Spyke
lemmy.world

Turn back stranger. This thread is full of people arguing about history and political theories without any clue about either.

139

Hold my common sense, I’m wading into a political comment section!

6

Thanks for the warning, but I ignored it and regret this decision.

17

I too saw this on top, and I’m going to listen to it! Later guys!

4
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Remember when he asked the supermodel what the "first five digits of the Pythagorean Theorem" were because haha stupid women? Then he got super owned because he meant to say Pi? What a complete wanker.

112
_lilithreply
lemmy.world

Even if that went the way he wanted who the fuck needs to know more than 3.14? memorization is not intelligence

48

Thank you! Having the skill of a piece of paper and a pen being compared to intelligence is pet peeve of mine.

10

He must have meant the first 5 digits of the theorem expressed as some kind of Godel numbering. I mean there's no way he's a complete moronic cunt, right?

23

He even got the numbers wrong…he says 3.147 when it’s 3.14159…if it were actually 3.147 you’d likely round 3.14 to 3.15 for the shorter version.

5

Haha. I am not familiar with that guy but he seemed to have owned it after he messed up.

-4
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I regret looking up the clip: https://youtu.be/jNFOVkB6JjQ

Sorry to say to my UK friends, it looks like these people have no manners when it comes to debating. Asking a question and then proceeded to shout over them. I'm surprised they still have viewers.

103
lemmy.world

No need to apologise as Piers Morgan does in fact not represent the UK, I'm fairly certain that he is almost universally disliked.

77

Apart from the flag-shaggers and gammons that want someone to "tell it like it is"

27

Also, seems like he represents the universally existing layer of people that couldn't care less about moral or ethics

5
???reply
lemmy.world

I couldn't hear half the shit Piers said or any of the other people because he keeps talking over them like a gigantic baby. What a total loser.

39

Holy hell, It hurt watching that so freaking much.

It was not worth watching it just for that moment. I am blown away at how much he kept saying something with a response being the opposite of what he wanted and then him repeating it. "I did protest Obama" "I already told you I don't know" "I don't know the number" dude, I am amazed at her patience with a grown man acting like a toddler that didn't get his way.

18

That's typical journalism on ITV and Channel 5. BBC has its moments but it's not as bad. I simply can't watch news on these channels for this reason.

10
lemmy.world

Did you have the video open already? I know in YT the timestamp didn’t seem to work after I already had the video open at a different time.

2

I must have. Another user reported no issue, so I’ll just put it down to one of those little quirks :)

2
feddit.de

When they sacked Clarkson for hitting a producer, I was like: But he also punched Morgan, shouldn't he, like, get one free for that?

78

He called him a "lazy Irish cunt" when he punched the producer for not being able to magically produce a restaurant quality steak at midnight.

Idk if you know anything about old gammon pricks, but that wasn't a simple observation that the guy was Irish.

17

I am amused by the fact that Piers Morgan is so daft that he manages to piss off a guy who fellates his car and bike loving commie hippies.

4

Piers Morgan blocked me on Xitter, back when I had an account there. It was the highlight of my brief time on that platform.

51
lemmy.world

"Xitter" is absolutely amazing. This is the first time I've seen someone call it that.

16
MataVatnikreply
lemmy.world

I would agree Mr PP Boy, but my self proclaimed communist friend from childhood loved Stalin. And last I ran into him he was reading Maos theory. Guy was 27 years old at that point too.

-74
reddthat.com

So for those of us following along at home, you know a guy who believes a thing, therefore you have applied that belief to all people who proclaim to believe a different thing?

114
Maevereply
kbin.social

I’m not even sure he knew a guy. A lot of people see someone reading something and assume all kinds of wild things.

23
reddthat.com

Exactly! Just because I'm reading volume 27 of "Sheep Fornicators Extreme - Global Takeover!" doesn't mean I'm into sex with sheep, I just appreciate the skill it takes to draw it so well.

12

That series gets wild with volume 32 "Sheep Fornicators Extreme - Mars Meltdown" I haven't been able to put it down

6
MataVatnikreply
lemmy.world

Oh trust me, thus person is very real. My conversations were so frustrating, he was so entrenched in his dogma it was like talking to a religious person.

-19

And you chose to believe that was every single communist... I guess that does say a lot.

15
MataVatnikreply
lemmy.world

And his friends. And the people in the Marxist Leninist instances here.

