Spyke

They want to be considered people to influence the government, they should be tried as people and everyone running it receives the same sentence.

112
Neatoreply
ttrpg.network

Capital punishment for corporations. Revoke their business license and liquidate their assess.

73

We have so many monopolistic companies in the US that should have been nationalized years ago. It's one reason we can't have nice things.

14

Ultimately the CEOs are also employees. It's the capital that pulls the strings

1
lemmy.world

Your a bit late, we've already had entire countries regimes overthrown and death squads in the name of corporate interests.

16

Yeah, but they were US companies doing to OTHER countries. Doesn't count

9
lemmy.world

That's from a week ago. Reality shouldn't be lapping satire this quickly.

155
Empricornreply
feddit.nl

Satire implies some humor. This is terrifying. I 100% believe this giant corporation murdered these people and other ones will try to do the same. It's like when Russia kills someone and barely tries to provide plausible deniability. Because there's no consequences and they'll get away with it anyway. And because they want to send a threatening message. We are literally living in a dystopia...

23

Boeing is a strategic military asset of the US government, who needs to hire private corporate hitmen when we have plenty of tax dollar funded ones

2

It's important to remember that Boeing isn't JUST a plane company, but a government contractor that does a massive amount of rocket work for the armed forces.

There are more people than stock holders that have a vested interest in Boeing.

205

Including just about every single person who promised and/or would end up being responsible for conducting an investigation on them. Boeing is basically above the law as long as they pay the fines levyed by the courts that are overwhelmingly on their side.

49
lemmy.world

Wait until Trump gets into office and becomes a dictator "on day one only." This will be legal.

108

The Purge. Brought to you by Carls Jr and President Trump.

14

Isn't it legal now? Did the US government nullify any Boeing contracts because of the first murder? Any of the Boeing heads and their government stooges in prison?

5
indexreply
sh.itjust.works

You don't have to wait it's already happening. Vote red and blue out

-23
lemmy.world

Who exactly am I supposed to vote for that has a credible chance of beating both Trump and Biden?

27
ggppjjreply
lemmy.world

I agree, and strongly believe that the most helpful way forward in this respect would be to implement ranked choice voting, which is just about as out-of-reach to most Americans as a viable third-party candidate is today.

Maybe the next try at democracy will be the one that sticks.

10

I would love an alternative to our current FPTP system, but I don't see it happening.

12
lemmy.world

Then get off your lazy ass and make another party more popular

-14
lemmy.world

Jill Stein, you could be gathering support for her, but instead complain and vote for either of the right wing candidates

-16
lemmy.world

Jill Stein does not have a credible chance of beating both Trump and Biden and why is it my job to do that?

13

Because she is the candidate of the largest party representing policies you "support" like universal healthcare. You could have spent the last 4 years helping build the party, or another party, or making your own party but instead did nothing.

-12
rusticusreply
lemm.ee

You mean Jill “Russia funded but slightly less than Trump” Stein lol?

10

Jill “sitting-between-Putin-and-convicted-felon-and-unregistered-foreign-agent-Michael-Flynn” Stein who collected millions for a recount and then just kept it?

Yeah, nah. Never.

8
indexreply
sh.itjust.works

You can vote for whoever you want, at this point pretty much everyone has a chance to beat these two mad men

-21
indexreply
sh.itjust.works

You are supposed to vote for the best nominee not according to made up poll

-17
lemmy.world

Maybe you throw your vote away on someone who has zero chance of winning, but that's not how I vote.

8
rusticusreply
lemm.ee

Go back to Russia shill. No rational human would equate red and blue.

10
rusticusreply
lemm.ee

Don’t need to. I’d just ask you to tell me where homeland is lol.

8
Coreidanreply
lemmy.world

Doubt it. He couldn’t do it in his first term why the fuck would he suddenly be able to make it happen the second term? He’s a pile of shit but he wouldn’t ever make it happen.

Obligatory fuck Trump comment.

-49

Despite the downvotes, you're probably right. Not because they won't try, but because they're not smart enough to pull it off.

They will do monumental damage in the process of trying, though.

5
lemmy.ml

Lemme guess, they died of natural causes like gravity or something right?

