Comment on
Oh dear
"Fake British accent". It's just a Wisconsin accent...
Comment on
Oh dear
"Fake British accent". It's just a Wisconsin accent...
Comment on
24 October 1989
Reply in thread
Mr. Waterson's no slouch with a couch.
Comment on
UFOs by Franco-American (1983)
"It's technically food!"
Comment on
Wall Street Is Getting Very Nervous About AI
Reply in thread
Yeah. That $80 billion loss was all for training I guess 🙄
Comment on
How come everything sucks?
Reply in thread
Making excuses well just keep you where you are. You want the world to stuck less, you have a way to do that, and it's more achievable than you claim. You have to be the one who wants it, though. You have to make the first steps out of your cynicism to do anything about it. Good luck.
Comment on
Wall Street Is Getting Very Nervous About AI
Reply in thread
I'm not talking about personal use.
Comment on
Wall Street Is Getting Very Nervous About AI
Reply in thread
Even its tool status only exists because these companies subsidize the cost. In the event any survive the pop, realistic costs would price it out of being a frequent tool for typical workers.
Comment on
Teamwork thanks all
Thanks for reposting with the artist credit <3
Comment on
Every parent dreads that call from school… 📞😱 [Litterbox Comics]
Zombie cat dad doesn't like punny tees I guess.
Comment on
How come everything sucks?
So dogs actively playing in a park makes you think about how their owners must suck and leave them indoors? That's a you problem bud. There are very real problems in this world, but it seems you can't even see a good thing without twisting it into a bad thing. You should get some help with that.
Comment on
Wall Street Is Getting Very Nervous About AI
Reply in thread
And none of those are "tool" level for the average company, so it's not what's being discussed.
Comment on
Wall Street Is Getting Very Nervous About AI
Reply in thread
I don't think businesses want the overhead, but maybe some will. The capabilities will be much lower, though. The subsidized costs are high because of the hardware and power needed to generate the content it does. Companies willing to upgrade to comparable hardware and oversight would probably be just as willing to pay a higher subscription. Also, I would hope any company considering it would be able to see by then that the results aren't worth the costs.
Comment on
Prize winning
Don't cut off the artist credit. And find a better source when it's obviously cropped out
Comment on
National Polling Company Admits It’s Totally Fake — Crows it Was ‘Far Too Easy’ to Get Major Media Outlets to Bite
Reply in thread
Seriously. Without further evidence this was a "test", this announcement is worth little to nothing.
Also, if it was a test, how is the data being included a "failure"? These outlets aggregate a lot of polls precisely to mitigate bad data. It's basically doing with polls what the polls do with people.
Comment on
Prize winning
Reply in thread
Fwiw, they haven't made a habit of this as far as I know. Still not OK, by likely an oversight considering their post history.
Comment on
Documentation of Lemmy.ml's Tankie Extremism [Megathread v2]
Reply in thread
That's basically what defederation does - users on that instance can still see and interact with posts and comments, but nobody on the instance that defederated them will see it.
Comment on
The Internet goes on high alert after discovery of 8 compromised TLS certs
Reply in thread
Got it. That's reassuring. Thanks again for the explanations!
Comment on
2026-10-21 #3
I really like seeing these early comics when he was still working out the style.
Comment on
The EXPANSE's return to TV takes a big step forwards
[Book Spoilers]
It's great that the series so far ended right before the time jump in the books. It's not a thirty year gap (hopefully), but they'll be able to keep what cast members are able to return without having to explain the aging between seasons (or just ignoring it like Stranger Things).
Comment on
The Internet goes on high alert after discovery of 8 compromised TLS certs
Reply in thread
First, thank you for the detailed response. I really appreciate it.
So from your explanation, I'm to understand that the risk here is just exposing sent data. Bad actors can't spoof these certificates to send bad data or malware to a device?