Spyke

It would take a lot longer than two months for people run out of not-yet-confiscated firearms or ammo, though (decades, probably), so effectively it doesn’t matter that much if they suddenly ban them, and I’d be thrilled with that outcome.

I mean what difference does it make if you murder someone or murder them with a banned weapon? The result of getting caught is being totally fucked either way.

5

sweeping gun reform laws

Except it was a printed gun. Might need sweeping printer reform laws too.

1
lemmy.world

Thats on track for climate goals. Maybe the Earth can be saved

33

On paper sure. But you never know how long it would take with inheritance.

The only way to know for sure is through experimentation.

16

Their kids would be…incentivized to give it away.

7

I know the correct response is to shoot less children, but I can't help but see the value in lowering CEO survival rates.

12
cmacreply
lemmy.world

There's always inheritance tax, and splitting the fortune with siblings. Eventually someone down the line would only be getting $999 million.

16

There are over 1,000 billionaires and about 2,500 school age children die by shooting each year. So more like 5 months.

4

Let's make it happen guys! (For legal reasons this is not an endorsement.)

2

You reached the end