Spyke
lemmy.world

Funnily, that's not really true. Such studies showing that exist but are sponsored by… paper towel companies

59
Karjalanreply
lemmy.world

Fucking dystopian late stage capitalism... Every fact is not actually a fact cause it's sponsored by corporate interests

37
leminal.space

Half the words are automatically capitalized when I text. Because they're part of a corporation's name.

12

I tell my phone to "Remove Suggestion" on that every time, but it never fucking takes and it pisses me off. Don't capitalist twitter or god.

6
GiveMemesreply
jlai.lu

Yes, and the ones that show air dryers to be healthier are funded by... hand dryer manufacturers.

35
RQGreply
lemmy.world

Someone should fund independent research.

14

I went for a whole month drying my hands with only independent research and the results were similar to using paper towels.

26

I remember someone tested this, and the bacteria was found in a wider area.

Either way bacteria is everywhere and we got immune systems.

8

Glad you posted it, this dude is oddly compelling! One of the few talks I remember and actually act on regularly...

2

The next person in line breathing in your neck dries your neck as an added bonus!

1
lemmy.ml

I particularly hate those airblade things even more than regular air dryers. I like that they're faster and typically not as gross and warm but they are designed in a way where you feed your hand in to a narrow gap with powerful air jets in front of and behind your hands in this gap. Your hands are not a completely uniform symmetrical shape, so the jets buffet your hand around and they inevitably touch the parts of the device where the jets are located, right where everyone else has had the same thing happen. It grosses me out.

52

And they don't dry as well, and the air moves faster so whatever is living in the water drops on your hands (depending really on how thoroughly you wash your hands) gets flung further, spread better in the space

3

Japan doesn't have paper towels or air dryers in their bathrooms.

Why?

Because everyone carries a handkerchief to dry their hands. They even sell them at airports when you land.

I've been trying to bring back the handkerchief in the States, but not as many places sell them

6
Mannivureply
feddit.it

You're right and I linked a fairly old study. I've edited my comment to add a more recent source.

34
kautaureply
lemmy.world

Findings: Air bacterial counts in close proximity to hand drying were 4.5-fold higher for the jet air dryer (70.7 cfu) compared with the warm air dryer (15.7 cfu) (P=0.001), and 27-fold higher compared with use of paper towels (2.6 cfu) (P<0.001).* Airborne counts were also significantly different during use of towel drying versus warm air dryer (P=0.001). A similar pattern was seen for bacterial counts at 1m away. Visualization experiments demonstrated that the jet air dryer caused the most droplet dispersal.

20

Isn't the point to get bacteria off your hands? Isn't it better to have them in the air than on your hands?

It's a lot more likely I'll eat something I touched than something that's been sitting in bathroom air.

4

They used a jet air dryer, those are the shitty ones that spray everything everywhere. Of course it'll be worse. I'd like to see how a dyson air blade hold up under that kind of test.

3
Owl
mander.xyz

Yet, the best hand dryers are still your trousers

51
lemmy.world

Why are there germs on your hands right after washing them? Didn't mythbusters already test it and concluded that they are only bad when people don't really wash their hands.

46

Yes.

The followup question is "how many people think getting their hands wet without soap is sufficient hand-washing" and the answer is not terribly comforting.

40

that they are only bad when people don't really wash their hands.

Well, yes.

11
psudreply
aussie.zone

Do you ever watch people wash their hands? Many wet them then dry them. A few rub a little soap around them. Nearly no one does the full hand wash method recommended by health organisations (where each finger is individually washed)

9

To be fair they probably didn't rub each individual finger over their disgusting body parts while in the toilet.

0
lemmy.world

I'll just leave this here:

Hygiene associated with the product has been questioned in research by the University of Westminster Trade Group, London and sponsored by the paper towel industry the European Tissue Symposium

37
Kbobabobreply
lemmy.world

It's ok to be cautious, but if the data is accurate then it doesn't matter much.

17
leveragereply
lemdro.id

Also, how is their research any worse than the one sponsored by Dyson, who is trying to sell overpriced hand dryers.

Anyone who has ever seen one of these more than a few weeks old knows how disgusting they get because cleaning crews were never trained to clean them. I'm assuming that isn't considered in Dyson's version of the research at all. There's one in a bathroom in my area that is covered in mold.

