Spyke
kbin.social

A pig didn't say they would die for you. It was murdered against its will and then you paid the killer to kill more.

81
Ataraxiareply
sh.itjust.works

Unlike you, I am familiar with the pig government and we actually have an agreement that we eat their death row inmates. Crime has never been so delicious.

5
lemmings.world

Okay but actually they grow up in cages and never see daylight. Their tails cut off without anaesthetic.

So yeh.

3
Glytchreply
ttrpg.network

You're buying from the wrong farmer. Family farmers care a lot more about their animals than factory farms. Just another reason to buy local.

-3

It is a strange way to care about someone by sending them to death. I wouldn't leave this people rise children. Or pigs. Or any other individual.

4

No pigs go "oink" silly or when they're scared they go "SSSSSSQQQQQQQEEEEEEEE-SSSSSSQQQQEEEEE-SSSSQQQQEEEEEE"

3
Glytchreply
ttrpg.network

If a pig had the chance he'd eat you and everyone you care about.

-3
kbin.social

And...?

Are you telling me that you eatpork as some sort of... preemptive revenge? Because even in a hypothetical universe where pigs are top of the food chain, it would still be wrong to imprison and kill them. Which is why doing this to tiger/lion/bear would also be wrong in our universe.

Weird comeback.

4
Glytchreply
ttrpg.network

You must be great at parties(unless they're serving pigs in a blanket, obvs)

-1
  1. I truly AM great at parties. I'm loud, funny, cute and get REAL drunk. What's not to love?

  2. lol personal insults means you know your argument sucks

  3. Seitan pigs in a blanket are flippin' great. I literally serve that at parties. 😂

3
Sybilreply
lemmy.world

almost no one has paid for a pig to be killed

-27
De_Narmreply
lemmy.world

It's called 'buying pork'. They don't kill them for fun and just happen to sell them afterwards.

26
Sybilreply
lemmy.world

when you buy pork, the person who killed the pig has already been paid.

-17
De_Narmreply
lemmy.world

That's just useless semantics, neither funny nor clever. The pig you bought may be dead, but the money you pay will be used to raise and kill other pigs.

18
nullreply
slrpnk.net

It absolutely is. If you eat pork, you indirectly pay for pigs to be slaughtered. Full stop.

14

the pig was slaughtered in the past, before I walked into the store or decided what I'm eating this week. everyone involved was paid before all that, too.

-12
Sybilreply
lemmy.world

I give my money to the same people that you do: a grocer.

-11
Floeyreply

It's actually irrelevant whether or not you buy a product made from slave labour, the product is already made! How much product is made is completely independent of how much gets purchased, because that's how markets work!

9

Assuming what I think you're assuming, now I want to hear this story of pig assassination.

2
2d
kbin.social

bacon died for you without its consent

38
Sybilreply
lemmy.world

all the research I can find indicates there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that non-human animals understand personal mortality, so given the choice, the pig would even understand.

0
Slowyreply
lemmy.world

I would think the cases of non-human animals committing suicide (mostly cetaceans) would be indicative that at least some of them can comprehend personal mortality on some level. It’s a bit different if an animal doesn’t eat due to stress or whatever and starves to death, I wouldn’t call that suicide. But whales occasionally just drown themselves, that’s pretty hard to rationalize any other way

2
Sybilreply
lemmy.world

if you can find something scholarly, id love to read it.

2
Slowyreply
lemmy.world

https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1201&context=animsent

Nothing concrete of course, because it’s very difficult to study at a stage where we cannot communicate or directly observe the emotional states of animals, nor ethically design a study where one attempts to cause animals enough distress to engage in self harm or bring about their deaths (and simultaneously prove that was their intent).

It’s in no way a concluded topic, but it doesn’t make sense to reject outright either - and I definitely think there is enough evidence around for animals understanding of their peers mortality, why start with the assumption that they have an inability to recognize their own mortality in the first place? It’s good to be skeptical, but unproven anthropomorphism is just as illogical as the opposite assumption.

2

i am open to evidence, but I do not have enough evidence now to support the belief that nonhuman animals understand personal mortality, so I do not believe that they do.

1

I didn't expect to find any vegan message in this "pure carnist" meme post. This was the #1 comment in the post, that's awesome!

7

A thing which dies for your meal. What they grow in the lab is living tissue, a mass of living cells.

2
MBMreply
lemmings.world

Except for like, fruits, seeds, eggs, dairy etc.

7
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Only eggs haven't died for us. Fruits and seeds definitely died for us too. Cheese is complicated.

9
lemmings.world

Animals died to get eggs and cheese. Also the animals that are giving milk and eggs will die when they reach a certain age. Also I wouldn't consider being in a cage 24/7, never seeing the sun, a "life" exactly.

6
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Sure but the eggs haven't died for us. They aren't fertilised either so have no chance of becoming a chicken

8
lemmings.world

That's like saying you don't mind buying blood diamonds because diamonds are just a rock. Of course they contributed to death, but in essence they are just a shiny rock.

2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

No, it's like me saying diamonds are minerals.

You are thinking too hard. I never alluded to eating eggs or cheese being ethical or not. Cheese is complicated because of the bacteria that makes it, not because it came from an animal.

2

Oh I guess my comment does look like a vegetarian shopping list. My point was that even though many vegetables 'die' for us, there are things you can harvest without killing the plant/animal. Not as a moral stance, I doubt anyone cares more about carrots dying than cows and chickens suffering.

1
sh.itjust.works

Fun fact: Gas chambers are often used to kill pigs. You can hear their screaming from outside the facilities as the gas burns them to death from the inside out.

This is common practice.

It is plenty likely the victim in the picture whose mutilated corpse is very disrespectfully converted into sewage by now was gassed to death.

12
Glytchreply
ttrpg.network

Stop trying to invoke the holocaust when talking about animals. Pigs aren't people. Jews aren't animals.

-4

Nobody has said anything about the Holocaust or the Jews. This is standard practice of killing pigs.

If you want to have a conversation about this topic, I would like to highlight that we are animals too (just a different species) and I don't think there is any moral difference between our species and dogs or pigs when regarding killing, even when I know about our differences because at the end of the day we are just individuals we clear interests in avoiding suffering and death, and byproducts of pigs are just unnecessary to consume and cruel to get.

5

Image Transcription: Meme


[An image of bacon sizzling on a cook surface]

Top text: BACON IS BETTER THAN THAT GIRL (OR GUY) WHO SAID THEY WOULD DIE FOR YOU

Bottom Text: BACON ACTUALLY DID DIE FOR YOU. BACON'S LOVE IS REAL.

6

Jesus Christ is better than that girl (or guy) that said they would die for you Jesus Christ did actually died for you. Jesus Christ's love is real.

Ftfy

0
lemm.ee

Bu bu bu but we didn’t have a signed consent form from the pig! MURDER!

-1
mriormroreply
lemmy.world

Did you also tip your fedora whenever you pressed it?

3
lemmy.world

It was a wearable button, with a pin to pin it to a jacket. I'm sure they still make these things.

2