Bikers really need their own infrastructure that's kept entirely apart from where cars are. Bikes and cars sharing the same road is terrifyingly unsafe for both.

Adding this to your uBlock Origin filters also makes the problem go away:

www.youtube.com##+js(nano-stb, resolve(1), *, 0.001)

While we're digging shit up, lets lay some fiber.

That's not just an idea - its physical reality. You can't get your physical needs met in old age if you didn't win the lotto. Suicide is the retirement plan for most of us non-boomers.

USA and Morocco signed a treaty 1786 which remains the longest unbroken relationship in U.S. history, in 2004 Morocco was declared a "Major Non-NATO Ally", and Morocco's military and law enforcement train and work together with their U.S. counterparts.

always has been

Clay, more or less.

The Tesla brand has become distasteful due to the owner's antics, and no other carmaker builds an EV that's capable of long range travel due to a lack of quick charge capability and infrastructure.

edit: "the owners" meaning the person who owns the company, ie Elon, not the people who bought the cars. Apostrophe added for clarity.

“The whole thing about the Nation estate saying Daleks have to appear once a year/series to keep the licence, that’s not true is it?”

“They’re the Daleks. It’s Doctor Who. Nothing weird about using them at all.”

That doesn't answer the question though, does it?

All he wants for xmass is his father back, you son of a bitch.

I hope that includes what other sites would call "strictly necessary". No thanks, if your site won't work without, then I don't need to visit.

And the presence of a large carnivore at the end implies the food chain is healthy all the way down.

A "free" cup of coffee that you need to buy food and pay medical bills for.

Yeah, for traveling to underdeveloped parts of the world, hybrid is the way to go.

I still listen to Dancing Mad

The insurance companies will go for it if the data shows driverless cars cause fewer accidents and lower claims versus human drivers, but it seems like that data will be a long time coming because right now the court of public opinion goes nuts when a driverless car hits someone while ignoring all the times that a human does the same. It makes no sense, and I hope the insurance companies can make it make sense soon.

That's still too cheap.

There's probably a price that could be paid to encourage a higher birth rate, but I doubt the governments who have attempted such programs were willing to aim high enough.

This video helped me understand the concept of looking in a mirror and seeing the back of your head:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFNgd3pitAI

Yeah, that's what I meant.

Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don't need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap.