Sadly reasonable conclusions based on reality is pretty based.

Here's the difference, an artist can make more art. You cannot change your DNA. If someone steals some of your art it's not the end of the world. You can make more. If someone has your DNA, you can't change it. Once its out there that's it. More over having someone's DNA can give you significant insight into into just the person whose DNA you have but also their parents and their children.

Its diffidently that some certificate expired

Well he can fuck right off, God of War 2018 was amazing

I have a a feeling this is not referring to someone's biological mother...

I love cave clues

Given he seems to bwlive they exist, I doubt thats the case.

He looks like a cardboard cut out

Do you have a public example of a sovereign saying something that has precedent?

Lmao best response

There is yet hope https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/983#issuecomment-1913513693

Pooetry even

https://www.eurogamer.net/valve-gives-black-mesa-permission-to-be-a-commercial-product

Goldfish

I learned recently coal is not renewable at all. We will never get more coal. Coal exists from a period of time when trees had cellulose but bacteria had no means of breaking down cellulose.

Estrogen

Brian Acton, the creator of WhatsApp, co-founded Signal and loaned them a shit ton of money. "$105,000,400, due to be repaid on February 28, 2068. The loan is unsecured and carries nil interest." He's still Executive Chairman.

Holy shit as a socialist this is the most grounded and respectable take I have ever seen.

I do think there is an AI bubble, but "guy who bets against things, bets against the latest thing"