Spyke
til·Today I LearnedbyVaryk

TIL 40 states in the US charge you $20-$80 a day for being incarcerated in prison.

Very weird that I am so old and have literally never heard this mentioned in a TV show or book or movie or anything.

In four out of five states, if you go to prison, you are literally paying for the time you spend there.

As you can guess, this results in crippling debt as soon as you're released.

The county gets back a fraction of what they hold over your head the rest of your life until you commit suicide(or die naturally and peacefully with the sword of damocles hanging over your head).

$20-$80 a day according to Rutgers.

Counties apparently sue people and employ wage garnishment to get back the money that majority of people obviously cannot pay back.

https://www.rutgers.edu/news/states-unfairly-burdening-incarcerated-people-pay-stay-fees

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay-to-stay_(imprisonment)Open linkView original on sh.itjust.works
Epherareply
lemmy.ml

In particular, to force you back into crime, to be able to pay for that debt.

132
aodhsishajreply
lemmy.world

Absolutely, I mean I'm already a felon, what's one more barrier to credit and gainful employment?

70
programming.dev

Rich people never pay what they owe, especially if they owe it to the gov't. Unlike poor people, the police doesn't knock on their door to get the money.

8

This golden oldie, "all hail the job creators, creators of all jobs."

2
jkrtnreply
lemmy.ml

Did Donald file for personal bankruptcy or did a Donald business file for bankruptcy? It might be like stealing: legal and cool if you are a corporation and the victims are poors.

6

Corporations have more rights than the people, and rich people hide behind their companies. So, without looking it up, I'm guessing trump business.

3
aodhsishajreply
lemmy.world

Bankruptcy without a lawyer, a permanent address and transportation to the courts is a serious hurdle. People rotating out of prison are already at a disadvantage. My point is they shouldn't be in debt when they leave prison in the first place. The whole point is that they paid their debt to society.

This isn't, oh shit I'm in over my head in a cornerstore, restaurant, family warehouse, what have you. It's very tone-deaf to not address the elephant in the room of these people entering society at a grave disadvantage.

The services below should not be necessary for every person incarcerated by the state. The system is broken.

https://legalbeagle.com/5666136-file-bankruptcy-prison.html

https://library.nclc.org/article/bankruptcys-role-alleviating-criminal-justice-debt-0

9
sh.itjust.works

Bankruptcy isn't a bad option if you don't have any credit or have bad credit already. You can turn things around in a couple of months. Also I am unaware of employers performing a credit check as a basis for employment.

15
ainokeareply
lemmy.world

Depends on the company. Background checks can include credit checks. Any job with money or security clearance will check credit and large employers sometimes do as well.

12
aodhsishajreply
lemmy.world

You've chosen your username well.

https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/finance/credit-score-employer-checking

Felonies also don't help with getting a job. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2022/02/08/employment/

Bankruptcy, without a lawyer is not just a couple months. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/credit-score/bankruptcy-on-credit-report/

Also another place where credit can affect your chances is housing https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/credit-score-needed-to-rent-apartment?op=1

And when it's that bad you can just move into a relatives house right? https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11290&context=ilj

2
mander.xyz

Wait, are you unironically advocating for people not to declare bankruptcy after leaving prison with crippling debt?

1

I'm saying it shouldn't be necessary in the first place. You're supposed to have paid your debt to society by being in there. Federal amd state tax money pay for you to be there, charging room and board is predatory.

Just declare bankruptcy bro! Is a very tone deaf response to what is essentially bonded labor.

3

I interned at a bank and they do a credit check as a standard step for hiring someone. I also overheard HR at that bank talking about how they should stop running credit checks before hiring people because they can't use the info from that for anything and it just costs money to run the credit check

1
beanreply
lemmy.world

So felons can do that, but students can’t with crushing loans. Cool

7
Sir_Kevinreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I wish i knew why you were being downvoted but nobody offered a counter point. Bankrupcy seems like a logical solution for this situation.

-1

I hope kbin never federates downvotes because I couldn't care less

but it's probably people who got scammed with student loans they can't discharge with bankruptcy.

1
AeronMelonreply
lemmy.world

I left America over a decade ago due to a laundry list of grievances that I developed while having only ever lived in America.

Once I started living in other countries, I finally developed context to compare my American life with. And it just made things look so much worse than I had previously thought.

And now it feels like not a day can go by without learning some new awful truth about my former home.

94
SaintWackoreply
midwest.social

Where did you go, if you don't mind me asking? It's certainly something we've talked about...

38
AeronMelonreply
lemmy.world

I hopped around Southeast Asia until I landed in Japan.

It's not easy here, and it's not without its own problems, but it works much better for me.

(I'd probably still be in Singapore were it not for the heat. The food is 10/10 and dirt cheap, but I missed seasons.)

(I knew that answering this question would make the jerks upset somehow.)

17
Codilingusreply
sh.itjust.works

Do you have to struggle with the insane only work, no life, salary man/woman problems? Or did you find something that doesn't follow that "life style?"

6

No, I see it but I don't have to deal with it.