Also, another really smart dude I talk to regularlu, he says he would consider himself a Marxists. Probably not a Tankie, but still says stupid shit saying that the war un Ukraine is the US fault and its a result of NATO expansionist. Which is wrong for so many reasons. And his grandma was a communist China apologist.

Communism is stupid, and the people that follow it are dogmatic and have no pragmatic basis for their "theory" other than their feelings. If it offends go cry about it.

-42

Or apparently not replying at all, in this case. My favorite is the Jordan Peterson response, though: "I had over 6 months to prepare for a debate on this topic after decades of claiming to be an expert and showed up to admit I could only be bothered to read his manifesto"

1

Which is wrong for so many reasons.

Which reasons are most prominent and why?

Communism is stupid, and the people that follow it are dogmatic and have no pragmatic basis for their “theory” other than their Communism is stupid, and the people that follow it are dogmatic and have no pragmatic basis for their “theory” other than their feelings. If it offends go cry about it. feelings. If it offends go cry about it.

Working backwards, I’m not offended, rather amused.

Why did you put theory in quotes? Why and how is the theory stupid? Please give me direct critiques of Marx/Engels work, that aren’t copied/pasted (I’m rusty af so we’re probably starting from the same point).

Communist China apologist? What kinds of things, for example?

How didn’t NATO expansionism continue to, if not cause, the way in Ukraine? Bonus points if you can find msm articles that no one remembers talking about the alarming spread of communism, in Ukraine, before the war started.

-11
monyet.cc

That logic lol. It's like me saying my american friend read mein kampf and love hitler, thus all american is nazi.

51
Maevereply
kbin.social

Tbf a lot of Americans are Nazis.

Source: Am American

29
Chriswildreply
lemmy.world

Even very famous Americans that we try to glorify, Henry Ford for instance.

14

Henry Ford also wrote a series of books titled "the international jew" in which he spew antisemitic shit and crazy conspiracy theories.

He had his own newspaper to publish anti-semitic ideology. High ranking German Nazis including Hitler considered him an inspiration.

Saying he was "just the Elon Musk of his time" falls on short on how fiercly Ford was anti-semitic, how he systematicall contributed to the ideological framework for anti-semitism and spread it among the Americans and the people in the world.

5
Jumireply
lemmy.world

Stalin and Mao are not the kind of people you follow when you want a more equal world or you're seriously misguided.

14
sh.itjust.works

A tankie is every bit as real of a leftist as an anarchist or demsoc imo. Tankies suck balls, no question. But to say that they're not true leftists is kinda dumb. A typical convinced tankie well and truly believes that they are fighting for equality and the path towards communism.

1

Uh huh.

Explain where socialism is best enacted through genocide, imperialism, and the creation of a rigid and often hereditary heirarchy.

1

To be fair.. soviet Russia should've absolutely steamrolled Germany with even a half decent leader.

Stalin almost let Hitler win by being just about the dumbest fucking leader on the planet. And that includes whatever idiot was leading the French.

3

Yes because all reds support Stalin, like all fascists support trump. Please.

65

I think it looked cute. Definitely worked a lot better on Charlie Chaplin.

2

Remember when Piers Morgan came to the U.S. and everyone hated him here too, so he slinked back to the UK?

45

conservatives are really good at arguing against what they imagine leftists to be and really bad at arguing against what leftists actually are

24

Her "I'm literally a communist." is hilarious and your statement is spot on.

11

When the economy was tough he really helped those who were most in need. It all trickled down from there.

6
forcereply
lemmy.world

lol with how the last few centuries of politics have turned out imagine unironically still being a rightie in 2024, that's pretty embarrassing

35

Weren't you just telling me how your right wing parents would've approve of our... arrangement?

-7
forcereply
lemmy.world

I mean if you wanna be a dumbass that's your choice bro, you can keep getting fucked over by daddy government as you please. But don't come crying to leftists in a few decades when the world's on fire and your entire life is in ruins lol.

14
forcereply
lemmy.world

you unironically believe that a failed murderous ideology that has led to nothing but poverty, famine, tyranny, violence, and eventually collapse

Capitalism? Rates of poverty are unbelievably high, starving, tyranny, and violence is too, and extremely capitalist countries are in a constant state of collapse and go into recession every few years causing mass starvation, homelessness, and death. As opposed to even shitty communist countries like the USSR or PRC where they were far better off after communism than before communism, even being authoritarian they still had way better standard of living than when they were extremely capitalist & imperialist. Even Cuba, a small island with a dictatorship which has been cut off from most of the world for a large part of its history and has technology outdated by decades, is doing better than some Republican strongholds in the US, which is pretty embarrassing for a country with as many natural resources as the US.

