Spyke
lemmy.world

Democrats keep trying to increase minimum wage, read a fucking News source.

132
lemmy.world

The problem is, we need caps on profit margins on necessities, and to stop the making of things we need for basic survival investment opportunities.

But that would be difficult to get done. So they go for the low hanging fruit of wages, which never permanently solve anything because they’ll just keep raising prices under this scamflation cycle we’ve been in since COVID.

21
Scratchreply
sh.itjust.works

Every service that is necessary for human survival should have a not-for-profit vendor.

16
lemmy.world

When all it takes to stop them is the nonbinding opinion of an unelected advisor, are they really trying, though?

13
LemmysMumreply
lemmy.world

Politicians love non-voters, one less idiot they need to convince.

1

I mean, look at how hard Republicans work to increase non-voter numbers. Kinda telling what the outcome is.

3
lolcatnipreply
reddthat.com

Maybe if Democratic legislators vote harder, the Republicans won't be able to stop them!

-1
shyguybluereply
lemmy.world

Or a single House speaker that refuses to even bring it up for a vote. Or or a dipshit that brings it up for vote, then filibusters their own bill (coughMcConnellCough)

6

The obvious fact that Republicans are much worse doesn't make it ok for the Democrats to not fight for the things the overwhelming majority of their voters want.

2

The parliamentarian's word is law, baby.

If only people could eat Democrats' excuses, no one would ever go hungry.

-1
midwest.social

They just repealed right to work in Michigan, and Meijer employees presumably used that leverage to significantly improve wages and benefits.

6

Right to work is another BS right wing policy that needs to die. I put in less than two weeks notice, I'm an asshole; company drops me in an instant, business as usual.

4

When will they finally increase it to something plausible, and then appoint some department to review and increase it in line with inflation every year according to XYZ rules.

Seems silly to need acts of congress to increase it every time.

1

*Pretending to try

Important distinction. Its an old tried and true election year chestnut they trot out every few years to hoodwink a few idiots. They refuse to use power when they have it, and cry about being unable to do anything when they dont.

inb4 - That they havent packed the court to unfuck Roe negates any point you may conceivably be contriving in the moment you read this. So save your breath.

1
Asafumreply
feddit.nl

Minimum wage is not the same thing as a living wage. The minimum wage should be a living wage, but it isn't.

See: NY. We just got our minimum wage increase and it's 15-16/hr depending on where you are in NY... That's what we were fighting for more than ten goddamn years ago. $15-$16/hr is an absolute joke on Long Island and NYC. I finally managed to claw my way up to 60k/year and as a single guy the thought of homeownership on long Island is as fantastical and far-fetched as a unicorn, forget about 15/hr... You can't even rent most illegal apartments at that income alone.

The conversation needs to be about what constitutes a living wage and how to calculate it at a given time for each area not just blanket minimum wage increases to specific numbers that sound nice to chant like "fight for fifteen."

-4

Lol getting down voted out of pure tribalism. The complete unwillingness of their base to seriously criticize Democrats is such a massive fucking turn off to voting for them.

-4

Minimum wage and living wage are two very different things. Most Democrats absolutely do not support a living wage, and don't try to lie to us about how they do.

-5
Blooperreply
lemmy.world

No, one of the two parties makes posts like this to make stupid people say "both sides" whilst said party passes laws to suppress black votes, discriminate against gay folk, and ban abortions.

Quit trying to "both sides". It's what stupid people say.

7
kadotuxreply
lemmings.world

But I'm not saying that. I'm saying that a two-party system is stupid. And I'm saying that as a citizen of a country that has 9 political parties. edit: to make it clear, if I'd be an American, I'd definitely vote for Dems, no question about it.

0

Why are they trying, and not doing tho?

This is saying that tho

You can't say "but Democrats" then say "I'm not saying that"

1

Republicans aren't stopping states like NY or CA from passing a living wage. Democrats are stopping that.

So sick of the straw men and blatant gaslighting coming from the democratic party. Anything to excuse why corporations keep getting their way with Dems. Meanwhile it takes 10 fucking years to increase the minimum wage in a blue state.