It's also not as much of a constant as it used to be.

4
sh.itjust.works

It's unfortunate you left... When good people leave, we're stuck with more of the bad gaining power.

If we lose this country to the bad people even more than it's already been lost, then the entire world may pay dearly as a result.

3

If he left a solid red or blue state, it doesn’t really matter. Our minority representation, first pst the pole voting and electoral college means that a lot of smart people from cities or solid blue areas can leave and nothing will change.

Plus OP’s an outlier, most of us can’t afford to relocate like this.

4

But this has begun sounding like made up details, like someone heard how we feel and they decided to play into those concerns to see how much we'd believe before calling them out.

4
canreply
sh.itjust.works

Yes, but the more I live and hear things about the states it starts to sound like satire or as if it's a joke to see what other people will believe.

9
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

You're just getting older, haha. The longer we live, the more we can't help seeing what's right in front of us.

2
Raffsterreply
lemmy.world

Nah, it's exactly the other way around. Except for a tiny minority. All the others have to ignore what's around them in order to not go insane.

3
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

I can understand why it seems that way, but the broad American public supports civil and labor liberties, green energy, healthy and equitable policies in general; it's the vocal minority that is subverting the will of the more fair-minded, rational and compassionate majority(sure would be nice if more than one out of every three or four people voted).

And I don't even think most conservatives believe in the policies they support so much as they don't comprehend what they're supporting and they are afraid of relinquishing control over what they narrowly perceive as "power" and "freedom".

The ones I've talked to don't.

3
Codilingusreply
sh.itjust.works

I feel like most of them only vote R because they're getting bamboozled into believing that the Rs stand for conservative, Christian, family values.

2

Anecdotally, ignorance and fear seems to be significant factors supporting conservative beliefs.

When I tell a liberal something that they aren't expecting or that they didn't know, they'll respond with "what? How do you know that? Really?"

Then with a conservative, I usually get "No, no. Really? Well, I don't know about that, anyway..."

And that'll be some hard truth or contradicting statistic that the conservative doesn't want to address or learn about because it will fly in the face of a fear or ignorance based belief.

2
lemmy.world

I'd like to believe that. Social Media did a great job of reprogramming people.

1

Media did a great job before that, and humans tend to get conservative as they age, so I think there's a lot of factors working together to make people more cynical than they ought to be.

2
canreply
sh.itjust.works

I'd love to invite you up north but we need to get some housing first.

2
Mangoreply
lemmy.world

We all have housing. It's just a matter of prying the leeches off first.

1
canreply
sh.itjust.works

As long as the leeches are still there then we really don't.

1
lemmy.world

Isn't the US famous for their prison for profit, where prisons are privately owned and states need to pay if there are fewer incarcerated people inside?

To me, this sounds straight from 1984.

106

Yeah, the states is the most country with for-profit prisons, and not coincidentally incarcerates the 6th highest percentage of its population of any country, just about half a percent of the total population at any time, or somewhere under 2 million people.

But boy howdy, do those percentages change when you control for economic class and ethnicity.

30

It's less than ten percent of federal prisons. Police unions (including correctional officers) have a greater impact.

15

I don't remember prisons being mentioned in 1984. They just vaporized people and then acted like they never existed

0

This is some serious "keep hitting yourself" material. It's not like you can decide to not be incarcerated. $7300-$29200 of debt per year spent in prison. Man, that is some vicious shit. Nobody will be able to convince me that this is not specifically designed to keep people down forever.

92
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Exactly. Recidivism makes a lot more sense now.

Imagine if you had $30,000 of debt right after you get out of jail with zero contacts and social support.

Yeah of course you're going to go back to what you were doing before, you have no other options that you're aware of.

Fuck that system.

73
Hobbesreply
startrek.website

You also have a record which makes getting hired even more difficult.

22
sopuli.xyz

A lot of the education programs in prison are equally vile. They have people learn a few skills or trades, then when they get out they learn it’s impossible to get a state license in that trade because they are felons.

2

My wife knows a guy who learned programming in prison. He was apparently extremely lucky in which one he was sent to. And I don’t mean like “was fortunate for how he was charged” no he got sent to the most recent “prison reform” prison. They never close or update the old ones, just use prison reform as a justification to build a new one.

2
lemm.ee

It's not rehabilitation, it's slavery with extra steps

The amendment banning slavery says you can still enslave people if it's to punish them for a crime

Prisons are largely privatized nowadays, creating a demand for prisoners as they profit off of the free labor they get from prisoners

Rehabilitation efforts in the modern penal system are largely non-existent, with people usually coming out more violent and criminal than they came in, even if it was a bullshit arrest.

Black people are incarcerated at higher rates and with harsher sentences than white people for the same crimes, they also tend to get found guilty on much weaker evidence than their white peers

If you think it's a coincidence, I can't help you

8
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Were you responding to me specifically or just sharing this information in general?

1
lemm.ee

I am talking to you, I'm just saying the system wasn't designed this way out of stupidity, but malice.