10

In both cases, it is the instance of conflict of interest and a moral hazard. Tainted and not to be trusted.

3
Revan343reply
lemmy.ca

They always look clean in the malls I see them in.

3
leveragereply
lemdro.id

That's great, probably better for life happiness to just not look very closely, and ignore research like this. I doubt anyone is getting sick, even if it is certainly spraying stuff around.

3

Actual science is always good, but I'd like to see data on them with hourly vs daily vs weekly vs monthly washroom cleaning, and the same data on regular hand dryers and as well as paper towel.

Bet the airblades are best with a quick cleaning cycle, and worst with a slow cleaning cycle (except for paper towel if the cleaning cycle is slow enough; 'no paper towel, dry your hands on what you can' is certainly the least best option)

3
ani.social

Are you calling the air powered piss blasters gross?

29
lemmy.world

It’s insane we keep using those things after covid. They’re fucking disgusting.

28
lemm.ee

I just wish people would know how to use paper towels so that they don't end up wasting huge piles of them for nothing. 1 sheet is enough. You don't need 5. Do it like this:

  • After washing your hands, brush excess water off each hand using your other hand. Your hands should not be dripping wet when you reach for the paper towel.
  • Take a single paper towel. Don't scrunch it up, and don't just clasp the towel. Use all parts of the paper towel to deliberately wipe your hands. The paper towels are quite absorbent. They don't need to be 100% dry to remove the water from your hands.

The end. If you do this, your hands will not be wet. You will not need a second paper towel.

27

You missed something. You gotta fold the paper in half. The capillary action will trap more water in between the folded halves than it could unfolded.

The Shake & Fold method. There was a Ted Talk!

16
Frozengyroreply
lemmy.world

Yea, wouldn't want to use 2 sheets. Not like that stuff grows on trees.

10

Funny joke. But yeah, the creation, distribution, and disposal are not free - even if they are created from trees. Using two sheets isn't a big deal, but why use double what you need?

Anyway, I'm not trying to say we need to be super-frugal with our paper towels. I'm really talking about people who just keep grabbing more and more of them until their hands are dry. I'm sure we've all seen bins overflowing with barely-used paper towels. We don't need that.

7
lemm.ee

My biggest issue is the decibel level. I can hear, for now, but the decibel level on those things makes one of my ears feel like it’s being blasted out of my skull and induces ringing.

I use the paper because it doesn’t hurt my ear.

Yes, I’ve seen a doctor, it simply is what it is and my only recourse for that ear is to wear ear protection. In any public restroom, apparently.

26
reddthat.com

My daughter is extremely noise sensitive and can't handle the noise of those either. After a really rough 2 hour drive involving 3 gas station stops because she refused to even try to use one due to the auto-flushing toilet my wife suggested "making an app to track public bathrooms with air dryers and autoflushing toilets" and I've been debating if I want to start tagging every public bathroom I visit on Open Street Map with the toilet flush mechanism and existence of air dryers. And if i did so I'd probably also mark what changing table amenities are available and if there's more/less changing table amenities in the womens' or mens' rooms.

18
lemm.ee

Can you use osm to do that? How do I mark free parking spots and street parking spots as well?

5
zephorahreply
lemm.ee

You can buy boxes of moldable foam earplugs which can do very well for noise blocking. Individually wrapped in pairs. They carry well in a back pocket. Those work if you’re ok with the sensation of something in your ears, don’t have ear tubes, or some other contraindicated condition.

An aesthetically pleasing pair of full muffs can also work. Sometimes kids need their environment dimmed, and the muffs can work rather well.

4

We actually already have hearing protection headphones for the kids, but they're bulky and I usually don't want to risk them getting messed up in the bathroom on a trip

We try to balance both giving her the tools to be successful but also not having her entirely rely on the hearing protection as a crutch

2

They absolutely are loud. I avoir them as much as possible even though I don't have ear issues (yet, I gguess)

7

How can it spread germs if the germs are 99% gone after having washed your hands with soap? We're assuming people aren't washing their hands properly, right?

25
bluewingreply
lemm.ee

Yes you can assume all people don't wash their hands correctly.

30
GiveMemesreply
jlai.lu

Which is accurate. How often have you seen somebody spend 30 seconds washing their hands in a public restroom? For me it ain't exactly common

9

I wash my hands for nearly a minute. But most of that time is spent trying to get those stupid no touch faucets to work.