-3
NateNate60reply
lemmy.world

My home state of Oregon mandates a minimum wage of $13.20 in rural areas and $15.45 in the Portland metro area, and it adjusts to inflation. Oregon has been governed by Democrats for years. Thanks to these and other laws, I can go down to a McDonald's and get a job that pays $16-17 an hour to start in my city. TriMet in Portland is always advertising a $28 starting wage for bus drivers (no CDL) up to $37 after three years. Rent in my city is $800-900 for a one-bedroom flat with excellent free public transit and fair bikeability. Fuel prices are reasonable. We have strong protections for tenants against abusive landlords. Strong anti-discrimination laws. Everyone has paid sick days. No regressive sales tax. Working-class people can afford a roof over their heads and decent food on the table.

Check out the neighbouring state minimum wages.

  • Washington (Democratic government): $16.28
  • California (Democratic government): $16.00
  • Nevada (divided government): $12.00
  • Idaho (Republican government): $7.25

But yeah, keep harping on about how both parties are the same and that Democrats don't do more to help the working man.

79
pingvenoreply
lemmy.ml

My home state of Oregon mandates a minimum wage of $13.20 in rural areas and $15.45 in the Portland metro area, and it adjusts to inflation.

I was part of that! I was on a team that made a web site that visualized the effect on poverty levels on a county-by-county basis when the minimum wage was at different levels. It made the need for a split minimum wage obvious, since the minimum wage that is necessary for metro areas is inappropriate for rural areas. Rumor has it that the legislature used it in the decision making to some degree.

30
lemmy.world

That's actually better than I thought. People in other states are so used to the dysfunction that they literally don't believe these things are possible.

10

Good news doesn't spread as quickly as bad news and rage bait. "McDonald's Workers Can Afford Flat on 1/3 of Income" isn't a good headline but "Families Increasingly Priced Out By Red-Hot Housing Market" does.

6

I think that's why it's important to encourage participation in the primary process. There are the neoliberals mixed in with the social democrats and actual socialists. We should be voting for and supporting the latter in the primaries if we want to influence the party in a leftward direction.

4
rambarooreply
lemmy.world

None of these are living wages. You don't get a cookie for doing the bare minimum of keeping people out of effective slavery. Give me a fucking break.

-1

Your other comment says—

So pathetic how you claim to support democracy but shit on anyone who criticizes your precious political party and then make juvenile excuses for doing so.

I don't. But it's undeniably true that one party is much better, in my opinion, than the other. They aren't a perfect party but to equate them with the Republican Party simply because they aren't doing a perfect (or in many cases, even a good) job is stupid.

Right now, the choices are "bare minimum" or "nothing at all". These choices are not the same. One is clearly better.

If you would like a more nuanced opinion then read carefully the rest of my comments in this thread. I'm not going to repeat my points for every person who comes along with the same retort and insult thinking they've "got" me.

1
kbin.social

"Look at how well the democrats allow the capitalists to treat me as they ensure they can continue to exploit my labour for their own profit uninterrupted!!11"

(seriously - start by looking at those companies profit margins for a tip of the iceberg idea of just how much they are making off of your labour before you do a happy dance over a couple of dollars more they're willing to throw your way to keep you from demanding actual freedom)

But yeah, keep harping on about how represented you are in the sham they call electoral politics..

-14
Sprokesreply
jlai.lu

I think OP is just saying that democrats are better than Republicans. We have multiple parties in my country but people vote for tree ones that support capitalism and rich people. We also have people that support a politician that was found guilty of fraud.

Rich people have power so they can do what they want.

17
NateNate60reply
lemmy.world

Arguments against electoral democracy by so-called socialists always boil down to "it's not perfect so why bother".

Okay, so keep complaining. Your vision of a better tomorrow isn't going to magically come true if you complain hard enough. You can help make it come true only by participating in the political system we have today. Even if you think it doesn't work, you have no choice but to participate anyway and hope you are wrong.

This is how I got banned from Hexbear. I told someone "You can either participate in the current system or plot to overthrow it. Are you working with the next Lenin or Mao, or merely fantasizing about it?"

So what about you? What are you doing to build the future you want?

3

Have you ever been to California actually? Yes the situation is bad but not everywhere is California is like that.

13
explodiclereply
local106.com

That's waaaay more complicated than just minimum wage. $16 isn't even a living wage here in L.A. where we've got lots of homelessness.