2
dgmibreply
lemmy.world

And it’s never going to change either. No politician would ever campaign on a platform of prison reform, few would even vote in favor of it. Imagine the attack ads “Jeff Jackson wants to let murders and rapists go free and work at your kid’s school. Jack Jefferson protects kids and is tough on criminals voting three time to ensure growth of his investments in PrisonMegaCorp make sure they rot in prison forever… I’m Jack Jefferson and I approve this message.”

3

Prison reform can happen in the United States, and it can be used as a platform by Earnest politicians like Bernie Sanders or AOC.

Prison abuse and reform happened in other countries, and there isn't any evidence for inherent American exceptionalism

People are people, so positive prison reforms can happen in the States too.

3
redcalciumreply
lemmy.institute

It would be nice if the prisoners could take class or earn a degree while in prison, at least when they get out they have a new skill or a degree so they have a better chance to get a job to pay off their prison debt.

17
lemmy.world

In Finland low risk prisoners can even get (or keep) a job. They drive a loaner car from the prison to their job in the morning and then drive back to prison in the afternoon.

26
lemmy.world

Oh here in America they have to hold a job. If they work really hard they may even make a few dollars a day

6

It's actual the one instance where slavery is legal, and most prisoners are black because of obvious racial bias in the court system.... I wonder if that's a concidence....

1

Well after they’re done shaking down your loved ones too. It’s ok together you can all theoretically scrape together enough to keep you fed

2

As someone who's lived in the US her life everytime I hear about other first world nations it sounds so idyllic that if you put it in a Utopian Future Sci-Fi novel I'd laugh and call it hopelessly optimistic and just incredibly naive about how humans work....

But... no... people outside of America actually live like this...

This is not a cry for help (It totally is, I hate it here)

But for real though, if America wasn't a world power (at the expense of its citizens' well-being) or if there were other world powers strong as or stronger than it that weren't Russia or China, I would not be even slightly surprised if it offered amnesty to US Citizens fleeing Late Stage Capitalism, at this point it'd be morally justified...

The UN actually did surveys here and found that Americans (especially in rural areas) experience levels of poverty that said UN believed to only exist in the worst case scenarios of 3rd World Countries. The problem is THAT bad...

God I hope there's an afterlife, that may be the only way any of us see true freedom... escaping reality itself.

2
Daqureply
lemm.ee

Do all the politicians sleep in prison?

1

What do you mean? I was talking about having education in prison.

1

Omg I can hear my parents now:

"Wait, I had to work and save and still not be able to afford an education?!?! I sHoUlD hAvE jUsT hElD uP a CoNvEnIeNcE sToRe."

I agree with you, 100%, FWIW. I'm just imagining the asinine conversations we're going to have to have with people who don't understand that the world doesn't revolve around them and they're not the main character.

8
lemmy.world

Not always.

Regardless of the fact that prison education is clearly beneficial for the prison population and wider society, many prison education programs experienced significant budget cuts. States with large prison populations had cut prison education funding by 10%, on average. On top of this, further research has shownthat states with medium-sized populations slashed education budgets by an average of 20%.

The introduction of the Second Chance Pell Experimental Sites Initiative helped fund additional programs in 2016, although access to postsecondary education in prisons remained limited because the scheme served a maximum of 12,000 prisoners annually. Since, the program has enrolled 22,000 participantsand 130 colleges in the scheme, although only 7,000 individuals have earned credentials. Due to this, many of the 2.1 million people who are currently incarcerated in the U.S. are denied access to education.

However:

To find out how people who have been in prison feel about this situation, we conducted a survey of 100 people who have recently been incarcerated. Surprisingly, they told us that they were generally happy with the education opportunities presented to them. Overall, 74% of our respondents told us that they disagreed with the statement “I had no access to educational programs/education whilst incarcerated.”

As well as being offered an education, many of our respondents told us that they were actively encouraged to take part in these programs. More than 60% of respondents disagreed with the statement “I was not encouraged to participate in educational programs whilst incarcerated.”

So access to education seems to be one of those things that is at least partially lip service. Education might be offered, it also might be substandard compared to a regular school. However, if it is offered and decent, inmates who have participated in getting a GED or better education state that it did help with avoiding recidivism and having better mental health.

https://www.degreechoices.com/blog/prison-education-usa/

8
morriscoxreply
lemmy.world

A survey of 100 people out of 10s of thousands is useless.

0
lemmy.world

Ok. Glad you weighed in with your expertise. This may not be the exhaustive survey that would offer incontrovertible proof, but it’s what we’ve got. Care to offer anything to the contrary other than an opinion?

0
morriscoxreply
lemmy.world

You can cherry-pick anything if you have 22K people to pick from and only need 100. We don't how and at which point the question was asked. We don't know the selection process. All we know is that they got 100 people to say something. It shouldn't matter if we agree with the findings.

-1

Ok. So you’re attacking the source, not the argument, while absolving yourself of any effort to contribute to the discussion. Well done.

0
havokdjreply
lemmy.world

You can, just not a degree specifically but you can get certifications and a ged in prison

2
sopuli.xyz

I commented this elsewhere, but a lot of those certifications are not worth anything because if you are a felon you cannot get that state license.

