Spyke

Replies

europe

Comment on

After a torrid 100 days, Germany’s Friedrich Merz is mocked as a ‘dead man walking’. He must fight back

Reply in thread

Our conservatives, with the help of our so called social democrats, stopped almost all investments into infrastructure, housing, education, defense... basically everything, over the last 20 years. So now we have unaffordable housing, crumbling infrastructure, bad and expensive public transport and telecommunication, paired with sky high taxes and an overburdened and under-financed healthcare and retirement system. Income is taxed, wealth isn't. And because of demographics the only thing parties care about is raising retirement payments - adding fuel to the doomed system. The economy is slowing down, and nothing is done against it (tax cuts of course, and watering down the laws against tax evasion). The working class is disappearing because the only thing they ever can imagine is to raise taxes to finance these increasingly inefficient and unfair systems.

While some of their party members wasted literally billions of taxpayer money, they are now blaming some absolute minorities (unwilling unemployed, and foreigners of course), and try to squeeze money out of them.

They (Merz especially) have no plan for the country. . Like, at all. The only plan was to get into power.

Oh, and the Nazis are back, and our conservatives play "wait and see". Fucking happy times, everyone.

dach

Comment on

Warum die Porsches bei VW nicht auf eine Dividende verzichten können

Wiwo sollte mal den Unterschied zwischen "können" und "wollen" recherchieren. So ein Blödsinn.

Wenn sie die Dividende streichen, würden die Aktionäre endlich mal ihr "unternehmerisches Risiko" tragen, was immer herbeifabuliert wird wenn es darum geht warum sie Geld fürs nichtstun bekommen. Aber das passiert natürlich nicht. Das unternehmerische Risiko tragen jetzt die Arbeitnehmer in Form von Lohnkürzungen und Werksschließungen.

privacy

Comment on

Why is that the Normies had shifted from "I have nothing to hide" to "Privacy is not real"???

The claim to have "nothing to hide" was not just born our of ignorance, but also out of comfort - to not having to do anything about it.

Now that even the last one accepted that they do indeed have something to hide, but in order to justify their own inaction, it's labeled as inevitable: privacy is not real.

They are lying to themselves, because doing otherwise would mean they have to admit being wrong.