Spyke
feddit.de

Nobody mentioned Adobe yet. They’re absolutely the worst. They offer creative products behind a 70$ / month paywall and they hold a monopoly in their field. Only need their software sporadically? Sorry, no plan for you.

They haven’t significantly updated some of their software in like 20 years. I currently have the displeasure of using After Effects again and apart from not even supporting system dark mode on macOS or even fullscreen mode, there are all kinds of weird small bugs that you just get used to when using the software for a while.

Fuck Adobe.

85
Moonguidereply
lemmy.ml

Remember kids. It is always morally correct to pirate adobe products.

I'm a graphic designer and honestly, been thinking long and hard about switching to Affinity. Affinity Designer even seems like it would streamline most of my workflow.

50

I use Affinity sometimes, but PS, AI, & AE rule the roost because they are just better at most tasks.

PSSm: Apple Motion flies way below the radar and can do a LOT of things better/more elegantly than AE.

I delivered two seasons worth of graphics for a network show, and 85-90% was done completely in Motion.

7
Pechentereply
feddit.de

I switched to Affinity! It's great. Not all of the features are there but most of them. It's also much less buggy and the interface is way better thought out.

They don't make a replacement for After Effects though, that's why I'm stuck with it for one project.

6
0opsreply

That's my experience. Less features (like still no object blending in designer), but much faster and smoother over all. Admittedly I haven't used an Adobe product in a few years, but when I first switched I was amazed at how much more performant the affinity suite was.

2

Affinity designer is a great tool if you are looking to use it. I can't say for the newer versions due to reasons, but some 4 years ago that I tried it, it absolutely blew me away. Easy to use, lots of advanced features, stable, great pricing. And they got a v2 as well, unfortunately v1 customers will need to rebut though at a discounted price.

3

im a graphic designer and i love affinity products ive had them for many years

tho im new to the field

1

Have you heard of Oracle? It’s the database version of Adobe, but maybe worse. They seem to deploy more lawyers than technical staff.

14

They’re also the company who mainstreamed the software subscription model.

It used to be that only services required subscriptions. Applications would be a one time payment. But, Adobe converted to the subscription model and because they hold a monopoly over the design space, people/companies had no choice but to go along. Once they were successful, every business in the world decided that they also wanted that sweet monthly payment and now software licensing sucks.

I refuse to even pirate Adobe products on principle.

TL;DR Fuck Adobe, use open source.

9

The suite itself. Being able to drop photoshop files into after effects and after effects files into premiere timelines while being able to go back and edit any piece is huge for efficiency.

7
kbin.social

Microsoft - erosion of any motivation to understand your PC so they can put whatever they want in their updates and you won't know until you dig through the logs

Facebook - erosion of any critical thinking by rewarding echo chambers and groupthink. Just look at their Metaverse shite.

Amazon - erosion of labour standards and publishing anti-union propaganda to prevent workers from realising they're being abused. Also, instituting anti-competitive measures and strongarming third party sellers.

OpenAI (insert any LLM/generative model company) - erosion of the creative process thus allowing people with zero artistic expression to plagiarise other artists' work

EA (or any AAA studio but also Nintendo) - erosion of consumer rights to own the products they buy and preventing any effort to preserve their games AND THEN complaining about piracy.

Dear lord, it is so exhausting to list these out.

58
Techognitoreply
lemmy.world

"Erosion of consumer rights" goes for pretty much all tech large companies.

"you will own nothing and be happy" seems to be the way the new standard way of living.

18

Very true. Subscription services and live service models are among the most parasitic inventions that have become common.

8

Not a tech company, just one of the worst companies. Thanks Switzerland.

11
lemm.ee

Just naming a company isn't particularly useful. Some context would be great, so others can hate the company too. 🫠

50

They just own everything. Literally everything.

They are an asset management company not a tech company though.

20
lemmy.ca

Oracle. They have the midas touch of enshittification

49
marx2kreply
lemmy.world

Same with IBM. I pity you of your business decides to go with IBM for vital enterprise services that you have to maintain.

Kill me

21
xigoireply
lemmy.sdf.org

You say that as if destroying Twitter was a bad thing.

15

For some cases, yes it was bad. Plenty of organizations used Twitter as a micro blog to keep interested parties up to date... Like a short concise RSS. That's what I primarily used Twitter for, for years, and that was Twitter at its best.

10
spidermanreply
ani.social

Twitter once was an online townhall where people can start any movement or use it to spread their movement to wide masses. These days it's just some shitty tool for propaganda.

2
jackreply
monero.town

Spread movement to wide masses == propaganda

0

A movement necessarily doesn't have to be a bad movement or bad propaganda.

1

palantir are pretty fucking evil, but you're unlikely to have heard of them unless you're social justice minded or have worked in tech.

Thiel is a vampire, in the metaphorical sociological sense and the literal one. Fucking creep.