1
havokdjreply
lemmy.world

You absolutely can still use those certifications and they are often the stepping stone to help you get your foot in the door in an industry. I used to work IT in corrections and while not everyone winds up making it, I've seen felons go on to make $40/hr doing welding.

I do not agree with the US when it comes to corrections at all and I think it is blatantly abused in order to incarcerate as many people as possible, but I will give credit where it is due, not ALL hope is lost if you get incarcerated

0

You can use some of them, but there are a few like a barber’s license (in some states) that cannot be used.

People spend their time thinking they are reinventing themselves in prison only to find out they cannot work in said field/trade.

1

That would happen if Rehabilitation was the goal, that is not the point of the private prison system, the point is to legalize slavery.

2
Daqureply

If the twos are very small, it might be a heavy three.

1

"It's not like you can decide to not be incarcerated"

You can though..

-3

It's actually worse than that... I went looking for a list, I found this:

https://www.vox.com/2015/5/26/8660001/prison-jail-cost

"Forty-three states allow inmates to get charged for "room and board" — the cost of their own imprisonment. Thirty-five states charge inmates for at least some medical expenses. Taken together, at least 49 states have a law on the books that authorizes at least one of the two. (Hawaii, as well as DC, doesn't have statutes that explicitly address pay-to-stay.)"

89
lemmy.world

That's the beauty of both ruling parties being 100% in support of the prison industrial complex. In fact, our current president even helped usher through the '94 Crime Bill, which keeps prisons nice and full for his golf buddies and institutional donors.

86
Ookami38reply
sh.itjust.works

Remember, though, that people, opinions, and political landscapes can change. Yes, Biden was pretty shit back in the 90s, but it actually feels a little bit like he's trying to move back in the other direction. Don't gotta forget the bad, but also can't forget the (attempts at) good

59

Right it's important to remember 94 was literally 30 years ago. Attitudes can change significantly in that time.

46

Yeah, he wants to be known as a good guy. Look at GW Bush. They all want to be known as good guys late in life. Gates, Buffet, et al.

6
lemmy.world

Remember, though, that people, opinions, and political landscapes can change.

Yeah, but Biden hasn't.

Remember when he mocked 'Defund the Police' in his first state of the union address?

He's an authoritarian. Always has been, and he's been a reliable vote in favor of every regressive piece of legislation that's led the country to this point, where fascism is becoming normalized.

-11
lemmy.world

Oh, please. If he was an authoritarian, he would behave like Trump or any other authoritarian ruler out there.

Remember when Trump was president? He would kick reporters out of the white house, or tear gas people in front of the white house for a photo op. He said stuff like "I totally won't do this," then the very following day, he would do that. His speech was divisive. Should I go on?

17
lemmy.world

Just because Trump was more personally belligerent doesn't change the fact that Biden is an authoritarian.

-21
lemmy.world

You just spotted my flawed argument. True. Biden is not authoritarian, though.

Tell me how is Biden authoritarian, Russian Agent #4557?

13

People change as the issues become more apparent, when Obama was elected he said he "Respected the LGBT Community" but firmly believed "Marriage is between a man and a woman"

This same president gave us Gay Marriage in all 50 states

13
Ookami38reply
sh.itjust.works

He's had some policies I agree with, that move us towards a less police state level. I admit, I haven't followed him super closely, he's less interesting than things have been lately, but at least the federal decriminalization of marijuana and pardons (I know they were effectively useless, didn't really do anything - we can get into exactly why) show he's at least trying to do what constituents want, which is a far cry more than a lot of other politicians.

Can he, should he, do more? Yeah. But credit where it's due, he seems like he's trying to steer two giant ships - his own past biases, and the United States political climate. Both of those are slow and hard to do, so anything moving in that direction should be celebrated.

5
havokdjreply
lemmy.world

Don't be fooled, Joe doesn't give a shit about decriminalizing any substance, after all, he wqs the biggest proponent of the RAVE act

-2
Ookami38reply
sh.itjust.works

See, this is EXACTLY my point. We all get obsessed over the things of the past, and while those can help inform us of the present, they're not actually the present.

Yes, he was a proponent of the RAVE act. That's one of those "don't forget the bads" that I mentioned. We can accept that, and also accept that he seems to have lightened up on that BS in recent times.

No one's perfect, everyone changes their minds about things. You did horrible things in your past too, almost certainly. That's not you, we can accept that, but for politicians it's this unchanging thing - you supported one thing, you will always continue supporting that thing.

Let people grow. Let ideas be brought up, and shot down. Let mistakes be in the past, and start focusing on what's actually happening in the present.

10
havokdjreply
lemmy.world

It's not about "being obsessed with the past" it's about paying attention to history, particularly a certain person's history. Joe biden had not been even remotely interested in legalization/decriminalization until he started running for office. Joe Biden was already an old man when he pushed for enforcement of the RAVE act along with other drug bills, I can maybe understand his "concrete jungle" statements from the 70's, but we are literally talking about barely over 20 years ago.

