"babies were made of food" gave me a chuckle! a bit of a shower thought moment :)

What people don't understand is that satellies don't run traditional OS. They run simple state machine firmares and real-time software. Also, you don't interact with them with something like a command line and general shell commands. So even if a bug or vulnerability were to be found in some library, driver or firmware and it's far from a vector for attack.

A way more plausible way of gaining control is to attack the ground equipment. Anothr method will be learning the command and telemetry dictionary by careful observation of the communication (not trivial, but lets assume possible).

Now you have the problem of what to do with the control. The usual fanciful doomsday scenario is diverting the satellite to hit another one. this is extremely unlikely, manoeuvring satellites isn't like making a car take a turn, it take careful planning and execution. Even then it's not fast, the other satellite operator can see it coming and do a small manoeuver to be able to dodge. On top of all that, lots of nano and small satellites have a very limited propulsion system if at all.

The other alternative is to hurt it's ability to operate, which is a way more easy. But again, there are simpler and easier ways to that - mostly by jamming and disrupting communication.

In conclusion, not that I think cyber security in satellites shouldn't be a thing, but that article, based on an academic study of the code of 3 firmwares from amateur to research level small-sats, doesn't impress me much.

That's more of a "believing lies told my adults around you" case.

you're a hip young dude as well?

It is a federation ship, after all.

on second thought, let's not go to endor. 'tis a silly place.

"Generally prosthetics that mimic body parts don’t work as well...They are usually clumsy and fatiguing," says Ott. But perhaps that wasn't so with the Cairo Toe. Hopefully this ancient prosthetic was as functional as it was beautiful, making the wearer feel both emotionally and physically more whole.

some more information

yeah, but for example: Luxembourg - the last grand duchy in the world, one of four institutional seats of the european union, capital city is an UNESCO world heritage site, has a 1000 years of history.

Idaho - potatoes. wait... maybe it's Iowa? or Ohio?

edit: really seems like people can't take a joke, lmao

"Baby, your temperature is so high, you're gonna send me straight to the gender liquid phase"

No matter what "narrative" you seek to believe, the fact is that Hamas hasn't been firing every once in awhile - They have been firing rockets and mortars regularly. Sometimes daily. You can see a list here and more info here

These attacks almost exclusively target civilians. more than 20,000 rockets in the past 20 years.

Additionally, airborne arson attacks are carried out..

edit:fixed links

now with music

The workings of your mind are a mystery to me pinky...

but... but... most of earth's water is carbonated

Do you want to know how I got these scars?

that's the origin of picard's famous saying "I live my life a 1.304E-14 parsec at a time"

This became too long for me to grammar and spell check... apologies in advance.

If you are talking about raining satellites down on earth, rods from god style, than I can assure you the risk is theortic at best.

Lets, as it's said, start from the beginning. In order for a satellite to hit the surface of earth, it has to be big enough, massive enough and dense enough. Not a lot of satellites are in that category. probably non that can be turned into a proper kinetic energy weapon.

Then it needs the right trajectory. Too shallow and the speed fall will be gradual, the satellite will break up to small bits that will, in the worst case, fall out of the sky in their respective terminal velocity. Too steep of a trajectory and it will burn it's self completely.

Now lets say we have the perfect satellite and the perfect trajectory for reaching the target, on top of it being vulnerable to cyber attack. We reach the biggest hurdle - fuel. Satellite don't carry as much as you might think. The stuff is heavy and expensive. Satellites will typically use a lot of their fuel in their initial orbit insertion or will carry only what is needed to keep their said orbit as long as their mission dictates. Why is that important? because big changes in a satellite orbit are very costly in terms of energy, i.e. fuel.

Ok, ok, lets pretend we have a satellite with all the above criteria and has enough fuel. Now we need to make the manoeuver. oops, the satellite engines can't make it in one go. see, satellites use small thrusters to do most of their manoeuvring, as they mostly do station keeping or small orbital changes. So now we're talking about a series of maneuvers in order to carry out the deadly plan. and do it without the original owners getting control back.

But what if it did happen, you ask. Then I have more bad news. The satellite will be tracked, it's trajectory calculated and a warning would be issued. The damage would be light, but will generate lots of headlines.

doesn't even matter. what matters is the meta data. if the data from the list say you like science videos with emphasis on electrical engineering, star wars podcasts and mmorpg let's plays - does that data go away apon history deletion. what about meta-meta data. if the meta data puts you on group X that receive content Y, does that go away apon history deletion. and what kind of integration does that get with the rest of the google knowledge about you...

Using firefox on android and going to the "new" site works perfectly. with ublock I don't even see any ads.