28

They market themselves as a "big data" company, what they actually do is use "big data" in a way not unlike what Philip K Dick predicted in minority report. Instead of clarvoiant tank people it's extremely racist algorithms though.

They have been involved in a bunch of racist "crime preventing" pre policing stuff. I believe at the moment they're mostly used to round up migrants in the usa for whatever the fuck their border farce does over there.

5

Meta, they have a huge reach to a lot of ignorant people and they seem actively disdainful of user privacy.

24

Reddit did something pretty shitty this year and is the reason many of us are here.

Blizzard Activision if we are counting gaming companies with their sexual harassment controversies which have led to suicide (also the cosby suite), their shitty monetization schemes, and the utter ruination of most of their popular IPs

23

Id argue Blackrock is a finance company that uses tech rather than being a tech company. But the differences these days are pretty negligible. In my mind a tech company provides tech to end users (google fb etc). Maybe a fintech? But even then in my mind thats more like a start up “modern tech” bank rather than a classical bank.

Meta, XFormerlyKnownAsTwitter, Google are all pretty bad for society these days

21

Whichever contributes the most to anti-competitive corporate culture. Most problems at the end-user level can be solved by having sufficient competition (and some labor problems, too).

Unfortunately, there are plenty to choose from.

There's Microsoft's "embrace, extend, and extinguish" strategy. Comcast's creation of artificial legal barriers to competition by lobbying state and local lawmakers. And then there's Amazon doing it by sheer hard power to put competitors under (plus all their anti-union crap).

16

Meta.

Amazon I'd advocate for the nationalization of, at least of AWS. Meta caused a genocide and just needs to go. There's nothing they can provide that another company can't. Yeah WhatsApp is entrenched in much of the world, but it doesn't have to stay that way.

16
danreply
upvote.au

Actually MAANA since Google is now Alphabet.

3

Any company that engages in vendor lock-in, abuses copyright of creators through generative AI for profit, tracks users for profit/advertising, or censors content and people on their platform that suggest alternative platforms.

Microsoft takes all 3 points. It has created a very terrible operating system that gets preinstalled on most PCs through unfair competition, makes it harder and harder to customize it, has created GitHub Copilot that infringes copyright for GPL-licensed software and adds mandatory telemetry and Microsoft account. Additionally, Constructively criticizing Microsoft products publicly is dangerous.

EDIT: removed Medium link

12

Amazon, Facebook (Meta), Microsoft, OpenAI are top of my list simply due to being aware of them.

though I'm sure most large tech corps have blood on their hands in some way or another, doing "well" under capitalism demands exploitation.

10

Facebook is the one that took as its goal to insert itself as a middleman into all human social interaction.

10
lemmy.ml

For me it's a tie between Oracle, Atlassian, and Microsoft.

All three of them have built their business models around intentional poor design = money for extra services. They could make their software easier and more functional, but they intentionally don't so because it would hurt their profits. That kind of greed is inexcusable to me.

9
spidermanreply
ani.social

Confluence is one of the shittiest things I have ever had to work on.

7
fuboreply
lemmy.world

It especially sucks if your company migrated from a working but "unsupported" wiki system to Confluence, importing all the pages and breaking all the links in the process.

3
lps2reply

One
Raging
Asshole
Called
Larry
Ellison

2

If we're limited to just tech companies, it's gotta be Amazon. Their unfair business practices and horrible work conditions make them one of the most deplorable companies on the planet

6

Surprisingly. Xero. They are muscling their "partners", and screwing them for every penny they can get. Xero it turns out, has switched on enshitification and turned evil.

3
lemmy.nz

Microsoft because their software infects every bit of life

2

Maybe not quite so much these days. I use Outlook at work, but that's been the limit of my MS contact in tech for a few years now (apart from the odd Teams meeting I've been invited to). It used to be worse in terms of lock in, IMO.

3
lemm.ee

Nestle, Adobe, Intuit, most health insurance/pharma, T-Mobile is getting there under Sievert

2

Microsoft. I am sorry but they ruin everything they touch with bloat.

1

Most comments about GAFAM, they are really hostile and bad for overall tech.

But take a look at China's Tencent, that's what those big tech companies would have been if not regulations. For example Tencent was literally blocking their chat app QQ if it detect on a computer an antvirus that was competion to their own antivirus.

1

I’m shocked they had an employee to answer the phone. I didn’t know you could even buy stuff from them anymore, makes me feel a tiny bit better about my old Kenmore refrigerator.

2
lemmy.ml

Mozilla. I despise ESG & woke nonsense.

-20
hottarireply
lemmy.ml

It's okay. I wouldn't expect a wokie to say anything that makes sense.

-8

Don't care for Disney. But slightly care for Firefox.

1
what tech company is the worst in you're opinion? | Spyke