All I am saying is to be cautious and not too trusting, ESPECIALLY of politicians.

0

Right. As I said, you can use the past to color your present, but the thing that matters presently is present actions and, to a lesser extent, words. So, judging him based on his actions during presidency, which should show us either his current beliefs or, at least, his willingness to listen to constituents.

During his presidency, he's been... Well, I won't say stellar, but his actions have been more in line with someone who actually wants better, rather than someone who wants to cling to old habits. Again, could he do more, yes. But his record -recently- has been, for a politician, pretty good.

You bring up the RAVE act. That was 20 years ago. 20 of the most eventful years in at least modern history. Do you think someone is incapable of change for 20 years? I know I've changed drastically just in the last 2 or 3 years. I mean, yeah, he's old, but I've seen old people change too. Might not come full revolution, change is slow, but again - any progress is worth acknowledging and celebrating.

Is there something he's done during his presidency that leads you to believe he's still got those same values from prior? We can talk efficacy of some of his planned solutions, and some of his lack of a spine, but I think overall his actions are consistent with his words, in this regard.

7
Aolleyreply
lemmy.world

When in most of our lifetimes has the u.s. presidental election not been 'the lesser of two evils'?

1
lemmy.world

Liberals hate the fact they openly support a right wing segregationist authoritarian

-1
lemmy.world

criticize him all you want... after he's elected.

we all hate the either/or state of american politics, but it's still the reality. live in reality, ppl.

4
lemmy.world

You consent to all these issues with your vote for Dems. I on the other hand will express democracy by voting for a candidate that opposes this: Jill Stein.

-8
lemmy.world

you mean to tell me you're going to vote for jill stein in november? what state do you live in? it better not be a battle ground state

1
lemmy.world

Absolutely, because she is the candidate of the largest party I agree with.

-4
lemmy.world

Biden or Trump winning is a major loss. Instead build a better party instead of complaining.

-5

Biden or Trump winning is a major loss.

They aren't equal. They're both shit, but they aren't equal. And I don't know about you, but I'd rather keep my right to vote, which is under threat thanks to the likes of Trump.

Instead build a better party instead of complaining.

Not seeing anything you've built. All I see is you complaining about Biden and Trump.

If you want better, we need electoral reform. Our current system is mathematically biased against third parties.

1
lemmy.world

I vote third party.

Choosing between a giant douche and a turd sandwich isn't very appealing to me.

Also, people like you pretending you didn't need the votes of people like me is how we got Trump in the first place.

-19
lemmy.world

sure. hold humanity hostage because you can't get exactly what you want, traitor. i'm not going to kiss your ass to vote for practical results. if you're too blind to see what you're doing, you can live with the consequences. i have a feeling you have a lot more time left on this planet than i do, junior.

11
Tattorackreply
lemmy.world

Jesus Christ, you're calling another person a traitor over... this. XD

You Americans are like a bad parody. What a terrible farce this is.

-1
lemmy.world

In a two party system, voting third party will only ever result in your vote being thrown out. It is taking a stand against reality for the sake of your own personal idealism.

A lot of left-aligned voters learned that lesson the hard way in 2016. If you didn't learn the lesson, you either weren't paying attention or your idealism is more important to you than the actual outcome of the vote.

Doing that willingly, despite (or maybe because) the rest of your side screaming at you not to fuck this up again, is absolutely a level of betrayal.

0
Tattorackreply
lemmy.world

Yeah, this whole explanation is just you saying "Our country is broken and I don't want to fix it".

2
KrapKakereply
lemmy.world

Yea OK, just keep voting for same parties over and over again. Let's just maintain the shitty status quo where nothing really gets better regardless of who is in office!

1

So your solution is to vote in protest for a party you know won't win.

I'm actually curious now, what possible good do you think that's doing?

1

Blah blah blah same propaganda, same lies. Even a fool could say you're trying to get Trump elected.

1
lemmy.world

I just heard about that for the first time a few days ago, and I couldn't believe it was real. As horrible as I think the United States of Ferenginar is, they always manage to surprise me and be worse.

67
lemm.ee

I have to keep asking people not to compare American Capitalists to the Ferengi

The Ferengi have a rule book dictating the ways they are and aren't allowed to rip you off, American Capitalists would call that level of honesty and integrity Far-Left Socialism

47
samus12345reply
lemmy.world

The Ferengi are also perfectly happy to break any and all of the rules if it means more profit - that's probably one of the rules.

17
Sippy Cupreply
lemmy.world

Most of the rules have a counter, opposite rule. IE, war is good for business, peace is good for business.

14
samus12345reply
lemmy.world

I think they're "War is profitable" and "Peace is profitable". Which I guess isn't really contradictory. They're profitable in different ways.

7
knifereply
lemmy.world

There's nothing more dangerous than an honest business man.

10

The people writing these laws and the people paying them to write them are the ones who belong in prison.

38
lemmy.world

I have a friend who was in. Outrageously expensive! Paid 'rent', paid for various classes he was required to take, and paid for each mandatory random drig test. Plus, what they have to pay for phone calls is crazy!!