63
neuropeanreply
kbin.social

Pneumonia and a MRSA infection, also suffered a stroke. I wonder if someone could weaponize MRSA, perhaps aerosolize it?

30
Ranvierreply
lemmy.world

MRSA is just a version of staph aureus that is resistant to some common antibiotics. The antibiotic resistant version is common everywhere now since we use so much antibiotics. The antibiotic resistant version doesn't make someone sicker in and of itself than the non resistant version, it just doesn't respond to some antibiotics. From context I gather this was MRSA pneumonia.

Staph aureus lives on all of our skin, mouth and external surfaces. It's not like something you catch, it's something that's already there and takes advantage of an opening, like a wound, lungs already damaged by a recent flu virus or something, or a weakened immune system. It's common that people in the hospital get staph infections, because they're already there for something else making them sick that gives staph an opening. Strokes are also more common in hospitalized patients that are sick with other things. Strokes usually aren't directly related to an infection, but the pro inflammatory response can increase clotting and make a stroke more likely. Strokes also can inversely make pneumonia more likely, if you have trouble swallowing and saliva and secretions are going down the wrong tube, then it creates an easy way for bacteria from your mouth like staph to get to the lungs and start up a pneumonia.

Tldr: MRSA is on your skin right now, don't worry about it too much, don't overuse antibiotics

47
discuss.tchncs.de

Ever woke up and noticed a small zit or pimple? Yep, that's likely a staph infection, although there might be some streptococcus in there as well. They probably also entered your blood stream, but got quickly eliminated by your immune system. It's all about the bacterial load.

Which is why you should not scratch wounds, even when they itch really bad. Here is a pic of my leg from almost a year ago, it got out of control because I kept scratching the wound and ignored the occasional flaring pain until it got so bad that I almost passed out when moving my leg. This is a combination of staph aureus and strep pyogenes when they really thrive in your wound. If those had been resistant strains, I would have been in a lot of trouble.

::: spoiler graphic image :::

19
discuss.tchncs.de

Well, shortly before Christmas 2022, a friend from out of town came over to drink and reconnect. Somewhat late into the evening, I was going to the refrigerator to get some more beer and on my way there I have to pass 2 devious steps totaling about 15cm in height. I slipped, or tripped -I don't really remember-, and fell bang on the edge of the upper step. A fair bit of my tumble was cushioned by my behind (left a bruise there) and the rest was absorbed by my leg. Pic below was from the morning after and the pic in my post above was after a month of scratching that wound and ignoring the damage I inflicted.

It's a pretty neat comparison, you can really see the swelling and which parts of the wounds were surface scratches and which went deeper.

::: spoiler less graphical image :::

3
Infynisreply
midwest.social

It's possible. But corporations haven't changed in the past 100 years. Wizards of the Coast hired the Pinkertons, film studios have more power now than they ever did back when they were broken up with anti-trust laws, and children are still working in dangerous factories. It's not much of a stretch to believe that a massive military contractor would engage in some good old fashioned corporate assassination.

38

Or heck just someone who works there and doesn't want to go down with the ship. I doubt they are having high level board meetings about plans to kill people.

2
lemmy.world

Sure, and I could be Andy Kaufman. You have to admit that there is at least a chance that Andy Kaufman didn't die of cancer, faked his death, hid for decades for no clear reason, and is talking to you now.

11
sh.itjust.works

Add a few letters to afraid_of_zombies and it's an anagram of Andy Kaufman. Coincidence?...

3
sh.itjust.works

That's true, but I would say its significantly less likely than my theory of a person dying, as they often do. Its also a distinct possibility it was caused by an external force as people here are insinuating. I just don't think its a good idea to pretend that's the only plausible explanation.

2
lemmy.world

Sure must be a coincidence. Nothing to see here. Another Boeing whistleblower just randomly died within a month of a different one.

I wonder if you will maintain your position when the next one dies

-1

I have no position other than believing its a possibility it wasn't an assassination. Assuming that's what you're referring to, yes I will maintain that position.

1

dude literally all you have to do for this shit is put people in incredibly stressful situations. It's commonly understand that medical issues, particularly serious ones are worsened by stress.

