Young voters right now overwhelmingly prefer Biden: The Economist/YouGov poll
Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.
In the Economist/YouGov poll — conducted via web-based interviews Dec. 16-18 — more than half (53 percent) of registered voters under 30 said they would support Biden, and less than a quarter (24 percent) said they would support Trump.
Another 10 percent said they would support another candidate, 4 percent said they were not sure, and 9 percent said they wouldn’t vote.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4369951-young-voters-right-now-prefer-biden-poll/Open linkView original on lemmy.world725
Comments480
Young voters are being given really shitty choices.
Doesn't matter, over half won't be voting. Even less than normal if GOP state legislatures do away with mail in ballots or automatic mailed request forms from COVID times.
The less people who vote the more elections Republicans win.
Make sure your friends go vote (unless they’re trumpeter assholes maybe, then don’t talk about it).
Less young people voting is a direct result of the national DNC’s deeply infuriating tactic of promising a fuckton of stuff and then just abandoning those goals and… “compromising” with the GOP every single fucking time the chips are down. And here, “compromise” is pronounced “submit to”, because most Democrats have the neurological inability to understand that these days the GOP will betray them simply on principle, or because one GOP rep wants to tweet something so they can “troll the libs”. And then we all suffer for it.
We all fucking understand the stakes here. The DNC is actively pushing young voters away by using such a deeply cynical strategy and then thinking we’ll forget all about that stupidity the next time an election comes around. From where a lot of young people are standing, it looks a lot like a choice between “actively bad” and “passively bad”, and it’s hard to give a fuck about that, especially if you’re already struggling with other shit in your life, like most of our generation is to one degree or another.
Don’t get me wrong - I vote in every single election I can. But the amount of deeply, fundamentally uninspiring or even actively bad candidates I feel I’m forced to vote for, simply because they’re not a neo-Nazi or a member of the GOP is not small. And to all you vOTe fOr a ThiRD pArTY types out there: you and I both know that’s a great way to hand elections to the GOP, given how our shitty electoral system works.
The party is absolutely taking advantage of how bad their opponents have become. Democratic party leadership has regarded the left of the party with such withering contempt for so long, and then they wonder why the left resents them.
It’s super frustrating, because while I still think it’s possible to move the DNC in a more reliably progressive direction, it’s abundantly clear all the fossils in charge of the party have no intention whatsoever of going in that direction, so we either need to force them out or wait for them to die.
And in the meantime, the planet is warming and the fascists they keep "compromising" with only need to win once.
Yeah these polls always being in terms like "registered voters" or "likely voters". Where as they really should poll "eligible to vote" instead to get full picture of the societal political mood situation.
Less than 50% voter turnout is a sign of a healthy democracy /s
Should I have added a /s ? My bad lmao, that's on me
This is obviously sarcasm lol
In what way?
This must be a joke.
I feel quite confident that the comment you’re responding to is an example of deadpan humor.
Sharkfucker420, fuckin awesome username lol. Is this a joke or no?
This is a joke lol, added a /s for clarity
I wonder when this magical time was where voting for the president had great choices. What many young voters fail to understand is that it’s not all about the president. Get enough Democrats into Congress, and they will be able to vote for progressive legislation, and if you send that to your far-from-ideal president’s desk, they’ll sign it.
It's certainly a much easier task than having an awesome progressive president who begs a near 50-50 Congress to pass good bills, and it just doesn’t happen.
We had 60 and they killed the public option. How many do we need?
People need to study how the Moral Majority took control of the GOP. Nixon was a dead duck after he lost his California Senate race, but he knew that an ex-Vice President was a big deal in small places. He campaigned tirelessly for years, getting lots of Reps, Governors, and Mayors elected. In 1968 he breezed in because he had the Party base on his side.
The MMs did the same. They would show up at every local GOP meeting with enoughvotes to get their agenda enacted. One day the Party big shots looked around and realized that all the dog catchers, county clerks, and sheriffs in their state were MMs.
What is an MM?
Oh gotcha thanks.
Thanks for explaining
Ok, so we need to force the system to change outside of its normal paths of power to have choices. No one thinks this time existed, everyone understands the current situation is bad.
repeated comment
Who woulda thunk that grassroots campaign works? Even for the side that you don't like?
There is no exact number. The more there are, the bolder they can be.
Please tell me you’re not talking about the two month window in 2010 where they had a filibuster-proof majority, and passed a major healthcare reform bill, but it was kneecapped because it relied on Joe Lieberman to pass. Because that’s a case where a couple more Democrats would have made a huge difference in what we would have gotten, and also turned 2 months and some change into two years. That’s my point that there’s no exact number.
Having enough is a spectrum: the more there are, the bolder the legislation and the more likely it is to pass. So however many you get, you always fall short of doing even better with more.
Single payer healthcare had been discussed in the early stages — and it was clear they wouldn’t have 60 votes for it, so it was a non-starter. Because there were exactly 60 D/Is, there was no wiggle room. And the GOP held up the 60th Senator in the courts as long as they could because they had no wiggle room. And then Ted Kennedy had to vote for the ACA on his virtual deathbed, and after that their 60 votes were gone, so they couldn’t spend more time on healthcare or move on to other tough issues. Lieberman forced them to remove the public option from the bill.
But you are just overlooking that they did pass a major, consequential healthcare reform bill that solved some very important problems, which couldn’t be accomplished for decades before then, even though people tried.
And this all touches on my original point: a couple more Senators would have changed things significantly at that time, but a more progressive president would not have.
Yes, this is tradition.
Right? This poll is literally the same as asking young voters if they would rather have their entire heads cut off or just their eyes and ears gouged out.