And even if you don't want to consider that, there's pretty much any democratically elected socialist governments which the CIA immediately assassinated & overthrew, which had extremely high success and standards of living increases. But I guess if your democratic leader's head gets blown off during an artificial American-led coup, that counts as a W for capitalism, aye? Entirely orchestrating uprisings in most previously friendly Latin American countries, Iran, etc. and turning them into authoritarian fascist shitholes certainly is a way to make your ideology seem like the only choice.

Capitalism has caused the deaths and suffering of billions. We have seen dozens, hundreds of capitalist regimes fail tremendously, bringing their entire population down with them, multiple times the amount of communist countries that have even existed. Capitalist countries have caused the worst disasters, the worst famines, the worst mass deaths, far more than even the worst communist regimes somehow. Yet you think you can point to the failures of the few communist countries in history and say that it's proof your flavor of fascism is totally better than leftism.

I'm not even a communist. I don't like communism, I don't like any of the authoritarian regimes that followed a variation of the ideology, I strongly disapprove of the people who think the ideology of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc. was in any way at all sustainable. But my God it takes a real idiot to not be able to see how modern right-wing capitalism is just as bad if not worse than even those shitty ideologies, the difference being that capitalism has been given infinite chances to fail under the pretext of "oh tens of millions died from this one event but it's fine, that's just normal market fluctuation". You can't even call the US a democratic country at this point, it's an oligarchy for the ultra-rich. Even pointing to other capitalist countries you can see that them partially implementing socialism has made them a far better place than the US, even if still heavily flawed by the capitalism.

is going to totally work this time despite the mountains of evidence that it is a failure in both theory and bla bla bla

Lol yea bro these leftist policies are totally failing in, say, Finland or whatever Euro country is of your desire. Countries that rely on very leftist socdem ideological views which Americans would call "socialist" or even "communist" and have much better equality & standard of living than the US, solely because of those ideologies. Isn't it funny how the further left these countries go, the higher their standard of living and general success, and the further right they go, the more unstable and worse off they become. For example some select places in Europe have tried tasting right-wing ideology for recently and are paying the price for it (e.g. Germany, Netherlands, Italy). Crazy coincidence, isn't it.

I'm sure the massive political unrest, attempt to overthrow the government, hundreds of mass shootings, worst healthcare in the developed world, record garbage education, even worse starvation than China and Ukraine, extremely high crime rate, and everything else the US is going through is a sign of a successful ideology. And similar thing in Canada & to a lesser extent the UK. I'm sure it's those damn communists causing all the issues, if we stray further to the right surely we'll stop all that nonsense!

The current systems are flawed

"Flawed" is an understatement.

but a parasitic ideology that's just as bad, if not worse, than fascism is not and will never be an acceptable solution.

You are delusional

There's a reason why brainless morons cower together in some no name echo chamber like this and larp about revolutionaries.

Looks like r/conservative lost one of their losers. You clearly don't like this forum, so you can cry on your Reddit echo chamber about how everyone on there is a communist, then whine about people brigading your sub when a people disagree with your opinion, but nobody falls for it here lol.

15

Preach. All the Society Experts here have come to a conclusion- based on the hardest of evidences - that Democrats are the only good ones they just aren't left enough. Notice their unwavering homogeneity- it's not groupthink or any kind of propaganda campaign, it's just how the Lemmy MENSA brains operate. Why make room for tolerance of dissenting opinions when you just like know you're totally right?

-8
lemmynsfw.com

Please tell the world about how awesome communist rule is while in a free democracy. Please let those starving people in those concentration camps in China know how good they have it.

Please go on. Enlightened us.

-77
lemmy.ca

Communism doesn't automatically mean authoritianism. And you think China isn't capitalist? Enlighten yourself bozo.

45
gaifuxreply
lemmy.world

Lol yes, abolishment of private property and government ownership of the means of production doesn't automatically mean authoritarianism. How could I forget? To control a government best thing is to give them more power, gotcha. Thanks for clueing me into your logic steel trap dawg

-3

My authoritarianism comment was in refrence to the "free democracy" comment, homie. Sorry if you need those things spoonfed to you. And state ownership doesn't automatically mean public ownership. China is a real world example of that. Thanks for clueing me into your idiocy, dipshit.