5
lemmy.world

It was an hospital acquired infection. It happens frequently. This conspiracy talk here is just nuts.

4
Optionalreply
lemmy.world

Well, yeah. It is nuts. That it’s happened twice. In rapid succession.

8

No it didn’t. The first guy died of apparent suicide. I agree that one feels suspicious, but I think there are a lot of “what ifs” getting clumped together into a giant shitball of a conspiracy.

1
ColeSlothreply
discuss.tchncs.de

Getting ahold of mrsa bacteria from a person who currently has an infection would be a trivial matter. The stuff is more hardy than most virus' and can survive on things like towels for upwards of a week without even trying to keep it alive.

2
lemmy.world

You can't just wave MRSA in someone's direction and give them a stroke from septic coagulopathy.

1
ColeSlothreply
discuss.tchncs.de

First of all; I was only answering the question about if you could weaponize mrsa. Not anything about if this guy could have had it done to him. MRSA survives on surfaces for extended periods of time and is very contagious, so yes, it would be easy to do.

As to the rest of your comment: MRSA can cause sepsis, and coagulopathy is a common symptom of sepsis. So really you're just asking the wrong question. The guy died of complications from a MRSA infection.

1

It's not nearly as contagious as you're making it out to be. I'm a nurse who directly cares for patients with MRSA. Nosocomal infections are a major issue and require contact isolation to prevent but MRSA in general is not a particularly scary pathogen. If you wanted to deliberately infect someone, you'd have to straight up inject them with it.

Staph aureus is already everywhere and even community aquired MRSA is becoming common.

There was a time when we screened everybody, but now we don't even do that. It ended up being considered a waste of contact isolation gear and carer time to gown up before you entered 1 in 5 rooms that just happened to have a positive MRSA skin swab.

1
lemmy.world

At his age it’s pretty normal to die from a stroke, if you are 20 years older.

60
Thrashyreply
lemmy.world

Looks like the stroke was a complication from a systemic MRSA infection, which would not be my assassination agent of choice if I was trying to kill somebody on purpose, even if I did want it to look like an accident. MRSA only kills about 1 in 4 people infected with it, and many of those are people who are already hospitalized for some other serious illness. It strikes me as a rather low-probability way to kill a healthy adult.

35
lemmy.world

I really hate it when this sort of thing happens. If you read into this particular death, it looks like a tragic series of unfortunate events and not anything nefarious. The earlier whistleblower death looked truly suspicious and I don't fault people for that one, but this one just isn't. Now this family is going to be dealing with a conspiracy and hounded by insane people while trying to grieve their loved one. I wish people could really look into these things instead of just reacting because Boeing has been sketchy lately.

42
maynarkhreply
feddit.nl

The root of the problem is that the general lawlessness and the actual proven conspiracies make everyone rightly paranoid. If the govt didn't cause the crack epidemic, or didn't actually try brain control experiments on their own citizens, or didn't surveil literally everyone, this wouldn't happen.

29
lemmy.world

Sure, I'm not assigning any blame in my original comment. I agree with your comment, but I also still think we have a personal responsibility to look into these things and be critical. Conspiracy theories can be a failure of the state and of the individuals.

6
maynarkhreply
feddit.nl

The thing with assigning responsibility is that it does not ever solve anything.

Assigning it to individuals actually does prevent solving issues, since if you assign individual responsibility to a systemic problem, you get to - instead of looking for a root cause - say "people should just be better". By attributing it to some individual moral quality, you get to avoid the hard questions - like "why is everyone stupid?" or "why is everyone immoral?", and not realize the environment in which these people live foster the stupidity or immorality, and the only way to solve it would be education or higher standards for leaders.

1
lemmy.world

I agree with everything you said, genuinely. Ignoring societal factors would be foolish and expecting personal responsibility to be the deciding factor is naive. All that said, to ignore it entirely leaves you with an incomplete view as well. People have the potential to be more than our nature and circumstances dictate us to be.

To address your point directly, I don't expect anyone to do anything. I do though believe that personal responsibility is a core element of any non-autocratic political system. I will ask for it, because my fellow citizens belong to the same government I do and I have a vested interest in it working. I'll also be doing what I can to improve those contextual circumstances we mentioned earlier. Expect, though? No, I really don't.