We ought to employ Land Value Taxation to fund the basic necessities for survival, and the remainder should go towards a UBI.

5

For what it's worth, the minimum wage in LA will rise to $17.28 in July of this year. I get that's still not very high by LA standards, but I stress that progress is better than stagnation.

3

Yes, and that's because the progressive and left-wing of the Democratic Party is losing a power struggle against the centrists and neoliberals. If you want to change that, be sure to vote in the party primary elections and to encourage everyone you know to do the same.

Register to vote

5

There's an $18 minimum wage in Denver, for instance. Republicans sure as hell didn't vote for that.

24
lemmy.ml

Yeah, subby. We get it. "Both sides are bad." But one side is boring corporatists who don't give a crap and the other side is 100% concentrated evil fascists, authoritarians and religious nutjobs. And while that's a choice between the lesser of two evils, it's not a difficult one.

89

That may have been the point of the original comic, but given the caption, I think OP's point wasn't that both sides are bad, but was that a two party system is inherently biased towards corporate capture.

17

That’s the problem with this “both sides” take. Yes, there is no true leftist party in the US. They’re both corporatists. The Republicans are undeniably much worse, though. Anti-union, anti other labor rights, oppose every kind of social safety net, want to privatize (loot) and profit from public assets, are thoroughly in favor of racist classist policies of every type imaginable. Some democrats are too, but ALL republicans are like that.

14
explodiclereply
local106.com

We do get it. It's obvious. It's so obvious that the only people still supporting FPTP are in favor of it; they don't give a crap about selling us out to fascists.

And the "not fascists" angle worked a lot better when they weren't aiding a genocide.

4
IIIreply
lemmy.world

aiding a genocide

As opposed to the alternative who is in rabid support of multiple genocides...? You are SO smart and totally know what you are talking about.

3
lemmy.world

And while that’s a choice between the lesser of two evils, it’s not a difficult one.

There's other choices. Moderates and Biden could choose to compromise with leftists and progressives any time. But all signs point to them preferring to lose to fascists a second time.

2
tills13reply
lemmy.world

No, there are two choices. It sucks and nobody likes it but if you don't vote for a Dem you are giving a vote to a Rep. Cut the crap.

8
lemmy.world

nobody likes it

Moderates like it just fine. They're happy continuing to elect awful pro-corporate, strike blocking, genocide supporting piece of shit candidates and then expecting leftists and progressives to support them in the general. If moderates didn't like it they would have voted for one of the many alternatives in the 2020 primaries.

You need to cut the crap. Stop lecturing leftists and progressives and giving moderates a free pass. Moderates are the majority voting bloc for Democrats and thus they take the lions share of the responsibility. Spend your effort lecturing them.

-3
tills13reply
lemmy.world

I'm further left than you but anyone with a brain knows that it's a two party system and any vote for any other party is just pissing in the ocean. Find change inside the party with progressives but at the end of the day you (unfortunately) either vote blue or red or you might as well not vote at all.

5
lemmy.world

You can call yourself whatever you want but if at the end of the day you vote like a moderate your beliefs make no difference.

0

No. I'm fine with voting 3rd party or writing in knowing they'll likely not be elected. Are moderates fine with Biden losing to Trump? If not then they need to find some policy to compromise on in order to encourage progressives and leftists to vote for Biden again. We compromised in 2020 and voted for Joe Biden in the general. We've gotten fuck all for it. It's time for a compromise in the other direction. There's no point for us to stand around a table when moderates refuse to give us a seat.

0
uisreply
lemm.ee

Corporations pay evil fascists to be evil fascist so you could choose "lesser evil"

-1
uisreply

Sounds like average election candidates in Russia.

  1. Stalinist
  2. Member of LDPR
  3. "Let's calm down" member of United Russia
  4. Noname(if lucky)

UR always makes themselves to look like lesser evil. "Look at these clowns", "old thief is fed up, new one will be hungry and steal more", "look how experienced we are". If they don't have 1, 2 or 4th, they will make their own janitor to run against them, so they will look like "lesser evil".

Btw janitor won.

2
lemmy.world

I'm just here to watch the complete and total dumpster fire in the comments.