3
gaifuxreply
lemmy.world

Oof. I know it's hard to get educated but it's worth the effort. I recommend starting with a good encyclopedia. Unless those are simply far right dog whistles in your brain

-5

Communism, political and economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit-based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major means of production (e.g., mines, mills, and factories) and the natural resources of a society.

(Encyclopedia Brittanica)

So I looked it up on an online encyclopedia and it looks like communism is public ownership, not government ownership.

I’m not a communist so I might be missing a detail here or there, but this really doesn’t seem like it says anything about state ownership, especially considering the fact that a shorthand definition for communism that my communist friends love saying is “A stateless, classless, moneyless society where goods are distributed from each according to their ability to each according to their need”

Since it seems like you are certain about communism being authoritarian, here is an excerpt from the same encyclopedia (under the dropdown for “what is communism”)

However, over the years others have made contributions—or corruptions, depending on one’s perspective—to Marxist thought. Perhaps the most influential changes were proposed by Soviet leader Vladimir Lenin, who notably supported authoritarianism.

I know many communists love to tie Lenin into communism, but it looks like this encyclopedia indicates that some people think differently about this!

If only getting educated was as easy as a fucking google search, and was almost no effort, instead of speaking out of your ass on something you don’t understand and blind opposition of prevented you from starting with a good ol’ encyclopedia.

6
Mangoreply
lemmy.world

China really isn't. They gotta jump through some wild hoops to do business over there. Apparently the way they exchange value between companies is via some share of inventory for sales or whatever. It's complicated AF, so I don't know how to explain it.

-28
lemmy.ca

Julan Du and Chenggang Xu analyzed the Chinese model in a 2005 paper to assess whether it represents a type of market socialism or capitalism. They concluded that China's contemporary economic system represents a form of capitalism rather than market socialism because: (1) financial markets exist which permit private share ownership—a feature absent in the economic literature on market socialism; and (2) state profits are retained by enterprises rather than being distributed among the population in a social dividend or similar scheme, which are central features in most models of market socialism. Du and Xu concluded that China is not a market socialist economy, but an unstable form of capitalism.[18]

That's from a Wikipedia. I'm not going to pretend to have a strong grasp on it but it's state owned enterprises that function, essentially, as private (separate from government). That combined with production for profit > production for use makes it way more in the capitalist spectrum compared to Marxists ideology. Especially considering their human rights record.

25
Mangoreply
lemmy.world

That's fair enough I guess. They're trying really hard to not be capitalism though. 🤣

-20

Well, it's not a fair argument but non-communist countries have starved a lot more people to death than Communist countries ever had, but something tells me you're not really here to learn anything or that you care for fair arguments.

14
Mangoreply
lemmy.world

You think that a commune can't have voting? Well that says enough about your level of understanding. Would you really like some light on the definitions of words, or do you think you're just bringing some slam dunk "haha commies bad" you learned from your grandpa?

12
Soulgreply
lemmy.world

Obama is a capitalist so someone who is a communist would have no reason to view him as a hero

55
gaifuxreply
lemmy.world

But someone who is a communist wouldn't exactly be owning anyone right?

-71
discuss.tchncs.de

It’s always the baby accounts with this nonsense. Like 5 sad guys tops, making new accounts just to spew bullshit. Get a better hobby.

37
Lokisanreply
lemmy.zip

Isn't that a joke about property and communism? Not being able for a communist to own anything?

13
msagereply
programming.dev

But that's not even ultimately true. Infrastructure and utilities should belong to public.

No one, and I repeat, not a single oofing one, is going to use your dildo.

18
Lokisanreply
lemmy.zip

Oh I know that's no true. It's just that I had reasonable doubt weither it was a silly joke or a troll. Can be both actually

4
gaifuxreply
lemmy.world

9 upvotes for a needlessly lude humorless comment. I'm really starting to feel at home here ♥️

-8

*lewd

Come on now, if you're going to be a pedantic ass, proofread your comments.

4

So you don't like jokes huh? Sorry ChillCapybara think we need to talk about your username lol

-11
Mangoreply
lemmy.world

The brainwashing really got this guy good.

7

DAYUM now that's the owning I was waiting for. Excellent rebuttal!

-6