What on earth are you talking about? Joe Biden tried to give 20k to each of them who went to college. And he would have if the--let me check my notes here: oh, right--Nazis in the other party hadn't sued to prevent him from giving away money.
I appreciate that Biden might not be some folks' first choice, but if you think young people believe another four years of Grampa Joe is just barely more tolerable than the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist traitors, you might need to meet one.
It doesn't really matter in the long run, America is run by oil companies, not the people. Joe signed off on more land for drilling than trump did.
I believe those were agreements signed by Trump that Biden had to follow through on, no?
But let’s also be clear, Biden appointed the first Native Secretary of the Interior and signed the Inflation Reduction Act (the most significant climate legislation the US has ever had). Trump appointed Scott Pruitt to lead the EPA.
One will kill us slightly faster than the other. Great.
Brother he's basically a war criminal the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist dictators is already happening
Unlike that peace-lover Trump who only cares about the welfare of the Palestinian people, right?
You misspelled Russia.
My criticism of Biden is totally my endorsement of trump for sure
Do you have the name of a third person who has a chance of being elected in 2024?
? So I should just love Biden? I don't understand what you mean. I never said anything about voting did I?
Also I came back to say this. How do you not see Biden and Trump being our only feasible options as inherently undemocratic? People only like them in comparison to the other. We should not be forced to choose between two objective evils. Are you so resigned to stagnation that you think continuing to enforce a system that exploits is the best option?
Centrists falsely interpret all criticism of Biden as support for Trump. It's dishonest.
And realists know that bashing Biden with no nuance, as these comments are doing, does nothing but benefit Republicans.
Centrists just want everyone to their left and only their left to shut up.
Then what you're telling us is there is no opportunity for improvement... Clinton was 30 years ago and Biden is to the right of Clinton. Three decades of "incremental progress" has gotten us nowhere.
When you don't vote, therefore allowing Trump to win the election...then yeah.
Equating the above with "all criticism" is what's dishonest. Plenty of people criticize Biden who voted for him once, and they are still voting for him again. But you know that. We might not like him but believe it or not, we dislike fascism even more. Crazy, I know.
He seems to be doing a pretty good job given his poor circumstances where the Republican house and supreme court are both totally useless.
He didn't have those issues in his first two years. His own party blocked his agenda.
Wel the first two years we had the fuckheads Sinema and Manchin who are basically republicans at this point
Sinema didn't kill the minimum wage increase by herself. She was one of 8 democrats to vote against workers.
Manchin is the perfect centrist Democrat.
Maybe pay attention to what's actually happening rather than just repeating what other people say about him.
Biden is continuing to seek (and find) pathways to forgiving student loan debt, despite the Supreme Court ruling against his program. Millions of people have had their loans forgiven since that decision, and it seems more are getting it every day.
Anyone who thinks he's senile or incoherent should listen to the interview he did on Conan O'Brien's podcast that was released the other day. I was surprised that it went so well, and Biden was far more lucid than I've ever seen Trump.
I don't think he's senile, I just think he's out of touch. It's hard to be in touch as an 80-some year old man.
This...just absolutely this. I was going to post something along the lines of it being a choice between eating shit or being flayed alive, but this is just better. Kudos.
Wow you guys are so original 🙄
We totally are. thanks.
Sure, Biden kinda sucks, but THE ALTERNATIVE IS ACTUAL FASCISM.
I've been saying this for years. It's kind of not really a choice, as much as it sucks. Let's just hope enough people actually turn out to vote
Lol no he doesnt
The alternative would have been a strong primary challenger, in a just world.
Im actually quite worried that Trump will be removed from all ballots by the supreme court and Biden will lose to Hailey.
I don't think he will get removed from the ballots, at least not in current state. I feel like the argument is going to be the presumption of innocence until proven guilty; an indictment is unfortunately premature. We need to apply the law equally or we'll get Republicans finding every way to do the same... albeit with no arguments for it.
I'd rather have Biden lose to Nikki Haley instead of Trump. Yes, I know she's a legacy Tea Party candidate, I don't want her, but at least she isn't campaigning on ethnic cleansing and actually criticized R bullshit like TC&J.
She literally wants to wage war with Mexico and abolish the Department of Education, as per the first primary debate. She's also a dangerous loon.
Ideally we would have a Democratic candidate that could wipe the floor with both of them regardless of who the GOP nominee is.
like biden's presidency
him and his vice got in office and immediately went back on campaign promises for cannabis, police reform, women's rights, voter rights everything went to the shitter just like trump
now here we are AGAIN
and people screaming just vote HOW? not everyone has that right thanks to politicians like biden
https://truthout.org/articles/a-federal-court-will-decide-whether-atlanta-voters-could-have-a-say-on-cop-city/
cop city is happening under biden's watch too
no difference with either demopublican
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/?ruling=true
Seems like he's only went back on one campaign promise so far. He's compromised on a few, he's working on a third, got stalled on a third and has kept roughly a third.
Brother there's a mile wide difference between "couldn't keep campaign promises" and "literally running on a platform of 'i will be a dictator for the first day'"
As a minority who will experience an enormous difference if Republicans win, this outlook is viscerally revolting.
Biden is a Fascist Nazi already.
You guys aren't going to convince anyone to vote with the lesser of evils spiel. Shit's gonna get bad and all you had to do was pick a real candidate.
What do you think happened in 2020?
People felt the absurdity. It's been four years. The wound isn't festering anymore.
Biden made a bunch of promises and acted like progressives and leftists actually had a seat at the table. The BBB, student loan, weed legalization, rail strike and gaza genocide have made it clear: We do not.
We gave him a chance and he gave us the finger.
