Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

US imposes sanctions on international criminal court

Trump administration says US ‘doesn’t need’ ICC after accusing court of unfairly targeting Americans for war crime charges

The United States imposed sanctions on the international criminal court (ICC), its latest escalation against an entity the Trump administration has accused of politicization and unfairly targeting Americans for war crime charges.

The ICC accused Donald Trump’s officials of attempting to “obstruct the course of justice” after “an assault” on the international legal order.

Just hours after a former ICC judge was awarded the Nobel Peace prize, Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, announced in a video that the US would move to impose financial sanctions.

US imposes sanctions on international criminal courthttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/09/sanctions-icc-trumpOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
290

37 replies

lemmy.world

Gee, I can't imagine why the ICC would target so many US citizens for war crimes...

75
chaogomureply
lemmy.world

It's targeted zero US citizens.

Lots of Russians and a very prominent Israeli, but no US citizens.

22
lemmy.ca

Just more naked demonstration of the need for digital sovereignty.

In payment systems, in emails, in data storage, in cloud, in desktop software, in encryption, messaging, etc. If you have a dependency with any American company, you are not sovereign.

This is not easy, but if you are not already taking steps forward you are behind.

62
lemmy.world

"The ICC has never indicted or even issued an arrest warrant for a US citizen". They have, however, issued warrants for Russian war crimes in Ukraine. All that needs to be said

46
Blade9732reply
lemmy.world

Definitely not just Russians, I somehow deleted the line that listed Netanyahu also. Trump also tends to go with whoever he talked to last, so it just depends who was in his mind when he decided the ICC had to go. His memory is like a goldfish.

5
lemmy.ml

I don't think Kamala would have done anything different. The US is notoriously not a signatory to the ICC and has been bending over backwards for Israel before trump came around.

-9
chaogomureply
lemmy.world

Love that both sides energy you have going to normalize this shit.

6

You forget which side was in power when the genocide kicked into overdrive in Gaza? Both sides are literally responsible for supplying Israel with unlimited weapons.

5

What facts? I responded to an opinion, a bad opinion that normalizes this shit.

Remember, none of this is normal, and the corpo democrats are obsessed with maintaining norms. If that doesn't tell you how things would be different, then you're a lost cause.

I don't like the corpo dems, but they are not outright fascists.

2

Then every member state of the ICC (almost the entire world) should impose sanctions on the US in return. Enough is enough.

25
feddit.uk

I wonder what'll happen when Trumps term ends and he tries to leave the U.S.

Unless the U.S. deal with them first.

14
meatreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Assuming he is alive, he will need permanent supervision due to all the top secrets he holds.

10

That he couldn't shove down the toilet at his personal cemetery (golf course).

4

All the ICC has to do is to issue international arrest warrants, with extradition and exfiltration permit avowed, for whichever executives apply the sanctions.

10

All because Donny didn’t get the Nobel peace prize…back to back FIFA peace prize winner!

3

Starting next April, it will be prohibited for any US citizens, companies, or organizations to conduct business with the ICC. Organizations outside the US that collaborate with the court also face the threat of sanctions.

One possible consequence is that ICC staff salaries can no longer be paid. "The ICC holds its bank account with ABN Amro," says De Hoon. "It is highly questionable whether the bank can circumvent these sanctions."

Once the sanctions take effect, staff members will no longer be able to use US-made software. For instance, they would be unable to send emails to one another via Microsoft, and documents—such as investigative materials—could not be stored on US servers.

Previous sanctions imposed by the US government applied only to individual prosecutors and judges; now, the court itself is being targeted as an institution. The ICC had already begun migrating its IT systems in response to those earlier sanctions, but the progress of this process remains unclear. "These systems are so complex that I wonder if it can be done by April," says De Hoon. International organizations

translated from: https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2634366-amerikaanse-sancties-mokerslag-voor-internationaal-strafhof-wat-doet-nederland

2

You reached the end