Spyke
feddit.nl

These kinds of charts are a bit dangerous, as it will be used by anti-EU folk in net contributing countries to say look at how much money we can save when we leave the EU. But this looks only at money being shipped back and forth. The EU has so much benefits in terms of trade and collaboration, it's a steal at any price.

220
xkforcereply
lemmy.world

All people have to do to refute the leavers is point to the UK

77

These people are usually reality deniers, so showing them anything is a no go.

And you know how they do it too.

First they do a whole FUD campaign, which get the people riled up and polarized. Up till the point that it doesn't matter what the truth is, it's tribalism, us against them etc. This phase is in full swing in Europe right now. Next they say well what if we do a non binding referendum? It shows the people we are actively taking an interest and we get to see what people think. If everyone votes remain, the issue is done and buried. Then leading up to the referendum they do a massive misinformation campaign, with TV ads, social media ads and posts, etc. Everything they can do to misinform the public, with Russia footing the bill for most of it. Most people aren't interested enough to dive into such a complex topic (and I don't blame them, it's very complicated), so they'll go off their gut and their gut is influenced by their experience in the world and on social media, so they will vote exit. After the referendum is done and the outcome is 50/50, they'll go yell: "THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN". And before you know it your whole country goes to shit and you are leaving the EU and basically committing economic suicide. By the time people realize what happened, it's much too late and all the shitbags responsible have gone away.

If you told me this before Brexit, I would have laughed and told you it's total BS. But then it happened in real life and I don't know how to deal with that.

26
gazterreply
aussie.zone

It would be interesting to see this chart when the UK was included.

10
CAVOKreply
lemmy.world

The UK would have been on par with France.

6
jolreply
discuss.tchncs.de

Exactly. Germany makes way more than 25 billion Euro by being able to freely trade with neighbours.

49

Not to mention the fact that the €'s low value makes german goods much more competitive for international export.

3

Also by improving struggling countries it means you have more and stronger markets to sell to. When you empower your neighboring countries everyone is safer and stronger.

26

But this looks only at money being shipped back and forth.

Not even that. It only looks at money being shipped back and forth via one specific channel.

2
letmesleepreply
feddit.de

It's a big country with large regions that are still comparatively poor and agricultural. The latter two factors are what the EU pays for and the first works as a multiplicator.

Per capita it looks a bit different. According bpd.de the main recipient per capita in 2022 was Estonia with 677 Euros per capita and year and the main contributor is indeed Germany with 237 Euros. Poland "only" gets 279 Euros per person and year.

69
TheMurphyreply
lemmy.world

Agriculture is a great point overlooked in this chart.

EU puts a lot of money into this, and Poland being a great exporter for this, they also receives alot from EU to be able to do it.

Why are we doing it then, if it's a net negative? It's not, because we can all get our bread (literally) this way. And Poland farmers can make a living making the country richer.

3

All countries get agricultural subsidies and Poland is not one of the big ones. They sit on place 5 with all 4 before them production at least twice as much. (see here, page 10)

0
teslasaurreply
lemmy.world

War in Ukraine. A whole fuckload of people that seek asylum in Poland for obvious reasons.

0
kbin.social

Well, duh.

But it used to be behind the Iron Curtain.

None of the former Eastern Bloc countries are net contributors in this chart. Greece, Portugal, and Spain were also dictatorships not that long ago. Cyprus there's the whole Greek military Junta and Turkish invasion thing.

The only other net recipients are Malta (which doesn't receive much), and Luxemburg and Belgium. They host a lot of EU institutions.

4

Love the former East Germany, lived there for a while, but it's still deprived even after the federal state pumping loads of money into it. I suspect West Germany's crumbling infrastructure is in part caused by the burden of absorbing East Germany.

But it's not an independent country, so it's hidden in these figures. Germany's had to shoulder that burden on its own.

Cost trillions. West Germany shouldered that burden, but West German companies also profited from it. Eg. not as if there were private East German companies to build motorways to western standards.

1

PiS combine socialist economics with one-party control of state institutions, so while their rule has technically not been communist, it has rhymed with it.

-11

More authoritarian kleptocracy, communism is a misnomer.

5
feddit.de

Would be nice to have the same data per capita.