You do realize that Biden can't just declare things into law, right?
For the first two years, Biden had a Democratic House that could theoretically pass anything he wanted, but a Senate which was split nearly 50-50. If they didn't get every vote, they could fail to pass a bill. And this doesn't even get into the filibuster which would tank bills unless 60 votes were reached or the fact that Manchin and Sinema frequently acted to sink Democratic bills despite technically being Democrats. Biden could put some pressure on them, but his options were limited. It's not like he could hold a gun to their heads and force them to vote on favor of bills
Since January, Biden has had a Democratic Senate with a razor thin margin and a Republican House. This threw even more wrenches in the works.
And then there's the Supreme Court. Thanks to Mitch McConnell, Trump, and the Republicans, the Supreme Court has a huge conservative majority. So Biden can try to take action for things like forgiving student loans, but then Republicans sue, the case ends up in the Supreme Court and the conservative justices rule that Biden isn't allowed to do this by law. (He's managed to find a way to forgive some loans even if it wasn't as much as he wanted to do.)
Putting all the blame on Biden and saying "he didn't fulfill all his promises" is disingenuous. He hasn't exactly had the Congress and Supreme Court that could support what he wanted to do. Could he have done everything anyway and proclaimed that he makes the laws now? Perhaps, but then he'd be a fascist dictator and not working within our political system - exactly the type of thing that Trump wants to do and is properly criticized for.
It's funny, the student loan thing was literally decided by the supreme Court reiterating that executive branch rulemaking can't be done capriciously, and people are still pushing this patently false idea that Biden can legalize pot with the stroke of his pen.
Buddy, you seem to misunderstand something here. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. If you want to believe Biden deserves your vote go nuts. It makes no difference to me.
But I'm telling you as someone who voted for him in the 2020 general: Fuck Joe Biden. Do whatever you want with that information. But trust no amount of these excuses will change my mind. I was already angry I had to give him a chance in 2020 after people voted for him in the primaries specifically to fuck over progressive and leftist efforts. I held up my end of the bargain. Biden and the people who elected him in the primaries did not.
Fuck Joe Biden for screwing up the BBB. Fuck Joe Biden for negotiating down from $50k student loan forgiveness. Fuck Joe Biden for waiting until after the midterms to fuck over the rail workers. Fuck Joe Biden for blocking the strike. Fuck Joe Biden for supporting Israel against our wishes.
For someone who needs the votes of people like me to win the 2024 general election he sure ain't fucking acting like it. He can go fuck himself along with everyone who voted for him in the primaries.
Ok, so I get that you are privileged enough that you can probably ride out Trumpist fascism without much real damage, at least for a while. Just understand that there are many vulnerable people who will be seriously harmed by your decision to do anything besides voting for Biden. This isn't dooming or trying to scare you into a vote, it's a simple statement of fact.
If you are fine with that moral liability, then carry on.
Funny, that's precisely how I view the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries. Where's your ire for them?
So who you voting for then?
Definitely not trump or Biden. If a decent 3rd party candidate shows I'll go that route otherwise I'll just write in.
You're angry because you're ignorant, and because of that, you're threatening to not vote for the best option in the general election out of spite. Not voting or voting for anyone but Biden is an effective vote for his opponent, which at this time appears to be Trump. So you honestly think that there is anyone else currently running that you think would better represent your interests than the guy that had actually tried to do just that without the needed support?
You can hate the guy all you want, but check in on the reasons you listed and gain a better understanding of the situation around them so you can see how far off you are.
How about in just a high level way, explain how someone could have realistically handled those situations in a better way that would have benefits the country better. Student Loans, Rail Strike, and Israel, how would you have pleased everyone?
I doubt I'm going to change your mind at all, but I just want to let you know your information about the rail strike is incorrect. Biden did help secure sick pay for those workers, here's part of the statement from the IBEW:
"We’re thankful that the Biden administration played the long game on sick days and stuck with us for months after Congress imposed our updated national agreement,” Russo said. “Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers."
https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid
The student loan aid was also legally blocked by Congress, and the military budgets were also passed by Congress. There's no magic wand to a lot of the problems you seem to have with Biden, unfortunately. He isn't the sole authority in the US govt.
Well buddy, you're in a two party system. You going to just give a literial fascist a chance because Biden wasn't able to wrangle the crazies on the other side to agree all the time?
that's cutting of your nose to spite your face in the worst way.
Because all student loans forgiven have been forgiven via executive order, Biden is literally the only person who didn't give you the finger over it
You really think anyone voting for Biden in 2020 had high hopes he'd be a really progressive candidate? People didn't want him then and we don't want him now, but as long as we're dealing with actual nazis on the other side I don't see how the choice has fundamentally changed in 4 years.
I don’t think anyone who supported say Bernie or Warren thought that Biden was a progressive. However, there were attempts made by the Biden campaign to appeal to progressives. After Bernie lost, Biden and Bernie staffers actually collaborated to release a joint list of policy proposals. I think that gave a lot of progressives false hopes for what a Biden presidency could be.
Not high hopes no. But higher and considering the very thin margin he won by in the 2020 general that's a pretty important point Biden apologists seem to want to sweep under the rug.
Maybe you don't understand the stakes. Biden is the lesser of two evils, and no other candidate is anywhere near popular enough to take on Trump. Biden is the only ethical vote.
Democrats are in an abusive relationship - it's just better than the alternative.
There were plenty of better alternatives in the 2020 primaries than Biden. People voted him specifically to fuck over Progressives and Leftists. They'd rather lose to MAGA than leftists.
A lot of people voted for Biden in the primaries because they were being told he had the best chance of beating Trump. Plenty of those people actually favored the policy proposals of other candidates.