5

There are too many people that think rinsing hands with water is enough, or that using a urinal doesn't need hand rinsing much less washing.

Even post-COVID, habits are too hard to break

5
lemmy.world

Some microbes will survive the hand washing process, and need to be removed by drying. Those Dyson air blades collect germs from water from washed hands and the toilet environment, then blow the germs around. It's gross.

Also, Mr Dyson is a fucking dick.

25

If those dryers had UV lamps, maybe one that only ran when external motion sensors detected nobody nearby, that could mitigate that problem entirely

3

I mean sure, but!

... It trains everyone to make the silly nyaa anime catgirl poses with our arms and hands.

Checkmate.

13
lemm.ee

It sucks that the only device that works spreads germs. Will humanity ever find a hand drying method that not only dries hands but is also safe?

11
blubfischreply
discuss.tchncs.de

That is such an american problem 😵‍💫. Reducing trash is a great motivation, but the reminder that the trash is just dumped and stored indefinitely over there just makes me want to scream.

8
discuss.tchncs.de

Paper towels aren't even trash, paper can be recycled and you'll get new paper towels. But landfill it is...

4
bluewingreply
lemm.ee

They often are partially recycled material. But recycled paper isn't like recycling aluminum or steel. There are limits to how often and how much of the cycled material you can add back to make useful paper products.

But paper towels can and does make great compost as most gardeners know. And a properly run landfill is a compost pile. But you need to keep the nasty garbage out.

5
spacesatanreply
leminal.space

It's a non-issue. Landfills are a negligible amount of land usage and the land can be repurposed after the landfill is decommissioned. I genuinely don't get why people care.

1

Because the landfills produce methane, a greenhouse gas much more potent than CO2. Once a landfill is closed, the methane can mostly be caught. There are always leaks, however. Containing the methane and other problems creates forever-costs. Recycling as much as possible and burning the rest, greatly reduces the problem. Remaining ash from burning still needs to be stored, but has less volume. And while burning trash does produce CO2, the energy is used for electricity and communal heating.

1
oldfartreply
lemm.ee

The strong bleached ones which pollute the environment or the brown ones which tear apart on wet skin and you have to pluck pieces of them from between hair on your hand?

0

I was about to ask how much hair you have on your hand but then i saw your username...

6

I thought it was the dumb ass shape of them and how it just mists and sprays the bacteria on and off the walls. The old ones were fine. Point it straight down. Who cares if a couple of drops touch the ground

2

Machine should have a "blow" vent above a "suck" vent with a drip tray that drains away. Any air that passes in close contact with the heating element would be sterilized.

1
el_abueloreply
programming.dev

I've often noticed people leaving theirs outside the waste bin so others can reuse them. Reduce, reuse THEN recycle.

2

I kinda got that sense from the moment that “AirBlade” sprayed all my germy hand water up into my face

5

...how? I genuinely haven't experienced this; I like airblades precisely because the water is blown directionally, away from you.

2

I can't fathom how those dyson piece of shit blade hand dryers were chosen at so many places instead of like a Columbia Vortex.

Those nasty ass dysons near guarantee you touch the inside of them, all while misting water back up towards your face.

4

I always have to imagine I’m playing Operation and it’s going to buzz and light up a red light over my head if I bump the sides.

6
adam_yreply
lemmy.world

Going to need to see your citations for that assertion, sir.

10

Cool.

From the conclusion:

This may have implications in some industrial and clinical settings as well as in immunocompromised individuals.

1
fedia.io

There are a lot of different dryer designs as well, some of which are much more friendly to breeding bacteria than others.

3
psudreply
aussie.zone

It doesn't seem plausible. After wiping your hands dry the bacteria either stayed on your hands or were transferred to the paper towel. I can't see a path to the air.

Blasting your hands with air fast enough to blow off whole water drops and shatter them would put bacteria in the air.

I presume that when testing their air driers they use a sterile room and thoroughly washed hands in hospital type soap so any bacteria went down the drain and only sterile water was blown into the air

3

OP edited their post with a link. It's an entirely different topic, it's about germs on paper towels coming from the factory.

3

UV kills the germs. They should install lamps. Added bonus everybody gets tan hands.

2