Spyke
lemmy.world

Isn't this the exact reason why we have antitrust and monopoly laws?

139
SuperDuperreply
lemmy.world

we have antitrust and monopoly laws

Well yes, but actually no.

100
orcareply
orcas.enjoying.yachts

Pretty sure the current admin is too busy tripping over itself to help Israel continue carrying out genocide in Palestine.

18
Asafumreply
feddit.nl

"Pretty sure the current admin is too busy tripping over itself to help Israel continue carrying out genocide in Palestine. get the US Jewish vote."

I don't think the administration actually gives a shit about what's happening there, Biden just wants their votes. :(

4
startrek.website

Read up on Reagan and anti-trust. He essentially said that monopolies that resulted in lower prices were good for consumers and that the government would turn a blind eye to them. Hasn't been much change since then.

65
lemmy.ml

monopolies that resulted in lower prices

IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT DAYO~

When you own the market, you either:

  • Dictate the price as the sole provider
  • Are forced to set the price because of your natural monopoly status (as a utility for example; until you stuff the utilities commission or regulatory capture your way into even controlling that)
  • Have to break up to create competition, release patents, or otherwise be forced to allow competition which leads to a lower cost alternative

I hate the gipper. Fucking cunt, and he can't fucking act either.

17

He knew. All capitalists know. They don't care, because the goal of capitalism is to profit — therefore profit is the one and only true guiding virtue.

14
lemmy.world

Everything will be owned by one company, The Company, eventually.

85
Capt. Wolfreply
lemmy.world

Warhammer 40k got it wrong... We won't praise the god emperor. All corporate CEOs will merge into one being. The Company will be God, leader, and employer to all of humanity. Lesser companies will be grown and then merged with him to sustain him.

That's what's behind the wall in Lethal Company...

52

"Ford, we are twelve; oh, make us one,

Like drops within the Social River;

Oh, make us now together run

As swiftly as thy shining Flivver."

-Aldous Huxley "Brave New World"

1

Anyone seen Markiplier’s Lethal Company playthrough videos?

We looove the companyyyyyy

The companyyyyy

1

Hey man, I can do some competition any time I want. Just lemme do a little more central planning first.

3

Capitalists: Capitalism creates competition which lowers prices and increases innovation!

Also Capitalists:

71
lemmy.ml

Disclaimer: I own Paramount stock, and worked at Paramount for a time.

Disclaimer 2: It is sadly non-voting common stock because fuck this fucking timeline.

I can think of nothing worse for the common good than having YET ANOTHER ENTERTAINMENT MERGER. I AM IN CONTINUOUS ANGUISH. STOP IT.

53

Their defense will be that they need to merge to be able to compete against Disney. The sad thing is they're probably right. Even post merger their market cap will be less than 1/4 of Disney's market cap.

Really, we need to destroy Disney.

3
TheFriarreply
lemm.ee

I HATE CORPORATIONS CAPITALISM I HATE CORPORATIONS CAPITALISM I HATE CORPORATIONS CAPITALISM

ftfy

16
wewbullreply
iusearchlinux.fyi

The problem is shareholders; The fact that extracting money out of the company is prioritised over the stability of the company. This leads to unstable companies which are vulnerable to shit like this.

WB would not be verging on the edge of bankruptcy if it was privately held.

1
lemmy.world

Introducing Paramount Max Plus, now for the low low price of 49.95 per month for the first 6 months!

36

In the article you linked with "force"

"I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing,” he said. Then he suggested a model: “Fox News, in my opinion, has followed an interesting trajectory of trying to have ‘news’ news, I mean some actual journalism, embedded in a program schedule of all opinions.

It's too fucking early for me to be so enraged. I'm torn between throwing up, punching something, or throwing up on something I'm punching...

14
Cortreply
lemmy.world

I think they'll call it Warner Brother's MAX DP+

9

bill and ted voice MAXIMUM PARAMOUNT PLUSSSSS

or

rush hour renegades voice MAXIMUM PARAMOUNT PLUS COMIN' ATCHA

2

Consolidation of all the market is fucking great for the economy /s

15

When I saw this in the news, I thought they had already merged for some reason. Either way, fuck this. FTC should block this if they had any balls

15

They do have balls for the first time in a while, but it's not just on them. The FTC sued to block the Microsoft and ActiBlizz merger, but the judge sided with MicrosoftActiBlizz.

2

i get max for free because they said im billed through youtube yet im not actually billed so if this means i also get star trek free ill take it

but seriously fuck zaslav and mergers

15
lemm.ee

hear me out, what if they all merged back into the public and somethingsomething fully automated luxury gay space utopia?

15
Fungahreply
lemmy.world

Like , fully gay? Or is it more like 50, 75%? I don't know this for a fact but I'm thinking I could probably have / see a fair amount of dude on dude stuff if I got to see / have regular girl on girl on girl and dude stuff.

4

tbh i think pan may be more fun for everyone but the ol' meme is gay so went with gay and i imagine this is the widely inclusive gay for all that fun stuff

4
lemmy.world

Maybe they can all merge so that we can get down TO ONE OR TWO FUCKING DECENT STREAMING SERVICES INSTEAD OF THE MILLION SHITTY ONES THAT EXIST NOW

11
lemmy.ca

Better to have a million shitty ones with no exclusivity than to have one with everything

12

One monopoly on streaming means they'd probably jack the prices up a lot since they would be the only legal way to watch things (and theyd probably crack down on piracy even more)

Multiple streaming services at least helps keep prices at a reasonable level

Hard agree though that exclusives are the worst thing streaming services adopted

3

One with everything will be far more expensive than millions with one thing, and if you disagree with the service you wouldn't be able to switch to another one.

3

I can't wait when there will be just one company owning everything. It will be great.

11

So I'm hearing that any new Star Trek shows will only last one season and all of the rest will be removed from streaming.

11

This is a great time to support people like Olan Rogers who have worked for all the majors and are bucking the system. He funded his latest animated series pilot through kickstarter and is getting funding for the rest of the episodes now. Imagine that: paying creative people in advance and bypassing the corporate bullshit. He's even left kickstarter behind now to take payments directly. https://godspeedseries.com/

Also with mentioning when Alan Tudyk did the same with Con Man, a comedy tribute to the Firefly fandom that was fan-financed for 2 seasons.

Helluva Boss doing quite well too.

You may not hear about shows like these because promotion is just not worth throwing any money at... The following is already grassroots and the powers that be make it tough to compete against their ads. But there is quality stuff being made by directly funding film makers. There just needs to be more ways of finding funds for up and coming talent.

(And there needs to be a better place to release non network shows than YouTube, but that's a whole other can of worms)

10
lemmy.world

I don't give a fuck. "oh but my shows, oh they will close into a walled garden". Who cares. There's lots of good, if not better content elsewhere. Hell, there's lots of better things to do than sit and just consume the garbage they spew.

8
spudwartreply
spudwart.com

Except these are more than just content companies. They are empires with tons of shell companies and child companies under their roof.

And it giving any company that much control of a market is a death sentence. If they begin to crash, the entire economy around that will crash. And it will ripple.

28

They don't have to actually crash, they just need to start to crash.

Then competitor's values will drop, they'll buy them up, and then get bailed out.

6

And yet, a combined Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery would only be a tiny fraction of the size of Disney.

1

There’s lots of good, if not better content elsewhere.

arrrr, matey we set sail for the high seas

4

Mount Bros. I also suggest put “Super” in the start of the name to emphasize that is a super strong merge.

8

Look at it this way it this way; it'll be easier to nationalize one big company than a bunch of smaller ones when the revolution comes.

3