I understand it's a joke, but really isnt the entire point of git is to be able to work locally as much as you want without affecting the remote repo and vice versa

Damn, how do you deport a kid with cancer and not even pause to think of you're doing the right thing

He's pissed that he's not getting all the attention

They could start manufacturing ram? Or fund startups trying to make ram?

Seriously is there no way to get out of having only 2-3 chip and memory makers?

90% of what people do on computers can be done comfortably on 10 year old computers, performance wise. If a device hasn't fallen apart by now, you can assume that it's built to last, which isn't guaranteed with new computers, especially those that you can get at the same price.

Hmm, can you upload files? Wonder if they set an upper limit. Wonder which language would burn the most cycles?

Beating mouse + KB is hard and people already have good enough Xbox/ps controllers to justify buying another

Is this considered a bad thing? I mean I haven't had a computer virus in a decade, so it seems to be working.

Real monster was in his pants all along

Wonder if it wouldve made any difference if this article was published weeks earlier.

He was talking about Leia right?

So is the issue that they dont project far enough into the future? Or do they never correctly predict the size and impact of the negativity?

Maybe it focused more on Hailey Steinfeld?

This was just the question I wanted answered

I understand the joke, but I never had to change the name of a branch because of a wrong upper/lower case character. Hell, I don't think I've ever even renamed a branch. Only matters when you create the PR.

Looks like it works

Maybe it's inspired by Rothko

Gotta arrange by penis

Ok, dumb question time. I'm assuming no one has any significant issues, legal or otherwise, with a person studying all Van Gogh paintings, learning how to reproduce them, and using that knowledge to create new, derivative works and even selling them.

But when this is done with software, it seems wrong. I can't quite articulate why though. Is it because it takes much less effort? Anyone can press a button and do something that would presumably take the person from the example above years or decades to do? What if the person was somehow super talented and could do it in a week or a day?

There's no way he did anything worth 100m and definitely no way Musk did anything worth 1T, what the fuck.

If he screws up badly enough do they take 100m from him?