1

I understand your point, but "a culture of personal responsibility" will still be a societal thing. On a moral level, you can of course assign blame to individual people, but that will not solve the problem, and my point is that a lot of people use personal responsibility to distance themselves from a problem and justify why they aren't solving it.

What I mean is that it is beneficial to think of personal responsibility when you think of your personal responsibility. You see somebody stealing public funds? You go and be the whistleblower because you are responsible for making society a better, fairer place.

The problem is when people go and see a problem as someone else's personal responsibility. Simple example, you see a guy throw away some trash on the sidewalk. If you think it's their personal responsibility to keep our streets clean, and you justify not picking it up after them, the trash will still be there, as long as someone doesn't pick it up.

The point is, it's fine to think whatever, but thoughts in themselves won't solve problems. Thoughts are secondary to actions, and whatever thoughts you have that motivate you making the world better are good, and whatever thoughts push you into apathy, or even stir you to actively make the world worse, are bad. The notion of personal responsibility can be both.

1

The sad part is that the situation would be the same if this person had died from a shot to the back of the head while tied to a chair

1
lemmy.world

It’s gotta be the same trolls that visit every Boeing thread claiming accidents are the fault of the airport not the manufacturer. They are fucking relentless.

54
Strykkerreply
programming.dev

First off fuck Boeing. Second off. When a part falls off of a 30 year old plane it's typically because the airline that owns it fucked up in the maintenance of the plane, sometimes it's the manufacturer not stating a correct procedure, or having the stated intervals too long, but just as many aviation accidents have been caused by fuckups during maintenance.

18

Or sometimes manufacturers simply send a wrong manual which doesn't apply to your aircraft at all. And it turns out you have to order one from across the ocean because the whole continent got the wrong manuals. Don't ask how I know.

14
theherkreply
lemmy.world

I read this whole comment thread but somehow missed that one? What prompted this?

15
Smoogsreply
lemmy.world

Any post with the name ‘boeing’ usually comes with the ‘actually’ bots. Just give this one some time for them to recalibrate

5
theherkreply
lemmy.world

Probably, but I can’t help but feel you are what you accuse here, leveling an accusation at a target which doesn’t exist yet.

8
theherkreply
lemmy.world

Fuck Boeing, but your comment was still a nonsense hammer in search of a nail, and what you said would come never came.

1
lemmy.world

But you spoke as if its already happening. in fact your post reads as if you are replying to someone? Honestly if anyone is coming off as a bot its you dude. I, of course, don't think you are but....your post makes absolutely no sense in the current context.

7
lemmy.world

No it's just that you spoke out against Boeing and people upvoted you despite the lack of context.

1
sh.itjust.works

Those people are just clarifying headlines that give no idea how long the plane was in service. If they’ve been in service for over a decade it stands to reason that the maintenance on the plane might have been faulty. OFC Boeing should be investigated due to the door plug blow-out, and have previously demonstrated their willingness to cut corners with the Max debacle. That doesn’t mean every incident is their direct fault, and Airbus can suffer similar incidents but not be reported on.

7

Apparently not wanting to burn Boeing to the ground regardless of who was in the wrong is a sign of being a bot

3
Optionalreply
lemmy.world

Er, no - because the crashes weren’t the topic. It was just very sudden-left-turn which felt bot-like. Agreed about the Boeing crashes, they’re just different from the deaths of the Boeing whistleblowers.

-3

I was responding to someone who specifically brought up the crashes…

It’s gotta be the same trolls that visit every Boeing thread claiming accidents are the fault of the airport not the manufacturer. They are fucking relentless.

3

i waa listening to the dollop (great podcast btw) and they talked about how organized crime in america was just replaced by corporations.

54

It's impossible though. The whistleblower has to whistle to someone from the government. Corps like Boeing pay a lot to many people from the government. In case of Boeing they also pay with the taxpayers money that the government gave them. Which is funny because those whistleblowers likely payed for their own murder.

1
Smoogsreply
lemmy.world

Ew. No one should be chilling with Epstein.

30

The 9th circle in the Inferno was a frozen lake. Though I'd expect Weinstein and Epstein to end up on the ring dedicated to the lustful rather than down on the 9th with the traitors.