34
talreply
lemmy.today

statistia-netcontrib.csv

country,netcontrib
DE,25572
FR,12380
NL,6929
IT,3337
SE,2826
DK,1766
AT,1540
FI,1109
IE,703
MT,-14
CY,-172
SI,-386
EE,-729
LT,-860
SK,-1398
LV,-1544
BG,-1727
HR,-1746
ES,-1946
LU,-2020
CZ,-2853
BE,-2950
PT,-3132
RO,-4096
HU,-4206
GR,-4278
PL,-11910

eu-contribution-per-capita.r

if (!require("pacman")) install.packages("pacman")
pacman::p_load(
            countrycode,
            dplyr,
            ggdark,
            ggplot2,
            r2country
        )

abs <- read.csv("statista-netcontrib.csv",header = TRUE)
abs2 <- cbind(abs,name = countrycode(abs$country,"iso2c","country.name")) 

df <- inner_join(country_names, abs2)
df2 <- inner_join(country_population, df)
df2$percap <- df2$netcontrib/df2$population2023*1000000

df3 <- arrange(df2,percap)

ggplot(df3, aes(x = percap, y = reorder(name, percap))) +
    geom_bar(stat = "identity") +
    dark_theme_gray() +
    ylab("Country") +
    xlab("Euros per capita") +
    scale_x_continuous(breaks = scales::pretty_breaks(n = 20)) +
    geom_text(aes(label = percap))

ggsave("euros-percap.png")

Full size image

Sorry about the broken escaping of the angle brackets (“<” is “&lt;”) in the source; Lemmy is, regrettably, broken on that at the moment.

EDIT: Fixed Latvia country code error.

EDIT2: And Austria country code error.

34
talreply
lemmy.today

Also, a Markdown table rendition:

eu-contribution-per-capita-markdown.r

if (!require("pacman")) install.packages("pacman")
pacman::p_load(
            countrycode,
            dplyr,
            r2country,
            simplermarkdown
        )

abs &lt;- read.csv("statista-netcontrib.csv",header = TRUE)
abs2 &lt;- cbind(abs,name = countrycode(abs$country,"iso2c","country.name")) 

df &lt;- inner_join(country_names, abs2)
df2 &lt;- inner_join(country_population, df)
df2$percap &lt;- df2$netcontrib/df2$population2023*1000000

df3 &lt;- arrange(df2,-percap)

md_table(df3)

namepercap
Netherlands386.91124
Germany302.86855
Denmark297.09908
Sweden267.98643
Finland199.90810
France181.71677
Austria168.68113
Ireland136.52768
Italy56.76638
Malta-26.94577
Spain-40.25217
Slovenia-182.27546
Cyprus-187.34343
Romania-214.99549
Belgium-250.73894
Slovakia-257.60767
Bulgaria-267.84703
Portugal-299.21568
Lithuania-300.05251
Poland-315.86485
Greece-408.10926
Hungary-438.25808
Croatia-449.01298
Estonia-533.72029
Latvia-819.79399
Luxembourg-3056.85909
12
lemmy.world

This is very clever. Is Lemmy actually running the code to achieve this, or did you paste it just so other people can replicate the process?

3

Nah, I just pasted it so that other people can reproduce.

5

Poland and hungary are constantly complaining about the EU and vetooing laws too

21

Interesting. The red bars almost exclusively belong to nations that had authoritarian single party government in the last half century.

When laid out like this you really see how deviating and long term the consequences of authoritarianism can be. Stable healthy democracy is a fucking superpower.

18

I'm Polish. So, if I understand this correctly, we are getting the most out of the EU, and yet still people here are complaining about it. And about Germany.

16
janjareply
lemmy.world

Both host import EU institutions. The income they provide for the locals, possibly indirectly, is also seen as a benefit.

10
naeapreply
sopuli.xyz

Strasbourg in France should also make a dent into France's contributions then. Would be nice to know how much it would be, without those things calculated in - sure they are?

2
Manucodereply
infosec.pub

Is the European Central Bank taken into consideration for Germany?

1
Yoz
lemmy.world

I went to Poland and I can 100% say its a fucking shithole. Shouldn't be in EU at all

-22

I'm Polish. Can confirm, it's a shit hole. Still better than the US dough.

4

You reached the end

EU Budget - Which Countries are EU Contributors and Beneficiaries? | Spyke