36
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Yeah that is totally crazy.

I've obviously heard from movies and stuff that you have to pay for your phone calls, but not once have I sienna depicted prisoners paying for their jail time and paying for the classes they take prison.

It's totally insane

10
PineRunereply
lemmy.world

$12 for a 15 minute phone call, more if it's considered long distance.

8

Let me guess - long distance is if it's outside the prison? /s

7
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

You mean the prison forgives your prisoner debt if you make license plates?

6
olavreply
theweird.space

@Varyk I didn't say that. AFAIK you're mostly down to having friends send you money for soap and toothpaste

-4
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

What do you mean by your comment "I think it's forgiven if you take the job making license plates at $2/hr sometimes $2/day"?

9
olavreply
theweird.space

@Varyk ultimately they want the slave labor for the companies they contract with.

I mean even when it's not a corporate "for-profit" prison it's still for-profit by the government. Even in California

-2

I'm missing something, because all of your comments are way out of context.

Were you trying to respond to somebody else initially?

7
lemmy.world

This is what conservatives wanted. This is what Democrats wanted. This is what capitalists wanted. America is a fucking authoritarian shithole. It has no concept at all what freedom is, and never has. All of that "freedom" shit is a bald faced fucking lie.

And now some asshole raised in some Appalachian shithole is gonna stomp in here and try to tell everyone that America is great because he served in Afghanistan and if you hate America move

33
ADTJreply
feddit.uk

You think this is bad, we recently had a high profile case in the UK finally overturn a law where people who were found to have been wrongfully imprisoned had fees deducted from their compensation to pay the prison service for their food and accommodation.

Imagine spending years of your life in prison on a false conviction and then finding out you have to pay the government for the privilege.

22
lemmy.world

I am not surprised, as the UK is who taught the world the concept of ownership and financial enslavement. The US is the eager scion of such pedigree

8
sh.itjust.works

hey, the uk has taught the world other things too

like how to make concentration camps

5

Don't forget, the U.S. has had some fun lessons to teach others. Like there was that time when the U.S. taught Germany how to make gas chambers and use them on "lower races".

hOmE oF ThE fReE

1

rationales justifying these fees routinely do not recognize them as a form of punishment and instead policymakers see pay-to-stay as financial reimbursement to the state by portraying incarcerated people as using up system resources. The justification allows pay-to-stay statutes to survive legal arguments alleging double punishment.

32
lemmy.world

I read the wiki page. Pretty barebones, but it did link to https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34705968

In theory, I could entertain an argument about having criminals repay some of the costs of dealing with them, that's not what's going on here.

The sum that is able to be collected doesn't go straight into the county coffers, either - the jail contracts with a company

The jail gets 30%, the company gets 70%.

It really just looks like just another way to exploit prisoners for profit.

28

Yeah, that's what the Rutgers article at the bottom of my post was for, more context.

There is no doubt that the prisons are using pay for stay as an excuse to hoover up more money from the most vulnerable populations.

6
lemmy.world

Might be somewhat acceptable if a job was available while in prison to support these living expenses. That at least might improve confidence and start the rehabilitation process.

Oh wait, who am I kidding. Prison has nothing to do with rehabilitation.

28

Not in the states. US prisons are exploitative first and punitive second.

19
Traegertreply
lemm.ee

There are, but the jobs available pay like $1 or 2 a day

5

On release: "you've paid your debt to society, now pay your debt to the prison!"

23
lemmy.world

The very idea is absurd. It is so counter productive to the idea of rehabilitation. The prisons themselves say they aren't a significant revenue stream. Trying to offset the cost of a societal need by charging fees to prisons doesn't even make any sense. And the companies that are tasked with collecting this debt get 70% of what they collect which means that even the argument about offsetting the state's cost doesn't make sense.

It's profit seeking, counter productive cruelty and that's it. Just shameful.

21
lemmy.world

Trying to offset the cost of a societal need by charging fees to prisons (sic) doesn’t even make any sense.

Sure it does. It costs $$$ to build jails and prisons and more $$$ to run them. Why should I, the victim, have to pay twice? (once for my car, which the thief stole, and again in my taxes to fund the legal system once the thief is caught)

I can very much entertain an argument like that (counter-argument, pay prisoners minimum wage for whatever work they do and charge the $20/day from that).

But that's not what's going on here.

This is about a collection agency figuring out how to profit from a captive audience. It deserves the same regard from us as prison phone operators do.

It's really just another form of predatory bullshit.

The prisons themselves say they aren’t a significant revenue stream

This is crucial here, IMO. We could put whatever we want on the bills -- hell, we could charge a million dollar fee for each sentence! That would fix the funding problems -- but the simple truth is that most of the prisoners don't have the money.

2
orrkreply
lemmy.world

the overwhelming majority of inmates are non-violent offenders, often times in prison for the heinous crime of: smoking weed, or some other petty crime

2
lemmy.world

Okay? I don't understand what point you might be trying to make with this statement, even if it were true.

