In 1925, some 57 years after Congress had first attempted to specify the spot, the problems surrounding the originally misplaced marker were brought up before the US Supreme Court. In order to amicably remedy this original surveying error, the US Supreme Court then redefined the point of the Four Corners, officially moving the Four Corners point roughly 1,800 feet (550 m) east, to where the original survey had first held it to be all along, and where it remains to this day, duly marked.[6] This initial survey error has resulted in some longstanding misunderstandings about the correct location of the Four Corners marker, some of which remain to this day.

well shoot. I guess I gobbled up this longstanding misunderstanding, even though it has been corrected for longer than it was ever wrong.

the one that makes me irrationally angry is the used car dealership advertising. like the decals are annoying, but the license plate covers/border things that people don't take off.

like do you really want to be advertising chuck and donna's used car emporium every time you drive your car?

While the original certainly has an actual style, i have to say that I have no fucking clue what I'm looking at with the trump face

I hate everything about this. these dumb fucking people making these dumb fucking choices and only cause problems for a child who had no say in the matter.

this kid doesn't even get a chance at life because his idiot "caregivers" decided that he was better off

I don't get it.

Interesting how insurance companies demand restrictions to "special enrollment" periods or specified times to begin coverage. It's a tactic to prevent people from beginning coverage before taking on significant healthcare costs and then cancelling after their treatment is finished.

But yet, an insurance company is able to change coverage without following similar practices? Is just about as close to a bait and switch as you can get.

I don't buy locked up stuff because I don't want to talk to people.

we-are-not-the-same.jpg

you're not wrong on every point. but the unfortunate addendum is that the essentials are also too expensive.

don't worry random-internet-person, I just graded your answer and found that you were correct and that other person grading you was wrong.

so you know, you can move on now?

By the looks of it, it's 30% to NYC, 30% to Texas, and 30% to California. So 10% for literally everywhere else in the US. That's gotta be close, right?

I don't love that the headline as well as the first line of the article use the words "says" and "claims".

the jury ruled he was guilty. we're so far past "allegedly" and all that garbage. he did it. she was drugged. she was raped. there is no reason to be inferring any amount of doubt anymore.

Not gonna lie, that's some crazy decent editing for a joke

You rang?

thanks for that. also, not sure that's "hilarious" by most metrics

Truthfully, it's far from relevant that the kid is autistic.

If you drag a child by the ankle, especially as a teacher, you're a 100% piece of shit.

Addendum:

They were too young and a bunch were sick, they were forced to get older puppies, who then also got sick.

They fucked up, got told they fucked up, then fucked up again.

that pupil dilation is bonkers tho

I understand that people are being told different stories, the created issue is that those stories aren't questioned with even the slightest scrutiny. for this situation, the only evidence that the officer was going to be hit by the vehicle is from a video that's 500 feet away with 15 pixels for the car and officer.

no one wants to find clarity if it already fits their narrative

water that is wet

Oh geez, better be careful making controversial statements like that.

I wouldn't say wounding a creep 20 years before they sent this particular email would be "brought to justice".