Spyke

Replies

Comment on

Only 13% of companies see real returns from AI, survey finds

13% (presumably 12.5%) means 1 in 8.

CxOs with their Thought Leadership™️ and outside the box (follow the herd) thinking have done everything they can to reduce the cost and chaos of humans in their company, and prioritising the reverse centaur approach to LLMs for short term gain instead of making them centaurs: a useful tool to enhance their productivity for long term results.

And now they're waving their hands in despair, wondering who's to blame. It can't be them, by definition.

Let them burn. Let those companies die. Piss on their ashes. Blacklist the people involved. It's more than they deserve.

Comment on

Police officer gave her Flock login to her ICE agent husband // SPD officer Amber Harpe was fired for sharing her Flock access with her ICE agent husband.

Shared their login details - as in username and password? Why am I not surprised it doesn't even use multi-factor authentication... 🤦🏻‍♂️

At this stage in the game, I'd not be surprised to learn that Flock's database is stored on an unsecured cloud instance with password123 or sithlord as the sole security between it and the world.

Comment on

Ad suppression

Reply in thread

This is the way.

The "in app browser" that phone apps offer is for convenience alone, not security nor anything else that matters in our current "techbros vs humanity" reality.

Comment on

Elsevier vs Meta: first science publisher sues over scraped research papers

I think my irony meter just broke. The company that takes freely published papers* and paywalls them for extortionate profit is mad that that someone else is making money off free content?

I propose a trial by mortal combat. It's the only logical solution.


*You'll be hard pressed to find a published researcher who thinks well of the Elsevier distribution monopoly, and it's even harder to find one that won't send you a PDF copy for free if you just ask for it.

Comment on

Why is space 2 dimensional?

I asked this question many years ago on a Usenet group, and the answer was along the lines of what we're seeing is many millions of years after those orbits began, and that they all eventually flatten out due to the gravity of the other objects in orbit.

So you could have 2 objects at roughly the same orbital distance but perpendicular to one another (eg. one orbiting the star's poles and the other around it's equator), and over time the small amount of gravitational force they exert on one another will bring them roughly into the same plane.

Hopefully someone better versed in the topic can come along to explain it better than I can.