon as he took over, but was convinced to keep the name because it had become a popular brand.

14
lemmy.ca

Breaking: self proclaimed genius is, in fact, an idiot.

58

To be fair his dad's opinion isn't one that I respect.

But yes. The man has more money than God and basically his entire family has completely disowned him, with the exception of the baby he carries around as body armor because he isn't old enough to know what that is yet.

For anyone else in the world I would hope that would be something of a wake up call.

10
lemmy.world

If Hitler is communist then the Nazi party is communist.

If the nazi party is communist then nazis and supporter of the nazi ideology are communists.

The far right is comprised majorly of nazis and supporters of nazi ideology, then the far right is communist.

The far right has Trump as a leader and have an ideology similar to their supporters, then… Trump is communist.

America, you know what to do with those commies.

50

If those people could follow logical trains of thought, we wouldn't have any of these problems in the first place.

1
sh.itjust.works

Ahh so elon is now publicly declaring he doesn't know what he is talking about.

35

Don't think he's actually that stupid unfortunately, this goes deeper than that and is far more manipulative

5

Funniest are people quoting Goebbels who said something like that...

Like... Bruh.... You are falling for the tricks of the minister of propaganda of the Deutsches Reich of 1940 in 2025...

32

Oh yes. In the early 1900s Nazis waged openly violent political gang war against the communists out of love and similar views.

30
lehenryreply
lemmy.world

I know this sarcastic, but conflict between various communist parties with slightly different views have been quite common in history

4

Pretty big difference though, the Nazis specifically targeted "Judeo-bolshevism" and were formed specifically to combat rising Communist sympathies and organization.

Conflicts between Communist orgs usually arose from incompatible differences in principle, such as whether or not to support such and such Socialist org, and usually the fighting isn't based on extermination like it was in Nazi Germany with the Night of Long Knives.

9

They can agree as much as they want. They can agree to suck each other's cocks too.That doesn't change the facts. Stupid people remain stupid people.Populism remains populism Stop listening to them.

23

Yeah, all the comments he made about the secret agenda of European jews to spread "judeobolshevism" through communist organizations and annihilate the Aryan race were just jokes about his good friends the communists. Him and Stalin were actually best buddies.

22

It's telling that it needs the second sentence you wrote for me to realize you were speaking about Hitler, not Elon. I don't say he's gone of that far, but it wouldn't have supposed me at all.

16
lemmy.world

I love it when folks are so stupid that they're ignorant of how stupid they are.

20
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

Some guy saying that in a pub is ignorant. The leader of a Nazi political party knows exactly what they're doing.

24

This, though.

The takeaway from this is not "OMG Musc + the new Natsis = stoopid! D:".

It's "Musk and the AfD are lying sons of bitches.".

3

The problem isn’t the Elon and co say this. It’s the middle ground people who, for the most part, are reasonable but have little education about politics, and don’t want to participate beyond soundbites.

In this case, the phrase works on two levels.

Most of these people would admit Hitler was bad. So, this reaffirms the statement Communism is bad. Even if they don’t know what Communism is.

For others, Communism is bad. This allows them to hear “We’re not like Hitler” about Elon and Co. They have no idea how bad Elon and Co may be, but at least their not commie pinkos.

The real genius of capitalists has been to persuade the electorate that there are no viable alternatives to capitalism.

18
Glytchreply
lemmy.world

BuT tHe PaRtY hAs SoShUlLiSt iN iTs NaMe So It MuSt Be TrUe A nAzI wOuLdN't LiE

2

Americans: "Hitler wasn't all bad. Sure, he killed some people but not as many as people say. He helped save the economy and even loved animals and children"

1

people can agree on whatever they want to. However facts say these two are fucken morons because facts say something entirely different about hitler.

13

It's like defining a sane leader by looking at Trump

2
lemmy.world

Are they the same morons that say Hitler was an atheist, despite him repeatedly quoting the Bible and the SS having "God is with us" on their uniforms? 🤔

8

Yes, he was opposed to Catholicism because it was a threat to the total rule of the Nazi party over every aspect of life, but he was following "German Christianism", which was a Protestant splinter group in line with Nazi ideology.

