I’m betting they’ll be sold to the feds as another grift

My money is on them being sold to the army then blown up by our tax dollars for training purposes or something tbh

I didn’t have time to find it earlier, but here is a DVD you can buy about their mission to the top of Mount Everest to kill mother Mary Magdalene so the Middle East wouldn’t be blocked from Jesus anymore.

Or here is a blog from 2015 that summarizes the DVD and it’s such an amazing read I would highly recommend it and look forward to someone turning it into a really stupid DnD one shot someday.

Sadly my state representative pretty much only posts on there and I feel like I can better tailor my complaints and insults towards him when he fucks up by reading his drivel

I was curious if it would but it’s the stored communications act instead, which frankly seems a much better case anyways. Theoretically two party consent could maybe cover it, but the law is old and we have others that cover electronic communications anyways.

The idiots complaining he isn’t left wing enough. It’s fucking Kansas, find something valid to criticize him about. People are complaining he is a pastor and other smoothbrained takes

If you wanted the actual answer, it’s the “New Apostolic Reformation” and they use the “Passion” translation of the bible. It’s the same denomination Mike Johnson and other scumbags are a part of.

An excellent book on the subject is “The Violent Take It By Force” and it’s absolutely fucking wild what they believe.

Oh no, not sanctions! Iran was only able to endure -checks notes- 5 decades of sanctions! Surely this will cripple them now!

Clowns would have made a better government than these idiots.

And those spineless fucks need to be out of a job. He is closer to them, but he is not them and if he was he wouldn’t have any chance at all more than likely.

I think people forget that geographically things can really vary wildly. Like if you ask someone their opinions on the right to own firearms in NYC, that same person is probably going to have a different opinion in Alaska where you are legally required to carry in some places because of the wildlife.

Kentucky, Alabama, Louisiana, etc. are not going to elect anyone close to a Bernie or an AOC in our lifetimes most likely. We cant let imperfection be the enemy of good enough sometimes

Stupid fucks overthrowing democracy off of a technicality.

If we do not prosecute and hang 4-10 people in particular for treason then we have failed.

“At least the trains ran on time” kinda attitude

Somebody in a state that isn’t single-party consent sue over this, I’d be really interested in seeing how far that could go.

Looking closer it appears that this would probably fall under the stored communications act, since it relates to electronic messages not intercepted real time and no one has attempted to prove texts would fall under eavesdropping/wiretapping laws, presumably because they are covered under the SCA.

That being said, under 18 USC 2702 “Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records” I think there’s actually a stronger argument under that law. You would either have to argue that ChatGPT is a provider or that they are an intended recipient, which goes back to my original point about all parties consenting to ChatGPT obtaining the content of their messages.

In states without single party consent, both/all parties involved have to give consent to have their communications recorded. If one person consents for ChatGPT and the other doesn’t, then it would be a violation unless you specifically tell everyone that all messages going forward will be sent and read by ChatGPT.

At least I’m relatively sure, but something about ChatGPT not being a sentient entity or something might invalidate it but it’s an interesting question.

You can play music on your 3D printers and other stepper powered automata!

Can we combine the first two points and add “surrender/capitulate in advance”

But it is because by sending messages back and forth shows consent between those parties. If Kevin sees text messages that he was not supposed to and then uses that information for harmful purposes he could be found liable, as clearly that was not the intent or Kevin would have been told himself either in a group message or individually.

It’s not just how the information is gathered but how it is used, and in ChatGPT’s circumstances there’s no other logical use for those messages other than monetization.

Remember when Blanche said we aren’t doing the Epstein files because the DoJ has more important stuff to do?

If Lindsey graham can do it, so can they.