This is a messaging problem then. The message that other candidates had a good chance against Trump didn't resonate as much as the message that Biden had a good chance. We need to figure out why that is if we hope to change that.
Read into that message a bit more and what you get is: "We voted for Biden in the primaries in order to fuck over progressive and leftists efforts." Now those same people are expecting our votes in the general? They can get fucked.
Yeah, it's not at all the fault of you idiots who don't understand the realities of a two party system
Young voters overwhelmingly prefer the guy who's not actively trying to destroy the future, how shocking!
Trumps stated first step is to "drill drill drill" so please explain why this isn't an effort to dissuade from the better option?
Biden isn't trying to destroy the world. Everything isn't black and white no matter how much you want it to be. We're back in the Paris Climate Accords despite how the man-baby in the previous administration pulled out because Obama.
I mean, if you want to argue that we are going to destroy the world no matter what, we could speedrun it by electing the fascist who wants to destabilize the entire world by pulling out of NATO. I however would prefer to live out the remainder of my natural life instead of nuclear Armageddon deciding for me.
No one said you did.
Which is why republicans are trying so hard to push the idea of not being able to vote until you're much older.
cause they want to cut off the youth vote, because they'd rather disenfranchise tens of millions and get rid of democracy than risk having to change their positions.
Well it's hardly surprising.
It's like preferring a slice of unbuttered slightly stale bread, to a literal dogshit on a stick, being waved around by others with shit all over their faces, knowing that if they eat enough, you'll have to eat double.
I hear ya. So many would literally eat a shit sandwich if it meant a liberal had to smell their breath.
Eew that doesn't sound hygienic.
I don't particularly prefer Biden, but he's much more preferable than these crazy nazi Republicans running against him
Every week it’s a different poll with a different result and a different headline. All I’m learning is that these polls are meaningless.
Not all polls are meaningless. But there are a ton of meaningless polls that get an inordinate amount of attention. And I believe the overall goal of that is to make people think they're all meaningless.
There haven’t been many disasters and the news orgs need the clicks
Man, the level of statistics illiteracy here is out of control. I hope y'all are just literal children that are still in pre-algebra or something.
ITT: right wing Poe's law trolls pretending to be leftists.
Wait, just yesterday young voters didn’t like Biden? I’m beginning to think that maybe the news is all made up 🤪
Liking Biden and voting for Biden can be two separate things.
This is very true
Still true, no one likes Biden. The alternative just happens to be an evil dictator.
I don't think that is true. It's like saying you don't like a Honda Accord because Ferraris exist. Sure you want everything, but you'll still appreciate the Accord over the Nike Express.
Its the difference of sitting in an ugly car VS sticking an industrial wood chipper up my ass and turning it on. Ill take the ugly car.
Sure. Biden at least does SOME good. He's not a Bernie or the shakeup we wanted. But it's far better than the Cheeto.
Sabata hates ugly cars! How dare you make fun my mom's old Chevy Cavalier!
It's a fallacy of polling. They only had two choices here. The correct interpretation is they prefer him over Trump, but do not like him.
If we had ranked ballot this would be my vote:
I don’t like Biden much either, but a tree stump is just unkind. We needed Bernie Sanders, not another TV celebrity. (I do love me some John though)
Love John, but he won't do it. He's said in multiple interviews that his place is outside the establishment generating the public will to act, which he couldn't do as a politician. I don't blame him. He seems to be more effective at getting change done than most senators or even presidents.
.
Stephen Colbert might be on that list too. And honestly, Harris would probably work for the same reasons as Biden.
Wait.. Tree Stump is running?
I read an article earlier this week that actually explains this. They had a result that young people preferred Trump to Biden -- but when they narrowed in on likely voters, it flipped to Biden. They noted that the individuals who preferred Trump tended to not vote in 2020.
Make of this what you will. I'm not entirely sure myself how to interpret this.
Which is funny, because I read almost the opposite. These people are just making everything up.
Pft of course haha
Polling companies need to figure out a new strategy. Their current methodology isn't working. For a poll to be accurate it needs to be a simple random sample. It's tricky to do, but clearly what we have now is insufficient.
Not made up. Just a large population.
I could write an article about how Biden is really a cat and find people on the street to provide quotes for it.
Unless it’s literary, then it’s both?
There's a difference between voting for him and liking him. He's an awful person but the alternative is Trump, so there's not even as choice there
Biden is not an awful person. He is a person who has spent a lifetime in politics and high office and has a long record to pick away at. People tend to forget that politics is the art of the possible. People who never compromise are radicals, like the Tea Party people, for example. It makes no sense to bitch about the radicals on the right and then denigrate the centrist. If you have specific criticisms, fine that's fair, but just summing Biden up as "an awful person" is both unwarranted and naive about the nature of politics.
You say that like he isn't using Trump era restrictions on Asylum still and about to restrict the acceptable basis of "reasonable fear" to send more people back to countries where their lives are in danger.
Or supporting the genocide in Gaza.
Or getting rail workers killed because he short circuited their strike to save Christmas.
Or is blaming the current economic crisis on everything but monopolistic/cartel pricing models in necessities like housing and food. While claiming the economy is stronger than ever.
I could go on. This is all stuff from his presidency. He is an awful person.
People who don't understand politics: I want my leader to always act uncompromisingly to solve all of the injustices I see.
The Tea Party and the Freedumb Caucus: Hold my beer...
People who don't understand politics: NoT LiKe Thaaaat!
I didn't say he was the worst choice. Just that he is objectively an awful person. He is willing to trade lives of refugees to get more money for Israel who is, right now, conducting summary executions of civilians.