3

Well wherever you want to put him, I would not put a whistle blower anywhere in the vicinity of a shitbag like him

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

hey, if you're chilling with epstein we would know whether or not he killed himself at the very least.

Can't deny that portion of it.

3
Sippy Cupreply
lemmy.world

He killed himself.

Was the situation around his suicide orchestrated to give him the best possible chance of killing himself? Maybe. Even that might be giving too much credit to the people who would have the motive to do so.

He was a guilty pedophile, he knew he was a guilty pedophile, and the easiest way out for him was by wrapping a prison bedsheet around his neck.

Give me a solution to his death simpler than he wanted to die, and the people guarding him weren't very good at their jobs, and I'll buy it.

0
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Give me a solution to his death simpler than he wanted to die, and the people guarding him weren’t very good at their jobs, and I’ll buy it.

the fact that someone who isn't supposed to be capable of committing suicide, manages to commit suicide. Is a pretty damn good argument as for why it's not entirely up to them, especially in the scenario that they have no legal autonomy over themselves anymore.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out that a billionaire running a pedo trafficking ring when left alone for about 23 seconds is going to immediately kill themselves.

0
lemmy.world

Weird to link to a publisher from the other side of the planet of where it happened when there’s plenty closer

-2
lemmy.world

I can't imagine the news that must enter your sphere. Only lemonade stands and yard sales from the neighbourhood?

4
lemmy.world

Wichita Kansas is where Spirit is. New Zealand is about as far as it gets from there. Reporters in New Zealand are just regurgitating what they read from more local sources. Being well informed requires good journalism and that requires access to sources so ya I stand by my statement to seek out more local articles

1
lemmy.world

@[email protected] Man, if Boeing had only sung or used nonviolent resistance, I'll bet these whistleblowers would have backed down as witnesses.

Also, tankman is dead. He got ran over by a tank. He really showed them.

-27
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

This guy got so angry at being called out for not having been in the military (as I'm in the reserves and still a conditional pacifist by conviction) and only being able to come up with inane violence fantasies that he had to tag me in another thread.

Go read the original conversation here. Guess he had to try to make a new one, due to getting downvoted quite hard in the actual one for the admittedly silly things he said. :/

Go buff your Walmart pistols, that'll make you feel safer.

Your refusal to read history doesn't mean it didn't happen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Trinidad_and_Tobago#End_of_slavery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage_in_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_Resistance_(Hungary)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1st_Movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1919_Egyptian_revolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-cooperation_movement_(1919%E2%80%931922)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_resistance_movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_resistance_to_apartheid

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Democratic_Revolution_of_1954

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_rights_movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_United_States_involvement_in_the_Vietnam_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prague_Spring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Revolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larzac

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_Power_Revolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singing_Revolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_of_Liberia_Mass_Action_for_Peace

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otpor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Revolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Egyptian_revolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_revolution

11

i think this is probably one of the few times i've seen people start random beef with internet strangers, and i am fucking here for it to be honest.

3

you know what? you've inspired me. believe it or not, i am a person who can change their mind. i'm going to play devil's advocate here and take up the opposite position to what you propose, not because i want to prove i'm right but because you've taken the time to back up your argument with cited examples. i appreciate that. should we start a new thread somewhere? i'm new to lemmy so i'm not exactly sure where the right place would be. i have a lot to do today, so i won't be able to counter you quickly.

let me just say that i'm not angry (well... i'm angry, but not at you). i recognize that we're on the same side and i don't want to disparage a fellow comrade. i respect the fact that you've had military training, and if i can prove you wrong, i hope that you would take a second look at the value you provide to the cause.

we'll discuss this more, hopefully.

-1
lemmy.world

He did not. There are lesser known photos showing him leaving the street. I think a lot of people haven't seen those.

I'm sure the Chinese government disposed of him if they were able to identify him. But as far as I know he's never been identified. I hope not. Brave motherfucker.

9
lemmy.world

i can't cite a source, but i was under the impression he was widely believed to have been run over by the tanks.

0

I’ve seen the pictures on Reddit, years ago. After blocking the tank for a while, he walked off the street going left. He was not run over by the tanks in that column at least.

