Very misleading. There is no way to know the results of STV from the results taken under the current system without actually carrying out an STV election. We would expect to see many more votes for third-parties under such a system.

Wayland is just the protocol. You're benchmarking a bunch of different wayland compositors against XOrg, and from the looks of things, at least one (mutter) is worse in every metric than XOrg, so the headline of the article is misleading.

What for?

lmao sure, and their costs will be $60T

Let people make their own mistakes. This is how we learn.

Turns out you need diplomacy so other countries take them back. Fascists are terrible at that. That‘s why they conveniently never explain how they make other countries accept their terms and take back all asylum seekers at once. They sit on the issue and beg other EU politicians to take care of it instead.

lmao why?????

This is the second "thing, but running on S3" vibe-coded nonsense that I've seen today.

Tobias Lutke is a fascist, and this is vibe-coded slop.

This is the third time I've seen a post on this theme in this community. I'm 100% certain that this is bot activity. It must be a common output of LLMs when asked to make posts to the fediverse. And it's always a really dumb question that makes you think they're an alien pretending to be one of us.

AI;DR

Sexy Lumberjack?

https://xcancel.com/BrianRoemmele/status/2091127620431933780

It's several paragraphs of slop that could have been ... a tweet. The point they're making is a good one, it's disappointing that they couldn't even be bothered to type 140 characters.

We must not grant magic 8 ball legal personhood.

I found his interview on the Tech Won't Save Us podcast really informative: https://www.techwontsave.us/episode/342_tech_fascism_has_come_for_american_democracy_w_gil_duran

If you use cloud services to do this (which is better than having a honeypot in your home network) make sure to set spending limits in your account!

Following Curators makes sense to cap, because that is more complex algorithm than just listing news

Do you have a reason to say this?

slop

This article is slop. The paper is here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-75689-z.pdf

And yes, the paper calls it a "helix." It's the LLM introducing the technical inaccuracy of calling it a "spiral."

Nathan Cofnas, a self-defined "race realist" who argues genes play a "non-trivial role" in intelligence differences between racial groups ...
...
His role at a Cambridge college was terminated in 2024 after backlash to his view that, under a true meritocracy, black people would "disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment".

We live in a world where the media will hound someone to death for the mere accusation of plagiarism while racists like this get an article written about them where it's just an aside that they are a racist piece of shit. Where is the media storm around this clown's misconduct?