I obviously don't support free verbal/physical violence.

Unless it's for defense Or against active nazis Or this kind of stuff...

can someone explain to me what is this "rule" I see a lot in posts titles? sometimes mixed with other words? I'm having a hard time to understand its meaning

oh thank you very much for your explanation! it's much clearer now :)

0:)

We can also call it "freedom of not letting dangerous and genocidal ideology spread", but that would be more annoying to use :(

Ben voilà on peut pas faire grand chose de plus, et réfléchir à d'autres stratégies si on en voit pour gagner en influence. J'ai juste tiqué quand t'as dit des "cons", désolé si ça sonnait comme négatif!

Mais oui je fais aussi un peu de tout ça quand je peux, on verra ce que ça donne ^^

I tried it but it only allows very simple stuff, for instance its not possible to insert images :( but I guess i'll begin with this

assez cons ou juste assez matraqués par les gros médias+lobby surtout

à l'échelle individuelle financer des médias alternatifs jpense que ça peut grave aider, genre le canard réfractaire, le média, blast... mais c'est juste si on a les moyens

sinon c'est une bonne question hahah, collectivement on peut créer plus de contenu crédible de gauche par exemple? s'étendre dans plus de réseaux? je balance des idées comme ça jsp

on fait ce qu'on peut :)

I asked you a question just before

That comment is neither helpful nor interesting criticism. It's not even pleasant to read.

• I don't understand why you say I'm Eve.
• I don't have any formation in cybersecurity, so no "lectures to go back and watch"
• It's not even a school project of any sort
• I was not planning on asking chatGPT, but I'm sure its answer would actually be more helpful for my problem than your comment

I used Alice and Bob because I read stuff with this scenario and liked it, that's all...

Maybe you thought that warning/advice would be helpful, but for me at least, it just sounds very paternalistic.

Indeed, I didn't think of that. And would it be possible to allow only one check and destroy/make the information of B unusable after this check?

Thank you for your reply!

You are not answering my question, Is the fact that it gives economical power to the majority of people or just a certain category of people?

I would like to avoid using photoshop if something else is available, but thank you for the proposition!

Alright thank you for your reply, I'll think about it :) maybe having a vérification that can be done in any computer and any amount of time is just not possible for my use case

that's interesting indeed! thank you very much!

is that a joke or is that a serious claim?

Do you really believe capitalism gives economical power to the people? And if yes, do you say "people" as "everyone" or "people" as "some people based on some criteria"?