7

I think that's' one of those "Mandela effect" things. It never happened, but a lot of people believe it did. Our brains take a lot of shortcuts.

5
tal
lemmy.today

If the implication here is that Boeing is assassinating people, I think that that's pretty ridiculous.

-50
odiumreply
programming.dev

Not just one, but two whistleblowers in two months. And one of them said that if he dies soon, it would be a Boeing assassination a few days before he died.

44

well, to be clear, he said if he committed suicide, that he didn't commit suicide. Now i dont know much about suicide because i haven't done it. But if i were to do it, and i was being sued by a large company, i would probably say that they did it to me anyway.

Mostly just because it would be funny, but also because it be partially true, given what probably led up to the suicide itself.

2
alester82reply
lemmy.world

Someone claiming to be a family friend said that’s what he said, after-the-fact. That part of the whole first whistleblower story is far from rock-solid.

-8
Zipitydewreply
sh.itjust.works

John was also in the process of deposition for an appeal to a case he already lost in 2019. If Boeing wanted to kill him they would have before the 2019 trial.

And by the time he complained in 2017, both 787 and 737 Max that he was spilling details on had been flying for years. The FAA investigated and found a decent chunk of the issues had already been addressed. So it wasn't even timely information by the time John spoke up.

2

and if i were a large multinational company trying to kill someone, i would probably do it at the most inconvenient point possible, because that would be murder, and murder would be illegal. But that's just me.

0
wandermindreply
sopuli.xyz

I mean.

One might be a coincidence.

Two out of two? Considering how few high profile whistleblowers there are, that is much more unlikely to be due to random chance, statistically speaking.

Similar to how it's not impossible that someone might fall out of a window and die.

But if in a certain country, important people who have crossed the leadership keep falling out of windows, ... well.

31

That all depends on how many whistle-blower there currently are, I suppose. If there's currently been only less than 10, is really, really, suspicious and unlikely two would die within even a year. If there's 500? Suspicious, but not outlandish.

3

Was this guy high profile? I'd never heard of him. And he was in the hospital for 2 weeks before dying and nobody seemed to care then. When I read the headline, I was extremely suspicious but the cause of death is just completely incompatible with a hit job.

2

So they.... gave him a MRSA lung infection without him noticing? I have never once heard of attempted murder in that way.

Did you read the article? My first thought on reading the headline was "this is extremely suspicious" and most people probably stopped there and went straight to the comment section. But reading the article I see no sign that this was murder.

2
NatakuNoxreply
lemmy.world

If you think a company that knowingly put 10s of thousands of people in danger with faulty planes resulting in over 300 deaths, wouldn't kill two people for exposing said crimes? I have a bridge to nowhere to sale you.

16
lemmy.world

Does anybody actually know how the second person died? It was from an hospital acquired MRSA infection. I think it’s insane if people think Boeing somehow managed that to happen.

6

How WOULD you give someone a MRSA infection of the lungs? Inject it into their bloodstream? Aerosolize liquid with the bacteria in it and then discretely waft it towards them in a public place maybe? That's pretty insane though. The risk to reward just isn't there. And besides, what's the point of killing a whistle-blower who's already blown their whistle, except to "send a message" I guess? And the guy died after being hospitalized for 2 weeks so if he had anything left to say he could still have done it. It's Boeing. It's an aerospace company with shitty, greedy executives. It's not the freaking KGB.

3

You're kidding right? Two whistle-blowers just don't die this quickly.

9
Zipitydewreply
sh.itjust.works

Welcome to Lemmy. Lots of terminally online idiots here. I was hoping this place would be like old Reddit. Turns out it's just as bad as current Reddit without as many bots.

2
talreply
lemmy.today

Well, it depends on the Threadiverse community, as it did the subreddit. I mean, /r/conspiracy probably would buy into an assassination campaign conspiracy theory, but the subreddits I subscribed to on Reddit wouldn't.

5

There's some truth to that... scrolling the Lemmyverse front page is kinda like scrolling YouTube while not signed into an account- its amazing how dumb most of YT is. It's honestly a testament to Lemmy being a solid community that it's even palatable to just consume it unfiltered, although there are still some garbage takes.

1