But the actual figure is 45% for drug offenses. That is the single biggest category, but I find it disingenuous to characterize "less than half" as "overwhelming majority".

-2
orrkreply
lemmy.world

so, here is the fun bit about statistics, when you have more than say, 3-4 different options the thing with almost half generally is an overwhelming majority

1
lemmy.world

No, it's incredibly misleading. When you said that, I expected to find something like 80% of prisoners are there because of drugs. Instead, I find that it's less than half.

-1

it's not misleading at all? half is a REALLY large amount. like i get that this is an issue of humans not having math brains, but imagine if you will:

a bag with 20 marbles, 10 blue, 3yellow, 2red, 2pink, 1green, 1black, and 1 clear.

0

If the issue was cost, you would build schools. A better educated population get less sick, earns more and thus pays more taxes, commit way less crimes, get less social welfare, in short it is a net gain in tax dollars.

Plus, someone who gets out of jail with a big debt will very likely cost way more to society than what could ever be recovered from them.

1
lemmy.world

The US is in free fall. Kinda crazy to see how passive the people are there.

16
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Americans are protesting and many are getting physically assaulted and arrested for protests everyday, and there are many civil rights and labor rights groups constantly bringing lawsuits against the government, actively changing policy.

24
Anticorpreply
lemmy.world

Unfortunately the government has been very busy snatching up essential liberties and writing bullshit laws, and it's almost impossible to keep up with the protests and lawsuits. The politicians get paid to be there, and can spend all of their time on legislation. Once they pass something, boom, it's in effect. Then it costs organizations and citizens tons of time and money to protest and appeal what was so easily done by the legislators.

8
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Fortunately, there are a lot of people who don't give up because stuff gets hard.

7

And gaining ground in other areas.

It's the long and arduous process of fighting for and maintaining civil rights, nobody is going to snap their fingers and make everything better.

3

So many people get a hard-on about the 2nd Amendment but they're all too spineless to invoke it.

0
lemmy.world

In Oz you get paid a small amount per day so you have some adjustment money when you get out

13
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Oz is better.

Is the far right movement down there getting as bad as it is presented, or is that just the only thing newspapers talk about besides the wildfires?

8
lemmy.world

Nah, we have what we call casual racism, but the real far right intense stuff is a vocal minority. I live in regional NSW and we have a growing immigrant population, largely from Asia and Africa. The colour difference between what was here 5 years ago and now is there if you care to look but honestly it is just people being people for the most part, nobody really seems to care. That said, our billionaires are a major issue and government capture seems inevitably unless major reform goes through.

4
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Best of luck.

I was in and around Melbourne for a few months, and everyone I met seemed very cool, just people being people, so that's good to hear.

Except, what shocked me over and over again as I traveled, was I always met someone who loved Trump.

Like I was staying with this hippie outside melbourne couchsurfing and he started talking about Trump and Q, and I had no idea what he was talking about at that point, and after I found out what conspiracy theories q was putting forth. I was so confused as to how this hippie wholeheartedly believed in things like pizzagate or the like.

1

I was so confused as to how this hippie wholeheartedly believed in things like pizzagate or the like.

Too much snoop smoke while browsing 4chan is my guess

2

I had a psychiatrist for my ADHD who went off the deep end on Q and Trump. It is entirely possible to get a high end degree without critical thinking skills, so seeing someone with at least 10 years of university, medical school, and specialisation in psychiatry going off the deep end is not impossible, just a bit odd to process.

That said, I think Australians tend to be a little more up front than North Americans, so when someone seems to just spew whatever they are thinking they seem more familiar. That said, someone spewing garbage should not be seen as normal but here we find ourselves I guess.

1

So they can sponge off any legal judgements you get for false imprisonment

11
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

And then if you can't pay after you get out, they'll sue you. I can't find evidence that you'll go back to jail, but I'm sure it's happened.

1

I thought last I heard about this that the bills for this weren't usually called for payment unless you were suing them for something. Could be mistaken

9

It's state dependant.

This article has a few Connecticut examples of the cruelty of the system and some background, from before Connecticut mostly abolished the pay to stay practice (thanks to democrats): https://apnews.com/article/crime-prisons-lawsuits-connecticut-074a8f643766e155df58d2c8fbc7214c

So apart from coercing inmates to do for profit work for pennies (other countries would call it slave labour), some inmates also get to pay for the privilege on top of that.

Here's a more comprehensive article on how inmates and their families are being milked in the USA : https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/americas-dystopian-incarceration-system-pay-stay-behind-bars

5
lemmy.ml

Indicative of a failed system OR a abusive system.
Pick one.
There are no other explanations.
Pick one.

9

There are definitely other explanations, and neither of those are helpful or tell the whole picture.

4

It only makes sense if you think of criminality as some baked in trait in someone or see hurting criminals as the goal in some twisted sense of justice.

3
YeetPicsreply
mander.xyz

I feel the same way about media control and social punishments for thought crimes.

-2

"social punishments for thought crimes."

You mean consequences for what you say?

