Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on programming.dev

9 replies

Why does this even need a study? Overpasses for wildlife being a good on all fronts has been established for decades.

1
lemmy.world

Awesome to see some numbers on one of these projects. It often takes so little to accommodate nature with little to no inconvenience to us. Glad to see there are near 2 dozen more being built, with hopefully many more to come.

28
anon6789reply
lemmy.world

They are investments for the sake of all parties involved.

The Colorado department of transportation said before the overpass system was built, there was an average of one wildlife-vehicle crash a day in this corridor.

Such wildlife crossings are popping up across the country as a way to protect wildlife habitat and reduce collisions, which can result in injuries and deaths in humans and animals. Research has shown that overpass systems are successful in “nearly eliminating” these accidents and that such infrastructure buildouts often “pay for themselves” by preventing costly crashes.

21
Stevereply
startrek.website

I see that now. They reckon each bridge pays for itself in 15 years due to fewer road crashes.

15
gruereply
lemmy.world

And that's probably not taking into account the externalities for things like wildlife conservation.

11

I saw some of these going through Banff years ago where the bridge itself was all natural as well. So small trees, shrubs etc. It looked really cool esthetically as well. Its a small thing, but still a thing.

11

Therefore, the Trump administration has decided to end all funding and shut it down

11

You reached the end

Colorado wildlife overpass cut vehicle-animal collisions by 91%, report finds | Spyke