Spyke
lemmy.world

What happens to the rapist, then? Can he get partial custody of the child? Can he use that as an excuse to keep meeting or at least indirectly interacting with his rape victim?

What a great healing agent, to force women to be repeatedly reminded of that time when they were raped.

173
lemmy.world

This is just a step to eliminating rape as a crime, they'll find some way to justify as "for the babies", the GOP are completely garbage people.

97
Drusasreply
kbin.social

Generally yes. They can even get partial custody.

41
wickedreply
programming.dev

Don't worry, the good bible has the answer.

28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered,
29 he shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

20

Good damn it's so obvious the Bible was written by mediocre, out of touch men

12
LOGIC💣reply
lemmy.world

That's pure evil, but one part stands out, not as the worst part, but somehow still stands out.

"and they are discovered." What's that got to do with anything? If this is from the religious point of view, then surely God knows what he did, so why would it matter if they're discovered. If it's from a legal point of view, then of course you can only redress crimes that are discovered, so there's no need to include that phrase.

So, including that phrase doesn't seem to have any relevance or benefit. Conversely, including a phrase like that does imply that if they're not discovered, then God doesn't care whether anything happens to the man. The girl has been violated and lost her virginity. But since they weren't discovered, there's no penalty, even from God.

The other thing this makes me think about is, "If the penalty for breaking a law is simply a fine, then the law really only applies to poor people." So, a person who can afford fifty shekels of silver can just pick any maiden he wants to marry, as long as she's not pledged to be married, even if he's old and gross. All he has to do is something terrible and then get "discovered." This section simply seems to legalize rape for rich people.

8

Fifty shekels of silver? That's how much today in Stanley Nickels?

1
Empricornreply
feddit.nl

A child that will be a living, breathing reminder of their attack for the rest of their life is also a cruel thing to force upon them. But this is masochism sadism.

6
lemmy.world

From the article: "Also in 2022, a Michigan Republican candidate said he told his daughters “If rape is inevitable, you should just lie back and enjoy it.”

I do not think I've ever read a statement from someone that has pissed me off so fucking quickly. Someone needs to check on this man's daughters and fucking take them from him, forcibly if necessary, ASAP, and then put them with a family who legitimately loves them.

FUCK I HATE THIS TIMELINE.

114
Ekybioreply
lemmy.world

Dont hate the timeline.

Hate Republicans. Thats just more honest.

40

You're right. They are the ones platforming these types of people.

I'd like to hope that enough of them would hear something like that and be like "Gross, I want nothing to do with the likes of this fucking asshole", however, unfortunately, I do not know that this would be the reality. Which is an absolutely mind-boggling statement to make.

11

I would make this guy walk around with a cantaloupe in his ass for 9 months and then shit it out, take it home a day later, and send him a bill for $10k a week later.

83
Kbobabobreply
lemmy.world

What makes you think he doesn't already like shoving huge things up his ass?

13

Bad take, straight men can enjoy a good pegging. Also empathy is not a prerequisite for homosexuality. I wager empathy has nothing to do with sexuality nor is it any indicator of sexual preference.

This is just bullshit he's spewing to justify forcibly spawning more meat for the grinder, by hook or by crook. While I don't know if he's married to a woman, I highly doubt he'd think this would apply if his wife was raped and became pregnant as a result. Carrying a rape baby to term is for proles in the eyes of people like this

5
lemmy.world

You don't want to do these fuck-knuckles any harm, you just want to give them opportunities for great healing events of their own.

24
z3rOR0nereply
lemmy.ml

I so wish there was a way to take away all this guys money, power, status, and then force him to push a baby out of his urethra...and then ask if he feels "healed".

7

People like that are evil and will never care about their victims even if they themselves experience what they put the victims through. The only thing that will deal with him is a guillotine.

4
sh.itjust.works

This dude looks like he has some kind of ulterior motive, here.

What i am saying is: he looks like a rapist.

64

Yeah, it looks like he wants to rape women and force them to have his rape babies. I'm guessing he's already raped somebody, based on this pro-rapist attitude.

