Spyke
lemmy.world

That's disgusting. Why aren't there any ads on the cliff walls?

92
lemmy.world

I'll never understand why we don't advertise using the surface of the moon.

29
lemmy.ml

Let's pave paradise and put up a Walmart parking lot!

50
WarmSodareply
lemm.ee

Oh man, just imagine: everyone living in those skyscrapers could work at that Walmart!

17

No one is promising those skyscrapers are in anyway nice to live in.

Company Canyon goes $$$$

4

OMG do you mean a 15 minute city!?!? How dare they focus us to live in such a place. They are bound to make us stop rolling coal with our trucks while they are at it! Freedum!

2
lemmy.ml

Being the U.S, there's basically zero chance that it would be high-rises. Instead, there would be McMansions. Also a lot more parking lots

47
Rolandoreply
lemmy.world

The McMansions are on the cliffs above. The high-rises are for the workers.

7

McMansions are for workers. That's how they got their name. Big like mansions, but built as cheap as possible so that they're (relatively) affordable.... Until they start falling apart in 15 years.

6

This looks like low-mid density. So much roads/wasted space and like 10 high rites do not make a high density neighborhood.

3
lemmy.world

No, real estate moguls have learned that apartments and high-rise condos and hotels are more profitable than single family homes.

2
lemmy.ml

Sure, when zoning codes allow for them.

So you know, essentially never.

3
lemmy.ml

If they rezone a national park to residential it will definitely be highrise MDU.

Edit more space efficient for the NIMGC tree huggers

1
lemmy.ca

Why do you say that? We destroy plenty of nature and it almost always ends up single family home suburban sprawl.

1
lemmy.ml

Continuous grade of square footage is one factor, the suburb would have trouble with sprawl and boulder ingress

1
lemmy.ca

Yes, car centric suburbs have tons of problems but when has that ever stopped us? We build them in literal flood plains, and along cramped mudslide prone mountains. I’ve never heard of an empty piece of land in the middle of nowhere being zoned for high density residential in the US.

1

All those people in the towers just work at the giant Walmart, which is now the attraction.

31

I mean fuck it, we've already exterminated entire biomes of species who dared to exist where we wanted strip malls, what's another pretty geological formation?

We might be the worst neighbor in the entire universe, because we handily win that title on Earth.

26
lemm.ee

There's actually a settlement down there already, they have to get their mail delivered by pack mule from the top of the canyon's post office

20

The mail is all junk mail! Extended warranty on my mule??

4

I'd think a zip line would be a much more efficient method of getting mail down. Then again it could just be a case of "well the mules already go down each day so they might as well carry mail".

1

Seriously though. We Europeans joke about the US a lot, but one thing I'll always envy/admire is your National Parks. You have to protect those at all costs.

14
XTornadoreply
lemmy.ml

But think of how cool it would look during the flash food.

7

Road-level parking should probably be addressed. That picture requires some touches.

But seriously, one could plan some nifty town, resisting flash floods, perhaps even utilizing them.

It might look gloriously out of this world. Only some bodies floating by might ruin it. Tourist campers upstream somewhere... Animal carcasses... Eh. Some filter, perhaps. A big mesh somewhere?

1
lemm.ee

I know this is just a joke, but having at least an "alpine" or "mountain" coaster down to the bottom could save many lives.

10
lemmy.dbzer0.com

A) It's a National Park and you wouldn't be able to have a city esp with a Walmart on a National Park.

B) Like 90% of Arizona is untouched wilderness and undeveloped. Why would you want to develop at the bottom of the GC when you could develop literally anywhere else in the state? The cost of transporting construction materials, given that there aren't any roads from the surface to the bottom, not to mention logistics for people living and working in the Canyon, would be astronomical.

9

You want to be the big swinging dick in the penthouse that has a view barely above the top of the canyon obviously

5
lemmy.world

Lmao, whoever posted that has clearly never been to the grand canyon.

8
lemmy.world

This is AI generated, I can tell by the pixels and having done many AIs in my time

8
lemmy.world

Just tell people there is gold/oil/some kind of rare earth elements there, people will start flocking, turning the area into a city overnight. Unless of course the government does not allow development on that area. Though I do wonder what would be lost aside from a beautiful view if people do start building a city in grand canyon itself?

6

Trump did remove national parks from the protection of exploration for oil and resources. He has also said in his "1 day of being a dictator" he would drill drill drill!

So I imagine in his new America there could be oil rigs in all of the national parks much like they are throughout Northwestern Texas.

4

Whst the fuck is wrong with people. Just leave us and the grandcanyon and nature alone.

5

Not only does this person dream to infest another piece of nature but with the most hideous city design my eyes had to see. Not that there aren't ugly examples to go by. I am sorry my american friends.

3
lemmy.world

Why hasn't there been a grand canyon themed casino/hotel built in Vegas yet?

2

Fake mountain backdrop like in the photo? Heck, make a hotel that looks like a giant cliff face?

2