This doesn't stop if we don't acknowledge the problems and pressure him.
Also, just for fun, I did choose things which he has the authority to unilaterally act on. He can initiate DOJ investigations into price collusion. He can tell Israel to pound sand. He can go back to Obama era Asylum policies. He could have told the rail companies he was willing to stand with the strikers until their very reasonable demands were met.
You don't get it.
Biden is not a king, he is a politician in a deeply divided democratic country. You don't agree with the current direction of certain parts of US government policy, which is determined by a huge breadth of considerations. That doesn't make Biden an "objectively awful person".
For comparison, Trump really is an awful person. Even most of his supporters don't think he is a "good person", they just don't care about his antics because he appeals to their fears and baser instincts.
In many ways the American president is very much a king. If you want to argue that he didn't have the political capital to do so then sure. But as I said above, these are all things within his power, he doesn't need Congress for any of them. And what he's doing with that power is morally repugnant. I would argue he's losing political capital by the truckload every time we get a new report on Israel's war crimes.
And while he can't buy weapons for Ukraine without Congress (the goal the GOP is holding hostage to kill more Asylees and Gazans) he can authorize Ukraine as a buyer in their own right and get a deal with Ukraine to pay for the weapons later. (This was done in both world wars)
He's pretending he's stuck where he can't do anything because people don't understand the powers of the executive and it's convenient for him.
Wait, you actually hate Biden? That even worse than "objectively awful person". Such strong language, especially considering who the alternative is.
It's possible to hate two people at once. Three actually. I hate Trump, Biden and Kissinger.
There is very little I enjoy as much as the moment when someone like you realizes their ideas make them an unpopular minority.
Oh no, negative 2?!? Whatever will I do with my life!
Oh wait, I need to go make another post about how the entire 2A debate is being held in bad faith so both sides can profit off of dead children. That will pump those numbers. (You think this is a joke but it's not. The Brady Campaign's AWB doesn't address gun violence, just gun LARPing)
I more meant the polls in the OP
That's a contest poll. It only presents two options. Here's how people actually feel about those options.
I prefer getting a finger cut off, as opposed to an arm.
Doesn't mean I want to lose my finger.
Regardless of how you feel about the candidates the important thing is to actually vote. Going around and saying "well they both suck" doesn't help anyone.
Not voting then getting the greater of two evils from your perspective is your own fault.
Always vote, even if the news or anyone else tells you the candidate you want is a sure thing, vote even if the candidate you don't want seems like a shoe-in.
Hillary vs trump was the first election in which I could vote, but I refrained on account of not wanting to vote for a giant douche or a shit sandwich. I will never make that mistake again...
I'm not a Biden fan, but I voted for him last election and will eagerly do so again this next cycle.
I also want to point out that the gap between the "lesser of two evils" has turned into the Grand fucking Canyon following trump's attempts to overthrow our government to remain in power, and platforming on literal fascism...
It's a vote for democracy or neonazi fascism. Period.
I don't know why the Onus is literally never on our politicians to do better. We always have the threat of some worse force to keep us in line.
The public selects the representation every few years, the public votes them out that's a form of being held accountable. If people ignore their right to vote then that can let people abuse their positions or cause people to pander only to people who actually vote since those are the people keeping them in. D
Just like Calarado had done there should be a "none of the above" option.
I'm no longer entertaining this perspective since people like you never have anything bad to say about people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries. A vote for Biden in the primaries was a vote specifically made to fuck over progressive and leftist efforts. You've got endless energy available to lecture us but none for the people who fucked us over? Pound sand.
Respectfully, I think you're misunderstanding my comments. It's anyone's right to hate how or who anyone else voted for. But not voting at all and getting upset with the outcome is your own fault.
Any person should be encouraging every other person that they know to exercise their right to select an official. Ignoring that right because you feel it's futile or because your super sure what you want will happen is a breakdown in democracy.
I don't really care who or how anyone votes but they all should be doing it.
I voted for Biden in the 2020 general election and I'm upset with the outcome. So in 2024 I won't be voting for Biden and I won't be upset with the outcome.
So it doesn't affect me at all but may I ask why you wouldn't decide to vote for an independent, or the republican party.
Really you should vote for whomever most closely aligns with your governing preferences. Ultimately if you dislike the platform of every party, then it should be a decision about which most closely aligns with what you're looking for.
If you were deciding what to eat it doesn't really matter if you don't like the options, eventually you have to choose something or someone else will choose for you.
Again I'm not endorsing any party or platform, I don't care about how you choose to cast your vote. I just think that everyone should vote, even if it doesn't align with my preferences or voting choices, which again I'm not saying I endorse any party specifically.
Oh. Perhaps I've misunderstood you as you tried to explain to me earlier. I'll be voting third party so if that's all you were encouraging me to do I apologize for misunderstanding you.
Yep, vote however you want, I don't care, just go and vote.
How exactly do you intend to win future primaries and elections without any of these voters? You have endless energy to criticize moderates about how they need to earn your vote and be higher quality candidates and represent you -- what about leftist candidates?
As long as you hold this double standard, you're not going to go anywhere. Moderate voters are not obedient little sheep, and progressive candidates are not entitled to moderate votes. If it isn't progressives' fault when moderates lose, then it isn't moderates' fault when progressives lose.
The same way they intended to win 2024 while fucking us over.
You aren't losing a finger, you're being forced to accept that your politics don't align with most of your fellow citizens.
Frederick Douglas couldn't even vote, but he worked for politicians who couldn't promise to end slavery.
Don't align with most of your fellow citizens that vote, specifically. And they're the only ones that count in this case.