$1000 says your post history shows you to be a completely horrible person.

4
sh.itjust.works

What do they do if the incarcerated people are unable to pay the fee? Do they just let the debt add up? That's awful...

8

That Rutgers article says that they literally take people with a debt to court, or they take money from your wages while you're working, assuming of course that you can find a job after you get out.

13
lemmy.world

Counties apparently sue people and employ wage garnishment to get back the money that majority of people obviously cannot pay back. For the rest of their lives until they commit suicide (or die naturally and peacefully with the sword of damocles hanging over their heads).

6

Sounds like good incentive to not have a normal tax paying job and rather maintain under the table and/or illegal ways of making money.

14
lemmy.world

They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison Following the rights movement, you clamped on with your iron fists Drugs became conveniently available for all the kids Following the rights movement, you clamped on with your iron fists Drugs became conveniently available for all the kids I buy my crack, my smack, my bitch right here in Hollywood (Nearly two million Americans are incarcerated in the prison system, prison system of the US) They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison (For you and me to live in) Another prison system Another prison system Another prison system (For you and me) Minor drug offenders fill your prisons you don't even flinch All our taxes paying for your wars against the new non-rich Minor drug offenders fill your prisons you don't even flinch All our taxes paying for your wars against the new non-rich I buy my crack, my smack, my bitch right here in Hollywood (The percentage of Americans in the prison system, prison system, has doubled since 1985) They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison (For you and me to live in) Another prison system Another prison system Another prison system (For you and me) For you and I, you and I, you and I You and I They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison for you and me Oh, baby, you and me Oh Oh All research and successful drug policy show that treatment should be increased (Oh) And law enforcement decreased while abolishing mandatory minimum sentences (Oh) All research and successful drug policy show that treatment should be increased (Oh) And law enforcement decreased while abolishing mandatory minimum sentences Utilising drugs to pay for secret wars around the world Drugs are now your global policy, now you police the globe I buy my crack, my smack, my bitch right here in Hollywood Drug money is used to rig elections and train brutal corporate sponsored dictators around the world They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison (For you and me to live in) Another prison system Another prison system Another prison system (For you and me) For you and I, you and I, you and I You and me They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison They're trying to build a prison for you and me Oh, baby, you and me

8
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Yeah that's a good one.

You can separate the lines so it's not all clumped together by adding double spaces at the end of the line.

I had to do that once when I posted a message like this, haha.

I felt like a dingus tapping out all the spaces, but it was very satisfying when it was properly formatted.

4
mander.xyz

For music the backslash at the end (\) is also useful, as it allows you to split verses without a new paragraph. For example

verse 1\
verse 2

verse 3\
verse 4

appears as

verse 1
verse 2

verse 3
verse 4

4
w2tpmfreply
lemmy.world

You can separate the lines so it's not all clumped together by adding double spaces at the end of the line.

I'm fully aware of this and saw what it did when I pasted it in....however...

I felt like a dingus tapping out all the spaces

I was also aware of this before I even began to, so I didn't bother.

1
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Did you see that slash trick
another commenter says

if you throw a after a line
all of the following lines will be

Automatically formatted
Correctly
For song lyrics Not this one though

Oh, but you still have to throw a after every single line. \

1

I literally copy/pasted the thing in two clicks and had zero interest in spending time making edits.

1

Very weird that I am so old and have literally never heard this mentioned in a TV show or book or movie or anything.

I don't think that's weird at all. But it certainly says a lot about the US media landscape.

7

I've also never met anyone in real life who has ever heard about this.

And at this point I've texted everybody I know.

How did zero people ever in my whole life know this?

Like I know lawyers, and we've occasionally talked about how terrible the prison situation in the United States is, it's crazy that not one of them mentioned that prisoner is also have to pay to stay.

Ever.

Charging a prisoner to stay in jail seems like one of the cruelest parts of prison, now that I know about it. That seems crazy.

And that's what literally everyone I have told is saying.

"That's crazy." And it is. It's crazy

3

not sure which ones, but at least one charges you per day for the length of your sentence even if you're let out early

4

But the important thing was to tie an onion on your belt, as it was the style at the time.

3
lemmy.world

it's sad and conspicuous that all of the reasons you hear about these days that would actually justify going out and killing terrible people mostly all involve things the American government has done or permitted. Truly the driving force for evil in the world.

3

They're barely a 200-year-old country; relevant for roughly 80 of those years, the states are not the ultimate driving force of anything, and certainly not a vague concept like evil.

This specific issue is a failing on part of its citizenry, in company of many failings, but the country is not a static moment in time defined by its failings.

0
lemmy.ml

Lol at those citations. low bar.

2

In Utah, you get charged fees by the day if you've been charged and/or convicted of a misdemeanor. No charge if it's a felony. They figure they'll get their moneys worth if the inmate goes to work at Utah Corrections Industries.

2
Varykreply
sh.itjust.works

Even if you're just charged, or you have to be convicted and in prison?

3

Nah, lots of things are getting better also.

Also, it's not as cool to joke about suicide as you think.

2