Spyke
miss_brainfartreply
lemmy.ml

I haven't seen it used much in a non-gendered way, so I guess that's why it has a clear masculine ring in my head

8
JoShmoereply

It is very common to hear girls use the term guys, and for people to address a mixed party as โ€œguysโ€

16
Lem Jukesreply
lemm.ee

Just like โ€˜mankindโ€™ right? (/s)

Sure, language is changing and guys has been veering neutral since the 70s. But claiming the word is outright โ€œnon-genderedโ€ is incorrect imo.

5
Jumutareply
sh.itjust.works

I agree that "guys" is not a gendered term but I don't like your argument.

Definitions of words can be very different to how people use them, and we shouldn't constrain the use of words to their definitions.

0

I disagree that we shouldn't constrain the use of words to their definitions. It's what helps make the meaning of sentences the most clear for everyone. If people had actually done that then the definition of "literally" wouldn't include "figuratively" and a lot of misunderstandings could be avoided.

Otherwise we could end up with people saying that when they wrote "all white people deserve to die" what they actually meant was that they deserve to live, since that's how they use the word "die". It's nonsensical to me.

2
Senshireply
lemmy.world

Kind of a bad example, because mankind very clearly stems from 'humankind'. And people are lazy and prefer using short words. The unfairness is rather that women got stuck with the words requiring more characters. But that is a phenomenon of the English language and not present in others.

However, in most languages the words for man/male are closer to human(kind) than female/woman, which very clearly shows the historic patriarchal influence, coming back around to your point after all.

3

Interestingly enough, in old English you had "werman" and "wifman" for man and woman respectively, in which case referring to all with "mankind" makes perfect sense. So the originator for mankind seems more likely to be from that than the explanation that it's a shortening of "humankind" to me.

3
hughesdikusreply
lemmy.ml

Not technically. Practically. In real world. As slang.

Cause technically and by definition, It's still very much gendered.

2
Mangoreply

Oh good, so it's just the OP who doesn't have their shit straight.

5
Slatlun
lemmy.ml

I'll take weapons that are as dangerous to the wielder as anyone else for $500...

51
lemmy.ml

Even Warhammer 40000 chainswords usually have the blade shielded from the wielder's side. Yes, even the chaos and ork ones.

19

According to the Minka Lesk omnibus after the Cadia destruction they did broke for a time before gathering their remains and losing half of their remaining numbers in incredibly suicidal but spectacular attack just to show the rest of Guard they didn't lost the edge.

-3
Gork
lemm.ee

Is it time to rip and tear?

27
Gormadt
lemmy.blahaj.zone

If I pull this out of a stump do I get to be king?

It's a cool shelf piece but in terms of practicality I'm to attached to my extremities to dare to turn it on

27

Listen, strange women lyin' near trees distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. That said, if you do pull it from a stump I'm not going to try and take it from you.

18
lemmy.ml

Aesthetically? Hell yeah. Functionally? I am not taking a sword that can run out of juice to the battlefield.

24

This is the kind of weapon you bring to a battle expected to be so bloody you die before it does

24

a back-mounted generator is still an option, although it just prolongs the inevitable.

9

May your enemies hear the liturgical roars of your eviscerator before they fall. Emperor protects !

17
lemmy.world

This is quite gendered and stereotypical.

But hell yeah.

14
kasereply

You're right. All are welcome to marvel at the majestic chainsword.

20
whoisearthreply
lemmy.ca

As someone with an electric chainsaw gas is still magnitudes most powerful. This sword would be cool and would cut but it wouldn't be like butter. You'd have to go relatively slow to avoid excessive friction binding the blade.

15
Socsareply
sh.itjust.works

By the time you get your gas chainsaw started in spring, I'll be six trees ahead of you.

7

I have an electric chainsaw. Fuck gas. For what I need one for battery is perfectly fine

5
AItoothbrushreply
lemmy.zip

Yeah but imagine a gas chainsaw sized electric one. That would cut like the wood was butter.

2

If you go slow yes. But speaking from experience my dewalt 16" struggles going through a 6*6 unless you go slowly.

0
w2tpmfreply
lemmy.world

OP doesn't have any thumbs left to reply to your comment.

15

Put a Taser on it and you've got one of the weapons from Steinhardt's Guide to the Eldritch Hunt, a d&d 5e supplement based on Bloodbourne aesthetic. I gave it to my campaign's current big bad.

4
lemmy.world

This is a truly devastating weapon... .
.
.

                .                           
           

.

                                .                        .                                             .                                               .                        .                                             .  

                                         .                        .                                             .                                               .                        .       

 

                             .                                               .                        .                                             .                                               .           

         .                                             .                                               .                        .                                             .              



                             .                        .                                             .                                               .                        .             


                            .                                               .                        .                                             .                                               .            
        .                                             .                                               .                        .                                             .                                               .           
         .                                             .                                               .                        .                                             .                                               .    

                .                                             .                                               .                        .                                             .      

                                     .                        .                                             .                                               .           ...If you ever face an army of trees.
5
GoodEye8reply
lemm.ee

It's a pretty good weapon when exterminating fungus.

6

Fantastic, my fungus has developed a cockney accent and it needs to go.

1

This thing is fucking cool. You donโ€™t even need the button. It doubles as a fan if you put on the floor.

1