Sounds like you think you can win the 2024 general election without our help then. Best of luck.
If you're petty enough to roll over and let fascism win, you were never someone who could be relied on anyway.
And yet, apparently the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries are relying on our votes because he wouldn't have won the general without us.
Based on what you know about the GOP, what makes you think that there will even be an election in 2028 it they gain power in 2024?
I don't. Question is, why did the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries think they could fuck us over and then turn around and expect our votes?
Do you think you can win primary and general elections without their help? Petulance only begets petulance.
Do you want our votes or not? This ain't the way to do it.
This entire thread is literally about how there aren't very many of "your votes"
Sounds like you think you don't need us to win the 2024 election then.
Exactly my point.
Awww is the Boomer upset that someone doesn't just do what they're told? Gonna throw a little fit and insist you're the grown up and therefore you make all the rules?
Typical.
In an ideal world, maybe the votes would be weighed by the expected remaining life span of the voter.
Young people prefer Joe over the guy LITERALLY ADVERTISING TYRANNY AS A FEATURE? What a fucking surprise.
If that's the case, hopefully they get out and vote.
"Prefer" doing a lot of work here
Now actually show up on election day.
We did in 2020. Or do you think Boomers won the 2020 general election all on their own?
That’s cool, as long as they actually follow through and vote when the time comes.
They won't
Do you think Boomers elected Biden in the 2020 general all on their own?
Well well well. Looks like we finally got a poll that wasn't conducted by people calling a boomer's landline at 2pm.
There is a distinct possibility the Supreme Court prevents Trump from running with this Colorado case in which case Biden is going to get his butt handed to him by Haley.
This just sucks.
I meant when this goes to the National Supreme Court.
We got a poll that centrists won't make up stories about in order to dismiss it in vaguely ageist terms.
That better future, most regrettably, is human annihilation via climate change.
I truly see, in that aspect, all capitalist candidates as the same.
Of the candidates, Biden has done the most to combat climate change. The Inflation Reduction Act was the biggest effort we've made so far, and it actually caused European countries to pass similar legislation so that their green energy companies would stay competitive.
Is the IRA perfect? Absolutely not. We need to do much more. And I trust Biden the most to do so.
Yes, I trust him more than the Greens. The green party likes to talk a big game but they have no results to show for it -- they could at least compete in local races, and as mayors and state representatives push sustainability policies. They also have no trouble running anti-science, fear mongering candidates who rub shoulders with the most corrupt capitalists in the world.
I think you are missing the point unless someone from one of the parties does something literally right now our species is going to be destroyed. It's arguably already too late to stop it.
I don't think anyone is taking this seriously enough.
It's hard to tell what our trajectory is. It's clear we're going to see the effects of climate change and that we have to deal with it, we can't just ignore it. What isn't clear to me though is the severity. Are journalists sensationalizing it as the end of the world? Or are officials at climate groups like the IPCC downplaying the severity? Should we be talking like it's an existential threat to humanity, so drastic action is taken?
I don't know. And I say that as an engineer at a green energy company. I'm trained to look through the bullshit and I have an interest in this field. If I'm unable to determine what's what, I can only imagine how much worse it is for people who care about this but may not have the technical background on the details.
It's certainly too late to stop it entirely. We need to take measures to mitigate and weather through its effects. And regardless if it's an existential threat or not to us still, we should be acting now. It would be fantastic if we could get an annual climate bill that judges the situation each year and makes adjustments to course correct us to whatever our goal needs to be.
We WILL Fix Climate Change! - Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
I've always found that channels takes to be unrealistically optimistic for my taste.
Optimism is dangerous in the face of a disaster. Pessimism lights the fire under you necessary to get it fixed.
Science has proven time and time again that it does not.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3807005/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2020/08/01/a-new-study-shows-pessimism-can-lead-to-early-death-do-you-need-to-change-your-outlook/
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/health-benefits-gratitude
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/08/well/mind/gratitude-health-benefits.html
A couple more recent blogs showing some benefits for pessimism but mostly negatives.
https://positivepsychology.com/pessimism-vs-optimism/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4764256/
https://www.verywellmind.com/is-it-safer-to-be-a-pessimist-3144874
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/pessimism
We aren't talking about abstract world views here, we're talking about optimism in the face of literally mid-drivinf off a cliff.
You can give in to doomerism as much as you want but the science simply doesn't back it up. It's always a spectrum.
Hopefully you're doing more good than bad by spreading apathy and depression.
A warmongering, racist piece of shit.*
FTFY
You don't have to pretend biden is good to say he's better than trump.
I thought that shit show was Trump's fault.
The kids are alright. Aint nobody younger than 50 who isn't a complete chud falling for that shit again.
But would they vote? Young Americans historically have low voter turnout. Problem with youths is that we're all talk and no action.
So Boomers elected Biden in the 2020 general all on their own? Got it.
55% of youths voted and 74% of boomers did.
Sounds like younger voters did show up then and if they hadn't Biden would have lost.
Mail-in-votes in 2020 made voting easier. But still, voter turnout among young Americans could do better if you compare voter turnout with other countries.
Oh trust me, we won't be showing up for Biden in 2024. His obvious disdain for anyone under the age of 65 made sure of that.
Care to elaborate?
Fucked the BBB, student loan forgiveness, weed legalization and getting healthcare insurance costs down. Currently using the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to fight American workers. Fucked over the rail workers by blocking the strike. Gave the most limp dicked support to the UAW. And currently supporting Israel against our wishes.
It's wild how many YouGov polls hit the front page of Lemmy. Regardless if you like the results or not, the polls are worthless trash that means nothing.