54
discuss.tchncs.de

Minimum wage works. Here is an article from the german newspaper FAZ (leans economically right) that presents a study that shows the low income sector has shrunk since the implementation of minimum wages.
Germany before had one of the biggest low income sectors in the western world.
And no, the unemployment rate did not skyrocket. In fact, Germany is as close to full employment as it gets.

43
uisreply
lemm.ee

Germany is as close to full employment as it gets.

I wonder what they do in 21st century when everything is mechanized and automated like never before.

2
explodiclereply
local106.com

That's literally the exact same thing they said about the 20th century.

4
uisreply

UBI and nordic-level welfare should have been implemented in 20th century.

6
lemmy.world

Oh look, more both sides trash slapped on top of someone else's work. Lazy fucks can't even propagandize properly.

37
lemmy.world

How about spending some of your time and energy telling moderates they can either compromise with leftists and progressives or lose to fascists a second time?

17

But if they compromise with leftists instead of telling them to suck an egg, they won't have a scapegoat anymore to blame all their losses and woes on!

Sure, they might just win instead, but that's like at best third on their list of priorities behind corporate donors and the status quo.

9
Bobmightyreply
lemmy.world

The dip shit fascist lost like a punk bitch even though they cheated like hell. He's going to lose again.

-3

...as long as we all do what we can to stop him.

You can't just leave it as inevitable. We cannot afford ANYONE to become complacent!

9
lemmy.world

Biden had a lot of help in the 2020 general election he won't have this time around. I won't be voting for him again. I'll be voting 3rd party or write in.

-8
Bobmightyreply
lemmy.world

All you said is that you're voting trump. Lots of people said the same dumb shit last time and trump lost his ass. I'm not worried about folks like you. Plenty of you folks aren't even real anyway. Lots of far right astroturfing.

7
lemmy.world

I voted for Biden in the 2020 general election. That was before he decided to block the rail strike and support genocide.

-8
Bobmightyreply
lemmy.world

I'm totally sure you did bud. Enjoy supporting fascism in the next election.

7

I'm not the one supporting fascism. Moderates are doing that in every single primary election.

0

Both sides are fascists, you can't compromise with either.

-7

It's not really propaganda when it's true, at least not in the negative sense of "false manipulative information." If it wasn't true we'd already have it. Republicans don't have complete control everywhere, and there are states where Democrats have complete control and they don't do it because corporations have complete control over most Democrats.

"We" have like a handful of actual progressives in the entirety of our government, state or otherwise.

-5
bob_lemonreply
feddit.de

🚫 Both sides are equally bad.

✔️ Both sides are bad, but not remotely equally so.

35
TrickDacyreply
lemmy.world

I would say medium-light grey and the deepest black imaginable

6

Well yeah, if you're going to actually describe reality instead of erasing it, I'm on board

4
lemmy.world

When it comes to the Federal minimum wage, they are equally bad, as is the point of the comic.

0
TrickDacyreply
lemmy.world

Really? Are democrats opposed to changing that, or just not prioritizing it because it can get complicated and there are a million other concerns?

7

It's the first part. The vast majority of Democrats are "moderate" and "corporate captured."

It's not a "both sides are equally bad in all respects." It's "both sides will not give us a change of law to enable a living wage be the standard." It's only speaking to that one aspect.

It might also be a complicated topic, but you don't solve a complicated topic by never starting on it.

0

Are democrats opposed to changing that, or just not prioritizing it because it can get complicated and there are a million other concerns?

Are those "concerns" bigger than the concern of Trump winning the general election? Make a choice. Raising the federal minimum wage in order to avoid losing to Trump sounds like a bargain to me.

-1
lemmy.world

Then spend some of that energy telling moderates to start compromising with leftists and progressives if they don't want to lose to fascists a second time.

-1
IIIreply
lemmy.world

Sadly, while we would value your support for stopping multiple genocides by voting against Trump, your numbers are far outweighed by that of moderates. I am sorry you can't comprehend very basic cause and effect and if that costs us our country, I guess you can rest well being so stupid you won't think you were part of the problem.

4

Well which is it? If our numbers are insignificant then we can't be part of the problem because we have no effect. Pick a lane.

-1
lemmy.world

There are two sides, but you can alter that a bit if you get your asses to the primaries.

27
literature.cafe

Lol, my primary choices 2024:

Biden

Democrats completely gave up on local elections in a purple county because it's in a red state.

5
fidodoreply
lemmy.world

There are lots of things to vote for besides president. Frankly, if your political involvement is limited to caring only about the President once every 4 years, then you have no right to complain. The only way to change things is to get more involved, not less.

6

Congress matters way more for minimum wage than president.

In Cali we can choose between Porter and Lee for (somewhat) pro-labor policies. Schiff is a standard Clinton OligoDem.

I prefer Lee's policies, but am worried that she and Porter will split their votes and put Schiff through.

4

Meanwhile in California there are a ton of choices, but the party has already decided who's gonna be the candidate in so many other states, that we don't count.

2

If every person on Lemmy was a US citizen that voted for a single third party, it still would not make a difference.

1

Criticism of the comic aside, two party system is still definitely undesirable. I believe it is a side effect of first past the post voting. What we really should implement is ranked choice voting. It gets rid of the dumb "voting third party is voting for [opposite party]" argument by letting you vote for who you want guilt-free and falling back on your lower-ranked votes if #1 wasn't popular enough.

But you know, this will always meet resistance because politicians would lose their jobs for implementing this.

26
lemmy.world

None of these things will pass so long as moderates would rather lose to fascists than compromise with leftists and progressives.

6
Lizreply
midwest.social

That's why you gotta pass it using a referendum. Take it out of the hands of the legislators and into the hands of the people. Ohio just enshrined abortion protection into their constitution that way.

1
lemmy.world

Odd that Democrat controlled states like California haven't done the same thing.

1
lemmy.world

We all agree with this premise and mostly that the FPTP system is a large contributing factor to the TPS saying how it has based on seeing how places that don't have a TPS appear to do so because the have different voting systems like different iterations of ranked choice voting.

What I am wondering is what 'we' think the best way to implement voting would be?

7
lemmy.world

Can't remember which South American country did it, might have been Venezuela, but at least one of them has an official app. You register to vote on your 18th birthday, and get daily notifications about the various proposals at each level of government that applies to your address. They also created a team to boil the proposals down into plain language. You vote personally and the government has to, in theory, listen to the will of the people.

Of course that system will still be susceptible to propaganda, as evidenced by the fact that whatever country did it, still has some serious issues.

3
lemmy.world

Sorry. I remember the article from around 2016. I searched as well, but came up with way too much noise to find the actual one that I was referencing

1
lemmy.world

Its always refreshing to look at the american political system if i am disappointed by the German one. Sure our sucks too, but at least we have more then 2 unvotable major parties.

4
NateNate60reply
lemmy.world

In the German system (or any other multiparty system), voters can effectively punish a political party without wasting their vote, because there is a lot of overlap between the parties.

If you don't like the current coalition but are a left-leaning person, you can vote for Die Linke. You might not agree with all of their positions but you at least can agree with some of them. Even if that is not palatable if you previously voted SDP you can switch your vote to Green or vice versa to punish the specific officeholders representing your constituency. If you voted for the FDP last time, maybe try Union next time. There are many ways to do this, and overall I think it makes the parties themselves more accountable to the voters because voters defecting their party list votes can drastically change the makeup of the Bundestag.

Similarly, right-leaning UK voters are punishing the Conservative Party by threatening to or actually voting for Reform candidates. Scots can punish the SNP by voting Labour.

You can't do this in the US. In the USA, the only recourse the voters have over the parties is to vote out undesirable candidates through primary elections so that the party cannot nominate them. This works alright, sometimes, but it is not an effective way to punish party leadership for bad decisions, and many primaries are uncompetitive anyway.

3
Asafumreply
feddit.nl

Same comic, just change the little guy to "Socialism 2024" and the two big guys to "DNC & Biden"

-7
lemmy.world

No we don't. Not so long as the moderates would rather lose to fascists than compromise with leftists and progressives.

4

The idea that you can change the world by voting is quaint, but you can change the world.

0

All you'll be demonstrating to the DNC, establishment Democrat politicians and moderates is that you'll vote blue no matter who so they'll continue to slide to the right.

1

I definitely don't, but together we have some semblance of power.

1
lemmy.zip

222 downvotes lol this really struck a nerve in liberals huh

2
abbenmreply
lemmy.ml

It's just shallow and disappointing.

