Spyke
lemmy.world

Kroger promises to lower grocery prices by $1 billion after artificially inflating them by $3 billion.

120

Prices are probably skyrocketing as we type in preparation for this "massive" amount of savings.

9

This item is $9000, but if you let us track your purchases and give us all of your personal information, it's $3.

7
lemmy.world

Why would anyone trust them right after the price gouging during the pandemic and long after logistics had adapted?

58
sh.itjust.works

They aren't even saying that.

After the merger closes, Kroger will invest $1 billion to lower Albertsons’ prices, consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation and providing value to customers.

So, they're going to invest $1 billion to lower prices (which the writer speculates will be through "increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain").

48

consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation

LOL, fucking what? They're literally one of the major causes of inflation.

which the writer speculates will be through "increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain

Oh, so firing more people, adding more self-checkout lanes, charging more for bags, and extorting distribution centers so they also have to fire a bunch of people?

8

increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain

That just sounds like sourcing lower quality food stuff to save their bottom line

3
sh.itjust.works

"You should let us reduce competition in the grocery space, because with less competition prices will be lower."

That's a bold take.

32
Zessreply
lemmy.world

Walmart has been doing it for decades to achieve its low prices. The problem isn't that it won't work, it's just still a shitty thing to squeeze every cent from your suppliers.

4

Wal*Mart does definitely squeeze their suppliers, and it does have relatively low prices, but it's hardly a charity. It squeezes suppliers, not so that it can supply customers with low prices but so that it can provide profits to investors.

6
shalafireply
lemmy.world

Economies of scale do allow for lower prices. Problem being, monopolies do not.

2

Economies of scale allow for lower costs, not lower prices. Lower prices are a choice that companies make, and it's a choice they don't have to make if they don't have competitors.

5
Kronoreply
lemmy.today

Self checkout did lower the prices if you play the game right.

For example, one time I had 2 donuts in a bag, but I rang them up as just 1 donut. Please dont tell the cops.

12
omarfwreply
lemmy.world

I wouldn't snitch even if I saw someone walking out with a wagon of money from the store safe. Fuck corporations.

7
ayyyreply
sh.itjust.works

1 year later

Why is my neighborhood a food desert??

-3
omarfwreply
lemmy.world

imagine being so brainwashed by corpos that you forget that small businesses exist and can easily take the place of every walmart.

2
ayyyreply
sh.itjust.works

I’m talking about my own lived experience, and it fucking sucks.

0

food deserts only happen when corporations move in, push out all the competition, then leave.

2

I always seem to lose count when scanning the same item repeatedly. I'm sure I got close to 12, and that's close enough.

4
lemmy.world

This is where we're at now, corporations are issuing demands to the government, and the government is appeasing them.

23

Sounds like extortion to me. Revoke their licenses to do business until they replace their C-suite.

5
bitchkatreply
lemmy.world

We passed that when the government order Microsoft to break up.

-2

Replied to wrong comment. Someone else said something about now the corps are giving orders to the government. My response was that when MS was ordered to be ask up, they more or less said "nope"

1

No that sounds an awful lot like extortion. That's a crime you know.

16

'improving their services'

=

extracting more value from their consumers

14

Force them to break up into all their constituent companies.

Competition and the free market, also free of M&A's, will help pricing for everyone, including suppliers and customers.

Be great if we could elect anti-merger reps.

12

First they added self checkout to reduce headcount, then came the price fixing/gouging. Then their shrink increased because people got tired of being fucked by Kroger. Then they had that shady deal with the UFCW. Then they decided to treat everyone that shops there like a criminal.

I'll never return.

12
lemmy.world

Someday, maybe soon, you won't have a choice but to shop at a Kroger grocery.

10

And then immediately raise them 5x a week later

6

Ok. But your tax base is tripled and we set price ceilings on certain goods.

6

Yes. If there's one thing that all corporations want, it's to MAKE LESS MONEY.

That's why they want to reduce competition. It's so people can give them less money.

Now, some people might suggest that this sort of selfless generosity might go against their fiduciary obligation to increade stockholder value. But those people would be wrong because of course they're only doing this to eliminate competition and gouge customers, you bunch of gullible idiots.

5

If they take them over and can't fix Albertsons ( supply chain inefficiency is what I've been told), then the whole organization is gonna go under within a few years.

That almost sounds like a good thing, but I know that it wouldn't be .

3

I thought "bidenomics" inflation dictated prices?? /s

?????

So it really is corporate greed then

(I know it's corporate greed, but I wanted to counter all the naysayers that say the price of groceries is strictly because of inflation)...

3

They will lower prices but will still be price gouging. I spread my money around these days to Aldi, Food Lion, and unfortunately Kroger as they have items the others do not.

1