Biden is a great president and best panacea to the ugliness of current politics. Feel free to not like him though. Nothing against polls but it is still far out so even as a Biden supporter I'm not going to wave this poll around like I'm Dean Phillips.
If we're going to have a president who backs fascist regimes abroad no matter what, they might as well be less fascist domestically.
The bar is so fucking low.
NYT did a new poll with a likely voter screen and likely voters prefer Biden too.
I mean that's 53%. This demographic is supposed to be the one Biden is relying on to win, so this is a disastrous number.
If the historically absent young vote is the one he's counting on then we're proper fucked.
Like I know this man has been in politics long enough to know that, he's one of the signatures on the magna carta.
Are you under the impression Biden won the 2020 general election without the votes of any young people?
They didn't say "any young people."
They pointed out that 18-29 year olds have historically had the lowest voter turnout of any group. It was higher in 2020 than in the previous election year, but overall, not many young people vote. Hyperbole sucks.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/984745/youth-voter-turnout-presidential-elections-us/
Did you miss this part of their comment?
As you've just pointed out, young people did vote for Biden and he didn't win by some huge margin. If they hadn't voted for him in 2020 he would have lost. Thus Biden is absolutely counting on the "young vote" in 2024.
Fine, I shouldn't have used the word absent as I didn't mean exactly 0. the person you're replying to understood what I meant though.
If the lowest turnout group is the one he's counting on then I'd say that's not a great bet.
... he is counting on them. What are you not understanding here? He wouldn't have won without them in 2020.
Says the person who clearly isn't understanding what I'm saying...
If they are the lynchpin to his victory, that's a bad bet because they are the lowest turnout of any group of voters.
As in: Biden IS counting on them. They however show up to vote in the lowest numbers of any group, so it's a bad bet to be relying on them. They should have a better strategy than that.
I've seen you all over this thread defending young people because you voted. That's great that you did, but you aren't all young people.
53% is not disastrous. In polling that isn't head-to-head, that's a landslide victory. It means that no consolidation of any other options will beat the majority. Trump is at 24%, and the rest is scattered with people that are more likely to tip their vote to Biden or not vote.
9% said they wouldn’t vote, but how many actually won’t bother going to the polls?
It’s true that abortion drove out young voters, but I’m interested to see how long that bump goes on for
I believe we'll just get them in the mail here. Should be standard everywhere tbh
Won't bother implies that it's an easy thing to do, but this isn't true of many underprivileged people. Next election will only be worse as restricting people's waterbottle access and eliminating polling stations had just begun during the midterms and hadn't been tested on the biggest scale elections yet.
I'd guess until it becomes clear that Democrats don't intend to fix the problem.
Except they have been, on a state by state basis, which is really the only legal way besides amending the US Constitution, which won’t happen on this issue.
So abortion bans are going to remain a Red State Problem forever. Got it.
Can’t tell if that’s sarcasm or not? But pretty much
Cool. I'll just file "10 year olds being forced to bear their rapists' offspring" with all the other Red State Problems that the national party has no plan or desire to fix, ever.
I’d love to hear your ideas to fix it when it’s unconstitutional to do so. Short of amending the constitution, what are the options?
For the record, no party has proposed a viable solution, regardless of how mainstream that party is
Well, once we have a majority of any size, we kill the filibuster. We use our majority to supersede the judiciary act of 1869 and increase the size of the Supreme Court. We then put additional justices on the supreme court and repeal Dobbs, thereby reinstating Roe.
Then we codify Roe so Republicans will have a harder time getting rid of it. Then we have a popular accomplishment to run on, a majority not hamstrung by the Jim Crow Filibuster, and a Supreme Court that isn't ruling in bad faith against the American people.
Or we continue to timidly do nothing, or worse, blame the victims because they live in red states and therefore need to suffer for committing the sin of being outnumbered.
Claudia De la Cruz for President.
I think this is always been the case but also young voters don't vote or express their opinions or do anything but jerk off
One day it's an article saying young voters are abandonning Biden, next day it's one saying they overwhelmingly support him.
In what universe is 53% (against a fascist malignant narcissist manchild, no less!) overwhelming support?
Certainly not this one.
The one where it's 53% for Biden vs 24% for Trump
Fair. Should have read more thoroughly lol.
Because it's not 53vs47, but 53vs24.
Biden has double the support with youth Trump has.
But one has to wonder where the other % are, not speaking their mind because they have someone with them that requires them to support the other guy or just don't want to go on the record with anything regardless. (and this goes both ways, teens not dare to say they would vote Bidden because the people with them are MAGAts or people that would vote Trump, but are scared to say out loud because they know full well their peers don't agree).
No one on the planet is overwhelming supporting him. The only question if if Trump is scarier. There is no sane reason why DNC won't put forward a better candidate. Why would Biden cling to power and senility instead of bowing out for health reasons. It's Ruth Bader all over again.
There are extremely good reasons for the DNC to go with Biden: he has already beaten Trump once, and incumbents tend to do well
Barely. With the awfulness that was Trump’s presidency still happening. The voters have ridiculously short memories and Biden's main campaign strategy of running as "not the other guy" isn't anywhere near as effective for an incumbent as for a challenger.
By insisting on Biden, the DNC is dramatically increasing the risk of losing the election and thereby making it the last one.
I understand that he won the popular vote "handily," but he only barely scraped by electorally. We were talking a handful of thousands of votes in key states.
Most incumbents don’t consistently back the genocidal actions of Israel.
Little bit different
Pretty much all presidents have unconditionally supported Israel, actually.
Including, of course, Biden's predecessor and electoral opponent. Who apparently wants to bar Gazan refugees from entry and conduct ideological screening of immigrants to make sure they're pro-Israel
Maybe it is time to change that.
