You wouldn't even have to die on that hill anymore because you can buy the uncensored wolfensteins in Germany today.

But the post talks about "fair" vs. "unfair" not "good" vs "bad". And if you want to say an Action is fair for us but unfair for them, you would need additional rules to distinguish between the Actions in respect to the Actors. Otherwise, it would indeed be hypocrisy. (Not that it matters too much, this is not sports.)

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Tqlg9nt4KiKyM8hiYLrT8vPGr3uCq8Q4

[...] Is that “nonbinary” is not the most accurate term for people because it, seems to me, to imply that gender is binary.

It does not imply that. If it did, it would defeat itself, because there is no place for nonbinary in binary. It implies that a slice of gender can be seen as binary (Men and Women), but there is more to it.

Steam used to have a way of backing up installs yourself; if it’s still a thing, I have no idea where it’s hidden now.

Library -> Game context menu -> Manage -> Back up game files...

The game files are just directories you can archive however you want anyway. No stinky 'installer executables' necessary. (:

What makes you think, she is complaining?

As a player, sometimes I want to settle down with an Orc and make a bunch of Half-Orc Babies, but seeing the word "species" gives me pause. I know in real life cross-breeding different species of animals rarely goes well and the children are as a rule sterile, so can i ethically bring a baby into the world that I know is going to be sterile and is probably doing to have serious health problems?

I don't get your problem here. Either the world that has half orcs declares if they are fine, or you are free to decide for yourself. Why bother yourself with some "knowledge" about the "real world"?

The cheap one is only the Hitman (2016) content and that is the only one of the three games you can buy without the others.

The dark almond sea salt from Tony's is. Ritter Sport and Lindt also have some vegan products, Haribo probably too.

Yes, I misremembered/misread the original text. Thank you for noticing me.

It is a variable holding the process id of the shell instance interpreting the command. You could say "yourself" instead.

Meinst du Andrej Holm?

Ich empfinde eher die Interpretation der Frage als ungünstig. Die beiden Möglichkeiten, die der Text nennt, sind eher trivial zu beantworten, wie es der Text auch tut. Der Rest ist eine eher oberflächliche Betrachtung dieser Trivialitäten oder Herumgestocher in einer unpassenden Analogie.

Ein "Recht auf Sex" wäre aber wie ein "Recht auf Leben" oder "Recht auf körperliche Unversehrtheit" kein Recht, das wir immer und unter allen Umständen garantieren können. So wie ich niemanden zwingen kann, seinen Körper dafür bereitzustellen, damit ich weiterleben kann, kann ich niemanden dazu zwingen Sex mit mir zu haben, selbst wenn ich ein "Recht auf Sex" hätte.

Wenn ich ein Recht auf Sex bejahe, denke ich nicht, es muss zu jeder Zeit für jeden Menschen einen sexuell willigen und kompatiblen Partner geben. Ich denke, es hat vor allem mit unserem Umgang mit Sexarbeit zu tun, die der Text nicht einmal berührt.

The comic doesn't talk about 'all men' or even 'men' at all. There are all sorts of people acting like this and if you don't, you don't have to defend yourself or attack your imagined adversary.

The race-horse-girl game is not realistic about animal cruelty in real horse racing.

You think this is an attack on the race-horse-girl game?

Was meinst du?

Es geht aber nicht darum, "dein Kind abzulehnen". Es geht darum deine eigene Schwangerschaft (also wenn deine Kinder in dir wachsen) abzubrechen. Das sollte selbstverständlich auch für schwangere Männer möglich sein.

I can see how people could have problems with that, yes. It is just not what I understood from the comment.

The symbol is the National emblem of East Germany (The GDR)

The medal might be this: Activist of social labor (German)

Per capita isn't really important in this case. Overall output is. The planet doesn't care if it's getting less per capita from one place or another.

I don't see any value in that approach except for finger pointing and doomer posting.

Then, the other thing is that your graph is just CO2.

No, it is CO2eq.