Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on feddit.org

20 replies

tburkholreply
slrpnk.net

Just make sure not to get MITM'd by someone whose secret key password is "4".

44
libewareply
feddit.org

Not the password. The key. The entire key (excluding metadata) is 0b100.

28
nord.pub

How is this even possible btw? Doesn’t the private key have to match the public key? Surely this would have been noticed earlier if it had a short public key as well?

6

They use Cryptographic hash functions, so the actual key length is not reflected in the resulting hash length.

Cryptographic hash functions are functions that take a variable-length input and return a fixed-length output, which can be used in, for example, a digital signature.

9
sopuli.xyz

“Astonishingly, the private keys were 4, 56, 66, 115, 155, 156, 230, [and ] 237.”

15
jaybonereply
lemmy.zip

There’s a PHP rce issue, and a ca cert issue, both going around right now. Good times.

17
fedinsfw.app

ca cert issue is a lot harder to exploit than a lot of people are acting. ... Not that it magically makes it less important to fix, but perhaps a reason to not let the stress rise just yet.

3

Yea. I don't think most normies, not even most home server nerds have much real exposure to this particular vulnerability.

So everyone, go harden your infrastructure, because it's the right thing to do, not just because of this.

3
Taleyareply
aussie.zone

This is why i steered out of cybersecurity

2

It would interest me to do research to find exploits, or red team / pen testing type stuff. But incident response seems pretty stressful.

3
lemmy.world

Switch them off or take them offline first. No point in exposing them to unknown exploits.

11

I was thinking of upgrading my servers recently to get away from a very old Ubuntu version. Good thing I waited.

3

You reached the end

Oh shit here we go again | Spyke