While I certainly understand the appeal of "free speech no compromises" the evidence is real clear that any online forum that adopts that mentality invariably becomes a bigoted shitpile, I'm not going to make a choice on philosophical grounds when the reality of the situation makes itself so obvious

My number one criticism of Netflix was that it was too accessible so this is a welcome change, I really think the higher bar will increase the quality of views.

Wow that is an astonishing lack of subtlety in his racism. I thought there'd be at least an attempt at pretending to not be racist.

The assertion panics are so much more readable, quality of life changes like that really add up and I'm always happy to see them.

You can't just commit war crimes because you're on the Internet

It's a gamble on the idea that people rely so much on the existing content and connections on social networks, in conjunction with the addictive nature of social media, that any attempts to move to a different platform would fail because anything new will always fail expectations of what's considered normal content-wise these days. People leaving sites like twitter complain about the lower quality and advertisers get scared off, but all the owners of these sites pay attention to is the people that come crawling back because nothing else is capable of meeting their expectations right this instant.

I understand all the component words here and still have absolutely no understanding of how you can make your assertions so confidently this makes no sense.

At the moment it's looking like the oil propaganda is getting downvoted to all hell, rightfully so. I guess buying votes only works for the first 30 minutes of a posts existence if you are as widely hated as oil is.

I mean a distaste for capitalism puts you in good company here but Mao's China is one of the shittiest examples you could pick as an alternative, that's one of the governments the right throws around as a stereotype for why they say communism is horrible and they do that with good reason.

Brainwashing people to stay in the military through gay influence(?) is an interesting tactic as opposed to just making people obedient in general, maybe being gay is part of the secret to superpowers idk.

Jokes on you I'm none of those things

They'd be doing this change on their TVs, in principle this would be no different from displaying the settings menu that comes up when you press the * button, no tampering of the HDMI signal required. HDMI inputs are their own "channels" in the UI so it's pretty trivial to put ads on the screen periodically when one such channel is open.

I feel like I must be in some alternate universe or something because I have yet to see a single furry porn and I have NSFW enabled on my feed.

Oh my word I need to check this out on my desktop tomorrow, it's already so bad on mobile it's like somebody managed to modernize every bad 90s web fad.

nonono you don't get it rigging is okay so long as it's the right people doing it, they don't want to get rid of rigging just bad rigging

Having diarrhea on a plane is like my worst nightmare times 11 and this article isn't helping

They already said, sabotage. I'm not going to pretend I know the law but sabotaging a military to which we are actively providing aid is likely frowned upon. Prosecution may not be a possibility though, but I imagine this is giving regulators ammo for later.

Why back in my day I would've asked for that seat, we used to have to tie rope to our trousers to stay in one spot

"I'd like you to beat the shit out of my neighbors, but try to be nice about it they're good people"

How does that not answer the question sabotage is literally a federal crime and it doesn't exclusively apply to the US military.

He cut off internet to a group that thought they had it while they were depending on it for an operation they already started, if that's not sabotage I don't know what is.