2

Yes because that's thing thing we care about, not that he was also a mass murdering fuckhead.

5
lemmy.world

Which shows how much they don't know about history. Given that Weidel talked about rather fictious versions of schools in Germany, I'd say that she did not spend enough time to learn anything worthwhile in there.

5
lemmy.ml

Hitler scares right wingers because he turned the colonialism that Western Europe plundered and looted the rest of the world towards Western Europe itself. Lebensraum was settler-colonial, after all. However, right wingers are fascinated by such an idea and wish to replicate it on their terms.

7

Amazing how they are revising history. So was Hitler good or bad? I thought they are staunchly against communism?

Edit: wait, so they are saying Hitler was bad because he was a communist and AfD is conservative and against communism? Incredible.

2

Not like it really matters. A lot of self proclaimed communists on the fediverse actively supported Trump, such as ML and Hexbear.

If nobody agrees what or who communism is then it gets used to describe anything and everything.

1
lemmy.ml

Eh, three arrows isn't really a good source either. Being against Socialism/Communism (one of the arrows in the 3) is a big red flag for attacking claims of Nazis being Socialist. A much better source would be Blackshirts and Reds by Dr. Michael Parenti.

8
barsoapreply
lemm.ee

Here's where the arrows come from. Figures that social democrats aren't authoritarians and thus don't like tankies which the KPD very much was. Calling them, at least at that time, "against socialism" is gross libel. (Technically the SPD still hasn't abandoned socialism, at least when you look into their party programme, but new labour etc).

I guess a much bigger red flag is coming from a .ml instance and re-heating "social fascist" rhetoric against SocDems.

...can't believe I'm actually defending the traitor party but it's against tankies so meh.

-2
lemmy.ml

I'm aware that the Three Arrows symbol originated from the Iron Front, I believe you are mistaken when you say Social Democracy is Socialist. Socialism is foundationally anticapitalist, Social Democrats wish to retain Capitalism and harness it to expand safety nets and social programs. This isn't about "tankies" or whatever, Social Democrats are opposed to Socialism both historically and ideologically, hence the addition of the slash.

You called them a traitor party for good reason.

6
barsoapreply
lemm.ee

No, they don't. From a Marxist perspective, they think that liberal-democratic capitalism is a better pre-stage to the abolishment of capitalism than Leninist state capitalism.

Quoth the SPD programme:

Our history is shaped by the idea of democratic socialism, a society of free and equal people where our core values are realized. It requires a structure in economy, state and society guaranteeing civil, political, social and economic basic rights for all people living a life without exploitation, suppression and violence, hence in social and human security.

The end of the soviet type state socialism did not disprove the idea of democratic socialism but it clearly confirmed the orientation of social democracy towards core values. In our understanding democratic socialism remains the vision of a free and fair society in solidarity. Its realization is a permanent task for us. The principle for our actions is social democracy.

-2

I'm aware of the claims of the SPD. I explained in another comment why they are contradictory and wrong, such as Rosa Luxemburg disproving them. This is further proven by the fact that Socialist systems have been built by Marxists, but none have been built by Social Democrats in history.

4
fedia.io

Talk about misinformation: Wired purposefully didn't cite actual statement which was: “The biggest success after that terrible era in our history was to label Adolf Hitler as right and conservative. He was exactly the opposite. He wasn’t a conservative. He wasn’t a libertarian. He was a communist socialist guy,”

With the context it reads more like communist-like person, not literal communist.

But the context be damned, we hate Elon and Wired confirms our bias so we eat misinformation like it's a gospel written by God himself

-7

You're overreacting too far the other way. Sure they're not saying he was a duck, they're saying he was a goose, but for many practical purposes, those two things are the same.

Furthermore, they said what they said in the way that they said it to foment precisely this sort of confusion (or because they're equally confused. Take your pick.). Did they go on to explicitly say "not an actual communist, but a bit like one"?

3