Your idea of what politics is about has to be bigger than shitposting and trolling.

0
Arelinreply
lemmy.zip

Sorry that you expected a 200 page analysis of politics from a meme

1

I love this, nobody can actually defend this as a healthy way of engaging with politics.

-2

Oh phew, I was worried. Okay okay, what year is it? Do you have any plutonium? I need to get back to my dimension and you've been so helpful so far

0

2 party system is almost the same as 1 party dictatorship. You do need unlimited amount of parties to have any kind of democracy

-7
nexguyreply
lemmy.world

We definitely don't have a two party system. Trump came in and invented a whole new party just like that. We have republicans, democrats and trumpers.

4

Pro-Trump Republicans and anti-Trump Republicans are not at all separate parties, and 99% of anti-Trump Republicans still support him in practice when the alternative is working with Democrats.

Saying they're separate is like saying AOC and Nancy Pelosi are in different parties.

8
nexguyreply
lemmy.world

If you want to get pedantic then the US has MANY different legal parties. Functionally only three that matter.

4

Still I think people should pay more attention on smaller parties. But nice to see a third big party forming

0
infosec.pub

Don't ask your government for a living wage. Or your employer. An education that gives you leverage to negotiate a living wage tough... that's totally a governments responsibility and in its range of possibility. Everything else is a social subsidy which is fine as long as you call it by its name which is disability pay and unemployment pay. Ask your government for that too.

-52
lemmy.ca

Teachers are very educated and yet have very low wages. The problem is not that workers are not skilled enough, it is that system isn't giving them their fair share. All the profit goes to the rich, while poor are getting poorer.

34
nomadreply
infosec.pub

Teachers are state employees. Their pay is a disgrace.

3
suppo.fi

You need to learn a skill that leads to a living wage. Demanding politicians to directly do that is pointless, they are absolutely unable to give you that. The only thing they can directly do is set a minimum wage, which is essentially a lie. It doesn't actually give you a minimum/living wage, instead it makes you completely unemployable if your wage level is between 0-(minimum wage).

As u/nomad mentioned, demanding structures that make getting an education easier or give you safety nets when things go to shit, or basic income/negative tax rates for low incomes is something politicans can do. But don't demand stupid things like minimum wage, they might actually do those.

-67
Oversparkreply
feddit.nl

Not sure what you have against minimum wage, it works well in other countries (I'm from the Netherlands). Obviously it doesn't solve everything by itself, but it's definitely a valuable part of a range of measures to treat people fairly. It's a fantasy that everyone can be educated to a level above minimum wage.

38
mellowheatreply
suppo.fi

Not sure what you have against minimum wage,

Having bit more than basic education in economics, I suppose.

It’s a fantasy that everyone can be educated to a level above minimum wage.

Is it more or less a fantasy than the fantasy that every employer is able to pay the minimum wage?

-34
lemmy.ca

If company can't pay it's workers a living wage, that company shouldn't exist.

23
mellowheatreply
suppo.fi

Indeed. That's exactly what will happen. And then people whose wage level is below the minimum wage will be unemployed.

-17

Ah, got it, so all our problems are the fault of those pesky workers wanting to afford to survive, and not those who refuse to function unless they're exploiting others..
Makes perfect sense, "economist".. 🙄😂

15
mellowheatreply
suppo.fi

Or UBI as we seemed to agree on other part of the thread. Either of these are better solutions than minimum wage.

-7

Minimum wage works. Here is an article from the german newspaper FAZ (leans economically right) that presents a study that shows the low income sector has shrunk since the implementation of minimum wages.
Germany before had one of the biggest low income sectors in the western world.
And no, the unemployment rate did not skyrocket. In fact, Germany is as close to full employment as it gets.

16
irmozreply
reddthat.com

You are not entitled workers just because you started a business. Pay them well or don't run a business

16
mellowheatreply
suppo.fi

Yes, that's what happens in a minimum wage environment, although not every single time like people have shown in these threads. But when somebody doesn't start a business, that's invisible.

What is visible is when an existing business's costs rise above the minimum wage level. There are plenty of reasons why this could happen, 9/10 of them not being "the C-levels are paid too much". That's when they start firing people or just go under which essentially fires everyone.

Perhaps we want a society that don't have employment for the people who can only work below a minimum wage level. That's some sort of a decision, I just want to be honest about making that decision.