Straight talk, the war is coming, and I would rather be the one to fight in it rather than my children.
Let’s just get it done and over with, cut off the festering limb, and start healing.
Trump backs Israel too. It's either going to be Biden or Trump. So if that's your criterion, you've already lost.
It doesn’t have to be!
Instead of fighting against those of us who want a different president, why not support us.
You have given up already, so how are you going to judge me if I give up next year?
The primaries are still an option.
Who exactly do you think has a chance at winning the primaries and becoming the nominee assuming Trump is allowed on the ballot? Because as far as I can see, it's Biden or Trump.
Anyone who wanted to compete in the primaries is way too late. But feel free to give me the name of the person you think has a chance and explain why.
I will gladly take literally any bet you like that, barring actual death, Joe Biden will be the DNC nominee. Find an escrow and name whatever bet you like.
Oh I agree, everyone is too scared too run anyone else because “trump”.
God forbid that everyone who is telling me he’s not that bad, and think about trump.
Fuck that, if we run Biden and end up with trump it is purely what we deserve.
Welp, when my daughter is pressed into service as a brood mare for the Theocratic American State after we lost our right to vote in the 2028 election, I’ll be sure to salute you for your heroic refusal to support genocide in Gaza (which was nuked in ‘26 btw)
You could join me in fighting against it
All of them do and have since Israel was established. One party just does it harder than the other while in power.
So maybe it’s time we change it
As opposed to his predecessor who literally did a shitton of the work for them and on their behalf?
Do White Leftists just not remember Jerusalem is also their fault for letting Trump Happen or is it just Roe they think they gotta deny deflect and project on?
Arrogant centrists put forth a candidate who was so inept that she promoted the candidate that beat her and then didn't campaign in swing states. Don't blame leftists for the mistake you nominated.
Biden is insanely healthy compared to RBG and her multiple cancers lmao what the fuck
Biden is also far more coherent than Trump and he has a fucking stutter to contend with.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.
A New York Times/Siena College poll released Tuesday showed Trump ahead of Biden by 6 points among registered voters under 30.
Biden and Trump are the current front-runners for the Democratic and Republican parties, respectively.
Recent polls have indicated Biden’s popularity is waning slightly as Trump’s ticks up.
The incumbent held a mostly consistent lead over Trump for the first several months of the year, until mid-September.
The Economist/YouGov poll surveyed 1,336 registered voters, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2 percentage points.
The original article contains 304 words, the summary contains 118 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
29yo and I am definitely voting Biden.
Clearly because of the lack of options... Biden and Trump again ey 😵💫
trump might not be able to run for president.
but republicans are republicans
Now they just have to vote!
Well yes. Now add in "Generic Democrat" and watch Biden's numbers drop like they're a 21 year old in their first club.
I hate it when I go to a club and my numbers drop.
It's the worst right?
53% is fucking abysmal. Christ we're all fucked.
You don't understand polling. Look again. It's more that twice as high as the next option. 53% is fucking fantastic.
Irrelevant, since he's going to be the one on the ballot.
That fact alone could still cause a major backlash. The GOP is absolutely readying bad faith attack ads about the lack of a democratic primary. (In reality neither party has allowed an incumbent president to be primaried in decades) They're already running FUD about it, hoping it goes viral.
But will they be excited - will they turn out?
Meh I reckon Boden at least chills, he knows that the US ain't got shit to prove, they just do whatever they do and try not accidentally sell guns to too many of the wrong people lol
In a world with such a myriad views how can there be a two party system. It's utter madness.
"Yong voters prefer man that can offer a slim hope of a future over man promising to plunge world into darkness."
Like who would vote for a guy saying he wants to be a dictator????
Old people overwhelmingly vote though.
When will we learn that all politicians are shit regardless of color? Guillotine for president 2024!!!
That's 2% less for Biden than for Hillary in 2016 and only 3% less for Trump than in 2016.
Good to see the the DNC propaganda machine is still working.
biden the man who helped take voting rights away, did not defend women's rights or anyone's bodily autonomy (why would this catholic defend abortion rights anyways), first day as president went back on campaign promises and fired cannabis users, promised national police reform and did nothing look at Georgia's cop city, minimum wage was a campaign promise that went nowhere
and as soon as you bring this up you get labeled as a trump lover and vilified
this country is totally fucked and is disuniting more by the day just look at the states rights issue federal law is going away in favor of what fifty individual states want to do
well the other guy has rallies where they chant "kill f*ggots, kill all transgenders" so show me a meaningful alternative that doesn't require a full overhaul of both the electorate and the electoral system by next November or I'm voting for Biden
Its a little infuriating that every Biden criticism is met with "But Trump is bad!".
Like, yeah, we know, that's why the thought of Biden losing by being a weak candidate scares the shite out of us.
then take my criticism to be
There's a concept in software development called 'shift-left', it means the best time to make meaningful changes and fix problems is as early in the development cycle as possible. The same concept is true in politics. If you're not voting or participating in state/municipal elections, primaries, etc. then you're gonna be stuck with whoever ends up on the 'major' ballots at the end of the cycle.
The presidential election is essentially the 'last resort' and the reality of the situation is that your options are now limited to 2 people who actually have a chance of winning.
So, do you vote for someone who is
The first option is obviously bad, and the third is no different than not voting, and not voting is essentially a vote in favour of the person you want least to win.
What do you do? You vote for the lesser of two evils and get 4 more years to make an impact in the elections that are actually important.
Like local elections, where the national party will openly support an anti-choice labor-hating NRA stooge if his opponent is a progressive.