Spyke
lemmy.world

In the 90s, the headlines were absurdist satire, and the point was to laugh at people who could fall for it being a real news publication.

Things like "Woman wins powerball lottery. Buys state of Montana."

NOW the headlines are absurdist satire, and the world has decided to bite the onion SO HARD that real life headlines are just as absurdist and satire adjacent, that you're easily forgiven for not knowing the difference between ketchup and catsup.

52

I call tomatoes god's perfect food, but they can only be pushed so far until they become an abomination before a loving Jesus.

5
uisreply

NOW the headlines are absurdist satire, and the world has decided to bite the onion SO HARD that real life headlines are just as absurdist and satire adjacent, that you're easily forgiven for not knowing the difference between ketchup and catsup.

Basically american version of soviet anecdotes.

6
sh.itjust.works

the onion is getting really good at "getting" me. they had me again with this article!

68
uisreply

Reminds about interview with creator of Masyanya.

"How your script is always so ridiculous and prophetic?"

"I just look at current trends and extrapolate."

9
lemmy.world

I had to double check the name of the sub to make sure this wasn’t a real law.

43

Fucking Onion keeps giving them ideas; the GOP might as well start paying them as policy advisors

23

You'd think that after the video from from the other day was co-opted in hours they'd wise up.

4

I actually ate the onion. Spooky that this one feels believable.

21

scariest thing I've seen this Halloween omg. Never ever has a headline made me physically gasp.

12
lemmy.dbzer0.com

19th Amendment:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Only about a century old. Let's go for another 100.

10
uisreply
lemm.ee

Basically US can create US LLC and deny to anyone based on anything.

1
uisreply
lemm.ee

Will say "it is not goverment, so it doesn't count"

1
chickenreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

If you are saying they will privatize elections somehow as a loophole around following the constitution, I am skeptical

1
uisreply

No, I mean private company beating everyone who they don't want to see on elections

1
sh.itjust.works

*female voters.

"women" is a noun, not an adjective. Writing "women voters" is just as bad as writing "voting females"

-25
sh.itjust.works

The phrase "women voters" is grammatically correct. It’s a compound noun phrase where "women" serves as an attributive noun modifying "voters." This construction is common in English (like "student athletes" or "senior citizens") and is used to specify a subgroup of voters.

45
Swedneckreply
discuss.tchncs.de

I will never understand this logic, it just obviously sounds atrocious!
You wouldn't say "man voters", so why do we say "women voters"?
It makes it sound like women aren't the actors, rather the subjects, like people are voting for who should win Miss America or something..

5
sh.itjust.works

You would say Men Voters. But yes, it does sound terrible. What can I say other than the English language is just full of all kinds of Fuckery.

9
sh.itjust.works

Maybe it's using a compound noun for a person? Or when an adjective exists? Maybe it's just tradition?

1

You reached the end