-15

It doesn't even happen a statistically significant number of times, you're just parrotting what executives want you to believe, believing they know what's best for you

5
lemmy.ml

You clearly don't have more than a basic education in economics if you're peddling debunked bullshit.

9
mellowheatreply
suppo.fi

That video does give good arguments, but to suggest that this is not a controversial issue in economics is perhaps a bit dishonest. Granted, I suppose I suggested that as well.

e: that channel's Breadtube vs Economics series seem pretty good, thanks for the pointer. Seems like the channel is left-leaning, and this makes me doubly happy. A political left with good knowledge on economics would be a great thing.

2

These folks seem to have a different understanding than you.

Specifically:

Since as many as 10 percent of the lowest-wage workers leave or start jobs every month, any decrease in the number of full-time equivalent jobs will mean that some workers will take more time finding a new job, or will work fewer hours. But many of these workers may still see their annual earnings rise because of their wage increase.

6
lemmy.world

You clearly don't have even a basic education in economics. There's enough data across a variety of jurisdictions and history at this point to establish the effectiveness of the minimum wage.youre choosing to ignore that and simp for managers and capital owners.

5
uisreply

Having bit more than basic education in economics, I suppose.

Good for your family I guess. Now study cybernetics.

Is it more or less a fantasy than the fantasy that every employer is able to pay the minimum wage?

Is that why it seems you have negative wage?

-1
gigachadreply
feddit.de

You need to learn a skill that leads to a living wage. Demanding politicians to directly do that

This is a perfect example of traditional neoliberal rhetoric, attributing success solely to individual effort and downplaying structural obstacles. It operates under the assumption that everyone has equal opportunities for success, which is simply not the case. This ideology perpetuates the existence of a low-wage sector for those who may not have had access to the same educational opportunities, such as migrants, single parents, and others facing systemic barriers. The American Dream, often touted as a symbol of success through hard work, is a myth perpetuated by neoliberalism. It is important not to buy into the narrative that one's circumstances are solely their own fault. Statistics show that social mobility is much lower in the US compared to many European countries, which further disproves the idea that hard work alone guarantees success.

38

But don’t demand stupid things like minimum wage

Wow. Let’s come back to reality for a moment.

There are millions out there that cannot afford to make themselves employable. They work long hours, possibly two jobs, plus a hustle just to not make enough for ends to meet. How do they go back to school? Learn a trade?

I am one of them, except I haven’t found my hustle yet. I work 40+ hours each week, but I take home so little. I was able to make rent two days ago, for last months rent. I have to hold off on a one of my meds, because paying rent took precedent over everything else, again. People like me don’t give a shit about programs that cannot help us in the short term. We already know our long term: work until we die, with nothing to show for it.

We could turn down the heat, so that the frogs might be able to escape their boiling fate? No, let’s design a better pot that won’t boil the frogs. The ones in there now won’t make it, but their progeny will also likely…not make it.

You ought to check yourself before you call what can be a major relief for millions, stupid. Seriously.

16
lemmy.ca

Sure, it is my fault that even though there is enough food and most of the farming is automated, I still need to work for it because I don't own the land. We shouldn't ask them to fix it for us, they never will. We need to take control of the land that feeds us.

4
mellowheatreply
suppo.fi

I don't know you, but I can guess: it's almost never the individual's fault. But we should still look for efficient solutions, not populist non-solutions.

3
lemmy.ca

UBI is very efficient. Efficient for the working class, not so much for the capitalists.

7
kbin.social

Lmmfao, so you're against minimum wage claiming it's a non-solution (and also that some workers must gain further education to even "deserve" it) while advocating UBI, which is a solution on the exact same level as minimum wage is - the level that still allows capitalists to exploit the labour of others for profit (except with UBI, it is the government compensating them from the tax pot, either way, it's working people paying the highest price - freedom).

Never mind that the meme doesn't offer it up as a solution to anything, but more of a bare minimum that neither democrats nor republicans will give, because, and this is the point the meme is actually making which seems to have gone completely over your head - both democrats and republicans work for capitalism, not you.

Truth is, you're just here to flex your "economist" muscles, but instead you're just spewing clueless yet confident incorrectness all over the place.. 😂

0