Comment on
See also: The Call of Chtulhu
To be fair, any text is terrible proof.
Comment on
See also: The Call of Chtulhu
To be fair, any text is terrible proof.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
But sometimes you are wrong.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
In Reddit and Lemmy the names of the censors are hidden, and the debate is hidden too.
I don't know how they do it on X and Facebook.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
Well we have this upvoting/downvoting paradigm. Simple and popular. Maybe that could be developed further.
Comment on
See also: The Call of Chtulhu
Reply in thread
Actually it's a picture of a cd
Comment on
how do I know that you guys are real and not bots?
You have entered a low-grade reality. Basically an 80s text adventure. Truth, depth and humanity have been thrown out the window.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
Yeah, but once the power is there it will be used for less legit reasons, like removing "saying nice stuff about the wrong politician".
Comment on
New Dad Can't Wait to Show Newborn Child Hard Drives Full of Pirated Movies Once He's Old Enough
Reply in thread
I have a 1tb hd. And a 1 tb backup. Manually switch on backups.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
You can see the reason cited.
In almost all cases you cannot see who did it.
Any conversation about it is, as a rule, private
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
I heard about this big Christian from a hundred years ago who doubted the existence of time, space and physical objects. I like that guy.
Comment on
Beyond overt bans how resilient is the Fediverse (and Lemmy specifically) to the new forms of digital control and censorship?
Anything short of a 100% auditable forum that's 100% in the control of the users is gonna slide towards total bullshit. And quick. It's inevitable. Everybody thinks they're so right that censorship is ok. Everybody.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
We're talking about removing stuff at the judgment of the presiding authority.
Rationale is infinitely flexible. It will never be science. So it cannot be relied upon.
So, ideals aside, consider it in that light. Be realistic.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
Maybe the power to censor could be kept out of the hands of individuals. Make it a democratic decision.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
Hmm. Maybe.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
You got a better one?
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
No matter what authority, rationale or interpretation cited, it comes to the judgment of the person actually pulling the trigger.
But this is obvious.
Comment on
Is censorship ok if the person you're censoring is wrong?
Reply in thread
That's a good point.
Prosecution might then assert that it was your responsibility to employ a system that DID allow for censorship. But I hate that one.
Another option would be to refer the offender to the LEOs. Just shift responsibility. Heck, it could be said that you're doing the LEOs a service. I like that one.
Comment on
J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization
Reply in thread
I'm gonna take it at face value. You seem to be spinning a bit.
Comment on
J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization
Reply in thread
Hey the mods removed my reply. I wonder what perfectly reasonable reason they'll cite.