Spyke

Replies

Comment on

An upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verification

Reply in thread

They don't care. They want your face, retina, fingerprints, DNA. All for their LLMs and so they can sell you something else.

Also to blackmail you later if they think they can or just feel like it... because they will put all that shit on an insecure server and some 13 year old hacker in Turkmenistan will leak it and make a killing (literally and figuratively) with it.

Comment on

Homeland Security is trying to force tech companies to hand over data about Trump critics

People wonder why I am a stickler for privacy and have been for a very long time. Shit like this is why. While my opsec is probably far from ideal, I at least try to maintain some level of it.

But shit like this is EXACTLY why privacy is such a critical thing that it is the bedrock of all other rights. Free speech is useless if you are under constant surveillance, especially by people with bad intentions. Unwarranted searches and seizures? Forget it, without privacy and companies wanting 24/7 live information on all sounds, images, and movements in your home? Yeah that shit is pointless. A single heated arguement, muttering something in your sleep, or anything, anything at all, is going to fuck you over.

I am going to give one example of what I mean. I knew a guy a long time ago who once told me that he stopped drinking alcohol for months. Yet when I visited the guy, the guy had beer in fridge and also had a habit of drinking a beer or even two at a bar before driving... at night. He wasn't drunk and was within the acceptable BAC for driving, but just him making one statement online to me and me seeing another when visiting made me think: What if a random ass company had access to that information? Someone trying to pass themselves off as a teetotaller but actually drinking? Would they sell that information to insurance companies and his premiums would go up? What if the guy did say he drinks a little, but actually drank a lot more than that? And might fit the definition of a high functioning alcoholic? In some places being a diagnosed alcoholic can incur a lot of penalties. Like in Canada if a gun owner was also someone who HAD to have a few beers every day, but otherwise was OK, the addiction might be grounds for their firearms license to be revoked.

Going on that, what if any cop could randomly pull that information on drinking. Let us suppose someone likes to drink, but never drives after drinking, instead when they get home they crank open a few cold ones right away. There are new laws (or have been on the books for a while, I am not sure) that police can knock on your door up to 3 hours after you've been driving and give you a test to see if you have any alcohol in your system. So our guy who maybe downed 3 or 4 beers within the two hours of arriving home, that guy is going to show a decent BAC and the cop could charge him with DUI or a citation. An asshole cop could do this to fill a quota or just be an asshole to someone, and if they could get a hold of that information due to a company having full surveillence from multiple companies (credit card purchases, CCTV tracking, car telemetry tracking, etc, etc) all combined and made available to any 'authority' then live will be unbearable.

I could go on forever. But shit like this isn't some DUI or marketing. This is a matter of life and fucking death for many people. Transpeople (and gays soon enough) will be in very real danger from this if they aren't already. Remember that the average cop and ICE agent is dumb as rocks, but they system they work under isn't. He is basically a caveman with access to tanks and drone strikes.

canada

Comment on

Canada discreetly puts money down on 14 additional F-35s

This is why I really, really hate Carney. He talk about how the new world order and how the old order is breaking down and how Canada and the rest need to abandon globalization as it demonstrates its potential for abuse (gee, right now? Some people have been saying it for decades). Yet at the exact same time he kowtows to US tech companies, is trying to pass (and probably going to pass) massive surveillance and control over civilians that will destroy any semblance of privacy, and those same bills are going to 100% share all that information with not only US governmental agencies, but also private companies. Don't get me started on Bill C-15 that wants to make Canadian companies (and probably many US companies working in Canada) exempt from civil law. Maybe those bills will be amended to make them less 'extreme' but they will still ultimately pass and have a lot of the bullshit they want kept in. I wish those bills could be thrown out all together, but they won't, they never are.

He is also increasing the military budget but wants to focus on 'unconventional' warfare since Canada will never be able to defeat the US military in a straight fight. Good idea... but why is it making it so much more difficult by still having 100% intelligence sharing with the Americans that will make pockets of resistance (both regular and reserve military and maybe civilians banding together) far less effective and easier to quash?

Edit: One of the unconventional war aspects he says is a 'civilianized' fighting force. Basically meaning militias or discharged soldiers taking up arms out of uniform. This is already going to be VERY difficult. The Americans already have a list of everyone with a RPAL/PAL (but maybe not what firearms they have registered in their names) and probably already know who is and who isn't military or ex-military. I know this because I have a valid RPAL and a long time ago I was stopped by a cop in the US (accidental traffic violation) and after the guy took my license and registeration, he called for backup and I had several other police cars with lights on. The whole thing didn't result in anything other than the usual ticket for me, but I was very confused by the delay and the fact that several other police cars showed up for what was a very minor traffic violation. He told me that he saw that I had a firearms permit and needed time to talk to the RCMP about it.

it was really fucking weird and kinda unnerving as to how much they know.

canada

Comment on

Canadian man detained at US border, forced to give biometrics including DNA, then rejected entry.

THIS! This is why I am not going to the US.

They already have my fingerprints (as does the RCMP) when I entered the US prior to becoming a Canadian citizen. After becoming one the process was so streamlined and quick it was a non issue.

But I will not subject myself to this kind of indignity.

If you are wondering why the RCMP has my fingerprints, it is because part of the process of obtaining a permanent residency you need to submit your fingerprints. All immigrants going through that process have to.

No DNA or facial information is required, at least not when I did it.