25
lemmy.world

If nothing else, he needs to come to terms with his vanishing hairline with more dignity than that. That 'Ghost of Chunk Sloth from Goonies' hairstyle does nothing fire him.

11
WindyRebelreply
lemmy.world

Fuck no. Fuck. No! Sloth is a treasure and a good man. Just wanted respect as a human, to show his strength, and have a Baby Ruth.

Sloth is too good for this fucking degenerate that even a single celled entity would reject.

31

Plus, he had the excuse of being dropped as a baby a few times. What's this guy's excuse?

16
kbin.social

I literally feel ill. Like physically ill. My wife blessed me with my baby boy and imagining that someone could force her to go what she went through to get him into this world is... IDK what it is... Too angry rn. Fucking disgusting fuckfaces!

60
Skeezixreply
lemmy.world

Conservatives are horrible people at worst and deluded at best. Conservatism is a mental disease.

10

Let's not conflate hideous morals with mental illness.

2

Rape Babies (Noun) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Rape Babies (Verb)

30

Of course the members of the pedophilia party would say that having a rapist's baby would be beneficial to the rape victim.

53
kbin.social

It seems more honest than touting exceptions as some sort of compromise. Have you ever thought of what a rape exception (or other exceptions) looks like in practice? They just don't happen. How many abortion providers are willing to test the law? How many pregnant people are able to get a police report necessary to be exempted? How many abortion providers are even practicing in states with rape exceptions to their otherwise strict abortion laws?

Arguing about what exceptions should or should not be on the books is a distraction. It's only service is to placate the general public into accepting barbaric abortion bans.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/01/21/us/abortion-ban-exceptions.html

42

It's also the most logically consistent. I respect these shitstains infinitely more then Republican politicians who support exceptions.

Respect is doing a lot of work there, but really it comes to down to fact that at least they ACTUALLY believe abortion is murder.

All those other GOP politicians who support exceptions are just groveling maggots.

What? You believe it's okay to murder babies in certain circumstances? Get fucked.

If you're going to destroy the lives of countless women, at least do it because you have an actual deeply held conviction, and not simply that you want to win a primary.

14

I wish we had technology that could do that so this fucker gets to experience that

17

This fuck-knuckle has 5 kids. If any of them are girls, I'd bet good money he wants this because he wants to be sure they can't have an abortion when he knocks one (or more) of them up, as part of his Handmaid's Tale fantasy.

36

We are reaping the rewards of "respecting religious beliefs".

I would absolutely abolish the goddamn psychos.

15
flickerreply
lemmy.world

Did you just make me, for half a second, support the serial gang rape of Senators who support this legislation?

26
pivot_rootreply
lemmy.world

I support the serial gang rape of Senators who support this legislation in perpetuity. If they're going to support this shit, they should walk a few hundred miles in their victims' shoes.

21

But he'll never get pregnant or birth a child, so the empathy argument goes out the window.

He's never going to suffer consequences unless we make him.

5

Why the fuck are repulitards like cartoon villains except without the humor?

30

I always knew something is wrong with a state when the local state drivers are policing the speed limit in the fast lane on the interstates.

1
lemmy.world

What is this garbage talk about God controlling whether a woman gets pregnant or not? It's a biological function, if the egg is there when the sperm is there, you get babies. It is not some holy blessed event -- God causing babies is about as sensible as the stork bringing them.

23
lemmy.nz

It's all part of God's ineffable plan.

Just like all the rape, cancer, pain, and evil in the world.

All part of the plan.

8
Subnet64reply
lemmy.world

Cabbage patch rape babies. The must have Christmas gift this year

10

I’m already at “Maximum Revolted,” but nice try.

3

This fucker deserves to be reincarnated as a women in medieval time and have a forced birth so he can experience what he puts women through

19
lemmy.world

These people should get intragastric balloon shoved up their ass and inflated so they can feel some of the "greatest healing" first hand. It should be done against their will as well since they claim it's not an issue. You know, not to be left out of the whole greatness. Not quite fair that only females get to experience it.

If anyone complains how "god didn't meant for balloons to be in our assholes", just make a counter argument: if that were true why did it make us fart then. Clearly air is suppose to be there.

18
kbin.social

I can't even believe what I'm reading.

Maybe this asshole is an example of a forced birth, it's why he believes in it.

Buddy, I hope you are forcibly raped with the biggest dildo in existence and not lubed either.

14
lemmynsfw.com

Anyone that actually believes this shouldn't be allowed to continue breathing.

I'm done being nice about this.

13
blazeknavereply
lemmy.world

I mean .. we could shove a 10 cm bowling ball up his ass against his will and see how he feels thereafter

7
lemmynsfw.com

You KNOW he's just going to respond "I've had bigger shits" and then cry about it in a closed room. If logic was ever going to work on these morons, it would've happened decades ago.

e. I feel like it's also important to note that there are dumb as fuck women who also believe this fucking nonsense and these laws would have far less efficacy if it didn't have their support (looking at all those ladies with (R) beside their name)

5
blazeknavereply
lemmy.world

I know, it sucks. It took years of therapy and separating from my ex and other unhealthy relationships to realize you can't debate crazy.

2
lemmynsfw.com

I think it was worth your time trying. There's always the possibility somewhere down the line that the individual(s) you spoke to will encounter a situation in their life that will force them to reflect on their views and attempt to update them from archaic to pre-modern.

Discussion is never a failure, in my opinion, but I absolutely believe it can be seriously draining.

2

Wow, not a single downvote against violent comments. Honestly taken a back by that.

0

If you give them an inch, they will take a mile.

"We would never take a mile, you have our promise"

And here they are taking a mile.

Suprisedpikachuface

12

I'll bet he thinks forced marriage to said rapist is a Great Healing Agent too. (He's never advocated this as far as I know, and I'm not trying to put words in his mouth. But c'mon, we gotta Bring Back the Nuclear Family, no?)

10

Would a rapist not take this as encouragement? Would this not make women feel incredibly unsafe? Why do men have no equivalent laws that restrict what they can do with their own body?

8

what do you expect. missouri republicans see women as brood mares, and brood mares aren't people.

I'm this close to expecting them to call women "fee males".

8

The problem is (a) Republicans don't care if the issue isn't their own, and (b) Republicans seem to lack the capacity for identifying systemic failures. It's like an object-permanence thing with them. If they can't physically see the thing happening directly with their two eyes, then there is no relation. Like they're blind to negative externalities or indirect side-effects. at the macro level.

In other words... There's a reason these folks don't normally make great engineers or scientists.

4

Frankly, he should be forced to watch the still birth of his own child from 10cm away, at breakfast time, every day for the rest of his life, while some sanctimonious asshole tells him and his wife it's all part of God's plan.

3

Republicans should do a Jonestown to protect the children. Far more effective than whatever it is they are doing now.

7

He's making great arguments for one abortion that would've made the world a much better place.

6

Force him to have a baby. He'll change his tune as its ripping his urethra. I hope this awaits each of these bastards if hell were spiritual instead of physically on this Earth.

6

So's flushing these fucking GOP turds down the toilet.

Them not existing anymore would heal the fuck out of me.

5
lemm.ee

This is EXACTLY what Republicans mean when they say they're HARD on Rapists! After a Rapist Rapes your daughter it's illegal for her to get an Abortion and if she does her Rapist gets a bunch of money from her!

4

how ironic, if a man rapes a woman she's forced to have the baby and he goes to jail. but if a man rapes HIS woman (wife, daughter, sister), she'd forced to have the baby but he needs to die.

they don't care because this doesn't involve them.

1

Look, if our species was somehow struggling with birth rates and was on the verge of extinction, I might agree… but taking away someone’s bodily autonomy? No, that’s a step taken way too far over the line.

2
jordanlundreply
lemmy.world

Removed, rule 6, 24 hour ban.

"No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning"

1

We should relegate all of them to their own country. Not succession. Just give them Texas, and maybe Oklahoma, and have them all live in it. We'll take everything else.

2

(sigh) Rule 6, 24 hour ban. Entirely too much of this today.

"No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning"

0