Spyke
feddit.nl

His insecurity-induced attack is pretty much confirmation that the bullet didn't touch him

177
DogPeePooreply
lemm.ee

Easy enough for him to prove it— just take the maxi pad off and show the public.

But now he has a bigger problem, eventually he has to make his lie match his purported ear damage.

70
PineRunereply
lemmy.world

"I got some great plastic surgery, the best plastic surgery. Better than the world has ever seen."

52

Yeah, with how much blood there was, there's no way he's not missing part of his ear if a bullet hit it.

2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Just when I thought Trump finally suffers some kind of paltry consequence and he didn't even get shot. Reality sucks.

19
kbin.run

We got thrust into the stupidest timeline. Although the tacos are pretty decent.

12
gruereply
lemmy.world

If these are the tacos we get, imagine how awesome the other timeline's tacos must be!

6

The quality of the tacos is inversely tied to the quality of the timeline. The TNO timeline has some really fucking good tacos, but the one where Theodore Roosevelt shot Woodrow Wilson and won the presidency has fucking horrible tacos.

4

It's so insecure right? To anyone who is confident or reflective it wouldn't matter.

16

Wouldn't be a big deal if he didn't already have the whole storyline of Jesus personally coming down from the heavens to nudge poor ol' Trump's head out of the way so that we can witness the peace and prosperity of fascist rule under a convicted fraudster

12

I remember one of the first things I heard was that a bullet struck the teleprompter and he was hit by broken glass. I never heard anything about it after that, so I assumed it was just false; but it made a whole lot of sense at the time.

79
Num10ckreply
lemmy.world

wheres the teleprompter now? wouldn't that tell all?

20

Sure it would, and I don't want to give credence to conspiracy theories, but the teleprompter belongs to Trump's campaign, so if it's going to be released, the call will have to come from inside the house.

2

The teleprompter thing seems to have been debunked but that doesn't mean it was a bullet either.

8
charlesreply
lemmy.world

Some people speculated on this from day 1 when he wasn't posing for photos with his "bullet wound."

47
GladiusBreply
lemmy.world

That's because it looks staged. He also has been on WrestleMania a few times and is aware of how to stir up a crowd like that. It's not that much of a stretch to say he had a good idea that the crowd would eat it up.

4

Nah, no need for a conspiracy theory. Also NYT photographer got a picture of a flying bullet.

4

There's a single hole in one upper corner in a photo.

But my casual impression is that screen was on the far side from the shooter, based on the direction of the sun. But I can't be sure of that without more info.

1
lemmy.world

The question was whether a bullet or shrapnel hit Trump. But of course, Trump does not comprehend nuance.

47
snooggumsreply
midwest.social

The question about whether it was a bullet or shrapnel wouldn't even be in the news if Trump didn't insist on playing up being an inch from death. Either answer would have been far less important than being shot at but no, he had to make the question about what hit him a big deal.

12

You’re not wrong, but the NYT played their part by taking a non-story and publishing it under an intentionally ambiguous headline for clicks. That’s probably got repeated to Trump as, “the FBI director is testifying to Congress that you didn’t get shot!” or something like that, which led to this outburst.

The NYT sure has been stirring the shit lately.

2
lemmy.world

Trump does not comprehend nuance.

I'm dizzy trying to figure out if this is irony, sarcasm, redundant, humour, reality, serious, comical, factual, dystopian...or did the psilocybin just kick in, on so many levels?

10
lemmy.world

Whoa, it wasn’t meant as some deep, philosophical statement. I just meant that Trump likely doesn’t comprehend Wray’s distinction between getting shot with a bullet and being struck by shrapnel.

15
lemmy.world

Sorry, omitted the "/s".
It was more hyperbolic and melodramatic, though. "/h + /m".

6
jonnereply
infosec.pub

Either way, it shouldn't matter, someone still got close to killing him. But of course, Trump probably insists that people say he got hit by a bullet.

I'm sure we'll find out eventually unless he decides to continue wearing his maxi-pad.

8

Yes, to sane people, it is a distinction without much of a difference. But to his incredibly fragile machismo image, every inch is a mile.

3
sopuli.xyz

This story could have just gone away, with most people never hearing that maybe he just has a little cut under his big gauze pad and anyone trying to bring it up looking extremely petty. But nope, Trump himself can't just let things pass unanswered.

42
commandarreply
lemmy.world

Also worth noting: Wray's statements were made in response to questions asked by Jim Jordan.

This isn't something Democrats went looking to dig up. It got stirred up by one of Trump's frothiest allies.

31

Trying to milk the pity party as long as he can to try and keep the spotlight off of Harris is all.

6
sh.itjust.works

For anyone who was wondering why Trump refused to release the medical report after the shooting, this is why.

41
lemmy.today

You're telling me Dementia Don the racist rapist with 34 felonies wouldn't release a medical report of him getting "shot"? If he had proof he was shot, It'd be on tshirts made in China and plastered all over the place. It'd be on billboards, flyers in the mail, and everywhere you look.

This is the proof that he didn't get shot, he got hit by shrapnel.

17
lemmyngreply
lemmy.ca

He didn't pay hush money to the couch.

24
lemmy.world

I have it on good authority that he also has not denied raping and murdering a young girl in the 1990s.

15
lemmy.world

Fingers crossed! I have 'shrapnel' on my election bingo card! I just need "Black Hillary" (thanks for that one @[email protected]) and 'JD cries'.

24
zcd
lemmy.ca

It was a splinter wasn't it?

22
donreply
lemm.ee

Complete mystery, total head-scratcher. I’m pretty sure slow cookers are involved.

2

There should be a service that’s always there in secret so we can know what happens.

1

They followed up that it was likely a bullet or bullet fragment

8
lemmy.world

pull strings from every conceivable angel.

A thread from their heavenly robes.

2
lemmy.world

It makes sense if it wasn't a bullet. I think most of the bullets went into the crowd so its likely he was never the real target.

-3
Echreply
lemm.ee

Just because the person shooting at you missed doesn't mean you weren't in "real danger". Anyone on the business end of a firearm, wielded intentionally or neglegently, is in real danger. The firearm doesn't become harmless due to lack of skill or intent.

22
lemmy.ca

Yes, he was absolutely in danger. It might not have been as close of a call as Trump would like to brag about however if it was shrapnel of some sort

4
Echreply

That's true enough. Probably not gonna convince the "jesus saved trump" crowd otherwise, though 🙄

1

But that's the thing if this is shrapnel and all the real shots hit the elevated bleachers the real risk to trump would probably not be very high. It certainly would suggest this is a mass shooting rather than a targetted assassination.

0