It's fascinating how people know that these devices break their privacy, yet they keep using them.

Obviously whoever is going to make the decision on what is "misinformation" and what's not, has always been right... and can never, ever, ever have ulterior motives.

All good. Nothing to see here.

Weird... why is piracy growing then? Every reasonable person should pay $300 to watch the shows they want on the weekend... and then pay a couple more hundreds in the theater.

Oneteen onety one

Try grayjay... it's an AWESOME new app, open source, and supports all video networks you can think of as plugins.

It's available on: grayjay.app

Not your keys, not your coins

It fascinates me people are still using Facebook...

If you're doing something extremely skillfully, chat gpt will make the dumbest suggestions ever...

Chatgpt is good for learning ideas and new things as an aggregate of what everyone thinks about it. But as a coding tool it cannot reason properly and has rubber stamp solutions for everything.

It's open source and it's free. You're free to pay too if you want to support them. Software costs money.

What Louis is protecting against in his license is repurposing the app with malware and ads like was repeatedly done with new pipe. Pick your poison.

Yep... it surprises me that people still think that the internet has principles or cares. Haven't we seen how weak people are for reddit already?

As long as they're not books on kinky sex that you share with kids because you're pure evil, I support you.

It was a parking lot fire. No hospital blew up. The propaganda has to stop.

For the record, payment is optional.

You're allowed to post political memes as long as the mods agree with your view.

It's a lie. 500 people didn't die because of that. Propaganda.

I do judge them. But I would more say that I came to terms with this ugly fact.

"You're not allowed to have private conversations because there are bad people in the world"

I'll never understand that kind of logic.

Encryption doesn't protect you from being identified. Encryption prevents eavesdropping unto the connection from a third party. DMCA lawyers don't need to do that to identify you as a seeder. All they need to do is request the content from you, watch you send to them, and make a record of your ip address.

The blacklist, maybe protects you. No idea. Though it can easily be circumvented by a motivated group.

Well, I don't think you can use written laws to fight human plans to centralize power. I guess our current system is proof of that. People will always find a way to centralize that power to benefit themselves and their groups.

But anyway. I guess we're getting into a dead end. This is becoming opinion stuff at this point, whether this will work. I'll have to think more about this stuff.