this may be the craziest decision I've ever heard of "were not saying it is legal, but they can't stop you from enforcing it"

I've seen a lot SCOTUS decisions over the years, but this may be the craziest.

Maybe Trump should have practiced abstinence.

Please explain to me like I'm five.

This is pretty much what I thought the first time I saw one.

OpenAI’s threat intelligence team banned multiple ChatGPT accounts that created English- and Chinese-language content to sway American public opinion against building data centers necessary for AI development and deployment.

Does anyone else think that using ChatGPT to write anti-AI articles pretty funny?

Pope Francis was a chemist.

ah yes, then it would be infallible.

Unlike some Christians, looking at you Baptists, Catholics have long seen science as a way to know more about God.

I mean who doesn't want a big tiddy goth gf?

So more Linux phones?

Or we could reference an actual article https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/out-touch-rfk-jr-says-35226477

I first posted this comment on !michigan[email protected]

His win, however slim, represents a significant shift for the Democratic Party; in 2018 he lost the gubernatorial primary to now-Gov. Gretchen Whitmer by 21 percentage points.

This is by no means the only article I’ve seen that mentions this. But what people seem to fail to remember is that at that time there had begun rumblings that if El-Sayed won the Democrat nomination there would be legal challenges to his candidacy. Michigan law requires one to have been a registered Michigan voter for 4 years prior to the election. While El-Sayed had registered to vote when he was 18 in Michigan, and never removed from the voting roles, he had registered and voted in New York like 3 years earlier when he was studying at Columbia.

Even the Republican Secretary of State indicated that she would not interfere with a party’s nominating process and that if such a decision were necessary about any party’s nominee it would only be taken up after their nomination.

After that came to light his poll numbers dropped significantly with Democrats fearing they would end up no one on the ballot. Personally, I doubt it would have gone that way, but people are scared.

Did anyone rise think this was about folks who use a paid version of Linux?

I'm a Christian, and I have no clue what he is talking about.

First off, what a bunch of douchebags. Certainly

He also highlighted that “any delay in blocking these ‘rogue websites’ would, in fact, result in irreparable loss and injury to the plaintiffs and cause violation of the intellectual property rights of the plaintiffs.”

is false on its face.

Second off I don't understand how a ruling in an Indian court can have

The court order, issued by the Delhi High Court on May 28(sic), represents a significant multi-jurisdictional triumph over online piracy.

jurisdiction outside of India.

Lastly the Club World Cup and the World Cup are two different compeitions and confusing them makes me want to punch someone in the face.

There is no 4th because no one else has 2 baseball teams.

It's brought to you by viewers like you. If you watched PBS, especially during pledge drive time, you would know today about 75% of funding comes from small donors.

@[email protected] this the girl you need to marry. She can manage a budget like a motherfucker.

The prohibition extends to services supporting prediction markets, like virtual private networks, that could allow consumers to disguise their location and get around the ban.

This is bad